Cele|bitchy

Michael Fassbender & Viggo Mortensen in London: who would you rather?
Ryan Reynolds’s dog is still the best part of his hookup with Blake Lively
Peaches Geldof allegedly shoplifted a bunch of makeup from a drugstore
Salma Hayek in Bottega Veneta for the ‘Puss in Boots’ premiere: fug or cute?
Kimberly Stewart debuts baby Delilah, claims Benicio del Toro is “involved”
Madonna’s brother is homeless and lives under a bridge in Michigan
Duchess Kate isn’t allowed to work for a charity “close to her heart”: why?
Jessica Simpson’s big baby bump is on full display, allegedly she’s having a girl
Scientology investigated and targeted South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone
Sofia Vergara in blue Missoni: busted, budget or beautiful?

Michael Fassbender & Viggo Mortensen in London: who would you rather?

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 08:49 AM PDT

Sigh… it's now a good day. Mondays usually suck so hard, and it was so inky black when I woke up and I had a dream about a sketchy ex last night and I've been thinking about him all morning (he was sketchy, but he was hung) and I can't wait for Daylight Savings to end so that it will actually be light out when I wake up and basically, today was really sucking. HARD. And then these photos popped up.

Michael Fassbender, with his ginger growing out and now looking so coppery and deep, autumnal red. Then there's Viggo, who must has found the Fountain of Youth years ago, because this man JUST turned 53 years old - can you believe that? These are photos from the photo call for A Dangerous Method at the London Film Festival. Why didn't Keira Knightley show up? Because her performance was the weak link in the film? Because she had other junk to do besides stand next to Viggo and Fassie? Further proof that Keira isn't that bright - she gave up an opportunity to stand next to Fassie and Viggo! How much would you pay for that chance? I have a figure in mind.

So… here's the question. In some kind of desert island situation, and the rule was "You can only sleep with ONE of these dudes," who would it be? Fassbender or Viggo? Now here's another one: if you had to choose one dude to have a relationship with and one dude to just have one night of passion with, which would be your choices? I would pick Viggo for the one night of passion, and Fassie for the relationship. No! Wait. I can't decide! It’s like the Sophie’s Choice of dong. No, it's always Fassie. Forever Fassie.

PS… this post better get A LOT of comments. Damn it, we need more Fassie and Viggo on this site!

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Ryan Reynolds’s dog is still the best part of his hookup with Blake Lively

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 08:49 AM PDT

The Sophie's Choice of Dong not withstanding, today is kind of slow for gossip, which is why I'm choosing to write about these even newer Blake Lively-Ryan Reynolds photos. Blake and Ryan were photographed Friday night in Boston - I covered those photos yesterday - and these are new photos of Blake and Ryan headed to the set of his new film, R.I.P.D., also yesterday. Ryan and Blake in the daylight hours… Ryan and Blake making the effort to not be spotted in the same photo frame… Ryan and Blake loved up in Boston. Blake invited to spend the entire weekend with her new boyfriend. Blake making herself at home to the point where she too brought along her little maltipoo for the trip - that’s her little puppy in her arms!

Just as it was yesterday, Ryan's puppy Baxter is still the true star of these photos. Seriously, y'all, that dog is gorgeous, and he has the most expression puppy face. Ryan keeps him well-groomed too - look how shiny his coat is! Sigh… I love dogs. Especially when they're well-behaved enough to simply follow their dad outside without running away like a maniac demon-dog (like my dog).

Incidentally, yesterday was Ryan's birthday. So that's why Blake was in town, beyond the fact that she's his latest girlfriend. She was giving him a b-day "present". I just saw some photos of Blake on the set of Ryan's film too (which we don't have access to) - she was holding a large, gift-wrapped package. Damn, they really got coupled up in a hurry, didn't they? You can see more photos of them here, at the Mail. I'd just like to point out that Blake and Ryan have now been photographed together more consistently than Ryan and Scarlett ever were.

Photos courtesy of Fame.

Peaches Geldof allegedly shoplifted a bunch of makeup from a drugstore

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 08:39 AM PDT

Peaches Geldof, the eldest daughter of one-hit wonder Bob Geldof, has been known to court controversy as a matter of course. Since people are so used to hearing her name mentioned in conjunction with heroin scandals, it’s no wonder that her new slimline figure caused a few eyebrows to raise and sparked wonder whether she simply snorted her way to a hotter bod.

Naturally, it’s not just the drug rumors that plague poor Peaches, who also appears to have a case of sticky fingers. Earlier this year, it was alleged that Peaches did a “grab and run” by stealing a dress from a vintage shop. Now, Peaches has been accused of strolling through Boots (a drugstore in London) while packing her pockets and bags with $111.54 worth of makeup and, uh, forgetting to pay for it beforehand. Does she just not feel like paying for this stuff, or does she simply want to get caught?

Peaches Geldof was facing a new shoplifting allegation last night after reportedly being caught stealing make-up from Boots.

The wayward daughter of Sir Bob Geldof is said to have been spotted by a store detective pocket-ing almost £70 worth of mascara, foundation and eyeliner as she strolled around a branch in Regent Street, Central London, on Friday.

It was claimed she had been caught stuffing the make-up into her pockets and a yellow Selfridges bag. Peaches, 22, had spent the afternoon shopping at Selfridges in nearby Oxford Street, and eating at a delicatessen, according to the Sunday Mirror.

The most expensive item recovered from her by Boots staff was said to be a £13.29 tube of L’Oreal foundation.

Peaches was held by an undercover detective as she tried to leave the store.

She is then said to have been taken to a back office where she was questioned and forced to hand over the cosmetics.

Staff did not call police although they have now banned her from entering the store again.

The incident is the fourth shoplifting scandal to plague the party-loving socialite, who has been trying to forge a television career.

In March, she was accused of trying to take £37 worth of items at a retro clothing store in Bristol, which her spokesman dismissed as ‘nonsense’.

Peaches also denied claims she had attempted to steal a £70 dress from another clothing shop weeks earlier.

In 2007, she set off alarms by walking out of a shop wearing a coat with the security tag still inside.

And later that year, a collection of high-fashion clothes and expensive accessories went missing after a magazine shoot Peaches had starred in. She said the items had been stolen.

A spokesman for Miss Geldof did not return calls last night.

A Boots spokeswoman said: “Unfortunately, we are not able to comment on individual customer circumstances.”

[From Daily Mail]

Here’s the thing — it’s almost not worth it for a famous person (even semi-famous like Peaches) to steal anything worth a mere $111.54. The price of getting caught is simply too high to justify that level of theft. Now everyone not only knows that Peaches is shoplifting but that she’s also taking really low-dollar stuff too. L’Oreal products, really? Not even Lindsay Lohan would bother taking that stuff — she’d encourage Peaches to go for the fur coats instead.

Meanwhile, Peaches hasn’t gotten a lot of work lately. Thanks to Xenu-lemons guy, she was fired from Ultimo, thereby losing a lucrative six-figure contract that merely involved posing in lingerie and getting her ass airbrushed off. Peaches’ talk show gig was dropped after just a few episodes for low ratings (and possibly the fact that she may or may not have farted on air). She also used to write monthly, typo-ridden columns for Nylon, but she hasn’t done that for at least a year either. Is Peaches merely having money problems and going to extreme lengths to acquire makeup and keep herself red-carpet ready for movie premieres and fashion shows? Is it that thrilling to try and get away with petty theft? Or is she simply an entitled brat?

Photos courtesy of Fame and WENN

Salma Hayek in Bottega Veneta for the ‘Puss in Boots’ premiere: fug or cute?

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 08:13 AM PDT

I may have to borrow CB's kid for a day trip just so I can go see Puss In Boots. What's the rule with adults wanting to see animated kids' films? I usually just roll my eyes whenever some adult tells me that so-and-so kids' movie was awesome, but now I can feel you rolling your eyes at me when I talk about how much I want to see Puss In Boots. It looks SO GOOD. I'm a cat person, if that explains anything. Animated kitties… animated kitties with little swords and hats? I'm there.

Anyway, these are photos of Salma Hayek and Antonio Banderas at the LA premiere for Puss in Boots. Salma wore Bottega Veneta, and I'm seriously disappointed. If you're Salma Hayek, and you look like THAT and you've got that body, why are wearing what amounts to a shapeless brown sack (with a belt)? It's not cute. Add to that the fact that Salma has her choice of so many designers (that her husband owns), and it's weird that she chose this completely boring, unflattering dress. Oh, and what are the thoughts on her Farrah hair? Also weird, right?

Meanwhile, Antonio wore this bad ensemble, and I'm really tired of the Caesar haircut. GROW IT OUT, Antonio. What's up with Antonio and Salma's body language? Antonio's wife Melanie Griffith was there, but Salma's husband was nowhere to be seen… hmmm….

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Kimberly Stewart debuts baby Delilah, claims Benicio del Toro is “involved”

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 07:39 AM PDT

Kimberly Stewart gave birth to her Benicio del Toro-love child two months ago, and Kimbo has finally "revealed" the baby in a new photo shoot with Hello Magazine. I'm always surprised when American celebrities go with the Hello Mag debut - I guess Hello must be paying more than People Mag? Probably. I'm also surprised that Kimberly was "allowed" to debut baby Delilah in a magazine - she kept a surprisingly low profile during her pregnancy, and it seemed like she was making an effort NOT to famewhore. Still, it's always nice to see baby pics. Kimbo also gave an interview about how Benicio is involved with the baby:

Benicio Del Toro surprised Hollywood earlier this year when he announced he was the father of Kimberly Stewart’s first child. And despite no longer being romantically involved with each other, the socialite insists the Oscar winner is very hands-on with their two-month-old daughter Delilah.

Showing off their child for the first time, the former model, 32, reveals Del Toro was in the delivery room when Delilah arrived on August 21. Del Toro and her mother Alana Stewart were by Kimberly’s side when she gave birth to Delilah Genoveva Stewart Del Toro in Los Angeles. Also at the hospital were her father Rod, stepmother Penny Lancaster, and her many siblings.

And despite Del Toro and Stewart splitting soon after Delilah was conceived, the actor is determined to be a prominent part of the little girl’s life.

Kimberly tells Hello! magazine: ‘The whole family, including Benicio, was at the hospital and my mom and Benicio were in the delivery room with me. Benicio’s very involved; he and Delilah have a very special bond.’

Kimberly admitted she had named her daughter after Tom Jones’s 1968 song Delilah.

She enthused: ‘I named her after the Tom Jones song, as I’d always loved that. She definitely looks like her dad, but she has my legs and eye colour.’

Delilah’s birth meant Rod, 66, became a grandfather just six months after becoming an eighth-time father to son Aiden, with third wife Lancaster. Having lots of young siblings, Kimberly has plenty of people to ask for parenting advice.

She said: ‘Dad handles children great - he’s had a lot of experience.

‘Since they (Delilah and Aiden) are only six months apart, I am counting on them being best friends.’

Kimberly and Del Toro were said to have had a brief romance last December after meeting at the Chateau Marmont in Hollywood.

However, when Del Toro announced her pregnancy in April, he made it clear they were no longer together. His statement read: ‘Kimberly is pregnant. Benicio is the father and is very supportive. Although they are not a couple, they are looking forward to the arrival of the baby.’

[From The Mail]

There have been a handful of reports indicating that Kimberly still wants to be in a relationship with Benicio, and I suspect that she's being so nice and sort-of forcing this whole "Benicio is really involved with the baby" idea so that Benicio will see that there are no hard feelings, that she still cares for him, and that they could be all coupled up with the baby, and she could make it really easy for him. Oh, well. I'm glad she and the baby are happy and healthy, and it's good to see little Delilah.

Photos courtesy of Hello Magazine and Fame.

Madonna’s brother is homeless and lives under a bridge in Michigan

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 07:25 AM PDT

I find it fascinating and sad when I hear stories of celebrity relatives who are getting by on public assistance or who are homeless. (Actually, I haven’t heard of any homeless celebrity relative except for Tobey Maguire’s grandfather, who used to live in his car but now gets social security and has a subsidized apartment.) I don’t think it’s the celebrity’s responsibility or that they should have necessarily done something to help, I just wonder how the person to that point. Did the celebrity offer to help at all, did they not know about it, or do they think their relative should figure it out themselves? Did multiple attempts to get them help fail? You might give the celebrity the benefit of the doubt, but in Madonna’s case I tend to think that she ignored it.

As part of a story on local services for the homeless, a Michigan newspaper did a brief interview with Madonna’s 55 year-old brother, Anthony Ciccone, who lives under a bridge, returns bottles to make a living, and has suffered frostbite on his feet. Anthony told The Michigan Messenger that his “family turned their back on me,” and that he’s been homeless for over a year.

Ciccone said he's been among the city's homeless for a year and a half since losing a job at his father's vineyard and winery in Suttons Bay. He said that it annoys him that some people are amused that a person from such a high profile family would end up sleeping, as he does, under the Union St. bridge.

"My family turned their back on me, basically, when I was having a hard time," he said. "You think I haven't answered this kind of question a bazillion times — why my sister is a multibazillionarie, and I'm homeless on the street?"

"Never say never," he said. "This could happen to anybody."

"I don't have any income, I've got to go collect bottles and cans, do odd jobs."

Despite the uncommon community effort to help the homeless here, there are gaps, and Ciccone was among several locals who got cold-related injuries last winter.

"They can't do everything all the time for everybody, they just don't have the resources," he said. "These people that run these things are all volunteers, they don't get paid to do these things."

In the cold seasons the church shelters usher people out at 8 am and city rules against camping and camp fires make staying warm difficult.

"Where do you go at 8 o'clock on a Sunday morning and you have no money in your pocket?"

If you spend enough time on frozen concrete without proper insulation you will get frostbite, he said. "You have no idea how gruesome it is."

"You get nerve damage. That's the milder stage, in the severe stage you have tissue damage, that is when you lose parts of your body."

"I got frostbite on my feet last winter, Ciccone said. "A friend of mine lost all ten toes. Several have died of hypothermia."

"You go and find a place to stay warm like the lobby at the jail, or you take a walk to get your feet warm and go to Meijer's and sit in the lobby there."

[From The Michigan Messenger via THR]

Anthony is one of Madonna’s seven siblings: she has three brothers, one half brother, two sisters and one half sister. Anthony is Madonna’s full brother, born to their mother before she died of breast cancer at just 30.

It’s probably not much of a leap to assume this guy has addiction problems which lead to him losing his job at the family winery. Madonna is worth $650 million, though. How much would it take for her to get her brother in rehab and to pay for a small home for him to stay in, even a minder to help keep him sober? He’s a grown man and of course he’s not her responsibility. She has more resources at her disposal than most of us could ever dream of, and she could make a few phone calls and ensure that her brother is safe and warm. That seems like the most reasonable and charitable thing to do, but Madonna has never been either.

The last we heard from one of Madonna’s siblings, another one of her brothers, Christopher Ciccone, published a tell all book about her called Life with My Sister Madonna. Christopher said that Madonna gave their then 97 year-old grandmother $500 a month and paid for her medical bills. Christopher said that wasn’t enough and that he wanted Madonna “to look after her. To get her a driver and a car.” Madonna’s grandmother passed away this March.

Madonna is shown in September at the Toronto film festival. Credit: WENN.com

Duchess Kate isn’t allowed to work for a charity “close to her heart”: why?

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 06:57 AM PDT

The Daily Mail had one of the most ridiculous stories about Duchess Kate this weekend. Katie Nichol - the gossip columnist who always gets the good Duchess Kate scoop, so much so that I'm almost positive that Duchess Kate herself leaks information to Nichol - reports that the Duchess of Cambridge will definitely not be signing on as a goodwill ambassador for any United Nations program because Kate "has been told it is not appropriate for her to publicly support [a United Nations program] because of her close ties to the Queen – a head of state."

Now, CB thinks there's something to that rationale because the Queen likely has a big say in what Kate and Will get involved with. But the whole "a duchess from England can't work with the UN because she's a member of the royal family" makes absolutely no sense - go here to see an extensive list of all of the celebrities and members of many, many royal families who act as UN goodwill ambassadors. There are ACTUAL heads of state who act as goodwill ambassadors. A sampling of some royalty who work with the UN: Her Highness Sheikha Fatima bint Mubarak al Ketbi (United Arab Emirates), HRH Crown Princess Mette-Marit (Norway), HM Queen Rania (Jordan), H.R.H. Princess Firyal of Jordan, H.R.H. the Grand Duchess María Teresa of Luxembourg, and H. R. H. Princess Lalla Meryem of Morocco. There are many, many more. But Duchess Kate can't join them because…?

The Duchess of Cambridge's dream of following in the footsteps of the late Princess Diana by becoming a charity figurehead has hit a stumbling block. Kate has been in secret discussions with a number of causes and will make an announcement in January about which ones she will be supporting.

But I can reveal she has been told she will not be allowed to publicly support one close to her heart.

Sources say Kate, 29, was keen to work with the Blue Heart Campaign, which raises awareness about human trafficking.

She is close friends with Lady Natasha Rufus Issacs and Lavinia Brennan, whose ethical fashion label Beulah has close links with Blue Heart. Natasha is also an old pal of Prince William's and attended the Royal Wedding in April.

However, Blue Heart is affiliated with the United Nations, a neutral organisation. That means Kate has been told it is not appropriate for her to publicly support it because of her close ties to the Queen – a head of state.

'Natasha and Lavinia spent two months working with human trafficking victims in India and when Kate heard their tales she was completely behind the project,' says one source. 'But because of UN protocol it was not deemed appropriate for her to be too visible within the campaign.'

But Kate has found other ways to support the cause.

At the 100 Women in Hedge Funds Gala at Clarence House last week Kate wore a scarlet Beulah gown.

And insiders say she asked her cake-maker brother James, 24, to bake cupcakes for a recent fashion show in aid of Blue Heart. The cakes were embossed with images of a Kate lookalike wearing a Beulah garment.

Meanwhile, Kate has been having training to perform solo charitable tasks on behalf of the Queen while she is busy with her Diamond Jubilee celebrations.

[From The Mail]

Because why sign on to be a patroness of a charity when she could just wear a dress and smile? Hasn't anyone told Kate that wearing a dress and smiling is one of the main parts of being a charity's patroness? Ugh. Look, if you want to make the argument that the Queen is in charge of everything, knock yourself out. But I think that the Queen and her advisors are slightly perturbed by how lazy Kate is. When Kate signed on to her first charity (her husband's charity), the questions about Kate's ability to actually WORK had already been raised, and "sources" within the palace already seemed like they were tired of trying to make it sound like Kate is keeping busy with her "princess training." I mean, Kate can't even be bothered to hand-write a note to a kid with cancer. And now she's blaming the Queen because Kate can't be bothered to sign on a charity that means so much to her? This is worrying.

Photos courtesy of Fame.

Jessica Simpson’s big baby bump is on full display, allegedly she’s having a girl

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 06:42 AM PDT

I think Fame Pictures is really excited that they bought these candid photos of Jessica Simpson and her baby bump, so they went a little "red circle" happy. Yes, we understand! There's a baby in there. And it appears to be a second-trimester baby, judging from the muddled bumpiness contained within the red circles.

As for whether Jessica is really pregnant… um, really? Are you still doubting it? All that remains to be seen is how and where she confirms the information. Last week, Page Six claimed that Papa Joe was trying to get Jessica an announcement and baby photo deal for the price of $500,000, likely with People Magazine. Last week, we did get a tip from a friend of a friend who saw Jessica in Palm Springs, doing a photo shoot at the Rancho Mirage Westin. Apparently, Jess was looking super-pregnant in person, and the photo shoot was probably for some magazine in which she might be announcing. So did she get paid?

Radar had some kind of "expert" chime in about the alleged baby announcement payout. Public relations "expert" Ronn Torossian tells Radar:

"The issue with Jessica Simpson maybe is that she simply hasn’t been 'hot' lately in terms of relevant, big celebrity occurrences," President and CEO of 5WPR, Ronn Torossian, told RadarOnline.com in an exclusive interview.

"No big movie, hit album or A-list happening, and even though she’s an A-list celebrity…in this economy, media needs to know for $500,000 that something is a sure bet — and Simpson simply may not be seen as that today.”

Ronn revealed that it's not out of the ordinary for a celebrity to sell baby photos and he doesn't see the market for such slowing down at all.

“Celebrities are smart to try and control images which are released of their children… I don’t think anyone can fault the oft-pictured celebrity from wanting to benefit financially from this continued media frenzy around very personal matters," Ronn said.

"And I am sure the celebrity baby payout will continue."

[From Radar]

Yeah… whatever. I think she's worth $500,000 if the deal is for the announcement, an exclusive interview and photo shoot, plus first dibs on the baby photos. I think $500K is a steal, even in this economy.

Also - for what it's worth, In Touch reports that Jessica is telling friends that she's knocked up with a baby girl. Sources tell the mag, "She's telling people it's like winning the lottery, twice. Jessica really wanted to find out the baby's sex, she hates surprises. Jessica and her mom, Tina, are the most excited." Eric is reportedly telling everyone that his daughter will be a "daddy's girl". Oh, and Jessica is already shopping for the baby.

By the way, don't you just love how natural Jessica's bump looks? Don't you also love how it's so much bigger than Beyonce's?

Photos courtesy of Fame.

Scientology investigated and targeted South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 05:42 AM PDT

Remember that 2005 “Trapped in the Closet” Southpark episode that made a mockery out of Scientology and Tom Cruise? (You can watch it here.) Back then people weren’t making as much fun of Scientology as they are now and it caused a big stir at the time. Cruise threw a fit and pulled rank by refusing to promote Mission Impossible III if the show re-aired on Comedy Central. (Viacom was the parent company of both MI’s Paramount and Comedy Central.) Scientologist Isaac Hayes, who played Chef, also quit the show amid rumors that he was pressured to do so by his higher-ups in his “religion.”

Not only did “Trapped” hilariously mock Cruise as gay, it also revealed “secret” details of the science fiction-type beliefs only told to followers who achieve the upper levels in Scientology. The “knowledge” of Scientology as told on South Park was something that cult members pay dearly for both monetarily and in terms of years of servitude and brainwashing. The Xenu volcano lost-souls stuff isn’t known to the vast majority of Scientologists under their system of indoctrination, but it’s quite easily googled and made fun of.

Well Scientologists targeted South Park creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker after that, even going so far as to dig through their trash to find out information about them. This story is consistent with everything we know about Scientology, including their doctrine of “fair game” in which they ruthlessly go after everyone who dares question them.

Scientology launched an intense investigation into the lives of South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone, The Village Voice is reporting.

According to Marty Rathbun, the famous 2005 South Park episode called Out of the Closet which spoofed Scientology, so enraged the hierarchy, a witch hunt was ordered.

Rathbun was himself once a high ranking Scientology official. He defected from the organization and in 2009 began blogging about Scientology secrets.

Even friends of Parker and Stone, including the formerly married John Stamos and Rebecca Romijn, were targeted, Rathbun told The Voice.

“These connections are being PRC’d,” reads a document Rathbun made public on Sunday, explaining that PRC stands for “public records check.”

In other words, a private eye was ordered to conduct a complete check of these people and their property through public records. If they owed taxes, or had been in messy divorces, or had been arrested, Scientology wanted to know about it, Rathbun said.

“There are some strings that will be pulled on the PRC on Stone,” the document reads, without further explanation.

“Otherwise the special collections will be debugged in order to get some viable strings that can be pulled,” the document then says “Special collections,” Rathbun explains, is Scientology code for “trash digging.”

What exactly were they looking for, The Voice asked Rathbun?

“Phone records. Bank records. Personal letters that expose some kind of vulnerability. They’ll read stuff into the kind of alcohol you’re drinking and how much. Prescriptions. They’ll figure out your diet. They can find out a lot about you through your trash,” said Rathbun.

Rathbun himself claims he has been a target of Scientology ever since he began his revealing blog. As RadarOnline.com recently reported, a Scientology video crew called Squirrel Busters followed his every move for months.

[From Radar Online]

At this point people aren’t as afraid of Scientology after a few high profile exposes, some defecting celebrities, and the hard work of Anonymous. Back in 2005, it was absolutely brave of Parker and Stone to mock them though. A lot of people have “committed suicide” after speaking out against this criminal organization or otherwise trying to leave. I hope that Scientology eventually loses its tax free status and is prosecuted in the US under the RICO act. In the mean time, the more stories like this that come out, the more people know what they’re up to and how to avoid them.

On another note, these guys are kind of nerdy hot, aren’t they?

Sofia Vergara in blue Missoni: busted, budget or beautiful?

Posted: 24 Oct 2011 05:41 AM PDT

These are some new photos of Sofia Vergara at the Rodeo Drive Walk of Style event last night, honoring Iman and Missoni. So, obviously, Sofia showed up in Missoni. I don't like the dress on Sofia… it looks really cheap on her, right? Like she just wrapped a Missoni knockoff towel around herself. I think the color is throwing me off too - I like that Sofia wears a lot of color on the red carpet, but sometimes those bright colors and patterns look "cheap" on her.

Sofia has just returned from LA after a vacation with her still-on boyfriend, Nick Loeb. Sofia, as always, was tweeting during her vacation, and she ended up posting this bikini pic that has everyone all riled up:

GAH. Her body is so amazing. Look at how toned she is! Usually, Sofia is committed to wearing one-piece swimsuits… I guess because her body is so bangin', she doesn't want to start a riot on the beach. I guess she was just in a bikini mood, though.

I'm also including a photo of Iman at the Missoni event - she was being honored with a plaque on Rodeo Drive. What do you think of her dress? I really dislike it.

Photos courtesy of WENN & Sofia's Twitter.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy

No comments:

Post a Comment