Cele|bitchy |
- Kris Humphries wants a separation and annulment, and he might be gay too
- Gwyneth Paltrows deigns to discuss her own excellent racial sensitivity
- OK! Mag: Jennifer Aniston wants to marry Justin Theroux on a Mexican beach
- Daniel Craig covers GQ UK, says the Kardashians are “f–king idiots”
- Kourtney Kardashian is pregnant with her second baby
- Beyonce, by her own claims, is more than eight months pregnant right now?
- Ali Lohan on plastic surgery: “I’m 17, do you think my mom would sign off on that?”
- Are the current crop of Victoria’s Secret models too thin compared to other years?
- Jessica Simpson in red Donna Karan at a NYC event: lovely and glowing?
- Kim Kardashian hit Kris Humphries on TV, Dr. Drew calls it domestic violence
Kris Humphries wants a separation and annulment, and he might be gay too Posted: 30 Nov 2011 08:51 AM PST Do you think Kris Humphries is gay? I don't. I might buy "bi-curious" but not flat-out gay. But that's Star Mag's claim this week. So, at this point, the Kardashians are just throwing whatever they can at Kris. He's verbally abusive! He's lazy! He hates fatties! HE'S TOTES GAY. Anyway, the big Kris Humphries news today is that Kris might be counter-filing some legal documents in response to Kim's divorce filing. According to People Magazine, Kris will be filing paperwork to seek a legal separation from Kim "within days." People's sources say that Kris's "ultimate intent" is to annul the 72-day marriage. Us Weekly actually managed to confirm this with Kris's rep:
[From Us Weekly] I don't really understand the legal and financial implications of an annulment-versus-divorce in this case. Would Kris be able to get more money out of the Kardashians with an annulment, because the prenup isn't an issue anymore? Or is the annulment just an intellectual "clean slate" so Kris doesn't have to refer to Kim as his "ex-wife" forever? I don't get it. I also don’t think an annulment can happen given that they “consummated” the marriage, correct? Or is that where the whole “HE’S TOTES GAY” thing comes in? Oh, and Radar has a really boring story about Kim's jealousy of Kris's relationship with his sister. A source told Radar, "Kris and Kaela have always been extremely close. They talk daily, exchange text messages, their parents are extremely proud that their children are so close. However, Kim was jealous of Kris’ relationship with Kaela. Kris holds his sister in very high regard, and takes her advice very seriously. Kim would often try and get Kris off the phone with Kaela by making suggestive comments, or telling him he needed to pick up after his dogs. Kim wanted the full attention on her at all times and saw Kris’ sister as competition. For his part, Kris thought his family were being treated like second class citizens and that was no more apparent than at the wedding.” And when Kim couldn't pull Kris's attention away, she would just beat him. You can read more about Kim's mistreatment of Kris's sister here. |
Gwyneth Paltrows deigns to discuss her own excellent racial sensitivity Posted: 30 Nov 2011 08:10 AM PST Gwyneth Paltrow can single-handedly heal America's racial divide! Not really, and I don't mean to make it sound like Gwyneth is claiming that either. Gwyneth appeared on the HuffPo Black Voices show The Tanning Effect to discuss race in America with host Steve Stoute, author of The Tanning of America, a book that explores how "hip-hop culture" changed the way Americans view race and the economy. So of course, he wanted to speak to Dame Gwyneth, who is America's Foremost Racial Expert. She's friends with Beyonce and Jay-Z, after all!
[From Huffington Post] I don't really have a problem with what Gwyneth is saying – she's just talking about her dad, who really was a ground-breaking television producer, and I don't have a problem with her comments about Obama and the shifting standards of beauty. She's right – it is important that all kids see that we have a black president, that African-American women are iconic, celebrated beauties, and that mommy's BFF is Beyonce. |
OK! Mag: Jennifer Aniston wants to marry Justin Theroux on a Mexican beach Posted: 30 Nov 2011 07:30 AM PST Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux seemed to be loved up for the long haul. I've actually wondered recently if Justin is as "into" this Aniston-level celebrity extravaganza, or whether he'd rather be sitting in a dank bar, getting hammered with his hipster friends. Right now, though, and for the foreseeable future, Justin and Jennifer seem tight. Justin's partner of 14 years has been effectively jettisoned, and perhaps even paid off by Team Aniston. Justin's getting better paychecks, he made People Mag's Sexiest Man Alive list, and whatever whim he has, his rich sugar mama buys it for him. It works for them. So is it any surprise that a new round of "wedding" rumors has started up again?
[From OK! Magazine] If it's true, I'm happy for her. I don't even think this is the product of the overactive imagination of Aniston's publicist – if this was an Aniston plant, I think she would have asked for the cover all to herself, instead of having to share it with Kourtney Kardashian, making it seem like Kourtney and Aniston ARE THE SAME. I think this is just the tabloids wanting their perpetual victim to get her "happy ending." I will say this too – out of all of the dudes that Aniston has dated after her divorce, I think Justin is the one most likely to get Aniston down the aisle again. Also – Page Six had a blurb this morning which I do think is the product of Aniston's publicist:
[From Page Six] Yeah, we get it. Justin Theroux has a rainbow coming out of his ass now that he's dating Jennifer Aniston. She is the gift that keeps on giving! Photos courtesy of Terry Richardson & cover courtesy of OK! Mag. |
Daniel Craig covers GQ UK, says the Kardashians are “f–king idiots” Posted: 30 Nov 2011 06:55 AM PST Daniel Craig is a curmudgeon. I don't know if he's always been so surly, or if it happened to him over the past five-six years as his career exploded (when he became James Bond). I tend to think that pre-Bond, he had some surliness, but I remember seeing him in interviews pre-Bond, and he just seemed more… open. More easy-going. Not so f–king angry about everything. Nowadays, he seems to have a shorter fuse. Daniel Craig will verbally bitch-slap anyone and anything. His interviews are full of expletives, which I usually think is a sign of someone trying too hard, but with Daniel, it just makes me think that he likes to talk dirty, and I like that. Anyway, Daniel has a new cover interview with GQ UK, to promote The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. Daniel verbally bitch-slaps the Kardashians, and really any celebrity who whores out their private life.
[From The Mail] I don't feel like calling Daniel out on whatever minor hypocrisies, mostly because I don't really think he is a hypocrite. He's never really been a famewhore, and he's always played his personal life pretty close to the vest. I understand the distinction he's making between "famewhoring your private life" and simply being honest about who you're with. Daniel hasn't had any problems walking the red carpet with girlfriends in the past, and I don't think acknowledging his new wife or the fact that he's in love is "famewhoring." (Although I’m sure Dame Gwyneth would disagree.) Sigh… I wish Daniel was talking dirty to me right now. Rachel Weisz is such a lucky bitch. PS… Did anyone else LOL at the delicious bitchiness of "I’m not judging it – well, I am obviously." Daniel is such a judgy bitch. |
Kourtney Kardashian is pregnant with her second baby Posted: 30 Nov 2011 06:03 AM PST
[From E! Online] Kourtney has a new “Mommy vlog” on E! in which she shows off Mason’s closet and all his shoes. She says that she likes dressing him more than she likes dressing herself, and that it’s “all about layering” and “all about shoes” and accessories. The kid is two freaking years old. She also puts down how other mothers dress their kids. “I see so many little boys and their outfits are so cute and their moms put kind of dorky shoes on them and I think it’s all about the shoes.” My kid is very picky about his shoes and will try on ten pairs before he settles on one that is comfortable for him. He will then want to wear those shoes every day and won’t wear any other pair. It’s not a priority for me to make sure my child looks fashionable, he has to be comfortable first. He also prefers shoes that light up and have velcro, which Kourtney would surely consider “dorky.” Does she look at families without the means to buy their children over a dozen shoes they’ll quickly grow out of and think “it’s all about the shoes, that kid looks dorky?” This family is ridiculous. They’re wasting wealth on crap and will be struggling to hold on to the designer goods they hold dear once their fame fades. Also, look at Scott in those mismatched stripes. He would benefit from getting dressed by Kourtney too. Anyway congratulations to Kourtney and Scott. I forsee another obscenely wasteful over-the-top wedding for this family. Kourtney is shown out on 11/28 (dress) and 11/29 (t-shirt and sweats). Credit: WENN.com |
Beyonce, by her own claims, is more than eight months pregnant right now? Posted: 30 Nov 2011 06:00 AM PST Here are some new photos of Beyonce and her bump in NYC yesterday. I don't even know. Do you really want me to start in on this? Because I will. Recently, Beyonce released a short behind-the-scenes video of her video shoot for "Countdown" – the music video where she plagiarized a Belgian choreographer. In this video, Beyonce identifies the date as September 23rd, and she claims she's six months pregnant. UM, WTF?!?!?!? That means she more than eight months pregnant right now. Is this how a eight-months pregnant lady looks? And that means she's due in the beginning of January? Which means…? Jesus, it's too early in the morning for Beyonce's never-ending bump conspiracies. Speaking of conspiracies, Bey also released an "alternate" version of the "Countdown" video, this time without the blatantly plagiarized choreography. This is how Bey rolls – don't acknowledge the plagiarism, just sweep it under the rug and act like it never happened: And I'd just like to add more fodder that I haven't seen discussed thus far: in all of Beyonce's music videos from 4, Bey hasn't been "showing". Does this mean that she filmed all of her music videos over the summer? Or does it mean she just detached her pillowy bump so that she could dance awkwardly for strange men whilst fanning her vadge? |
Ali Lohan on plastic surgery: “I’m 17, do you think my mom would sign off on that?” Posted: 30 Nov 2011 05:59 AM PST Several months ago, everyone really started worrying about 17-year-old Ali Lohan. There were photos of her in NYC where she looked… really jacked. Like she'd had lip injections and some surgical work on her face, plus she'd been starving herself and she looked really bony and emaciated. Many of us figured that it was likely Dina Lohan's doing, considering Ali is now old enough to be "pimped out" by her mom, and in Ali's case, that means being a "model". Ali had scored modeling representation (with a legit agency), and the agency and the Lohan family went out of their way to claim that Ali had not gotten any "work" done to her face. Personally, I thought Ali had gotten some lip injections (which weren't permanent), and she had gotten her breast implants taken out. Anyway, Ali is officially a "model" now – she scored her first magazine cover with Fault Mag, and now she's the cover girl for Page Six Magazine. Page Six had an early excerpt of Ali's interview:
[From Page Six] I'm reminded of that Plum Miami Magazine interview (the infamous one where Linnocent crack-screeched, "Move that cone, I'm Lindsay Lohan!") where the writer said that Ali was often the designated "adult" in Linnocent's nightly crack shenanigans. I actually believe that Ali is probably "the sober one" in her family – I believe that she's had to grow up really fast with her parents and her sister being the catastrophic messes that they are. As for the "legality" of Ali's plastic surgery – it's kind of sweet that she thinks we have a high opinion of Dina. We know Dina – we know Dina would sign anything to pimp out her kids. |
Are the current crop of Victoria’s Secret models too thin compared to other years? Posted: 30 Nov 2011 05:56 AM PST
[From E! Online] I don’t know. I mean Tyra and Heidi are somewhat more curvy than that current models, but Gisele was just as waif-like. I don’t see any curves on her. I looked up the 2006 and 2005 shows, and there were several other women that were maybe a smidgen larger than the current crop of models. They had hips but were still extremely fit. They really worked those outfits too. Here are a few I found. I’m not saying that it’s some big scandal or anything. They’re models, they’re always going to be skinny. I liked it a little better when they looked like they did in 2005. That’s something I can relate to a little more. Look at Tyra Banks in 2005. I can’t stand her but she looks hot here: Heidi Klum is super fit and tiny but she’s got some hips on her. Maybe those are just her bones, though. This is from 2008. Gisele in 2005. She’s about the same as the current models. For comparison, here are some of the current models. I think this is Lindsay Ellingson, 2011 *Thanks to Mu for help with the model IDs! Photo credit: WENN and Fame |
Jessica Simpson in red Donna Karan at a NYC event: lovely and glowing? Posted: 30 Nov 2011 05:55 AM PST Aw, these are cute photos. Jessica Simpson and her K-Fed, Eric Johnson, walked the nonexistent carpet last night for the Footwear News Achievement Awards at the Museum of Modern Art, an event which honors “top shoe designers, fashion brands, style stars, leading retailers, and industry icons.” Which includes Jessica, I'm assuming, because she designs a line of footwear which sells very well. Anyway, Jessica wore this rather stunning red Donna Karan dress which… I LOVE. I love it on Jessica. I love the dress on its own too. I wonder if this was intended as a maternity dress or if Donna Karan refigured it for preggos. Honestly, I would love to own this dress, I like it so much. Farty looks really happy, doesn't she? She's "glowing" – although I'm sure Jessica would say that it's just farty sweat. I hope she is genuinely happy. I hope her K-Fed doesn't irritate her. I hope this is what they both want. Oh, and thoughts about Jessica wearing heels while so, so preggo? She's said before that she'll probably give birth in Louboutins – her heel-wearing pregnancy is much more endearing than Beyonce's, isn't it? |
Kim Kardashian hit Kris Humphries on TV, Dr. Drew calls it domestic violence Posted: 30 Nov 2011 05:54 AM PST Dr. Drew is such a hack that he regularly armchair diagnoses celebrities with addictions and other problems based on interviews they’ve given. For instance he questioned Angelina Jolie’s charity work and wondered whether she was still on drugs after she admitted that she’d done heroin in her youth. He also called out Brad Pitt for admitting that he used to smoke pot, also in his past, and for moving his kids with Angie around while they’re working. (Kaiser did a recap of some of Dr. Drew’s nonsense here.) In this latest case, though, I’m rooting for Dr. Drew and I almost agree with him. On the last episode of Kim & Kourtney go to New York so they can have a spin-off, Kim moves to punch Kris Humphries after the big oaf steps on her toe and breaks her pedicured nail. Kris of course quickly deflects Kim’s blow since he’s a giant basketball player. It looks like Kim was seriously going for him, and like she could have caused some damage if she landed that punch. Dr. Drew got all incensed about it and says it’s a clear incident of domestic violence and that domestic violence goes both ways, meaning women can commit it against men. He also said that stuff like this can escalate into a more dangerous, abusive situation. Go Dr. Drew?
[From CBS Sports] So for all the times that Kris calls Kim “fat” or acts like a dick or accidentally steps on her, Kim is behaving even worse by lashing out at him physically. Even if Kim’s punch was delivered with a smirk, it’s still domestic violence according to Dr. Drew. I don’t think she was joking, she looked serious about hitting him. It’s a hard call for me to make since I don’t like either one of them and don’t particularly give a sh*t, but young teens watch this show and they should know that’s not acceptable. In other Dr. Drew news, it looks like he’s softening his stance against drugs. Or maybe he just bases it on whether he likes the celebrity or not. On the whole Miley Cyrus “I’m a stoner” Bob Marley birthday cake controversy, Dr. Drew said she’s not an addict. He told Extra “I don’t think it’s that big of a deal… Real marijuana addicts don’t quite talk like that. I don’t think we have somebody who has a drug problem on our hands.” Uh huh. When that Miley smoking “salvia” video came out in December of last year, Dr. Drew said “This is a child who is in trouble and who is suffering and this is her way of trying to manage that. Get professional help.” I bet Miley or someone close to her reached out to him after that, so during her next crisis Drew would be on her side. It worked. Now the Kardashians have to kiss his butt so he’ll call their dysfunctional squabbles no “big deal.” Look at Kim serving up food at the LA Mission. Jennifer Love Hewitt does this every single year. Credit: WENN |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment