Cele|bitchy |
- Michael Fassbender will only show the Fassdong to “facilitate” the story
- Katy Perry is either pregnant or getting a divorce, nothing in between
- Tori Spelling’s husband tweets a photo with her giant tatas in the background
- Protestors demand that Ryan Gosling be named Sexiest Man of The Year
- Natalie Wood’s 1981 death is being re-investigated with new, sketchy evidence
- Meryl Streep accused of being a money-grabbing history-revisionist
- Angelina Jolie might play “the female Lawrence of Arabia” for Ridley Scott
- Justin Theroux hates Jen Aniston & Chelsea Handler’s friendship
- Cameron Diaz is probably boning Ryan Phillippe and Leo DiCaprio too
- Did Demi Moore & Ashton Kutcher have an open marriage?
Michael Fassbender will only show the Fassdong to “facilitate” the story Posted: 18 Nov 2011 09:35 AM PST Michael Fassbender was at last night's GQ Men of the Year event - you can see some of the photos here, at Lainey. He wasn't wearing a tie, and he looked GOOD. He looked like he'd had a few before he came to the event, and then once at the event, he was the life of the party. Who doesn't want to spend time partying with the Fassdong? So, anyway, I'm including Fassie's GQ cover, an additional image from GQ, plus some grab-bag photos of Fassie from the last month or so as he's been promoting Shame and A Dangerous Method. FASSIE 4 EVA. By the way, I don't know if many of you watched this, but it's totally worth it - I LOVE this video. I want this video to have its way with me. JESUS CHRIST. His accent. His smile. The way that he looks in that charcoal henley. Why isn't he my husband? Anyway, yesterday, we ended up getting into a discussion about Fassie's height, because the GQ interviewer claimed he was "short". I don't know how tall he is, really - my guess is a tad shorter than 6 feet. But the hell does height mean, really? Women think height has something to do with dong size, and obviously, The Fassdong would rock your world. Everybody who sees Shame talks about how well-endowed Fassie is. And Fassie is the kind of dude who KNOWS WHAT TO DO WITH IT. I cannot stress that enough. There is this new interview with Fassie at HuffPo - they ask him a lot of questions about his full-frontal work in Shame. PRAISE IT, y'all. Here are some highlights:
[From HuffPo] I can't even describe how much I love this Shame promotional tour. Not only is Fassie proving to be intelligent and insightful, but he just sights around talking about dongs and sex all day. Did anyone else get a little tingle in their pants when Fassie said "eating" and "sensual". Hot damn. Try to work the rest of the day with that imagery. Fassie. Eating. Sensual. GAH. |
Katy Perry is either pregnant or getting a divorce, nothing in between Posted: 18 Nov 2011 08:29 AM PST Yesterday, Agent Bedhead discussed the new reports that Katy Perry and Russell Brand are either trying for a baby soon, or that Katy might already be pregnant. A few nights ago, Katy performed at Madison Square Garden, and everyone is still talking about how she looked slightly thicker in her mid-section - the photos of Katy in the blue wig are from that performance, and you can see more pics here. Anyway, Katy's rep denies that Katy has a gut full of anything but pizza BUT Katy is also announcing that she's going to take a year off.
[From Page Six] I tend to think that there are only two possibilities: either she is pregnant now (or will be very soon), or she and Brand are having serious problems, and Katy is making the effort to work on their marriage. I can believe both of those theories simultaneously, by the way. I think Katy may try to "fix" her marriage by getting knocked up, even though she might not really think having a baby is the best thing for her career. And where is Russell Brand in all of this? Well, this week's In Touch claims that while Katy has been endlessly touring, Brand has been growing closer and closer to his "friend" Sadie Turner, that blonde who he's photographed with often. Sadie and Rusty have been friends for seven years, apparently, and they go out to clubs and parties together, and, you know, they're probably boning. So… is Katy taking time off to work on her marriage with Rusty, or can it not be salvaged at this point, not even with a band-aid baby? |
Tori Spelling’s husband tweets a photo with her giant tatas in the background Posted: 18 Nov 2011 07:52 AM PST
Anyway Tori Spelling’s husband Dean McDermott tweeted a photo of their son Liam, four and a half, with a little sticker on his forehead and the caption “doughhead.” McDermott uploaded it to Twitter before he noticed that Tori’s giant nursing tatas were totally visible in the background. (To see an uncensored photo, click on the header image on this page. McDermott has since deleted the photo, but he hasn’t posted an explanation.) That totally cracked me up! Tori just had her third kid, daughter Hattie Margaret, on October 10th. Here’s more about this:
[From Celebrity-Gossip.net via ONTD] Well Tori and Dean have their new show coming out in a couple weeks and this gets them a lot of publicity for it. I saw an interview with them on E! a couple days ago (below) and I didn’t cover it, because they usually bug me and I find Tori’s personality grating. I think this was an honest mistake, though, and that Dean probably caught hell at home for it. I’ve seen about two episodes of their wedding planning show and that guy is quiet most of the time while Tori takes charge and does most of the talking. I’m surprised they’ve lasted as long as they have, given how they got their start and how they seem to interact. It’s working for them, though, and Dean told E! that he enjoys working with his wife, but that he understands that it’s not for everyone. Tori has been blogging a lot. She recently penned a cheesy love letter to Dean on his 45th birthday, and she also wrote about how her son doesn’t like her changing in front of him. I know a lot of people are going to be like “Tori let her son see her boobs!” but I don’t see the big deal. Those things serve a purpose. |
Protestors demand that Ryan Gosling be named Sexiest Man of The Year Posted: 18 Nov 2011 07:00 AM PST
Get More: Movie Trailers, Movies Blog Get More: Movie Trailers, Movies Blog I’m not a Ryan Gosling superfan, like I don’t get hot for him like I do for Matt Damon at any age or Johnny Depp prior to his recent phase of debauchery. After watching these I feel giddy, though, and like a surge of puppy love is rushing over me. He’s hot, funny and he doesn’t take himself seriously. I can imagine screwing this guy and enjoying the hell out of it. Compare that to Bradley Cooper, who is a competent actor with no discernible personality traits. Cooper was just named “Sexiest Man Alive” by People Magazine, and I saw his video interview for it (at the end of this page on People’s site) and was totally underwhelmed. He’s a decent-looking guy, but if he wasn’t famous and he came at me with that personality I might not even go out with him. I’m not kidding. He just doesn’t do it for me in any way. Many people agree with me. About 15 protesters gathered outside of People Magazine’s headquarters in New York Wednesday to protest Cooper and demand that Ryan Gosling be named the Sexiest Man instead:
[From People] Cooper is definitely sexy when he speaks French, but that’s about it. The French speaking doesn’t make up for the rest of his blah-ness, and it’s not going to come in handy unless you’re on a trip with him to a French-speaking country. (Which could be cool, I could entertain that thought.) That novelty will wear off fast though, and you’re left with a guy who is about as interesting as a room temperature light beer. Gosling has swagger and he loves to go to amusement parks. Sure he has crap taste in women sometimes, but that just means that he’s not that discerning. I could definitely get behind him as Sexiest Man Of The Year. I doubt I’d stand outside in the cold complaining about it, but thanks to these brave souls I don’t have to. Here’s a petition to ask People Magazine to admit that they were wrong and should have chosen Gosling. He is named as one of the sexiest this year, but he should have taken top honors. Thanks to Jezebel for this video of the protest. It just cracks me up. |
Natalie Wood’s 1981 death is being re-investigated with new, sketchy evidence Posted: 18 Nov 2011 06:48 AM PST This is for you bitches who used to beg me to write about vintage Hollywood scandals. In 1981, Natalie Wood's body was found floating in the ocean a mile from Splendor, the boat she shared with her husband, Robert Wagner. They had been anchored just off of Catalina Island, and at the time, the story was that Natalie was either buzzed or completely drunk, and she had slipped and fallen off of the boat. The idea of Natalie's accidental drowning was made worse by the fact that she had a well-documented fear of water - and I don't think she could swim, either. On the boat with Natalie that night: the captain of the boat, Natalie's husband Robert Wagner and Natalie's then-current costar, Christopher Walken. There was controversy, gossip and whispers about Natalie's death at the time, but it was ruled as an accident… until now. The LA County Sheriff's Office has just reopened the case because they say they have new evidence:
[From People] In September, 2009, The Enquirer excerpted the boat captain's (Dennis Davern's) book. According to Davern's account of the evening, Wagner and Wood were fighting ABOUT Christopher Walken. Wagner believed Walken wanted to sleep with Natalie, and that Natalie was encouraging Walken. Davern claims the fight continued for hours, fueled by alcohol, and that the screaming fight turned physical. Davern identified Natalie's body, and he claims that he saw bruises on her arms and legs that were from Wagner's abuse, not her fall. He also claims that Wagner was with Natalie when she fell into the water, and Wagner encouraged the cover-up. So, is it possible that Robert Wagner has gotten away with murder all this time? I don't know. My mom always thought Wagner was fishy, though. |
Meryl Streep accused of being a money-grabbing history-revisionist Posted: 18 Nov 2011 05:47 AM PST Ever since the trailer for The Iron Lady came out earlier this week, Margaret Thatcher's friends and former colleagues have been waging a campaign against Streep, and it's getting personal. Now, there were complaints and concerns before the trailer came out too - after all, Thatcher was and remains a divisive figure in the UK, but her supporters worship her like American conservatives worship Ronald Reagan. Thatcher's defenders have judged Meryl's performance JUST from the trailer, and they're trying to dismiss it out of hand as simply the work of some money-hungry Hollywood types - because surely the best way for a film to make money is to make it all about a controversial 1980s leader…? One of Thatcher's former colleagues wrote a piece for The Guardian, criticizing Streep's performance as "half-hysterical, over-emotional, over-acting" - once again, this is just from the trailer. He hasn't seen the film. But the most discussed bit of criticism came from Thatcher's former PR adviser Tim Bell, who told The Telegraph: “I can’t be bothered to sensationalise this rubbish. Its only value is to make some money for Meryl Streep and whoever wrote it. I have no interest in seeing it. I don’t need a film to remind me of my experiences of her. It is a non-event.” TUT-TUT. Crumpets. Unfortunately for those who criticize Streep as just another money-grubbing "Hollywood type," Meryl is pretty cool woman and she's worthy of respect too:
[From Page Six] The lesson? Don't even start with Meryl Streep. She's too cool. She cannot be dismissed as some money-hungry famewhore with no respect for history. Bitches, please. Now, all of that being said, Streep's performance is being hailed in early reviews, but it's only being recognized as a good-to-great performance in a so-so film. Most critics still think Viola Davis is the one to beat for the Best Actress Oscar this year. Hmm. Here's the trailer for The Iron Lady again: |
Angelina Jolie might play “the female Lawrence of Arabia” for Ridley Scott Posted: 18 Nov 2011 05:15 AM PST Angelina Jolie was just cast in a new film! We can add this one to the pile of films she's associated with - the Gucci bio-pic, the Cleopatra movie, the Kay Scarpetta franchise, another Salt movie and God knows what else. When is Angelina ever going to get back to work in front of the camera? Unknown. This new film - a bio-pic - sounds like it might start relatively soon, but I've heard that before. Jolie would be playing Gertrude Bell, an Englishwoman in the early 20th century who left her wealthy English family to work in the Middle East. Here's more:
[From Collider] Ah, so if it happens, it will be another year or two before anything ever happens. Damn it! Jolie needs to work. Brad Pitt was doing that stupid World War Z for too long - that production kept going and going, and I think it's probably going to be a mess of a film. Speaking of how much Brad works and how Angelina put her career on the backburner so Brad could complete the neverending film production, In Touch Weekly has a bitchy story about how Angelina is going to get "her way" for the family's Thanksgiving plans. Keep in mind that Jolie and the kids left Vietnam on Wednesday, after spending six days in country doing fun stuff like go out to eat and go on walking tours and such.
[From In Touch Weekly, print edition] So, they already left Vietnam, but I don't know where they are now. Perhaps Thanksgiving in Cambodia? Or LA? Or Missouri? And why would it be such a big deal for the kids to spend Thanksgiving doing charity work? Those kids live in luxury every day of their lives - and this is the age where you can start giving your kids lessons about civic and social responsibilities, and they'll actually learn it. Meh, whatever. They'll probably be in Missouri - where Angelina will get drunk on wine and give the kids lessons on the genocide of the Native American peoples. |
Justin Theroux hates Jen Aniston & Chelsea Handler’s friendship Posted: 18 Nov 2011 04:31 AM PST I was totally expecting this story. Wait, I actually wrote about a similar story more than two months ago - but I'm expecting this story to repeat ad nauseam until A) Chelsea Handler crashes and burns and becomes a pariah in Hollywood or B) Until Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux call it quits, in which this storyline will be forced onto Jennifer's next dude. The basic story is that ________, Jennifer's boyfriend, hates Jennifer's friendship with Chelsea Handler. This week's fill-in-the-blank is Justin Theroux. And this week's story comes with a side of lesbian terror. You see, Justin feels like "the third wheel" around Chelsea and Jennifer because they "love" each other so much. The Enquirer doesn't spell it out, but I'm definitely getting a "Justin thinks Jennifer and Chelsea should just get a room" vibe. I'm sure that would be fine with Chelsea, by the way. Chelsea just wants to be closer to Jennifer in way, shape or form. Anyway…
[From The Enquirer, print edition] Do I believe this story? Meh. I'll believe the part about Chelsea making some inappropriate and over-the-top speech about how she'll always be there for her BFF Jennifer Aniston, with the subtext being that Chelsea wishes that Justin would go away so she can have Jennifer all to herself. And they can "go down to Cabo" for some "just ladies" time. I don't know. Whatever. By the way - six-month relationship? Putting the start date at mid-May? But Heidi Bivens moved out beginning of June! Also: Justin has really entered the tabloid world of Aniston thoroughly, hasn't he? Stories every week, lots of hand-holding photo ops, rumors about babies and apartments, and lots of drama with Jennifer's BFF and Justin's ex. I wonder if he ever misses his old life? |
Cameron Diaz is probably boning Ryan Phillippe and Leo DiCaprio too Posted: 18 Nov 2011 04:25 AM PST Ever since Cameron Diaz and Alex Rodriguez ended things for good, the tabloids have been desperate for Camy to hook up with someone juicy, like she's That Girl. Camy isn't That Girl! She's not all about the high-profile hookups. She's not Jennifer Lopez, she's not Jennifer Aniston. Camy doesn't do "rollouts" of her relationships for PR - it's one of the things I like about her. Anyway, a few weeks ago the tabs claimed that Camy was all over Jude Law, a potential union that I was all for - they would make so much sense together! But then the rumors started flying around that Camy and P. Diddy were happening - something which I fear is true, but I hope it isn't serious. Now the tabloids have some new lovers awaiting Camy… first up, Ryan Phillippe. EW.
[From In Touch Weekly, print edition] Who would you rather, P. Diddy or Ryan Phillippe? I think I would rather set fire to my vagina than choose either of them, but if you're really forcing me into this, I'd say Ryan over Diddy. But just barely - both dudes are pretty gross. Plus, I thinK Ryan generally goes for much younger ladies, so I doubt anything is happening with Camy other than Ryan getting his ego inflated. But! There's also this report from Star, claiming that Camy has once again found her way into Leo DiCaprio's drawers:
[From Star Magazine, print edition] I'll buy that Leo and Camy could be f–k buddies. Couldn't you? They seem like birds of a feather, too similar to actually be in a relationship together, but so much alike that they enjoy the same activities - partying and screwing. So, who would you rather: Jude Law or Leonardo? I'd pick Jude, honestly. I know Jude could get me pregnant just be looking at me, but I'd rather listen to his accent and see his pretty face, rather than Leo's rat eyes and dull monotone. I'm so not Camy. I would love to advise her on her love life, though. |
Did Demi Moore & Ashton Kutcher have an open marriage? Posted: 18 Nov 2011 04:24 AM PST Demi Moore announced her split from Ashton Kutcher yesterday, in the late afternoon. What does this mean? Does a Thursday announcement mean that Demi wants maximum exposure, and she wants her divorce to dominate the headlines for the next week? I don't know - I think if you're going to announce something for maximum effect these days, you should just do it on Monday morning, because then you're guaranteed coverage the whole week. Anyway, there are lots of stories about the split already, and it hasn't even been 24 hours. Us Weekly has an exclusive with a "source" who says that Demi was "optimistic" about moving forward. The source says: “She said [she] was going to change for the better… And [she said] that it was time for her to focus on herself again and her girls. He has his thing [but she said she] wanted to focus on her.” Convoluted quote. Next up, some excerpts from this week's Star Magazine story, which Radar is now excerpting, and which CB already talked about briefly yesterday:
[From Radar] Star's print issue goes on to say that part of Demi and Ashton's open marriage deal was that they both engage in "flirtations" with some discretion and mutual respect, but that Ashton began having more and more public affairs, and Demi felt like he was "hooking up with all of these young women behind her back and that wasn't part of their deal." As for why Demi waited so long to file, sources claim that Demi's sense of self has just been battered mercilessly during her marriage to Ashton, and she's extremely insecure right now. As for Demi and her alleged hookups or "flirtations" with other women - God knows. It wouldn't surprise me, but who knows? Speaking of Ashton's other ladies, though, that chick that he banged last year on his wife's couch, Brittney Jones, told TMZ that she felt vindicated now:
[Via TMZ] Yeah, I always believed that something happened with Brittany and Ashton. Her story had so many specifics, and Ashton and Demi's reactions to the story were so guilt-ridden. Ridiculous. Ashton hasn't wanted to be married to Demi for a very long time. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment