Cele|bitchy |
- George Clooney, Matt Damon & Daniel Craig cover Vanity Fair: who looks worse?
- Ryan Gosling pretends that he’s too cool to be photographed by the paparazzi
- Exclusive, original blind items: who traded sexcapades for publicity?
- Brandi Glanville’s not really married to her “BFF of 20 years” Darin Harvey
- Kyle Richards thinks cheaters should get one free pass & not tell their spouses
- Howard Stern & wife Beth Ostrosky drunk dialed Twitter followers on New Years
- Lindsay Lohan wants to invest in more security, so she won’t have to pay her dealers
- Salma Hayek knighted by French government, basically for boning a Frenchman
- Demi Moore will play Gloria Steinem in ‘Lovelace’: believable or give me a break?
- Johnny Weir married his boyfriend of less than a year in NYC
George Clooney, Matt Damon & Daniel Craig cover Vanity Fair: who looks worse? Posted: 03 Jan 2012 08:44 AM PST Seriously? I don't actively dislike any of these men – George Clooney, Daniel Craig and Matt Damon – but I think it's odd that Vanity Fair has put them on the February cover with the title, "The Leading Men" or whatever. Yes, George has been having a good year, and he's looking to get nominated for another Oscar for The Descendants. And yes, Daniel has had a big year, although his films haven't done that well financially. But Matt? I love Matt, but I haven't seen a new Matt Damon movie in years. If he's not Jason Bourne, most people don't care, you know? Plus, this Annie Leibovitz-shot cover is only a good photo of Matt, really. Daniel looks like a gargoyle, and George looks like he's about to tell me to get off his lawn. Not the best, really. Another gut reaction – George is 50 years old. Daniel is 43 years old. Matt is 41 (and a boyish vampire). Would VF have put three over-40 actresses on the cover with the title "The Leading Women"?? Of course there's something to be said for "old faithful" leading men. But 2011 was dominated by actors like Michael Fassbender and Ryan Gosling. Some respect for them? I guess not. Anyway, here's a little excerpt from VF:
[From Vanity Fair] So, VF got Daniel, George and Matt together in one place, and they could only give them the Proust questionnaire? I want to know if Daniel kissed up to George. I want to know what stories George told about Matt, and vice versa (because those two are both terrible gossips). I want to know if Daniel dared to talk about politics around either George or Matt. I want to know if Daniel and Matt judge Clooney harshly for his Oscar-Date Barbie. And I'll never know! Because VF didn't ask the question. Oh, and we should play F–k, Marry, Kill with this cover. I would marry Matt, f–k Daniel and kill Clooney. |
Ryan Gosling pretends that he’s too cool to be photographed by the paparazzi Posted: 03 Jan 2012 08:06 AM PST There's so much I don't understand about being a celebrity. Like, I understand the idea behind "candid" photo ops, and the industry of celebrity accessibility. Lord knows, I love candid shots of many celebrities, and lord knows, many celebrities want us to pay attention to them when they're "off the clock". But the cameras and the attention can be too much, of course. And I'm sure that in these photos, Ryan Gosling was probably being swarmed by photographers in a New York airport (JFK?). I'm sure the flashes were bothering him, and he simply didn't feel like being photographed as he returned from the holidays (or whatever). But… but… but… why is Gosling so upset that he's been photographed? Especially considering he and Eva Mendes pretty much rolled out the red carpet and made out for the paparazzi while they were in Paris over Thanksgiving. And that's the part I don't get – why basically pose for a photo shoot with your girlfriend in Paris, and then a month later, act like you're too "private" to be photographed at the airport? Ryan and Eva made a "Funny or Die" video together, for the love of God. But we're still being sold the image that Gosling is "private" and that he's just not used to this kind of attention. BS. He's a Hollywood player at this point, and he knows how to manipulate his own media. Of course, maybe he was just being followed by some really annoying photographers in these pics. Or maybe he should just put the magazine down and accept that if he's going to pose for photos with his girlfriend in Paris, anything goes. Also – I love his leather bag. I want it. I don't want him, but I'll take the bag. |
Exclusive, original blind items: who traded sexcapades for publicity? Posted: 03 Jan 2012 07:30 AM PST Hello, all! We were contacted by a very well-informed, well-connected celebrity, and these blind items are the product of that celebrity’s gossip. Hope you enjoy! 1. Anonymous Christmas: This female celebrity spent Christmas at an AA meeting. Alcohol isn't even her biggest problem! 2. He's Not What You Think: Many assume that this celebrity couple are heavy into drugs. She's had a reputation as heavy drinker and a recreational user for more than a decade, although the gossip about her heavier inclinations are recent. Many think that he's a user too, perhaps even with harder drugs – it would befit his reputation. The dirty secret is that he's clean, though. He has been for years. And people are wondering if his tolerance for his girlfriend's extracurriculars isn't wearing thin. 3. The Big One: She's always had access to the good stuff. It's how she got her start in Hollywood – she was the dealer, the supplier, the connection. She would get anyone anything they needed, provided they could help her career, provided they were more famous then her. This happened back in the 1990s – she struggled for a long time (longer than her official age indicates). Her career didn't pick up until she started sleeping her way through her agency, though. 2011 was her best year ever. She had glowing, sycophantic press. She got magazine covers. She was hailed as the best, the brightest. She also got a shiny, new, super-connected boyfriend. But my chronology is wrong – the boyfriend came before the glowing press. The glowing press is what she got in return for what she provided him. Before he dumped her, everything got crazy. She fed him everything he wanted, and then some. Threesomes, party girls, party boys, hookers and drugs of every variety (coke, Ketamine, poppers and more). There are rumors that he grew to like strap-ons. There are rumors that the orgies involved man-on-man action. Whatever he wanted, she gave him. What did she get in return? More connections. More publicity. She got to be "the girlfriend of". She finally got to be the diva. People are still talking about how rude and obnoxious she was to anyone "lower" than her. And he protected her. He promoted her. Whatever she asked for, he gave her. When the end came, it happened suddenly. The people around him hated her and wanted to help him out of the dark hole he had found himself in. His health was suffering. There's talk of rehab, AGAIN, and his friends are already devising cover stories on his behalf. Meanwhile, she's trying to work her way back into his life. She's texting him constantly, promising him the same old vices, only more and better. So far, he hasn't given in. But now that she's had a taste of the kind of attention she can get as his girlfriend, she won't give up. photo credit, in order: jmdphoto/photocase.com, view7/photocase.com, ninth/photocase.com. Frontpage image credit: *princessa*/photocase.com |
Brandi Glanville’s not really married to her “BFF of 20 years” Darin Harvey Posted: 03 Jan 2012 07:29 AM PST As everyone reported yesterday, it seems like Brandi Glanville sort-of, kind-of got married on New Year's. She got "hitched" to her self-described "BFF" Darin Harvey, who… I actually find attractive. Us Weekly's source says Brandi isn't hittin' that, though. The source claims that Brandi and Darin have been tight for 20 years, but they're “like brother and sister. They’ve never hooked up. He came along with her to Vegas and they both got really drunk and thought it was a good idea at the time to get married… They kissed for the cameras and that was it. There's nothing romantically there.” Damn it, Brandi! Get on that. He has a job and he's not some 20-something fey boy. Hit it! Anyway, as it turns out, there might not be a need for an annulment. Brandi told Us Weekly, "[We're] married! But to make it legal, I have to go to the courthouse today and I don’t think we’re gonna. Super fun though! We’re not gonna stay married. But it was a fun way to start out the new year!” She went into greater detail on her Twitter page, where she wrote stuff like, "We're just friends! I will get married for real when everyone in the world that wants to can!" and:
[From Brandi's Twitter] So, there you go. Brandi and Darin had a ceremony, but they didn't fill out all of the paperwork and such, so they're not legally hitched or anything, and it won't affect her child support or alimony, I guess. It was just a drunken extravaganza, with strippers and friends and lots and lots of alcohol. |
Kyle Richards thinks cheaters should get one free pass & not tell their spouses Posted: 03 Jan 2012 07:28 AM PST
Kyle was on Good Morning America yesterday, and host Robin Roberts asked her what she meant in her book by claiming that cheaters should get one free pass to step out on their spouses. Kyle claimed that of course she wasn’t writing about herself or her husband at all (yeah right) but that she knew a couple who had dealt with infidelity and survived and that it’s possible.
[From The Daily Mail via ONTD] So Kyle is describing a scenario where a woman cheated on a man once and didn’t tell him. This was allegedly a friend of hers whom she counseled not to tell the husband. That sounds like b.s. to me. That sounds like something she went through with Mr. Nice Guy Rico Suave Muaricio and forgave him for since he convinced her it was a one-off. “Baby, I’m so sorry, it was just the one time. She meant nothing to me.” Yeah, it was the one time he got busted and after that he was much more careful about it. Should cheaters get a free pass? I think that should be their partner’s decision. Photos are from 1/2/12. Photo credit: GG/FameFlynet Pictures |
Howard Stern & wife Beth Ostrosky drunk dialed Twitter followers on New Years Posted: 03 Jan 2012 07:28 AM PST
[From MSNBC] That’s kind of awesome. I totally understand that guy who clammed up. I get nervous sometimes talking on the phone, and I think I would be totally speechless and wouldn’t know what to say if a celebrity called me. That’s why Kaiser spoke to the celebrity who contacted us over New Year’s weekend. I would have probably just sat there with my mouth open until I stammered out something unintelligible. Photos are from July, August and November 2011. Credit: WENN.com |
Lindsay Lohan wants to invest in more security, so she won’t have to pay her dealers Posted: 03 Jan 2012 06:18 AM PST Yesterday, TMZ reported that Lindsay Lohan had a shady "visitor" at her rented Venice Beach pad. The sketchball dude apparently knocked on LL's door, and tried to talk to her, but she didn't let him in. The cops were called and the visitor was arrested for trespassing. While I don't doubt that there are some really shady people out there, and that celebrities should be extra careful and stuff, I've always felt like LL is probably the kind of crackhead who doesn't pay her drug bills, and I often wonder if incidents like this are just incidences where her dealers are trying to get paid. Remember THIS STORY from Lohan's alleged former bodyguard? In 2007, she brought her bodyguard along to slap the sh-t out of her dealer. She also said, "I can dress like a princess and still fight like a whore." Because… why not? Anyway, TMZ has a follow-up on the whole "shady visitor" story. LL now wants to ramp up her security. Because you never know when your dealer is going to come to collect:
[From TMZ] Look, if she wants a bodyguard, she should totally get one. I think it's a waste of money, though – she has sketchier people in her entourage, you know? You could throw the craziest stalker-type at the Cracken, and the combination of Lindsay, Pootie and Dina would still be balls-out crazier. I think the real story here is that LL's Playboy money is burning a hole in her pocket – it wouldn't surprise me at all if she blows through her (rumored) $900,000 payday within a few months, just because she thinks she has "expenses" like a "full-time bodyguard," etc. |
Salma Hayek knighted by French government, basically for boning a Frenchman Posted: 03 Jan 2012 05:46 AM PST I mean no disrespect to Salma Hayek's career in this post. I've always liked her as actress, and God knows, I've seen Desperado like a million times. Salma is one of the few Mexican actresses to have been nominated for an Oscar, correct? I believe the group is very, very small, and Salma should be very proud of what she's achieved in two decades in Hollywood. But does Salma deserve to be knighted by the French government for her "career"? I mean, really? Let's just call this what it is… the French government giving Salma Hayek a knighthood for having a great rack and boning a Frenchman.
[From People] Yes, Clint Eastwood, Robert DeNiro… and Salma. One of these things is not like the other? Usually, these tributes are given to artists late in their career. I guess the Palace was like, "Damn, we should give this to her while her boobs still look fantastic!" Once again, I like Salma as an actress. But this is a joke, right? PS… Now that I’m really thinking about it, countries should give awards to sluts who concentrate their efforts among a certain nationality. Scotland should give me an award for the Scottish dudes I’ve boned. Do you think the Queen would give my vadge a CBE? |
Demi Moore will play Gloria Steinem in ‘Lovelace’: believable or give me a break? Posted: 03 Jan 2012 04:31 AM PST When I first read about this story, the first thought to spring to mind was that someone in Demi Moore’s camp had persuaded her to take Kaiser’s advice and position herself much differently for the post-Ashton era of life. You know, after Ashton made his wife look like a fool by sleeping around with randoms for almost the entirety of their six-year marriage. Kaiser’s point was that Demi didn’t need to be playing Ms. Sexy Young Thing by dancing for salivating men in bars and, instead, should forge a new image of confidence and maturity. Well, Demi has just taken a step towards doing just that by signing onto play noted feminist Gloria Steinem in the much-maligned Linda Loveless biopic called Lovelace. Yes, it’s a movie about porn, but ever since the film’s producers dropped Lindsay Lohan in the leading role, all sorts of A-to-B-listers have signed onto the movie. Oddly enough, Amanda Seyfried is now playing Linda (although Malin Akerman was briefly rumored for the part as well), but I guess the least surprising casting news of all is the role of Hugh Hefner, who will be played by (who else?) James Franco, who will probably show his butt and then insist that someone get fired for not appreciating it enough. Hopefully, Demi will steer clear of that nonsense, right?
[From Variety] While I’m not entirely certain that this movie will be good news for the career of anyone involved, this is definitely a step in the right direction for Demi. It will probably also bode well for her to gain a few pounds in advance of filming so that she doesn’t constantly remind the film’s audience of a woman who used weight loss as a cry for help towards her cheating, (borderline?) misogynistic husband. Can Demi actually pull off the role though? I guess we’ll have to wait and see. Here’s a photo of Gloria Steinem herself at the Women’s Media Awards on 11/30 of last year. Photos courtesy of Fame |
Johnny Weir married his boyfriend of less than a year in NYC Posted: 03 Jan 2012 04:31 AM PST OMG! Johnny Weir got married, y'all! Last I heard about Johnny Weir's love life, he was dating some willowy blonde, right? But that's over, apparently. Weir began dating hottie Victor Voronov over the summer, and over the holidays, they got married! I'm really happy for Johnny. His husband is super-cute! And he's Russian. And Jewish! Such a catch. Victor has even changed his Twitter name to Victor Weir-Voronov.
[From Us Weekly] I'm assuming Johnny and Victor were married in New York, where gay marriage is legal now (and where Johnny and Victor live). I was going through their Twitter pages, and it does seem like they were in New York on New Year's Eve, so I'm just saying… they got hitched in NYC. Congrats to Johnny and Victor! I'm so happy for them. They look so cute together. Hope it lasts, boys! Photos courtesy of Johnny and Victor's Twitter pages. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment