Cele|bitchy |
- Heather Graham on staying young: “I try to get 11 or 12 hours of sleep a night”
- Did Jennifer Aniston & Brad Pitt briefly reconcile over Norman’s death?
- Kim Kardashian got $300k just for her engagement photos in People
- More “Blake Lively” naked photos released, is it really Blake?
- Natalie Portman disrespected Oprah, called in “sick” to Oprah’s post-Oscar special
- Kevin Bacon bought a $500 disguise to protect himself from the public
- Ashton Kutcher leaves hotel with “mystery blonde”: innocent or suspicous?
- Khloe Kardashian is working with “a team of people to help her get pregnant”
- BFFs Jennifer Aniston & Courteney Cox breakup, CC is the new Brad Pitt
- Kelly Bensimon: “The psychic in French said I’m going to get married & pregnant”
Heather Graham on staying young: “I try to get 11 or 12 hours of sleep a night” Posted: 02 Jun 2011 09:02 AM PDT Pardon me, I just have to rant about this. When People Magazine asked Heather Graham, "How do you stay so young-looking and beautiful?" Heather replied, “I try to get 11 or 12 hours of sleep a night. It sounds excessive but that’s really what I need. It does the trick.” ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Yes, Heather looks good, and she could easily pass for more than a decade younger than her real age (she's 41 years old!). But seriously, 11 or 12 hours of SLEEP? Every night?!? That means that Heather has literally been asleep for HALF of her life. So here's my rant: I've been a person who struggles with getting enough sleep for a very long time. It started when I was a teenager, it got really bad in college, and I still struggle with weeks and months of intermediate insomnia to this day. Drinking helps, honestly. If I have a cocktail before bed, I can get a decent night's sleep. But I haven't been drinking lately, and so my sleep pattern has been all out of wack. When someone like Heather just tosses off "oh, I sleep 12 hours a day" my mind is boggled. How can you do that? Really, I want to know! My body's internal clock starts screaming "GET UP SLUT" around six a.m., no matter if I've just gone to bed at two a.m. Maybe it's because I'm neurotic? I lay in bed and think about all of the crap I have to do. Maybe Heather doesn't have that problem. Because she rarely works, and thus, she rarely has anxiety. I don't even remember the last time I got more than eight hours of sleep, honestly. Must be nice. I would love to have that kind of rest occasionally. |
Did Jennifer Aniston & Brad Pitt briefly reconcile over Norman’s death? Posted: 02 Jun 2011 08:31 AM PDT As we found out a few weeks ago on the same day that Brad Pitt premiered his new film at the Cannes Film Festival, Jennifer Aniston's beloved dog Norman passed away. It's probably been about a month since Aniston lost Norman, and while she seems to be drowning her grief in Justin Theroux dong, she also appreciates when Norman's former doggy-daddy contacts her. Yes, In Touch Weekly is all about how the death of a loyal companion can be twisted into the REUNION OF THE CENTURY. For real.
[From Hollywood Life] In Touch also claims that Brad might even "help" Aniston with her renovations to her NYC apartment. But I thought she hated his architectural and design style? And I thought Aniston preferred a home that looked like Ron Burgundy's 1976 lair? Oh, but this part cracked me up, and I truly hope this little side note from In Touch is a fact. According to ITW's sources, Angelina Jolie refers to Aniston as "The Valley Girl". LMAO. By the way, there's a new trailer for Horrible Bosses (I really like her wig in this film): |
Kim Kardashian got $300k just for her engagement photos in People Posted: 02 Jun 2011 08:22 AM PDT
Kim is engaged as you know, and she has a disgustingly garish 20.5 carat diamond ring, hopes to outdo the royal wedding, and is going to pay for it all by putting it on television and selling the rights for just about everything to just about anyone. There will be an insane amount of product placement at Kim’s wedding, and it will be obvious, just wait.
[From The Hollywood Reporter] At least People didn’t do that well with Kim’s engagement on the cover. She’s probably annoyed she didn’t snare a more famous guy, but it was time for her to get engaged since her sisters are outperforming her in the baby and partner departments. (As if scoring Scott Disick is in any way preferable to perpetual singlehood.) Meanwhile Kim has refuted that OK! cover story suggesting she could be pregnant, “I’m Having A Baby,” which was really all about how she’ll have kids someday as she’s said in the past. Kim also reportedly wants to change her last name to her would-be husband’s name, Humphries, so she’ll be Kim Humphries instead of Kim Kardashian. Her momager is annoyed at this, and says “She needs to be Kim Kardashian because she's worked so hard to get where she is.” You can read that as: “she’ll mess up our family’s brand if she ditches our name.” Life & Style reports that Kim is going to get married in the next two to three months, before basketball season starts for her fiance, Kris. L&S’ insider claims “The wedding is going to be at the end of July or the beginning of August. The reason they're rushing it is because they want to do it before the basketball season starts again, so that they have time to have a romantic honeymoon!" You know that it’s timed for business reasons and has nothing to do with Kris’ kareer. This whole thing has been orchestrated by the other Kris, the one pulling the strings and making the deals and selling us her daughters’ lives. They’re the famous equivalent of the trashy, tacky family down the street that we all cluck over while we’re having drinks with friends. Photos are from 5/27/11. Credit: News Pictures/WENN.com |
More “Blake Lively” naked photos released, is it really Blake? Posted: 02 Jun 2011 07:49 AM PDT Wow, this Blake Lively nude scandal is really picking up some steam. I mean, ALLEGED Blake Lively nude scandal. Since it's so obvious from this new batch of naked photos that this is SO NOT Blake Lively. I guess I have to say that because I don't want to get my ass sued. So, to recap: two nights ago, the internet exploded with photos that appeared to be Blake Lively naked in some bathroom or dressing room. The photos were budget, and obviously taken on a camera-phone. You can see the first batch here - beware, they are VERY NSFW, all you have to do is click through the WWTDD links. Anyway, even though Blake's rep denied it (in an oddly worded statement), I thought they were probably of Blake. So now there is a new batch of photos, mostly close-up shots of boobs, ass, etc. You can see the NSFW images here. There are also a couple of un-blurry photos of this chick's face. And it's TOTALLY NOT Blake, of course. Here's a question: did Blake really think that she could deny it and everything would go away? For some reason, I feel like this is only the tip of the naked-photo iceberg. I think Blake gets bored and instead of memorizing her lines, she takes photos of her gorgeous (enhanced) body. Anyway, the "hacker" says that this is Blake, and he's got more. I have a conspiracy theory too, and it's a nasty one. Michael K pointed out that these photos were likely taken when Blake was working on The Town - there are some shots of her fake tattoos, the ones she wore for that film. Who was Blake "allegedly" boning during The Town? Ben Affleck. Were these photos originally intended for Ben's eyes? And the timing is so, so suspicious. Right when Blake is about to promote The Green Lantern, right when she's rolling out her new relationship with Leonardo DiCaprio. It feels like this is someone trying to get at Blake, someone who used to be the recipient of these photos. And yes, her boobs are fake. I've known that for a few years! Why are people acting like it's new information. The bolt-ons are decent, though. Decent and completely fake. Photos courtesy of this NSFW site and WENN. |
Natalie Portman disrespected Oprah, called in “sick” to Oprah’s post-Oscar special Posted: 02 Jun 2011 07:48 AM PDT Ooooh, scandal! The print edition of Us Weekly has an interesting little "behind the scenes" story about this year's post-Oscar Oprah episode. For years, Oprah managed to do a "morning after" the Oscars show, usually with all of the newly-minted Oscar-winning actors. I noticed that on this year's show, it was very heavy on the Hathaway and very light on the Natalie Portman. I just figured that it was nothing, though. Turns out, Natalie Portman was scheduled for the show, but she cancelled at the last minute, leaving Oprah at the lurch.
[From Us Weekly, print edition] Not even Julia Roberts stands up Oprah! I mean, on one side, I can understand that Natalie wanted to go out after her Oscar win, as is her right, and why not party until the wee hours? And if she didn't feel like going on Oprah, fine. But what bugs is that Natalie AGREED to come on and simply didn't feel like pulling it together for Oprah. Meh… maybe Oprah should have invited Sarah Lane on instead. From what I gather, Lane gave the bulk of the Oscar-winning performance! (haha, let's see how many people yell at me for that) |
Kevin Bacon bought a $500 disguise to protect himself from the public Posted: 02 Jun 2011 07:45 AM PDT With the impending arrival of X-Men: First Class, there has definitely been an influx of Kevin Bacon-related publicity that we haven’t seen since the days of Footloose. Interpret that however you will, but it can never be a bad thing to hear more about an actor who doesn’t suffer from the disease of specialness. This particular story, however, is both amusing and bittersweet; it seems that, once upon a time, Bacon had enough of the trappings of fame and made arrangements to disappear for a while or, at least, for a few hours at a time behind a disguise. Fortunately, the results were not to his liking:
[From Hero Complex] The Bacon nearly left us! For some reason, I’m dying to know what this disguise looked like, but I guess we’ll never know unless Bacon decides to cart it along during his next visit to the Late Show with David Letterman. Bacon’s description of the Sebastian Shaw character only makes me want to see this movie more than I already did, which is really kind of embarrassing since I didn’t enjoy the other X-Men movies at all. It’s also rather interesting that McAvoy popped into this interview as well; while he had nothing but insightful things to say about Bacon, he’s really doing a lot of the talking on this publicity tour, but I always figured him as the socially-awkward and retiring type instead of, you know, poor, shy Michael Fassbender. Photos courtesy of WENN and AllMoviePhoto |
Ashton Kutcher leaves hotel with “mystery blonde”: innocent or suspicous? Posted: 02 Jun 2011 07:22 AM PDT
After that, Demi was seen out with a grumpy-looking Ashton and she was very obviously touchy-feely with him in their public appearances. It’s clear that she’s either forgiven him his transgressions or that she believed whatever excuses he fed to her. Well Ashton, the new star of Two and a Half Men (for the next year at least), was seen out last night with friends including an attractive “mystery blonde.” There were two other guys with them, and it’s possible the blonde was one of their girlfriends and there’s nothing to make of this. Still, Ashton was paying a lot of attention to her and he looked very annoyed to be photographed. With Ashton’s history you know that questions will come up. With Demi’s history you know she’ll buy it when he explains it away too. Ashton was seen talking to this “mystery blonde” and leaving with her outside of The Roosevelt hotel last night, where he caught the “Beacher’s Madhouse” show. Courteney Cox and David Arquette where there too, and they were papped outside. If Ashton is trying to get up to something you think he would know better than to go to a Hollywood hotspot. Still, the guy is super dim so that doesn’t mean much. Update: here’s another photo that shows that they weren’t holding hands. You can see that Kutcher is trying to watch out for her, though. Photo credit: Josephine Santos/Pacific Coast News |
Khloe Kardashian is working with “a team of people to help her get pregnant” Posted: 02 Jun 2011 06:36 AM PDT I feel kind of bad about writing about Khloe Kardashian's fertility troubles, but then I realized that Khloe is pretty much giving us permission to discuss the state of her womb. She gives lots of interviews about wanting to get pregnant and now we have this "exclusive" from Life & Style about Khloe and Lamar seeking out fertility treatments and such. Apparently, she has a "team" of people working in or around her biscuits. And before you cry foul and yell "TMI!" - Khloe and Lamar posed for photos for Life & Style, and they pitched this as a story about their "babymoon". I don't think this is the correct use of "babymoon" though. I thought babymoons were for ladies who were already pregnant, and the baby-daddies would take them somewhere a few months before the birth?
[From Life & Style] I've gone from horror at the very idea of Khloe and Lamar spawning to actually rooting for them to have a baby. But that's just me - I like Khloe. And I kind of like that she's okay with her womb being discussed so openly. I hate to admit it, but Khloe's fertility troubles might open a lot of dialogue and reduce the stigma and secrecy that still surround infertility. |
BFFs Jennifer Aniston & Courteney Cox breakup, CC is the new Brad Pitt Posted: 02 Jun 2011 06:32 AM PDT I've been wondering about this for a while, so it's nice to see the tabloids pick up on it - according to Us Weekly, Jennifer Aniston is in the midst of another breakup! OMG, POOR JEN. This time, however, a dong is not involved… unless it's Courteney Cox with a… nevermind. Yes, Court and Jen have split up, and they've managed to keep their split quiet for a year! Right around the time when Courteney and David Arquette were "having problems" and CC was "boning the hell out of" another man, Brian Van Holt. So, obviously, Aniston felt like CC was "cheating" on her, and so Aniston called up Vanity Fair and was like, "Hey, I feel like taking off my clothes and crying!" Just kidding. Here's what really went down:
[From Us Weekly] You know what? I'll buy that CC and Aniston have broken up - they really haven't been doing much together lately - but I doubt this is the reason. After all, David kind of threw Aniston under the bus in several of his interviews with Howard Stern - something about Aniston being a harbinger of marriage doom, if I remember correctly. Why would Aniston take David's side? That being said, I'm on David's side, and I think CC has issues. I can't believe Aniston and I might agree on something. Oh, and remember this story? CC was pissed that Aniston was spending so much time with Chelsea Handler. Chelsea is, in CC's opinion, trailer trash, and CC tried to get Aniston to dump the Chelsea friendship. That I would buy. The print edition also points to CC’s ongoing friendship (with benefits?) with Josh Hopkins, her CougarTown costar. Us Weekly notes that Josh and Aniston had a three-and-a-half month fling, that she wanted more and he didn’t, and then he was indiscreet about their relationship (to put it lightly). CC apparently didn’t care, and maintained a flirtatious friendship with Josh. By the way, I know no one seems to be interested in Aniston's latest romance/fauxmance with Justin Theroux, but I'm still enchanted by the PR shenanigans. The last time I wrote about Aniston’s bizarre "Are they dating?" BS (here), it barely got any comments and the general reaction to the whole thing seems rather "meh". Anyway, I just wanted to point out that despite denying that she and Theroux are dating to Us Weekly, this "romance" is still getting pushed in People Magazine and many, many other outlets:
[From People] So, we've gone from denial to an established couple, at least according to the Bible of established celebrity gossip. Makes me wonder why her Machiavellian publicist even bothered with the vehement denial to Us Weekly. It just makes Aniston and her publicist look ridiculous. |
Kelly Bensimon: “The psychic in French said I’m going to get married & pregnant” Posted: 02 Jun 2011 06:28 AM PDT I haven't been following RHONY, but my mom tells me that it's a total disaster and that on the ladies' trip to Morocco, they were the very definition of "ugly Americans." Apparently, on the trip, our favorite bat-crap crazy housewife, Kelly Bensimon, met with a psychic. Because her delusions needed more ammunition, I guess. This quote is wonderful: "The psychic in French tells me I think too much, and that I am going to get married and I am going to have a baby." That's a wonderful quote, isn't it? Only a French-speaking psychic in Morocco would accuse Kelly's crazy ass of "thinking too much."
[From People] CB wants me to point out that Kelly is 43 years old (a very rough looking 43, I might add), like Kelly's age is the biggest determining factor as to whether or not she'll get married and pregnant this year. Isn't her Crazy a bigger factor? I mean, seriously? Granted, there are some men who like their women crazy, leathery and kind of "dude looks like a lady." Like Alex Rodriguez. But even if Kelly is a certain guy's type, I still don't see any dude looking at Kelly's crazy ass and thinking "'til death do us part". |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment