Thursday, April 19, 2012

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy


Jennifer Morrison went from brown to blonde to redhead, which is her best look?

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 09:05 AM PDT


True story: Last week a friend was hanging out watching a “House” repeat which I wasn’t really paying attention to. I was doing other stuff, and when I turned to the TV I saw an actress who looked vaguely familiar to me whom I couldn’t place. (I was never a big “House” watcher.) Then I realized it was Jennifer Morrison with brown hair! Now I know Morrison well, I used to watch “Once Upon a Time” and I’ve covered her here several times. But she just looked so totally different with brown hair that it took me a while to register that it was her.


Morrison has of course gone blonde since her House days. (I was just checking our photo agencies, and she went blonde in mid 2007, right before her engagement to Jesse Spencer fizzled.) She just dyed her blonde hair to red for a new role in a film called Some Girls. She was gorgeous before (I love her in “Once,” her character is great) and now she’s a knockout! I think that red hair suits her well. Again, though, she looks like a totally different person. Like if she was just an acquaintance of mine I might not recognize her at first in person. Here’s more, from US:

It wasn’t easy to stand out at Us Weekly’s Hot Hollywood party Wednesday night, with sexy stars including Kim Kardashian and Julianne Hough in attendance. But one actress managed to steal the spotlight with her shocking new look.

Jennifer Morrison, who’s known for her long blonde hair, debuted a dark red color on the red carpet at Greystone Manor in West Hollywood, Calif. She wore a flirty black strapless Andrew Gn dress with silver detail and bright scarlet lipstick to complement her rich auburn hue.

“I’m doing a film called, Some Girls, so I’ve had red hair for 24 hours now,” the Once Upon a Time star revealed of her fiery ‘do.

Of being honored by Us for her classic, feminine style the beauty, 33, gushed, “It actually meant quite a lot to me. I tend to dress as comfortably as possible and in things that I really like and so the fact that other people like them too is really cool.”

[From US Weekly]

US has a whole “celebrity style” section in their current print edition featuring their Hot Hollywood Style Winners. This must be part of the way they get celebrities to attend their event. Kim Kardashian was named “The Total Pro” (snort!), and Julianne Hough is “The Free Spirit.” Olivia Munn, “The Sexy Tomboy,” and Stacy Keibler is “The Breakout,” among others. (They must have not been able to meet Stacy’s appearance fee, because she didn’t go to the bash.) Jennifer Morrison was named “The Sophisticate,” which I could see. Sometimes she looks very well put together and elegant, but other times not so much. She’s human that way.

In terms of her hair color, I really like her both as a blonde and a redhead. That brown color isn’t too flattering on her, but a deeper color in that shade with more tones might be.

In July, 2007 right after she went blonde. Remember when she was engaged to Jesse Spencer?

In January, 2007.

2006:

Brangelina, Kristen Stewart, Sparkles and more will be at Cannes this year

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 08:58 AM PDT

Angelina Jolie needs to get to work. Do you realize that she hasn't been in front of a camera since she filmed The Tourist in early 2010? Sure, she wrote and directed a movie, and she did voice work on Kung Fu Panda 2. But it's crazy that one of the highest paid and most in-demand actresses in Hollywood – with a long list of projects that she's associated with or signed on to – hasn't been in front of a camera for two years. She's got two films that she's allegedly going to be working on this summer – Maleficent and The Counselor. And now she's got somewhere else to go too – Brad Pitt's latest film was just announced to the Cannes Film Festival line-up, so she and Brad are going to be in France next month. Basically, I'm saying that they probably won't be getting married this summer. Guess who else is coming to Cannes this year? ROBSTEN. Bruce Willis. Reese Witherspoon. Nicole Kidman. Viggo Mortensen. Yay!

The carpet will be red hot – with Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson,Matthew McConaughey and Camila Alves, Reese Witherspoon and Jim Toth, and new parents Emma Heming and Bruce Willis, turning this year’s Cannes Film Festival into a two-week A-lister date night.

Add in Zac Efron, Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban – and the possibility of a Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith sighting – and you might forget they also show movies at the world’s most glamorous film event.

The 64th Cannes fest, which will run from May 16 to 27, formally announced its schedule in Paris on Thursday, and organizers haven’t stinted on star power.

One year after Pitt’s film Tree of Life took Cannes’s top prize, the star is returning, this time with his bride to be, Jolie, who is expected to join him when his New Orleans caper Killing Them Softly vies in competition.

Stewart and Pattinson will turn up separately for their movies, On the Road and Cosmopolis, although don’t be surprised to see them together.

Opening night’s movie Moonrise Kingdom, being shown in competition, stars Willis. Mud, starring McConaughey and Witherspoon, was a surprise last-minute addition, sources tell PEOPLE.

Also anticipated: Efron and Kidman climbing the Palais steps together. She has two films in Cannes, The Paperboy and the thriller Stoker.

Other names include Kirsten Dunst, James Gandolfini, Kylie Minogue, Viggo Mortensen, Bill Murray, Marion Cotillard, and Chris Rock, who’ll join Pinkett Smith for a special afternoon kids’ screening of Madagascar 3.

[From People Magazine]

It seems like a pretty exciting line-up this year, with lots of American stars scheduled to attend. I'm not one of those "USA! USA!" chanters, I'm just saying that Cannes Film Festival coverage is simply more interesting when there are big, internationally acclaimed celebrities there. Will this be Kristen Stewart's first time at Cannes? That should be exciting for her – I hope she brings it, fashion-wise. I wonder if Kristen and Sparkles will walk each other's carpets? That would be sweet if they did. Maybe they'll do it separately. It's been a while since Nicole Kidman has been there too!

In other Brangelina news, the family arrived on the Galápagos Islands yesterday. They're staying at a private villa, allegedly. People Mag's report is a bit confusing – they took a private jet to Baltra, Ecuador, then they boarded a yacht to the Galápagos Islands, maybe? Whatever. I guess this is their pre-Cannes vacation.

Brangelina through the years at the Cannes Film Festival, photos courtesy of WENN.
wenn1876603 wenn3336672 wenn3344828 wenn1356954 wenn1867768

Katy Perry nearly slips a boob in white lace Temperley: lovely or trashy?

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 08:57 AM PDT

katy perry

Here’s some photos of Katy Perry at last evening’s ASCAP Pop Music Awards in Hollywood. Her hair isn’t bad here, and it looks like the brand-new violet hue has faded a bit with a few (presumed) washings. The dress is Temperly London in white lace, and it’s a gorgeous gown in and of itself. However, this is Katy Perry we’re talking about, so just she had to trash it up a bit by letting the left shoulder strap fall by the wayside and, in the process, risking a major nipple slip. With a rack as big as Katy’s, such a move even risked her entire boob falling out too.

katy perry

Here is the moment when Katy “discovers” that she’s about to go topless in front of the world:

katy perry

I have to wonder whether Katy did this on purpose or if it was merely an accident. We’ve already seen how she often wears dresses that, while lovely, don’t flatter her girls, and it’s truly like she doesn’t know what to do with them. Or are these suspect fashion choices all part of her plan? Personally (and my rack is above average but not as big as Katy’s) I’m always very conscious about any potential wardrobe malfunction and go to great lengths to prevent such an accident from occurring. So I’m sort of wondering exactly how Katy could let that strap dangle without even noticing her error until it was almost too late. Her good-girl-gone-bad image seems too calculated for such a red-carpet appearance to not be entirely mapped out. She totally planned this, right?

katy perry

katy perry

Photos courtesy of WENN

wenn3834626 wenn3834341 wenn3834330 wenn3834621 wenn3834321

First look at Anthony Hopkins in character as Alfred Hitchcock: OMG!

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 08:20 AM PDT

*NOTE: This photo is of Anthony Hopkins in character as Alfred Hitchcock.

For whatever reason, I completely forgot about this behind-the-scenes, making-of-Psycho film. I forget what the movie used to be called, but it's current name is simply Hitchcock, which strongly implies "bio-pic" but that's not what it is at all. The movie is just about how Alfred Hitchcock made Psycho, and people have just been discussing how Jessica Biel and Scarlett Johansson were cast in it. But guess who's playing Hitch? Anthony Hopkins! And the header photo is actually Sir Anthony IN CHARACTER. Can you believe that's him?

The real Hitchcock (photos below) had that iconic profile, and it seems like they're sparing no expense with makeup and cosmetic add-ons and stuff. Did you know that Helen Mirren is in this movie too? She's going to playing Alma Reville, Hitch's wife, and the film focuses more on their marriage than on "the making of Psycho" I guess. Now I can't wait to see Hopkins and Mirren together – that should be a dream. Hoplins hasn't been working that much lately, which is rough because I love him so much. A few years ago, he dropped 75 pounds and he started looking a bit deflated and sick. I'm including some photos of Hopkins from February – he's gained a little weight back, and I'm guessing that he'll be padded for the Hitchcock role too.

Photos courtesy of WENN.
anthony hopkins hitch profile wenn3738584 wenn3739484 wenn1652937 wenn1652938

Jason Segel & Michelle Williams were majorly loved up at the Tribeca Film Festival

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 07:47 AM PDT

The Tribeca Film Festival opened last night with a premiere of 5 Year Engagement, that movie with Emily Blunt and Jason Segel playing an engaged couple who simply can't get married for various reasons. Jason was there, of course, but there were barely any photos of him, the star. Maybe he didn't walk the carpet for very long? People Magazine explains why – Jason's girlfriend of a month and a half was there. There are no photos of Michelle Williams, but People still managed to detail all of their loved-up PDA throughout the night:

New movie, new love. Michelle Williams and Jason Segel had plenty to feel giddy about Wednesday night, as the new couple attended the premiere of his movie The Five-Year Engagement at the Tribeca Film Festival – and snuggled together at the afterparty.

They were affectionate throughout the night. As the movie ended, he gave her a little kiss on the cheek, as she took off and he stayed in New York’s Ziegfeld Theater to chat with friends and well-wishers.

They were practically inseparable at the afterparty in the Museum of Modern Art. Segel held Williams’s hand and took her around to tables, whispering in her ear. They looked very new and very happy. At one point, he pulled her behind a curtain and she came back out and pointed at him jokingly.

Williams, 31, left before Segel, 32 – she leaned in, kissed his cheek, said something quickly in his ear, rubbed his back and dipped out through the curtain.

Speaking generally, not talking about Williams specifically, Segel, who co-wrote, the film about engaged couple who keep delaying their wedding, told PEOPLE about his own grand plans for getting engaged.

“My plan is to get her to marry me as quickly as possible before she finds out who I really am,” he said with a laugh. “I’ll do it romantic, but I’ll do it like over a three-day weekend. We’ll meet on Friday, have our first date on Saturday, engaged on Sunday and married on Monday.”

Segal certainly seems closer to making that kind of commitment than he used to be. “I hit my thirties and enough became enough,” he said. “I’m ready to enter phase three. I put the puppets into a closet. I’m getting nice furniture.”

Segel said his goal in making The Five-Year Engagement, which he co-wrote, was to show how complicated relationships are over the long haul. “A lot of people say ‘I do’ to a moment, but they don’t realize they’re saying ‘I do’ to a lifetime,” he said.

Asked if he would relocate for love, like his character does, Segel replied: “I would, absolutely.”

[From People Magazine]

Wow… he sounds like he's ready for a major commitment. I'm a big believer in the theory popularized by Sex and the City – when most men are ready for to get married, they "put their light on" (like a cab), and the next girl they meet is "the one". For Jason, it seems to be about timing – he got older, he entered his 30s, he made the choice to stop partying so much and he started thinking about settling down. And Michelle was the first quality woman he met within his new mindset. I guess that's the storyline now – that's "the love story" between Jason and Michelle, and it conveniently explains his past as a player. Still, lots of guys do make these kinds of changes as they get older, and I'm starting to see why Michelle and Jason are "happening" all of a sudden. Maybe they will end up getting married.

More photos from the 5 Year Engagement premiere – Olivia Wilde's new blonde hair is awful. It doesn't suit her at all. I'm not crazy about her Yigal Azrouel dress either.

LeeLee Sobieski in Band of Outsiders. Why does she keep wearing full-length gowns?

And Emily Blunt in Jason Wu. She loves this silhouette. I like the green-and-black combination – it suits her coloring. Plus, the pop of the emerald earrings is really nice too.

Photos courtesy of WENN.
wenn3834214 wenn3834296 wenn3834133 five_year_engagement_50_wenn3834179 wenn3834135 wenn3834203

‘The Avengers’ heat up Moscow: between Mark Ruffalo & RDJ, who would you rather?

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 07:16 AM PDT

The cast of The Avengers were in Moscow two days ago, and we just got these photos today. They did a photo call and a premiere – and I think a Q&A session too. I'm trying to figure out who's missing in these photos – Sam Jackson and Chris Evans, and that's it, right? The rest of them are all there. I don't know who organized these photos, but the only ones of Jeremy Renner are in group shots, yet the photographer made sure to get lots of pics of Scarlett Johansson's bust and limp hair. Since I don't have the time or the inclination to go through these shot by shot (it's not a fashion post!), and because so many are group shots, let's just talk about the dongfest that is The Avengers.

I've been hearing so much about Tom Hiddleston lately. Lainey even insinuated that Hiddleston is somehow BETTER than Michael Fassbender, which… I mean, everyone is entitled to their opinion. The only thing I've seen Hiddleston in was Midnight In Paris, where he played F. Scott Fitzgerald. I liked him just fine – he was a lovely F. Scott. He's attractive in photos, and I am willing to believe that he's probably pretty hot in person too. But for the love of God – Michael Fassbender is a completely different BEAST.

How adorable is Mark Ruffalo, though? He and Robert Downey Jr. seem to be having some kind of adorable playoff, RDJ with his cute plaid suit and bow tie, Mark with his general "I'm a sweet dude, trust" vibe. Who would I rather? I don't even know. I loved Mark's sex scenes in The Kids Are Alright. But I also loved RDJ's sex scenes in Two Girls and A Guy. DAMN! This is a hard choice.

I don't even feel like talking about Chris Hemsworth. He's still too pretty for my taste. Plus, I just don't like ponytails on a dude. As for ScarJo… well, The Jiggle is present and accounted for. Bless her. She's a lucky bitch for getting to hang out with all of these guys.

Photos courtesy of WENN.
the_avengers_09_wenn3834971 the_avengers_07_wenn3834954 the_avengers_05_wenn3834964 the_avengers_06_wenn3834961 the_avengers_14_wenn3834963 the_avengers_12_wenn3834968 the_avengers_28_wenn3834945 the_avengers_16_wenn3834960 wenn3834950

Kim Kardashian in silver at the Us Weekly party: jacked, busted & not terrible?

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 06:45 AM PDT

These are photos from last night's "Us Weekly Hot Hollywood party" or something like that. Us Weekly usually gets a decent turnout for their parties, and last night the woman of the hour was Kim Kardashian, of course. Honestly, I don't hate Kim's dress or her styling here. I usually think she's a katastrophe, but when she makes an effort with a "glam" look, she usually looks okay. I'm glad she's not doing the Croydon facelift – but she doesn't need to, because that face has been Botoxed, filler'd and injected into oblivion. She really needs to stop messing with her lips, because I think Kim's lip situation is worse than both Nicole Kidman and Lindsay Lohan. Kim also tweeted all about her night, including a suspicious one about maybe missing Kanye. Poor Kim. Poor Kanye too.

Julianne Hough was there. I kind of like her dress, even with the weird side-boobage. It's a pretty color on her. I find myself more and more impressed with Julianne's style choices lately – I think Seacrest bought her a decent stylist.

I think Busy Phillips is a hot mess here. I usually think she's a mess, though. She has "fun" with her clothes, which is fine, especially when she's going to an Us Weekly party. But I'd like to see her try a cleaner, more mature look when she's going to a big awards show or something.

Olivia Munn… disaster. Plain dress, poorly accessorized. The necklace doesn't "go" with the dress, and I just hate the booties.

Kellan Lutz knows you want to see Kellan Lutz. Kellan Lutz made the Us Weekly party especially Kellan Lutzy. KELLAN LUTZ!!!!

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.
wenn3834775 wenn3834545 wenn3834736 FFN_KMFF_HotHollywood_Party_041812_8996102 FFN_KMFF_HotHollywood_Party_041812_8996433 wenn3835184 wenn3834739

Stacy Keibler, this is your future: Elisabetta Canalis was just dumped… by Steve-O

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 05:44 AM PDT

You know when it's time to rethink your life choices? When someone from Jackass dumps you for being too hardcore. This is what has just happened to everybody's favorite Italian party girl/escort Elisabetta Canalis. After she was dumped by George Clooney, she started dating Mehcad Brooks. Then Eli and Mehcad broke up last December after an alleged fight about a purse (for real). And then Eli moved on Steve-O, best known as "that crazy dude from Jackass… no, the other crazy dude." Steve-O just dumped her. OUCH.

Italian beauty Elisabetta Canalis really is unlucky in love.

Following hot on the heels of her high profile break-up from ladies man George Clooney, the Dancing with the Stars alum is once again nursing a broken heart — this time following a split from Jackass star Steve-O, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.

RadarOnline.com was first to report back in January that the unlikely couple was hooking up, and now we can report all the details on their split.

“Steve-O dumped Elisbetta over her partying,” a source close to the situation tells RadarOnline.com. “He is extremely serious about his sobriety and did not want to be dating anyone who could jeopardize that.

“He still really cares about her but can’t risk relapsing back into his old ways, so he had to cut her loose. He has hooked her up with some women that he knows to help her try and get back on a stable footing again, and she has been attending meetings.

“Steve-O said he thinks she’s committed to getting control of her life again and that he will help her do that, he wants her to control the partying for her own sake. But, in the meantime he needs to distance himself from her.”

[From Radar]

Poor Elisabetta. After Clooney dumped her, she stuck around Hollywood, trying to make a career "happen" in America. She got Dancing With the Stars and she was the first one eliminated. She tried bearding for lesser celebrities (allegedly). She tried to get work… but it's just not happening without Clooney's influence. When Steve-O – of all people – is like, "Girl, we need to stop. You're too hardcore," that's when you know it's time to just pack it up. Elisabetta had a decent career in Italy – she should just go back home and settle in.

Stacy Keibler, this is your future. The George Clooney Ex-Girlfriend Retirement Plan is pretty awful.

Photos courtesy of WENN.
wenn3736942 wenn3736973 wenn3736951 wenn3736945 wenn3736966

Will Charlize Theron have to choose between Alex Skarsgard & Keanu Reeves?

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 05:15 AM PDT

Charlize Theron is a new mother. You'd think that because she's a single mom now ("Sisters are doing it for themselves," as Jon Hamm would say), she would go The Sandra Bullock Route and allow her image to be remade into a family-friendly vision of motherly love. But Charlize is not Sandra Bullock. Charlize likes boys, and boys like Charlize. So while we're hearing a little bit about Charlize's son Jackson, we're hearing even more about Charlize's potential boyfriends. Personally, I think Charlize would LOVE a ride on the Fassbender train – but I don't think he's into it. He doesn't go for tall blondes. Fortunately, there's one Viking who does like lithe blondes, and that's Alexander Skarsgard. Alex and Charlize had a much-rumored rendezvous back in early March – they were said to be cuddled up and "together" at a bar. Now Us Weekly claims that they went on a "second date":

Charlize Theron, who adopted son Jackson in March, went on a second date with Alexander Skarsgard on April 6 at West Hollywood's Soho House. Though the duo – who hung out March 3 at the area's Gym Sports bar – were with a group, "she rested her head on his shoulder and they looked very couple-y," says an onlooker. Explains a Theron source, "It isn't serious. And no, he has not met the baby!"

[From Us Weekly, print edition]

All I heard there was "casual sex". Is that what this is – something casual, something not at all serious because Alex doesn't want to get serious with a single mother and Charlize doesn't want to get serious with a Viking? If it's just physical… sure. I find their brother-sister appearances creepy though.

But that's not the only man Charlize might have coming around. In Touch Weekly (yeah) claims that Charlize and Keanu Reeves have been spending more time together too. Inevitably, the tabloids really want Sad Keanu and Charlize to happen – there were lots of rumors about them right after Charlize and Stuart Townsend broke up.

First comes love and marriage, then the baby carriage? Not for Charlize Theron. Now that she's a single mom to adopted son Jackson, Charlize is looking for a baby daddy. And the 36-year-old actress has her sights set on her longtime friend — and rumored former beau — Keanu Reeves!

A pal says the Sweet November co-stars have gotten closer since Charlize brought home Jackson and friends think a rekindled romance is inevitable. "They were friends with benefits in the past," the friend says, "but now it's something more."

So is Keanu, 47, dad material? "He babysits and brings toys when he visits Charlize and Jackson," the friend reports. "He even built the crib and changes diapers!" Sounds like a keeper!

[From In Touch Weekly]

"He babysits and brings toys when he visits Charlize and Jackson…" I just don't buy it. I don't buy this dynamic with them at all. If Charlize and Keanu are hanging out, I think they're just drinking beers and watching the game, you know?

Photos courtesy of Fame, WENN.
wenn5826241 FFN_RIJ_AVENGERS_041112_8975015 wenn9902001 wenn3818680 wenn5823440

Lindsay Lohan is allegedly $3 million in debt & she was ordered to stop Botoxing

Posted: 19 Apr 2012 04:20 AM PDT

Earlier this week, I was all set to write about Lindsay Lohan's latest cracked-out shenanigans at the Coachella festival. I had already prepared myself for a standard-issue tale of Porta-potty sex, cocaine, a Botoxy, puffy crackface, liquor and maybe a fistfight involving someone in a wheelchair. Instead, I got these relatively pleasant photos of a not-puffy, sober-looking (sort of) Lindsay, with no stories of her Coachella shenanigans. Has The Cracken changed? Maybe. OK! Mag has an interesting theory about LL's de-puffed face. Their source claims that Lifetime producers (of Liz & Dick) were aghast when they saw LL's puffy Botox-face, and they ordered her to stop messing with it. And she might have complied! Because she's broke as hell and she needs this gig like a crackhead needs her… oh.

Lindsay Lohan has a plum role waiting for in Lifetime's Liz & Dick… but in her desperation to look the part of one of the 20th century's great beauty icons, Lindsay submitted to cosmetic procedures that bloated and distorted her face – and nearly lost her the job.

An insider close to the Lohan camp reports that before flying from LA to NYC for several big meetings, including one with Lifetime executives, Lindsay "was overdone with fillers, Botox and God knows what else. Word is that she had so many shots she went way overboard. And when they took one look at her – they were repulsed and shocked."

According to the insider, Team Lohan has explained to the execs that Lindsay had indeed undergone some aesthetic touching up – but that the actress "was not told by doctors that she wasn't allowed to fly immediately afterward – and well, it was a catastrophe. In the course of Lindsay's five-hour flight, the change in air pressure obviously did much damage and caused unexpected side effects."

The Lifetime execs want to set conditions, says the insider. "I heard someone ask if Lindsay's people would take a few photos of her with proof of date over the next few weeks, and that if her face was less swollen and back to normal, they'd use her," the insider tells OK!

For Lindsay, there's a lot more than her reputation riding on Liz & Dick: apparently, Lindsay is flat broke.

"She's as poor as poor can be, doesn't have two nickels to rub together and she owes more than $3 million in debt," the insider tells OK!. "Lindsay's recent Playboy magazine spread only paid a small pittance compared with what she owes," adds the source, "and she's desperately looking, pitching and offering to do absolutely anything to take her back to something like the lifestyle she had become accustomed to."

[From OK! Magazine, print edition]

The obvious plotline failure is this: if LL is so f–king broke (which I believe), how can she still afford to jack up her face and lips all the time? My answer: she can't. So instead of going without, Lindsay and her mother go in for the cheapest, most budget procedures they can get. And they're probably paying their bills – ALL of their bills – in "trade". But seriously, how easy it to believe that LL has already blown through her $900K Playboy paycheck? Those aren't all legal bills too – remember, she's a cracked-out hoarder who loves to shop. And she's got significant drug bills too. Plus, some of her debt could be years-old – in 2010, it was widely reported that LL had $500,000 in credit card debt.

Still, let's enjoy the hint of her old, natural face once again (just don't look at her lips).

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.
FFN_Coachella_Day3A_ROCPPRFF_041512_8987974 lindsay lohan 1 FFN_Coachella_Day3A_ROCPPRFF_041512_8987183 lohan 2

No comments:

Post a Comment