Cele|bitchy

Elisabetta Canalis is papped in Berlin with Mehcad Brooks: give us a break?
Linnocent was offered $1 million for a mold of her ginger biscuits
Duchess Kate does not wear a busted weave, she just has a scalp scar
Why is Ashton Kutcher acting like he’s the victim?
Lady Gaga “loves pitting men against each other, feeling worshipped”
Kate Gosselin is giving her kids singing & acting lessons, plans to move to Los Angeles
Matt Bellamy’s bandmates hate Kate Hudson, call her “Yoko”
Kristen Stewart on Glamour UK, “I’m kind of repulsed by jocks from anywhere”
Is Frances Bean Cobain engaged to a Kurt Cobain lookalike?
Sandra Bullock in gold & black for amfAR event: adorable or underdone?

Elisabetta Canalis is papped in Berlin with Mehcad Brooks: give us a break?

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:56 AM PDT

Elisabetta Canalis is still dating former True Blood hottie Mehcad Brooks, 31. I could have sworn that their first date earlier this month was some publicist-arranged outing to help her save face after she got voted off DWTS, and it very well may have been. They’re still enjoying each other’s company or are contracted out for some meager tabloid space though, because they’ve been seen out yet again. She could do a lot worse. I like that she’s going for hot and relatively unknown this time. The dude is doing well for himself and is starring on USA’s “Necessary Roughness,” but it’s not like he’s exceptionally rich or famous.

Anyway these two were in Berlin. I’m in the states now but I lived in Berlin for about four years and I was there all summer. They did the tourist thing in Mitte, and they were photographed by someone they undoubtedly called ahead of time, because no one would even know who they are in Berlin or particularly care. Elisabetta is still trying to be famous, and again at least she is with a guy who is either also using her to be famous too and/or genuinely likes being around her. You would expect her to go for another bigwig.

As I mentioned before, my opinion of Brooks (who we did feature on HGF like three times, I know some of you will ask!) has diminished after this news. BUT he does look happy with Elisabetta, and he looks just as thrilled to get papped as she is. They look like a real couple. What is he doing with his hand in her face though? He’s like going “pow! hahah!” It’s weird.

Would she take Clooney back in a heartbeat though? Probably, although she may realize that ship has passed. She’s not waiting around for him, and she sure wants us to know it.

Photo credit: WENN.com

Linnocent was offered $1 million for a mold of her ginger biscuits

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:44 AM PDT

When I read the first sentence of this TMZ story, I felt the vom rising up. The sentence begins, "Lindsay Lohan’s genitals are a friggin’ gold mine…" VOM. Only wouldn't it be more accurate if Linnocent's genitals were a "copper" mine? Because she's a ginger, you know. Copper. Ginge. Firecrotch. Her biscuits look like a cool autumn day in the mountains, the shades of red blanketing the landscape. With scabies.

Anyway, TMZ reports that in addition to her six-figure Playboy deal (which includes everything, the full ginge), an "adult entertainment company" is also willing to pay ONE MILLION DOLLARS… just for a mold of LL's "lady parts".

Lindsay Lohan’s genitals are a friggin’ gold mine — because Playboy’s million dollar baby has just received ANOTHER million dollar offer from a sex toy company … TMZ has learned.

The honchos from an adult entertainment company called FleshLight have fired over a letter to Lohan’s reps … hoping to seal a deal with the actress which would allow the company to take a mold of LiLo’s lady parts to produce “authentic” Lindsay Lohan sex toys.

Shockingly, the practice of genital molding is not that uncommon in the world of adult entertainment … loads of XXX actresses — including Jesse Jane and “Nailin’ Palin” star Lisa Ann — have copied their private parts for sex toys.

We’re told Lindsay hasn’t seen the offer yet … but sources close to the actress tell us, “She would never accept such an offer for any amount of money.”

As TMZ first reported, Lindsay is going full frontal for Playboy … but only agreed to the deal because she felt the photos would be “tasteful.”

[From TMZ]

LMAO, “She would never accept such an offer for any amount of money.” Like she has such high standards! Like Linnocent is sitting around, fielding all of this amazing offers. "No, I don't get on my knees for less than $100 grand! Call back when you're ready to make a real offer. Hello, yes? A mold of my what? Ten million or I'll give you a mold of my middle finger!"

Honestly though… if I was faced with the decision between posing (tastefully) nude in Playboy for someodd $900K, or having a mold of my vadge made for $1 million, I think I would choose the mold. Right? It feels less creepy, honestly. But if I was Linnocent, I would do both.

Oh, and Star Mag had this sketchy story about the real reason LL isn’t going to be sent to jail - according to a “source,” “Lindsay has managed to form a friendship with a powerful political type. He’s promised her he’ll help get her out of trouble ASAP… the new friend has put her fears at bay and is offering her hope of getting the whole incident squashed.” Er… it’s Boehner, right? Weiner? Rick Perry!

Oh, and here are photos of LL from two days ago, where she brought two purses to the morgue (one purse for drugs, I'm assuming). One of the purses is a $4500 Fendi, and the other is a $1600 YSL. Of course.

Photos courtesy of WENN and Pacific Coast News.

Duchess Kate does not wear a busted weave, she just has a scalp scar

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:43 AM PDT

First things first: the dress that the Duchess of Cambridge wore for her first solo, royal event was Amanda Wakeley. Why did it take hours to get the designer ID straight? I don't know. I still really like the dress on Kate, although I'm sure she was criticized in some hoity-toity corridors for showing so much skin. But as some of you pointed out, Kate pulls it off because she's so slim and because she barely has much of a bust. If you gave this dress to Sofia Vergara, it would be obscene (and awesome, in a completely different way).

Now, in yesterday's post, I mentioned that The Mail was getting all tabloidy over the state of Kate's hair. Specifically, the "line" that could be seen just centimeters from her hairline, in her hair:

The Mail claimed that the line was likely proof that the Duchess wears a weave or some kind of clip-on extensions. The story was widely circulated until the "spokesman for the Duchess" (fancy!) got in a snit and released the information that Kate has an old scar on her head, and that was what everyone was seeing:

The Duchess left behind her Prince, but she showed the world something new. On Wednesday night Kate Middleton made her first official solo appearance in London as the Duchess of Cambridge at a charity dinner for In Kind Direct at the Clarence House. Prince William’s wife, 29, looked radiant in a floor length blue chiffon gown, with her styled hair half-up, half-down.

But underneath her beautiful ‘do, Kate revealed an alarming three-inch long scar on the left side of her head, behind her temple.

“The scar is related to a childhood operation,” said a spokesman for the Duchess.

As a child, the Duchess had “a very serious operation,” officials told the Daily Mail, but declined to detail the exact surgery or reason for treatment.

John Scurr, a London based surgeon, told the Daily Mail, “I really doubt it was any serious condition and I would say it is as a result of an arteriovenous malformation - a birthmark - being removed”.

Regardless, the Duchess wowed at Wednesday’s bash. “She is more beautiful in person than you can imagine, she literally wowed the room,” an insider tells Us Weekly. “She looked amazing.”

[From Us Weekly]

A serious operation that no one can talk about? WTF? Skip the jokes about The Omen and how Kate had a "666" birthmark removed. Let's face it, she's too lazy to be the devil. Which brings me to another question - Kate now has a spokesperson? I thought all of her staff and William's staff were technically employees of Prince Charles? But that's a little detail that keeps changing and revising too. Of course Kate has her own spokesman. Just like she probably has several assistants, dressers, stylists, secretaries and other assorted staffers. But if anyone comes out and admits that Kate already has a huge staff at her disposal, questions will arise: WHY? Why does she need so many people working for her at this moment when she barely does anything?

Photos courtesy of Fame.

Why is Ashton Kutcher acting like he’s the victim?

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:39 AM PDT

I was giving these Ashton Kutcher photos the side-eye yesterday, but I ended up not covering them. Mostly because I was feeling very punky, and I had to go to the doctor, but also because I absolutely loathe Ashton Kutcher at this point, and even looking at his dumb face fills me with rage. Anyway…

Two nights ago, Ashton was at the GQ Magazine Gentleman's Ball. He went solo, because… I guess he couldn't convince Demi Moore to come with him? Because it's too soon for her to walk a red carpet with him, even though most of think she's not going to leave him for his wandering dong? His date that night was Rabbi Philip Berg, the Kabbalah dude, and Ashton was wearing his wedding ring. Here's Us Weekly's take on the evening:

Ashton Kutcher wasn’t his usual wild and crazy self at the GQ Gentleman’s Ball at the Edison Ballroom in NYC on Wednesday night. Although wife Demi Moore was M.I.A. for the evening — where Kutcher was honored for the charity they cofounded, she certainly seemed to be on his mind. Kutcher, 33, wore his wedding ring, and when video monitors played footage of him with his wife of 6 years, the Two and a Half Men star watched with rapt, somber attention.

Instead of Moore, Kutcher’s date for the evening was Rabbi Philip Berg, his spiritual mentor and the current Dean of the worldwide Kabbalah Centre organization.

Sitting down for the dinner with Berg and other companions, Kutcher — rocked by the revelation of his September one-night stand with 22-year-old Sara Leal on the eve of his wedding anniversary with Moore, 48 — was in a atypically pensive, quiet mood. He lit up briefly when he removed his yarmulke to show off his long, shaggy hair to the table. For dinner that night? Salad, salmon, a roll — and a glass of wine, which he chugged within five minutes.

Honored for “Real Men Don’t Buy Girls,” Moore and Kutcher’s foundation which fights child prostitution worldwide, Kutcher took the podium for an emotional, passionate speech — peppered with more than a few expletives — as fellow stars Josh Lucas and Jason Sudeikis looked on.

“Our global issues are getting tougher,” Kutcher said during the speech. “A lot of the things we’re doing we can’t talk about, but I can promise you we’re fighting and we’re going to make a change, so that’s a little about what I’m working on.”

After his speech, Kutcher returned to his seat and stayed low-key and serious while The Roots played a 20-minute set during dessert.

Once the event was over, he and Berg encountered radio personality Craig Schwartz, a.k.a.. “Radio Man,” as they waited for their car outside the ballroom.

Schwartz lightly broached the topic of Kutcher’s marital woes, and whether he was with okay with “everything that’s going on.”

His reply: “Yeah. Yes. I am doing OK, thanks. Thank you for caring. Thank you for caring, really. It means a lot.”

[From Us Weekly]

Page Six had a different take on Ashton's appearance - they claim Ashton "appeared emotional as he delivered a rambling speech, fighting back tears when he spoke of his fight against sex trafficking. He even managed to incomprehensibly weave in Moammar Khadafy's death, his study of the Old Testament, social networking, global violence, the sloppy wool hat he was wearing and the Chicago Bears." Just another sad day in the sad life of The Hot Tube Boner. Gross.

Here's an honest-to-God question: why is Ashton Kutcher acting like HE is the victim in this situation? Like we're all just being so MEAN to him because he boned some club girl in a hot tub on his anniversary. He's such a child.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Lady Gaga “loves pitting men against each other, feeling worshipped”

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:10 AM PDT

I always have to give Lady Gaga credit for putting a lot of thought and effort into her dealings with the press. Not just in interviews, but in simple press conferences too, Lady Gaga takes pains to deliver noteworthy moments so that the press corps has something to write about. Take these new photos of Gaga in New Dehli, India earlier today. She's going to be performing in New Dehli at an after-party shoe for India's Formula 1 debut. It's a big deal, sure, but she didn't need to make the press conference this kind of big deal, with the debut of a new multi-colored wig and a giant ball gown and a temporary tattoo in what looks like Sanskrit. I think she's sitting on a throne, and she might be wearing real diamonds too. Also: she looks really puffy, right? Coke bloat? Or just weight gain?

Radar also has a story about PETA's Indian activists who are trying to convince Gaga to do a special "vegetarian" meat dress for her appearance in a country with hundreds of millions of vegetarians:

Is Lady Gaga’s next outrageous outfit that of a walking salad bar? If PETA India activists get their way, absolutely: The organization is urging the Born This Way singer to wear a dress made of lettuce when she headlines an invitation-only show in New Delhi this weekend, following India’s first Formula 1 Grand Prix race.

The dress, Sachin Bangera of PETA said, would take about five to six hours to construct, as Gaga would be decked out with lettuce leaves held together by pins and threads.

“If she agrees, we’ll make her a dress entirely of lettuce and held together by pins and threads,” Bangera said. “It will be a full length gown, and we’ll make sure it looks sexy … someone will be on hand to spray the lettuce with water so that it doesn’t wilt.

Gaga famously wore a meat dress the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards, which will be on display at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland until February.

[From Radar]

Blah. That's pretty boring. Luckily, Star Magazine has a much more interesting story about Gaga's love life. Apparently, she's still boning Tayloy Kinney, that hottie from her "You & I" video. Star claims that Kinney has moved in with Gaga, but there's trouble because Gaga is still casually seeing Ol' Luc Carl. A source tells the mag, "She feels Taylor loved the real her. She's given him the keys to her sprawling homes on both coasts, and if he's not working, he's with her. But… Gaga is still talking to and seeing Luc. They're not over." Why is doing this? Because, the source claims, "She loves pitting men against each other, feeling worshipped. She's always messing with people's hearts." Um, srsly? Taylor is a hot piece, Luc is a scummy douche. It really is that simple. Still, the "source" believes that Taylor is just a phase and that Gaga will end up back with Luc.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Kate Gosselin is giving her kids singing & acting lessons, plans to move to Los Angeles

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 08:07 AM PDT

You knew that Kate Gosselin wasn’t about to go back to being a nurse after the reality show money dried up. She’s made it clear that she wants to continue to make a sweet and easy living on the backs of her eight kids. Kate is getting her kids acting and singing lessons, according to the National Enquirer, and she wants to move to Los Angeles to make sure that they have more opportunities for show business careers. The Enquirer usually has solid sources in the Gosselin camp, and we all know how much Jon likes to blab. I would bet this is true, that Jon is livid about it, and that if Kate wants to do this she will and she’ll get some custody judge to sign off on it. She’s going to have to downsize her lifestyle while she tries to prep her little moneymakers, though, and I doubt that’s possible for her. Here’s more:

Money-hungry mom Kate Gosselin plans to enroll her eight kids in singing and acting classes, and then, after they sharpen their talents, move to Los Angeles, the Enquirer has learned.

“Kate’s ultimate goal is to get her kids into the entertainment business and manage their careers,” an insider told The Enquirer. “She’s looking into acting, singing and dancing classes near the family’s home in Pennsylvania. She wants to get the kids started in commercials by next year…”

Kate believes that she can be the mother of all stage moms, making big bucks by managing the kids’ careers, although she has yet to convince her ex-hubby, said the source.

“Jon’s been very outspoken about wanting to keep the children off TV,” the insider said.

“But Kate has slowly been talking him into it by promising to keep the spotlight off the kids’ personal lives. If she gets her way, the whole family will be hollywood bound by next year!”

[From The National Enquirer, print edition, November 7, 2011]

I don’t doubt this story at all. Kate will put Courtney Stodden and Lindsay Lohan’s momagers to shame. She’ll mess up her kids more than any momager that came before her. At least she’ll be paying attention to them for a little while as she tries to train them up, though. Mommy needs some new hair extensions and money to pay her married boyfriend to stick around. It’s not like anyone is going to hire her, so she has to pimp out her kids.

Matt Bellamy’s bandmates hate Kate Hudson, call her “Yoko”

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 07:38 AM PDT

All things considered, I really shouldn’t like Kate Hudson that much. Her Hollywood acting career has consisted of one decent performance that could probably be attributed more to Cameron Crowe’s directing skills than any true talent on her part; and she’s coasted upon the goodwill from Almost Famous to make many millions of dollars from a deluge of insipid romantic comedies. Of course, she probably also got her start in acting thanks to her famous mother and father figure too, so there’s a great deal of nepotism at work. On some level though, I admire that Kate just doesn’t give a crap what people think. She makes the movies that pay her the most, dates a continual stream of eligible bachelors (some grubbier than others), and gives us all the metaphorical finger in the process. I can sort of respect that Kate lives her life the way she wants to even though her alleged potential seems so wasted.

However, Kate has not managed to charm everyone with her ways, and The Enquirer reports that the bandmates of her latest man (and baby dady), Matt Bellamy, absolutely detest Kate’s very existence as a rock groupie of sorts:

Kate Hudson may have won the heart of Muse frontman Matt Bellamy, but she’s not scoring any points with his band mates!

The “Almost Famous” actress has been accused of stifling her fiance’s creativity, getting too involved in band affairs, and being an annoying distraction. In fact, sources say the other Muse members are now calling her “Yoko Ono,” referring to the late John Lennon’s wife, whose meddling was blamed for The Beatles’ breakup.

“Kate was a constant presence at Muse’s songwriting sessions until she recently left to film her new movie. She thinks she’s a musical expert and nitpicks over Matt’s lyrics and pushes her unsolicited opinion on songs,” a source revealed. “Her interference was highly frustrating to the other band members.”

The 32-year-old Oscar-nominated actress began dating Matt in May 2010 and gave birth to their son, Bingham (”Bing”), this past July. Kate also has a 7-year-old son, Ryder, with her ex-husband, Black Crowes singer Chris Robinson.

“Now that Matt and Kate have a baby together, Matt has been more prone to skipping recording sessions or cutting out early because he claims Kate needs him to help out at home or pick up something from the store,” continued the source.

“He’s turned from an edgy rocker into a house husband.”

Matt and the rest of the Muse musicians are currently working on their sixth album, a follow-up to their Grammy-winning release, The Resistance.

Although no one in the band has been willing to tell Kate to back off, they finally pulled Matt aside to talk to him about their concerns.

“They told him Kate is dampening his creativity and draining his energy,” noted the source. “They suggeted it might be better to limit her influence about their music.”

Hopefully, Matt will get the message.

[From Enquirer, print edition, November 7, 2011]

I can sort of buy that Kate would think she’s a “musical expert” after previously being married to a rock musician for several years, but she’s a bloody actress, and not a very good one at that. If she’s truly breathing down the band’s collective neck at rehearsals, maybe she should stay home and let them do their business. Then again, if Bellamy is writing lyrics that are about her that could be interpreted as unflattering, well, maybe she has a right to say something, but that’s the extent of it. And I doubt that Bellamy would say anything bad about his woman because he knows, just as well as everyone else, that he’s dating a serial monogamist. Bellamy is very easily replaceable in Kate’s life, so writing lyrics that compared her hair to freshly harvested corn husks would be a very stupid thing to do.

On the other hand, the “Yoko” comparisons are out of line and are likely spawned from frustration, but that doesn’t make them any better. While I’m sure that the Muse guys would prefer Bellamy to stick around and be funky with them for hours instead of heading home to help with the baby, calling a woman “Yoko” won’t work progress in any shape or form. It will only make Bellamy angry in the long run. I recall Trent Reznor’s fangirls referring to his wife, Mariqueen Maandig, as the Yoko of NIN, which was pretty unjustified as well, since Reznor had announced his intention to shelve NIN long before Mariqueen came into the picture. As for the implication that, somehow, Matt Bellamy is equal to John Lennon — whatever. Muse might be popular with the kiddies, but they’re certainly not the modern-day incarnation of The Beatles.

By the way, this guy isn’t exactly upset at being photographed by the paparazzi, right? He actually seems positively chuffed by the prospect.

Photos courtesy of Fame

Kristen Stewart on Glamour UK, “I’m kind of repulsed by jocks from anywhere”

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 07:38 AM PDT

Kristen Stewart covers the December issue of Glamour UK, all to promote Part I of Breaking Dawn. Most of the interview is Kristen discussing the film and there's very little of her talking about subjects that are often tricky for her - like the paparazzi, or her education (and lack there of) or whether Sparkles is officially her boyfriend. Kristen still curses up a blue streak in this interview (just like her GQ UK piece), but this is one of the friendlier pieces I've ever read with Kristen - meaning she came across as open, not so twitchy, and like she's a reasonably well-adjusted young woman. Here are some highlights from the interview:

The sex scenes had to be re-edited so there wouldn't be an R-rating: "It was so weird, it didn’t even feel like we were doing a Twilight film. I was like, ‘Bella! What are you doing? Wow! What is happening here?!' It was very surreal. We [originally] got rated R. They re-cut it."

More on Breaking Dawn: "It doesn’t get more action-packed… [But] they definitely get more physical. Well, they get married. We totally have sex – finally!"

Sparkles on the sex scenes: "I’m looking forward to the pillow-biting scene. I thought that was so funny. Of all the random things too do, really? He bites the pillow."

Working out to prepare for the sex scenes: "Usually we all make fun of Taylor for working out so often, and then suddenly me and Rob were like ‘S***’ and were running around the block while Taylor laughed at us."

The wedding scene: "I had to be shrouded in secrecy the entire two days of filming. It was crazy… I was on full lockdown, as if I was wearing millions of dollars’ worth of diamonds. It was one of those moments you go, ‘This is something to remember,’ and you want to put yourself in the experience so that it doesn’t pass you by. It ended up being great for everyone, I think.”

Kristen on her relationship with Sparkles: "It's funny when this question comes up, because I sort of feel like, I don't really care! People can say whatever they want…. [The interest] is totally understandable, but when it's personal to you, it's like your life becomes a product and I'm repelled by that. I don’t like to give away gems that people are gonna be like. ‘Oh my God!’ So I’ll always just shrug it off — in fact, I always find it kind of funny, and not just with Rob."

On how she's not as nervous as she was in 2007: "That’s a fair assessment. I don’t think there was much behind it other than I was young, and expecting it, and trying way too hard to be ‘not fake’. When I was younger, I’d look around and see these people, even people I knew, start to do an interview and become a completely different person. I was always scared of being like that. Someone would [ask a question] and you could see my whole thought process on my face. It’s like, ‘Hide that s–t! What are you doing?’”

On whether she ever Googles herself: “Not any more, man. I do like to look at what I wear, though. It’s not like I put on a f–king dress and don’t care about it after.”

On whether she prefers American jocks or British lads: “Well, I’m kind of repulsed by jocks from anywhere, so I have to go with the lads.”

On comparing London life to the States: “In L.A. you have to be fairly selective about where you go, but I’m so fine here. It’s similar to New York, in that people are doing their own thing and they feel like they’re probably cooler than you, so I tend to be able to get around very easily. We have bars, clubs and restaurants [in the US], but here you go to the pub for the afternoon and you have lunch. In an American publication, that would seem like, ‘She’s hitting the bars in London!’ but it’s just a different mentality here.”

On Sparkles being the Sexiest Man In the World: "The first time Rob was the ’sexiest man in the word’, a couple of years ago, it was the biggest joke in the world. We never stopped taking the piss and neither did he. [But] they’re all great guys and not … geez, now I sound like I’m generalizing about attractive men, but there’s something a little vain about working out every single day, whereas they’re the greatest guys and all kind of goofy. That’s why it’s so funny.”

[From ONTD & The Mail]

I imagine she does like it better in England - there are so rarely new photos of her, and she probably is able to keep a lower profile, for whatever reason. I also like her admission about how she used to try so hard to be "not fake" in interviews. I would argue that she's still that girl, though, but she is improving. Oh, and "repulsed by jocks"? Repulsed? Seriously? That's a sweeping generalization.

Glamour UK photos courtesy of ONTD.

Is Frances Bean Cobain engaged to a Kurt Cobain lookalike?

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 07:11 AM PDT

Kaiser sent me this story a couple of days ago and I shrugged until it got picked up by People. Apparently Frances Bean Cobain, still just 19, and her boyfriend of over a year, musician Isaiah Silva, changed their Facebook status to “engaged.” They’re pretty young to be getting married, and some outlets are claiming he’s a “Kurt Cobain lookalike.” There are photos of the guy in a flannel shirt and he’s a musician and looks kind of scrappy like Frances’ famous late dad, but I don’t see a strong resemblance there. Isaiah has dark hair. He’s looked like Kurt in the past, though, like strikingly so.

Frances Bean Cobain, 19, the daughter of Courtney Love and the late Kurt Cobain, has been dating Isaiah Silva of L.A. band the Rambles for more than a year – and they may have taken the next step, reports the OC Weekly.

They each quietly changed their Facebook relationship status to engaged a few weeks ago, the paper says, and a source confirms their happy news of Cobain’s engagement to PEOPLE. However, they have since changed their statuses back.

According to the report, the couple use fake names on Facebook – she goes by Frances Rachel Leigh Cook, he uses Isaiah David Berkowitz-Cusack. Screen shots of their Facebook pages also show comments that hint at an engagement.

“Getting to spend the rest of my life loving my best friend makes me the luckiest woman in the world,” Cobain wrote at one point.

Cobain, who exuded Old Hollywood glamour in a set of photos taken by fine art photographer Rocky Schenck earlier this year, was just 20 months old when she lost her father, the Nirvana frontman.

[From People]

She’s so young to get married but at least Frances is in a serious longterm relationship and at least she’s no longer under the influence of her mom. The last we saw of Frances she was in a photoshoot late this summer looking so elegant and like a young Angelina Jolie. She is rock royalty, and it seems so fitting that she would marry a musician. I hope that they don’t do it legally, though, and just keep it serious and committed without making it official. I know some people marry young and it works, but I still think it’s a bad idea. They’re so adorable together, though. Check out these photos from their Facebook. (The black and white ones below.)

Some photos credit: WENN.com

Sandra Bullock in gold & black for amfAR event: adorable or underdone?

Posted: 28 Oct 2011 06:28 AM PDT

I feel like designers these days take the easy way out by making too many dresses that are either sleeveless or strapless. Whatever happened to the elegant sleeved gown or cocktail dress? Whatever happened to making weather-appropriate dresses for ladies, so they don't have to add layers to something cute, just so they won't freeze their asses off? That was my thought when I was looking through these photos of Sandra Bullock at last night's amfAR Inspiration Gala. I would love to see Sandra's little gold dress on its own, but I fear that it probably has spaghetti straps, so Sandra paired it with this tuxedo jacket. I don't hate the jacket-over-cocktail-dress trend, but I'm just saying, it's sad that there needs to be a trend for that. Designers should make more dresses with sleeves.

Sandra's date was Kevin Huvane, an agent with CAA (and brother of Stephen Huvane, who represents Aniston and the like). Huvane purchased a Warhol at the auction event - but he bought it for Sandra's son!

At this rate, Louis Bardo is going to become quite the art collector. During Thursday’s amFAR Inspiration Gala at the Chateau Marmont in L.A., Andy Warhol’s iconic “Peaches” print was auctioned off for $14,000. The lucky bidders happened to be Sandra Bullock’s agents, who bought the artwork as a gift for the actress’ 1-year-old son, Louis.

“I want to thank Kevin Huvane and Bryan Lourd for not being cheap f-cks and gifting my son with his first Warhol,” a radiant Bullock joked.

The 47-year-old Oscar winner, who reunited with her Speed costar Keanu Reeves for dinner in New York City on Wednesday, was on hand to honor the late Elizabeth Taylor, who helped created amfAR in 1985.

“Earlier this year, the world lost a radiant woman of courage and compassion. She lives on in every person she touched,” Bullock said of the actress and philanthropist, who passed away at age 79 in March.

“She never thought twice to put her arm around someone who was suffering, and that is the gift we have a human beings, the ability to reach out and touch another human being. Tonight we can honor this extraordinary woman and finish what she started.”

[From Us Weekly]

That was nice of her agents. Baby's first Warhol! Must be nice. And it was great that Sandra was on hand to honor Elizabeth Taylor too! There were photos of Colin Farrell leaving the event as well - but I guess he didn't do the red carpet. He was probably just there for Elizabeth, his dear friend (he spoke at her funeral too).

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Friday, October 28, 2011

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy

No comments:

Post a Comment