Cele|bitchy |
- Hot Guy Friday: Much Ado About Dong
- Would Daniel Radcliffe’s “aw-shucks” act work on you?
- Enquirer: Pete Wentz is a pill addict and that’s what ended marriage to Ashlee
- Britney Spears’ new music video drops: cracked-out or cute?
- In Touch: Sandra Bullock rejected John Mayer’s offer to be friends with benefits
- Olivier Martinez is rethinking this whole Halle Berry thing
- Kate Middleton was “stunned & insulted” by Camilla Parker Bowles
- Star: Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes’ under strain from Scientology’s exposure
- Benjamin Millepied is suddenly “too busy” to spend time with Natalie Portman
- Keith Urban gave Nicole Kidman a $120K “push present” for baby Faith
Hot Guy Friday: Much Ado About Dong Posted: 18 Feb 2011 08:04 AM PST
Here’s Joel getting semi-naked on Community. Starts at 2:10. John Legend (By CB) We got a request for Legend through Facebook and I thought “oh of course, why haven’t we considered him before?” I know why we haven’t - because he’s such a decent guy. There’s little drama with Legend, and if there is he keeps it under wraps. He’s an immensely talented and gorgeous one-woman man who doesn’t promote the hell out of himself. He’s solid boyfriend material, but these guys are usually taken and end up being the friend who always comes through for you, and who you secretly lust over. Bonus link to a pic of him shirtless. Dwyane “The Rock” Johnson (By CB) Oh the things this man must be able to do with his big strong arms and rock solid body. You know he would be strong but tender when it’s needed, and is the kind of man who could hold you down if you’re into that. He never takes a bad picture and he doesn’t take himself seriously. He even looked sexy playing a tooth fairy. Andrew Garfield. (By Kaiser) I know he's not anyone's main crush or anything, and although I liked the kid before, he wasn't even one of my top ten, or even top twenty dudes. But I have a story - I had a dream about him. It was one of those really vivid fever-like dreams, and it happened that night that I got sick on bad Chinese. I dreamt that I was folding laundry in my underwear, and Andrew Garfield came in and he was complimenting my ass, and then he came up behind me and was all "Let's go somewhere private." So we did, and that boy went to town on me! I mean… this was one of the most graphic X-rated dreams I've ever had. And so now I can't look at photos of Andrew Garfirled without blushing. That boy has a magic tongue. In my dreams. Channing Tatum. Speaking of dudes going to town on me. Yes, I've done guys like Channing - pretty-boy rednecks with sweet temperments and an easy, hustling smile. Whenever I hear a soft Southern accent and the gunning of a Ford pick-up, I'll admit, I get sexual nostalia. Channing Taum is Southern erotica. Josh Holloway. Speaking of hustlers with soft Southern accents… MY MAN. I just love him. Do I think he's a great actor? Eh, not really. He's an underrated actor, though, and I would love to see him work more, in television or film. As far as looks go… the pics with the shorter hair are more recent. I love his haircut. He looks so sexy when he's all clean and not scruffy. Oh, and I bet he smells like sweat and wood and soap. Heaven. Christian Slater. By popular request, after yesterday's absolutely wonderful Details interview. Although… nobody really needed convincing. Many of us grew up in the era when Christian was, like, The Coolest. And after a rough phase, Christian has now been sober for 5 years now, and he's a father and a husband and he's trying to be a working actor. Let's show him some love! Benjamin McKenzie. We get some requests for Ben every now and then, and while I think he's rather adorable, I don't really know anything about him. Like, I know he's pretty, but is he sexy? Can he give a good interview? Is he a jag, or is he a nice guy? I don't know. What I do know: beautiful bedroom eyes. Oh, and he's a Virgo. SOLD! Eion Bailey. This is a late-breaking addition, just because he was on 30 Rock last night. True Eion-loonies will know him from Band of Brothers, where he was unbelievably beautiful. He's still beautiful. And I have no idea why he doesn't get more work, because he's a solid dramatic actor, comedic actor, and oh yeah, HE'S GORGEOUS. And after 30 Rock, he's always going to be Anders, the Swiss male prostitute that Martha Stewart recommended. Gerard Butler, Forever Dong & Hot Dong Dessert. I just can't quit him. I can't ignore the love we have we have for each other. In his absence, I've tried to fill Gerard's mooby void with other men… like Michael Fassbender, or Anthony Mackie, or Vincent Cassel. But Gerard is the one I keep coming back to. He's my Forever Dessert. Especially with his new, luscious locks. And he's lost weight too - he just looks really good these days. And God knows, it took forever for him to get the stank of the past few years off of him, what I like to refer to as "The Moob & Mullet Years". He's so sleek now. Sleek and hot and dongtastic. Forever and ever. Photos courtesy of Emmy Magazine, WENN, Fame, Vanity Fair, GQ, Details, Esquire, Superherofan, Entertainment Weekly, Google Images. |
Would Daniel Radcliffe’s “aw-shucks” act work on you? Posted: 18 Feb 2011 08:00 AM PST As some of you know, Daniel Radcliffe loves America, and he adores Broadway. So for one of his first post-Potter career moves, Dan is returning to the stage, taking the lead in How To Succeed In Business Without Really Trying. To celebrate, Daniel was photographed by Annie Leibovitz for Vogue, and Vogue sent us this lovely video interview: My favorite part is when Dan goes over to the giantess models and introduces himself, shaking all of their hands politely, and then telling the interviewer how gorgeous all the models are. Dan is so wonderful that way - you'd think to yourself "Wow, he's a song-and-dance man on Broadway, he must be a confirmed bachelor" and then you realize that he must get laid like crazy. He's so sweet and unassuming, and I have to admit, I totally would. His act would totally work on me. I love him. Header photo courtesy of Vogue. |
Enquirer: Pete Wentz is a pill addict and that’s what ended marriage to Ashlee Posted: 18 Feb 2011 07:50 AM PST
[Print editions, sources quoted in text] Both The Enquirer and Star have that story about how Ashlee called Pete during his trip to Dallas before the Super Bowl to break the news that she was divorcing him. And by most all accounts Pete was shocked and begged her not to do it. The Enquirer story makes the most sense to me. If Pete was taking all those prescription drugs that would explain why he wasn’t interested in sex at all. Being hooked on pills like that can really change a person and make them irresponsible and unreliable. Meanwhile Ashlee was drinking and partying toward the end because she knew it was over and was blowing off steam. They were too young to get married, and Pete needs to get off the pills. Hopefully little Bronx will be ok throughout this mess. Pete is shown in the header on 12/31/10. He’s shown with Bronx below on 11/27/10 and with Bronx and Ashlee in October and November of last year. Credit: Fame |
Britney Spears’ new music video drops: cracked-out or cute? Posted: 18 Feb 2011 07:40 AM PST I really, really wish I had the time or the inclination to do a second-by-second analysis of Britney Spears' new music video for "Hold It Against Me". Alas, I do not. I will describe my first thoughts upon watching 30 seconds of the video: "So… a meteor… then Britney hawking her perfume line, I think… and Britney only dances on her top half while nothing happens below the waist… and Britney is a space-age Miss Havisham…?" Here's the video: Okay, stuff I like: I like her wig in the part where she's dancing. I like Britney's little white halter-bra thing for that part too. I like all of the cuts of her old videos too - that's kind of cool. And I do like the song - compared to Gaga's "Born This Way" I think "Hold It Against Me" is a better dance song. Stuff I hate: I hate feeling so old, because these fast cuts are giving me a headache. I hate the "wedding dress". I hate that they needed all of the fast cuts because Britney probably could only "perform" a few seconds at a time. And I hate the part where Britney is "fighting with herself". Ugh. |
In Touch: Sandra Bullock rejected John Mayer’s offer to be friends with benefits Posted: 18 Feb 2011 07:20 AM PST
[From Star Magazine, print edition, February 28, 2011] How does this jibe with the report that John and Miley Cyrus were getting touchy-feely at the Grammys? (Sidenote: John called Miley a “child” in late 2009. I just found that story.) We know that John’s only type is “white” (sorry to be so blunt about that, but he said it) and that he goes for older as well as inappropriately younger women. So these reports aren’t mutually exclusive. Mayer could be sliming his pseudo intellectual douche all over Miley Cyrus while putting his feelers out for Sandra Bullock. Sandra’s been around the block, though. She knows what Mayer is about. This got me thinking about Sandra Bullock’s love life. I hope she’s getting laid well and often and that she’s got a secret lover somewhere. She doesn’t have to settle for some rebound sex with Ryan Reynolds whenever it’s convenient for him. Photo credit: WENN.com |
Olivier Martinez is rethinking this whole Halle Berry thing Posted: 18 Feb 2011 07:15 AM PST Well, this was completely predictable. After all of the dramatics over the past month between Halle Berry and Gabriel Aubry, it seems Halle's boyfriend of six months, Olivier Martinez, is starting to wonder… "Hey, this bitch is crazy. Maybe I shouldn't be with her?" This comes on the heels of the Enquirer's reporting that Halle wants Olivier to be Nahla's "new daddy" - which Gabriel is understandably upset about.
[From The National Enquirer, print edition] This is what I've been wondering since the beginning of Halle's Campaign of Destruction: What the hell does her new boyfriend think? While I don't think Olivier is the brightest bulb, I think even the most dense of guys would see huge red flags all over this situation and try to exit stage left. I mean… this is how she's treating her last significant other, the father of her child. How is she going to treat you when it's all over? I should represent Halle’s side too. Obviously, Olivier is racist. And abusive. There. One last story - In Touch Weekly has an interview with Halle's "estranged half-sister" Renee Berry. Renee tells ITW that she would advise Halle to "Bitch, be cool" - that is, if they were speaking. Renee says: "You don't get your wings by holding grudges… I hate that she's going through with this custody battle. I'm sure it's difficult for both her and Gabriel, but they should remember that the child comes first, and they should spare the child from being subjected to any of this." Renee also says that Gabriel has a right to be a father to Nahla, and that Nahla has a right to have her dad in her life: "If he wants to be a father, he should be allowed to do so. After all, so many men in this country run away from their responsibilities." Wow… a reasonable person with the last name "Berry". Shocking! |
Kate Middleton was “stunned & insulted” by Camilla Parker Bowles Posted: 18 Feb 2011 06:41 AM PST Last week, paparazzi got photos of Camilla Parker Bowles (HRH The Duchess of Cornwall) exiting a restaurant where she and Kate Middleton had enjoyed a lunch. The British papers claimed that the meeting was all good - that Camilla was giving Kate some pointers, some advice, and that Kate took it all in stride. The American tabloids, however, claim that the meeting went really, really badly. The Enquirer's Mike Walker claims that Camilla has convinced Prince Charles that Kate shouls only be allowed to invite a "handful" of guests to the wedding, and that Camilla is conspiring to get all of HER guests royal invites. According to Walker's sources, when Kate found out, she bitched out William and told him to stand up to his father and his step-mother, and that William totally did. Now, Kate can allegedly invite whoever she wants. I don't really buy any of that - because Kate is a geisha. She's not fighting with anyone over anything. But that's not all! Star Magazine had another take:
[From Star Magazine, print edition] The article goes on to detail how Kate is "pushing the envelope" and demanding her way on everything, including access to all of the royal properties so that she can "jog in peace" without the peasants milling about. According to Star, Kate is super-assertive and everyone is giving in to her because she waited for so long and they think she deserves it. My take? Kate is not assertive. Kate is not pushy. Kate is patient. She is quiet. She is reserved. She is anything the royals want her to be. But yeah, Camilla sounds like a real bitch here. We knew that already, right? |
Star: Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes’ under strain from Scientology’s exposure Posted: 18 Feb 2011 06:06 AM PST
I think it’s safe to assume they’re having issues, but whether or not they’re affected by the shakedown of their cult remains to be seen. There’s so much brainwashing and groupthink that goes on with those type of organizations that both of them may simply think that Scientology is under attack by Subversive Persons or Squirrels (see Mark Rathbun) or whatever the f’ck they call them, which could just cause them to circle their wagons. That might not necessarily drive them apart. I love that the tabloids are really paying attention to the Scientology drama, though, and Star reports it in detail. I’ll just do a quick overview here:
[From Star Magazine, print edition, February 28, 2011] They go into the charges of human trafficking and the FBI probe as was discussed in the New Yorker article. (That claim has been denied by Scientology of course.) They also cover the cult slave labor that built multiple vehicles for cruise, including custom motorcycles, an SUV, an airport hanger, and a bus that was tricked out so that Katie Holmes should get her daily brainwashing sessions wherever they went. As far as how this latest cult scandal affects Tom and Katie, Star reports that “Tom has told Katie over and over that the church hasn’t done anything wrong and they shouldn’t be worried, but she’s not totally convinced. This is really testing their marriage.” The Enquirer’s story is similar but more general about the issues they have, with the title “Katie Holmes breaks down” followed by these bullet points “She’s in tears over: They quote an insider who claims that “Katie’s world is threatening to cave in, and she’s on the bring of a major breakdown.” Given all I’ve heard about Scientology, that’s often true when people start questioning the cult. Katie may have countless more resources at her disposal than a typical cult member if she ever decides to leave, but it’s not going to be easy for her at all. Katie Holmes is shown on 1/20/11 below on the LA set of Jack N Jill. She’s shown out with Tom and Suri on 12/20/11. In most of those photos she looks happy honestly, but the tabloids are of course using one where she looks pissed off. Credit: Fame. |
Benjamin Millepied is suddenly “too busy” to spend time with Natalie Portman Posted: 18 Feb 2011 06:01 AM PST In Touch Weekly has an interesting little story about Natalie Portman and Benjamin Millepied this week. It's actually something that I've been wondering about, ever since I read Benjamin's New York Times profile - in the profile, he not only seemed like he was an unprofessional, famewhoring douche, but he also sounded really, really busy. The Ballet K-Fed is striking while the iron is hot, as they say, and it's looking more and more like he's not around for his baby-mama. ITW's piece is called "Natalie Portman's Love Trouble: Is her fiancé suddenly too busy for her?" You know it's going to be good!
[From In Touch Weekly, print edition] Years ago, I remember reading some study that was done on soon-to-be baby-daddies and how their partners' pregnancies affected the caveman part of their brain. The study claimed that while we think a baby-daddy would be super-protective of his partner during the pregnancy, biologically, men are hard-wired to spend more time working and "providing" when their partners are expecting because the caveman brain thinks that, you know, the meat needs to be stockpiled and there's extra hunting to be done. I don't know if that's really the case, or if the study was full of crap, but it's an interesting take on what's happening here. Personally, I've been slightly surprised that Benjamin hasn't been Natalie's "date" for every Oscar occasion - he was with her at the Globes, but I don't think he came to the SAGs, or anywhere else. It could be that he's just super-busy with his own thing, and that he cares about being a father and he's just going all caveman. Or it could totally be that Benjamin doesn't really give a crap and that Natalie chose the wrong K-Fed to knock her up. |
Keith Urban gave Nicole Kidman a $120K “push present” for baby Faith Posted: 18 Feb 2011 05:27 AM PST I just spent way too much time looking through photos of Nicole Kidman and her Lips of Doom. No, seriously, I wasn't really trying to look at her lips, but they were like an alien tractor beam sucking me in. My real purpose for going through the Kidman photo archives was to see if we had any photos of her wearing this cross necklace mentioned in the following story. Unfortunately, we don't have any photos of it. So… picture it in your brainsicles: a big, expensive-looking diamond and emerald cross pendant necklace. That's what Keith Urban gave Nicole Kidman as a "push present" for baby Faith.
[From In Touch Weekly, print edition] My only criticism is that it shouldn't be called a "push present". Just in general, I find that term very patronizing, and in this particular case, inaccurate. That being said, I like the idea of a man giving his wife/baby-mama a significant piece of jewelry upon the birth of their child. I think it's a lovely way to mark the occasion, and it's a tradition that works. Just don't call it a "push present". Especially when another woman did the pushing, for the love of God. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment