Life & Style just sent us this exclusive photo of David Arquette with Jasmine Waltz, the girl he has admitted to sleeping with twice (I think). I believe the photo was taken at a post office? How romantic? Anyway, David talked to Stern about the brief relationship with Jasmine, saying that after the mess with Courteney Cox, in which she suggested that they separate and see other people, David says he went out and boned this waitress. Jasmine has been milking this association for all it's worth, even getting herself pap'd and giving quotes to various outlets. Life & Style sat down with her for her first sit-down interview:
Speaking on the record for the first time since news of her romance with David Arquette broke, Jasmine Waltz sits down ONLY with LIFE & STYLE spilling details on their sexual encounters PLUS her revealing conversations with David about his split with Courteney Cox.
Jasmine Waltz, waitress and model, first met David on Sept. 30th when he and a group of friends showed up at Premiere nightclub, where Jasmine was working. Within 20 minutes of meeting her, David revealed that he and wife Courteney Cox had separated.
"I was surprised to hear that," Jasmine tells Life & Style. "But his friends all seemed to know about it." However, she says David seemed agitated and depressed about the split. "He was beaten down. He mentioned that he hadn't slept with anyone since separating from Courteney."
Just two nights later, David went back to the nightclub and after her shift ended, he took her to a house party. They both got very drunk, Jasmine says, and left the party around 2:30 a.m. Talking and strolling, they ended up at a Hollywood home — David told Jasmine it was the house he and his siblings had grown up in. Once they were alone, David was intent on having sex.
"It wasn't bad sex," she tells Life & Style, "but it wasn't emotional. It was quick and painless. Nothing exciting." She continues, "When we were done, he just looked at me and said, 'This is the first time I've felt like a man in a very long time.'"
Jasmine says it wasn't just a one-time thing, she and David had sex again.
But she was adamant about making sure he was telling the truth about the split before sleeping with him. David assured her he was single and opened up to her about what had caused the split.
"I definitely got the impression that Courteney had made the decision to separate," Jasmine recalls. "David did not seem like the one in control of the situation. Not at all."
Sure. I tend to believe that Courteney instigated the separation, and I'm still holding on my theory that it wasn't so much that Courteney and David were having problems together, it was that Courteney had a problem with David because she wanted to bone her costar, Brian Van Holt.
Here are some more photos of Jasmine… I swear to God, she has Megan Fox's 2008 Face.
The above is an additional photo from James Franco's "Leading Man of the Year" photo shoot for GQ. People are still saying that Franco is a shoo-in for a Lead Actor nomination. Which brings me to a funny point, one that is being made by a lot of people: what happens when you have a less-than-award-worthy film come out during or around the awards season? Does that screw up your chances? The famous example is Eddie Murphy and the Dreamgirls/Norbit problem. Eddie seemed to have the Best Supporting Actor Oscar locked up for Dreamgirls, and then Norbit was released in the heat of the awards season. Suddenly, everyone was like "Eddie's not Oscar-worthy, for real." People are already saying Natalie Portman's Black Swan Lead Actress Oscar chances are going to be hampered by No Strings Attached, that dumb-looking rom-com in which she stars with… Ashton Kutcher. New York Magazine ran a piece about "Norbits" - and I think they're right-on for the most part.
Anyway, Franco's potential "Norbit" was declared as Rise of The Apes, a prequel to Planet of the Apes. I haven't seen or heard anything about that yet, but I definitely think this new Franco film will cause some Academy eyebrows to raise - it's called Your Highness, and I have to admit, this NSFW trailer totally made me laugh:
Oh. My. God. I mean, it's cheesy and silly and stupid, but it also looks hilarious and like it's just the right thing to ensure that Colin Firth wins the Best Actor Oscar this year. Oh, well. I doubt Franco really wanted an Oscar this early in his career anyway.
Taylor Swift is the cover girl for the Dec/Jan issue, and she's been named Seventeen's "Style Star of the Year". Because no one ever gets tired of tutus, prom dresses and Lands' End sweaters! No, that's mean. At least Swifty keeps her business covered and CB isn't constantly yelling at me for using photos featuring Swifty vadge (coughcoughMileycough). So, I don't hate Swifty as the Style Star of the Year. Honestly, her style is better than Blake Lively's, so Seventeen has a leg up on Anna Wintour, at the very least. Anyway, Seventeen's interview excerpts are slim pickings but here's what I could find (note: some of these quotes might be from Swifty's Allure interview too)
17 - Do you always have a guy in your life? TS- “I know it seems like I do, but I don’t. My friends aren't used to me introducing them to a lot of guys. I’m not the girl who always has a boyfriend. I’m the girl who rarely has a boyfriend. But when something is a relationship I feel it, and when something is just a spark I feel it. For me all those feelings are equally important.”
17 - Do you still believe love can be like a fairy-tale? TS- “I will always have a fairy-tale complex. And I know that I’m never going to live on top of a tower and his name won’t be Prince Charming, but he’s going to make me laugh and he’s going to be self-deprecating and endearing and he’ll be fun to hang out with. I think that’s what my idea of Prince Charming has evolved into.”
On her history with perfumes and cologne: "Different smells bring different relationships to mind for me…I'd put on Abercrombie 8 to remember when I was in ninth grade and had my first boyfriend, because he gave me that," Swift explains. Then there was the scent that helped boost her popularity. "The coolest girl in school wore Britney Spears Fantasy, and I had to copy her." On the downside, fragrances can bring back bad memories, as in the case of a certain unnamed ex who wore a particular cologne. "Dolce & Gabbana Light Blue is still a difficult one for me to smell," reveals Swift. And while she doesn't reveal her former boyfriends' signature scents, we can't help but wonder which colognes some of her famous exes, including Taylor Lautner and John Mayer, wore.
Lordy, she's such a girly-girl. And this sweet act is so strong, I've got a toothache. Maybe she really is that sweet in real life - sure. Maybe. But I tend to think if she was nailin' John Mayer for months, the girl isn't as princessy and fairy-tale as she would have you believe.
Gwyneth Paltrow was the very special guest on Glee this week. She played a substitute teacher when Mr. Schue got sick with the flu. At first it seemed like the entire show was an excuse to showcase Gwynnie’s superiority, from her skill in Spanish pronunciation, to her singing and dancing skills, to how “hip” she was with the younger generation. There was plenty of that going on, and her constant preening got to be a little annoying despite how good she was. The show and Goop redeemed themselves toward the end, when her character’s vulnerabilities came out and she in turn seemed more human too. The Goop is a good actress when she gets out of her own way. Here’s a recap from The Stir, which just loved Goop. Most of the reviews I’ve seen are similarly very positive about Gwyneth’s turn on Glee, with EW and The NY Daily News raving about her, and BuddyTV a little more neutral.
It’s the Gwyneth Paltrow episode, finally! Of course, though we’ve all been frothing at the mouth for this day, Glee has upped the ante by promising a wedding next week. And Carol Burnett! Maybe I’m the only one excited about that. But still! But wait, we’re on this week’s shizz. Here goes.
Shue gets the flu. His horrible ex comes by to take care of him, but he throws her out when she declares her love for him with a Vaseline-covered anal thermometer in her hand. She woos him throughout the episode, revealing she's on meds and continuously remembering all the little things he loves. Dirty little trick.
Meanwhile, who's in charge of Glee Club? The same substitute who's a hit covering his Spanish class … Holly Holliday, played by Gwyneth Paltrow. (Oh my, she says she's the cure for the common class… is that a Mad Men reference?)
Does this count as Musical Number #1? We see how beloved Holly is when we see that she sang "Conjunction Junction" when she was covering an English class.
She immediately wins over Vocal Adrenaline New Directions by asking them what they want to sing, then grants Puck's finest desire (while he checks out her butt) by singing Musical Number #2, Cee-Lo's "Forget You" (we all know what the real words to “Forget You” are). Everybody kills it. The Cheerios sparkle, Finn almost looks animated, and Rachel's furious! Hooray!
Musical Number #3 is an amazing dream sequence: inspired by the "Singin in the Rain" DVD Terry left for him to comfort-watch, dream-Shue and dream-Mike-Chang do "Make ‘Em Laugh." Gorgeous and fun, though nothing beats the original. He wakes to Rachel tattling on the fun substitute.
Musical Number #4 is Holly's way to woo the only member of Glee Club resistant to her charms, Rachel, by pairing with her to let her do her must-desired number, "All That Jazz" from Cabaret “Nowadays” from Chicago. It's terrific! Rachel is too sparkling to be annoying, and Gwyneth is charming. I'm bothered, though, that their names don't appear in the lights after they machine-gun them like in the movie.
Did I mention Sue Sylvester has replaced the principal in a coup d'etat? Shue tries to return to school, but Sue has been hard at work. She's had the principal fired; she's fired Shue and sends him packing. She takes tater tots off the school menu, inspiring a coup.
But Holly realizes she's in over her head when Mercedes gets in trouble for shoving tots up the tailpipe of Sue's LeCar. Holly tearfully turns up at Shue's place and bemoans the way she didn't know what to do in the face of crisis. Terry storms in and goes all "OMG, I'm his wife!" (and btw, they totally did it) and Shue sends her packing.
Sue abruptly gives Shue his job back, after the LeCar/tater tot debacle. The Glee club gives him a hero's welcome, though they're bummed that he returns to his tradition of old song choices with a song from "Singin' in the Rain." He calls in Holly to make "it more relevant,"and they close the episode with Musical Number #5, a mash-up of "Singin' in the Rain" with Rihanna's "Umbrella." It's visually stunning, but the mash-up doesn't work for me. But honestly, it's too fabulous across the board, so giant thumbs up for Gwyneth on Glee. Gleeneth
Gwyneth was good, but I just got the feeling that Glee was pandering to her like they did to Britney. It was all about making musical numbers to suit the guest talent, instead of focusing on the kids. Glee is best when the kids shine, like on last week’s Never Been Kissed. I know they rely on celebrity appearances for publicity, but they could do without the stunt casting.
Ironic line of the week from Goop: “It’s a terrible economy and good teaching jobs are hard enough to get, let alone in the arts… I can’t turn this opportunity down.”
Favorite putdown. Goop: “I’m Holly Holiday”
Will’s ex wife “Are you a porn star or a drag queen?”
You can watch this episode of Glee on Hulu if you’re in the US.
From the looks of it, every tabloid other than Us Weekly seemed to be phoning it in this week, probably because they knew People Magazine's Sexiest Man Alive would be the magazine women picked up at the grocery store. Thus, this week's tabloid covers are going to be pretty boring - OK! Magazine is running a Twihard fan-fiction story, and now Star is phoning it in with a silly "Suri Cruise vs. Shiloh Jolie-Pitt" story. They released an excerpt, and I'm not really seeing how "the nannies" are telling us anything we don't already know, except for the whole idea of Suri playing with diamonds. Can you imagine giving a little girl a diamond to play with?
At just four years old, both Suri Cruise and Shiloh Jolie-Pitt are already living like Hollywood royalty. But for the little princess and the rough and tumble tomboy, life couldn’t be more different! One plays with diamonds, the other, with dead animals. And who would know better about their polar opposite lives than the people who care for them?
In the Nov. 29 issue of Star, on sale now, insiders from the Cruise and Brangie camps reveal the most intimate and shocking secrets of Suri and Shiloh’s totally different lives.
Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes’ daughter Suri “never hears the word ‘no,’ from a nanny or anyone else,” a source explains. Whether it’s a priceless diamond tiara or cupcakes at midnight, spoiled Suri’s wish is her overworked staff’s command!
But taking care of tomboy Shiloh, the daughter of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, presents a different set of challenges. Though she’s a sweet girl with a heart of gold, Shiloh has a serious mischievous streak that often gets the better of her. As we report in this week’s issue, the wild child collects dead animals, plays childish pranks on unsuspecting nannies and cuts the heads of sister Zahara’s dolls! “She was playing cowboys and Indians once and she said she had to scalp them,” an insider reveals. “Brad made her apologize.”
Shiloh learned about scalping from Brad! She watched Inglorious Basterds and she screamed "I learned it from watching you, DAD!" Also: Shiloh cuts the heads off Empress Z's dolls?!? The Empress is not pleased with this. The Empress shall bide her royal time and than Her Serene Highness shall order Minion Knox to do something absolutely horrible to Shiloh's beloved, dead, stuffed pet bird.
OK! Magazine is back to doing hokey Twihard fan-fiction cover stories again. This one is especially hilarious - you see, Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson just filmed Bella and Edward's wedding scene. Thus, "JUST MARRIED" on the cover. Just in case you thought K-Stew and The Sparkler would get hitched without inviting YOU. Anyway, the cover story excerpt is totally written by a 13-year-old Twihard who just learned how to masturbate using a photo of The Sparkler duct-taped to a pillow and some blanket friction:
It was a scene as lush and romantic as every Breaking Dawn reader had imagined: Rob Pattinson as vampire Edward Cullen and Kristen Stewart as heroine Bella Swan, nearly naked in skimpy swimsuits, frolicking together over a waterfall in tropical Paraty, south of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on their honeymoon. Under a searing afternoon sun on Nov. 8, Twilight's on- and off-screen lovers laughed giddily.
When Kristen hopped up on Rob's back for a lift over the falls, there was no doubt the two actors were having fun. It was a moment sexy enough to make any Twi-hard swoon. And it was all in a day's work: Rob, 24, and Kristen, 20, were in Brazil to shoot steamy scenes for The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, the fourth installment of Stephenie Meyer's vampire series. And, as always for this couple, art and life were hopelessly intertwined.
"Rob and Kristen were in a world of their own, rehearsing and running the scene," an on-set source says. "They were so cute together, looking very much in love — when they were filming and when the cameras were off."
Ordinarily, I wouldn't give a crap, but this comes just days after a breakup report got some wider circulation. I know, I know, there are breakup reports all the time, but this one was allegedly started by some alleged quotes from an alleged Summit Entertainment executive (Summit produces the Twilight films). According to Limelife:
Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart wasted no time hustling to Brazil to film their sexy wedding and honeymoon scenes for “Breaking Dawn.” We now have word why Summit Entertainment felt the need to hurry the taping — they’re afraid Rob and Kristen may split.
Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart spent approximately a week off the coast of Brazil to film their wedding and honeymoon scenes for “Breaking Dawn.” The pair traveled with an exclusive pack of film crew and ultra-high security before returning to Baton Rouge, Louisiana to continue filming with the rest of the cast.
Why the big production for the big production? An Irish website is citing a Summit Entertainment source who revealed that studio execs are still really nervous Rob and Kristen could break up, and if they do, it’s going to make filming intimate scenes between Edward and Bella really sticky. “Breaking Dawn” director Bill Condon said:
“Often times on films the sex scenes and the intimacy (between actors who are real-life couples) are shot first to get them out of the way … There’s always that 'Oh s*** factor’ - what if they break up and we haven’t shot all the intimate stuff yet? It would be awkward for everyone involved.”
Condon added that filming the love scenes early also helps keep press leaks at bay. What happens if paparazzi have time to plan and get some really good shots of Stewart and Pattinson on set for a sex scene? “You’re at risk of wrecking an entire movie,” Condon said, “especially one like ‘Breaking Dawn’ where the fans are dying to see these sexy moments between Edward and Bella.”
Did the director just utter some ominous words directed at the heart and loins of Twihards everywhere? Or did someone just state the obvious - it's more fun to shoot intimate scenes before the two leads are sick of each other? TWIHARD CODE RED.
Here’s another story from US Weekly that paints Kate Gosselin in a very negative light as a mother. US has run exclusives straight from Jon Gosselin in the past, so I think we know where these stories are coming from. We’ve already heard that two of Kate’s six year-old sextuplets have been expelled from their private school, something that In Touch placed squarely on Kate’s shoulders despite all the evidence we have that her do-nothing ex husband is an equally terrible parent. Now there’s news that Kate sends her kids to school with the same sandwiches day after day in an attempt to get them to eat the meals she makes. I’m surprised she doesn’t have someone else making their lunches, or maybe she’s just ordering them to repackage the same sandwiches until the kids finish them.
Waste not, want not!
Budget-minded Kate Gosselin has no tolerance for the finicky eating habits of her eight kids. A source close to the single reality TV mom, 35, tells UsMagazine.com that Kate gets incensed when her children don’t finish their packed lunches at school.
Instead of throwing away the uneaten grub, “she repacks it for them in the next’s day lunch,” the source explains, adding that it’s school policy to send any untouched food home with students each day.
And those PB and Js can get a little gross, the source adds. “The kids are stubborn, so sometimes the little kids have the same half-eaten sandwich in their lunch all week.”
Sometimes the 9-year-old twins and 6-year-old sextuplets get teased for the musty sandwiches. “Some of the little ones cry, and some get angry and fight,” the source adds.
Kate’s ex-husband Jon, 33, isn’t a fan of Kate’s frugal fits. A pal overheard the single dad quip to his kids: “If you lived with me, you wouldn't have to eat rotten food for lunch every day.”
Note to Gosselin kids: throw out your lunch and act like you ate it. I hate that I’m defending Kate, and I’m not really, but my six year-old rarely eats his snack either. He gets a hot lunch at school but we pack him a sandwich for his snack and he rarely finishes it. I’m surprised he doesn’t just throw it away. We keep making the food every day and throwing it out though. It seems wasteful for sure, but the one time we made less the poor guy said he was hungry after school. Sometimes he eats his snack, and sometimes he shares or trades. So I get the urge to keep sending the same sandwich every day, but all that does is ensure that your kids have no edible food in case they do get hungry. They’re six years old, they have small tummies and there will be days when they don’t eat all their food.
This is not loving motherly behavior, this is “do as I say or you’ll face the consequences” behavior. Remember that scene from Mommie Dearest where Joan Crawford made her daughter Christina eat the old rare/raw meat and sit at the table until she finished it? “Christina, you haven’t touched your lunch.” How long will it take before Kate Gosselin’s kids write tell alls about their mom?
What in the world is going on with Eva Longoria? Goodness. First it was TMZ and E! News, then it was People Magazine, and now her marriage/divorce drama has taken the cover of Us Weekly. Us Weekly's sources tell them that Eva and Tony's marriage is in serious trouble after she caught him exchanging "personal texts" with a "mutual female friend" for nearly a year. They also claim that Eva is "heartbroken" and that she wants to end the marriage and Tony is the one who wants to stick it out. This goes against TMZ's story that Tony was the one to file for divorce in Texas. I'd also like to note something peculiar - Eva's rep went around to every major media outlet yesterday and made them print retractions and denials about an impending divorce, and if the divorce is happening, Eva just lost a lot of media support for pulling what little rank she had over a series of lies.
Eva Longoria Parker and Tony Parker have split after three years of marriage, Us Weekly reveals in its newest issue, on stands Wednesday. Multiple sources tell Us Weekly that Longoria Parker, 35, recently discovered that her husband, 28, has been exchanging personal texts with a mutual female friend for nearly a year — hundreds in just one month.
She plans to file for divorce soon, sources tell Us.
“Eva is heartbroken by the betrayal,” says one insider, adding that her husband confessed to the inappropriateness - which took place for nearly a year - after she confronted him. Adds another friend, “Once the trust was lost, the marriage was over.”
Nonetheless, the decision to end one of Hollywood's most affectionate and glamorous romances wasn’t easy.
“Eva truly thought she was going to grow old with Tony and have children with him,” adds the pal. “She's inconsolable.”
Longoria Parker's rep had no comment; Parker's rep could not be reached.
For more - including Longoria Parker’s confrontation with the other woman and how he “does not want to end the marriage” - pick up the new Us Weekly, on stands now.
Surprisingly, this Us Weekly story sounds like the one sanctified by Eva's people, and maybe all of the other stuff was Tony not following her script, as Lainey theorized yesterday. I don't want to punch Eva when she's down, so I'm not even going to ask what you think the chances are of Eva and Tony pulling through. But I will say this - at the very least, Eva is getting headlines, right? That must make her happy.
Peter Krause was a guest on the Today Show yesterday to promote his NBC show Parenthood. There was some minor buzz that Parenthood might be canceled before the end of this second season, but E! just reported that it will continue to air on Tuesdays at 10 into March of next year, when they’ll move it to Mondays for a little while. So it’s not being canceled before the season is out at least. The numbers for Parenthood have been disappointingly low. This an incredibly solid and entertaining show that has a genuine feel to it and is one of my favorites. I hope that something can be done to ensure that this show continues into a third season.
Anyway Krause was inevitably asked about his off-screen relationship with Lauren Graham, who plays his sister on the show. He was coy but smiled widely when he said that she’s “fantastic.”
On how everything started to “click” halfway through season one I did feel that way last season, we’ve had a great second season so far. There was a little to-do about this last episode last week where the character I play Adam Braverman punches out a guy in a supermarket… My son on the show, Max, has Aspergers… the gentleman calls him a ‘retard’ so I take a swing at him at the supermarket.
On whether he’s dating Lauren Graham She’s great. She’s fantastic. She’s a fantastic actress and a wonderful person.
It’s a great bunch of people, enjoy to go to work every day. Very happy that the ratings have picked up a little bit and we’re going to be moved to Mondays. I guess people want their Parenthood a little earlier.
That was cute how he sidestepped that. I like them both and hope they stay together. Krause is such a good actor and this show is full of very excellent performances. The relationship between his character Adam Braverman and his son with Aspergers feels real, too, and I love the actress who plays his wife, Monica Potter. If you’re not watching Parenthood, I highly recommend that you give it a chance. You can watch it on Hulu and NBC.com if you’re in the US.
I haven’t seen this week’s Parenthood yet, so please don’t comment with spoilers unless you write “SPOILER” over the top. Minor plot details should be ok, though.
(This is a personal recommendation. I started watching this show on my own and we were not encouraged to promote it. We are a member of the Today Show Network, which is owned by NBC.)
Photos are from 2/22/10 and 1/10/10. Credit: WENN.com
Just a few minutes ago, I emailed CB in anticipation of this year's unveiling on People Magazine's Sexiest Man Alive. My vote was for Jon Hamm, and CB agreed that he would be a good pick. So… imagine my disappointment when the SMA was unveiled. It's… Ryan Reynolds (cue clown music). Now, Ryan is cute, he's got a nice body, he's turning into a decent (not great, DECENT) actor. But I don't see the sex appeal with him. Granted, YES, I find men like Gerard Butler and Jon Hamm and Ralph Fiennes attractive. I like my guys dirty and gritty and maybe a little bit gross and serial killer-y. And in The Hamm's case, he's not only beautiful, but he can act circles around all of his contemporaries AND he's a real man, you know? Enough with the boys. Enough with PRETTY boys, with their orange fake tans and their manicured and sculpted bodies. Ryan Reynolds feels like a very safe "Patrick Dempsey" choice - sure, he's pretty, but do you ever find yourself fantasizing about Dempsey or Ryan Reynolds going to town on you in the middle of a work day? I don't.
Sure, his chiseled abs have caused millions to swoon, but this year’s Sexiest Man Alive Ryan Reynolds loves to keep them laughing.
“My body naturally wants to look like Dick Van Dyke,” says the 6′2″ actor, who suits up as the Green Lantern next year. “When I stop training, I turn into a skin-colored whisper.”
We doubt that. From growing up the youngest of four brothers in Canada to being the funny guy in films like The Proposal, Reynolds has learned to take everything in stride. “You just have to go with the flow,” he says of his new title. “This gives my family entre into teasing me for the rest of my life. ”
The actor does expect a few new perks at home with his wife of two years, Scarlett Johansson. “Now it’s going to be, ‘Sexiest man, take out the garbage.’ That does sound better,” Reynolds says. “The most difficult part is going to be organically working this title into a conversation with random strangers.”
Note: there are two covers circulating, and on one of them, it's like "Hi, I'm Ryan, here's my crotch." On the other, it's like, "Hi, I'm Ryan, here's my pec" (see that one here, at People). On one, I see a very old photo of Brad Pitt, and a completely vanilla photo of Jake Gyllenhaal. On the other cover (the official cover), I see insets of Johnny Depp and … Conan O'Brien?!?! I agree with their inclusions on SMA, but I still feel let-down. Where's The Hamm? Where's The Franco? Where's The Gosling? Where's The RDJ? Ugh. Granted, they may all be on the list, but they didn't make the cover. Disappointing.
The SMA slideshow is here - the third photo (after Reynolds and The Hamm) is of KELLAN LUTZ. And he's shirtless. Kellan Lutz wants you to know that Kellan Lutz is shirtless in People Magazine, and Kellan Lutz knows you will enjoy Kellan Lutz's tweaked nipples. Ugh, Vin Diesel made the list too. What People editor was smoking crack?
No comments:
Post a Comment