Cele|bitchy

Kate Moss gets wasted, parties until 3am, drinks 3 beers for breakfast
Rumer Willis’s tattoo-covered arms: temporary and try-hard?
Justin Bieber’s hookup: he didn’t take my phone # (Update: video of her lawyers)
Hilary Swank makes her first post-Chechnya appearance as her PR firm fires her
Brett Ratner on Olivia Munn: “I banged her a few times… she’s bitter”
Amber Heard versus Eva Green: who’s the bigger bombshell?
Kris Jenner snipes “I hate an Indian giver,” Native American groups call her out
LeAnn Rimes threw a total hissy fit when Brandi publicly called her “overbearing”
Kristen Stewart in Marios Schwab: very cute or too short for squatting?
Madonna’s friends dumped her when she tried to move in on Chris Martin

Kate Moss gets wasted, parties until 3am, drinks 3 beers for breakfast

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 08:44 AM PDT

Last night, Kate Moss went on a bit of a bender and looked completely wasted in public both on the way to and from the 20th anniversary party for Dazed and Confused magazine, which was held at the W hotel in London. She was spotted leaving the event at 3am; earlier, Kate was photographed leaving St. Johns restaurant while still carting around her own glass of wine because … perhaps she was afraid there wouldn’t be enough liquor at the party?

Most high-brow parties don’t usually ask guests to bring their own wine. But that’s exactly what Kate Moss appeared to do last night when she arrived at the Dazed & Confused 20th birthday party in London.

Arriving at the plush W London Hotel in a sexy black mini-dress, the 37-year-old was carrying a glass of wine… presumably a souvenir from her dinner. Looking slightly worse for wear as she entered the W through the back door, she was accosted by a homeless man, who she was happy to talk to.

The supermodel had started off the night at an exhibition at Somerset House to mark the 20th anniversary of the hip publication. Then she popped on to a nearby restaurant before ending the evening at the W bar for the main Dazed & Confused 20th celebrations.

Moss was at the event to support ex-boyfriend and father of her child, Jefferson Hack, who founded the publication.

[From Daily Mail]

Quite often, I marvel at the genuinely friendly relationship that Kate continues to maintain with Jefferson Hack. Even though he is the father of her child, I can attest (probably along with many of you) that it’s exceedingly difficult to “like” one’s ex other than to fake it for the sake of the children. My guess is that Kate was the one who broke off the relationship, and (to an extent) Jefferson continues to worship La Moss. They hooked up after she first appeared in his magazine in the early aughts; after their split, Jefferson continued to support Kate’s career and even gave her the cover of Dazed in 2007 when she was preparing to launch her first Topshop high-street fashion line.

As for Kate’s drunken state last night, that’s merely how she rolls. The Mail tried to make a huge deal of her recent Jamaican vacation with friend Sadie Frost. That article described the getaway as necessary in terms of “marriage shock” (to Kills guitarist Jamie Hince) because Kate was supposedly sighted downing three beers for breakfast, but I doubt that’s the case. The Kills recently released their fourth album, so Jamie’s been touring like crazy for the past few months and shows no signs of letting up anytime soon.

In the meantime, Kate just likes her booze. She doesn’t eat much, and it doesn’t take much to get drunk on an empty stomach. I’d even be willing to wager that most of her daily caloric intake comes from wine, beer, and the regular gin and tonic. Somehow, Kate still ends up looking fabulous even in a very disheveled state. Kaiser, CB, and I are all crushing on her very 1990s outfit here. She’s wearing head-to-toe black while showing off her roots, unpolished nails, and very minimal makeup. Still, bitch looks good:

At a certain point between stops, Kate paused to talk to a homeless man, who asked her for money. Before Kate could comply, her friends dragged the supermodel away by yanking on her dress. I bet she’d have handed over a lot of cash in her inebriated state.

Photos courtesy of Fame, PCN, and WENN

Rumer Willis’s tattoo-covered arms: temporary and try-hard?

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 08:39 AM PDT

WHOA. Rumer Willis has tattoos all over her arms. When did that happen? Just last week, I discussed some photos of Rumer on a red carpet where she looked really, really pretty - go here to review. As you can see, it looks like she has one large tattoo on her right forearm, but other than that, nothing. So… CB and I have been looking through these new, candid photos of Rumer out and about in LA, flashing these "tattoos" - we were debating whether or not they were real. CB thinks they're definitely all fake, and she says that they're just transfers that have been treated with something to make them less shiny, and look more authentic, like this:

I think a few of the tats are real, though, especially the large on her right forearm. Maybe another one or two are real as well. But how great is it that transfers have come such a long way that they look so natural these days? Seriously, Rumer is looking very Kat Von D in these pics, and I think I mean that in a good way? Debatable. Someone gave me a henna tattoo kit as a gift, and now I'm feeling the urge to go play with it. I'm too old to play with it, right? Right.

Anyway, The Mail thinks Rumer is just doing this for attention, like a kid who acts out when her parents are fighting. Because Rumer is upset over Ashton and her mom, I guess. I don't know… part of me thinks that Rumer probably already had an idea about what her step-father was really like. Maybe she's not surprised at all.

Photos courtesy of Fame.

Justin Bieber’s hookup: he didn’t take my phone # (Update: video of her lawyers)

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 08:06 AM PDT

The Superficial has the MySpace photos of the woman who claims to have a three month-old baby fathered by Justin Bieber, 20 year-old Mariah Yeater. Yeater has since made her MySpace profile private. The photos are goofy and suggest to some that she could be out for fame with these accusations. So many teens have stupid photos online like Yeater’s, particularly on MySpace, where they’re likely to have been posted several years ago and forgotten. Remember the bikini modeling photos from the mother of Jude Law’s illegitimate child? Just because someone wants to be famous doesn’t mean they’re not telling the truth about having a baby by a celebrity. Yeater has tattoos and piercings in the pictures, but it’s possible she got them at 16 with a parent’s permission and that these photos are old. No one really uses MySpace anymore. In terms of the way she looks, it bothers me that people are saying that she must be lying because she’s not particularly cute or thin. That’s ridiculous.

There’s news that Yeater is on Twitter, where she’s supposedly written things like “thanks for making me famous.” There are so many Mariah Yeaters on Twitter, none of them are verified, and the one with the most followers is just the most obnoxious. I doubt it’s her.

I finally had the chance to read the full Star story on Yeater’s paternity lawsuit against Bieber. We’ve already heard most of the sordid details: Yeater claims she was picked out of the crowd near the front of a concert by Bieber’s people, that she went backstage to meet him, and that they had sex in a bathroom during which Bieber lasted half a minute and didn’t use a condom. There’s more in the Star story, including the sad detail that Bieber didn’t give Yeater his phone number afterwards and didn’t even bother to write down her’s. (We’ve already heard the other details in this story, but it’s worthwhile to see them in context.)

“I was… near the front of the concert. Immediately following the concert, I was approached by a security guard who asked if I wanted to meet Justin Bieber backstage,” Mariah wrote in a hand-signed affidavit on Oct. 30, sworn under the penalty of perjury. “I accepted the invitation and followed him backstage.

“After waiting for a short period of time with several other young women, Justin Bieber appeared and engaged me in conversation. Immediately it was obvious that we were mutually attracted to one another, and we began to kiss. Shortly thereafter, Justin Bieber suggested that I go with him to a private place where we could be alone.

“I agreed to go with him and on the walk to a private area in the Staples Center he told me he wanted to make love to me and this was going to be his first time. He also said he would give me his phone number after we had sex and told me he wanted me to be at his future concerts too and he would give me backstage passes.”

“After walking away from the other people backstage, Justin found a place where we could be alone - a bathroom. We went inside and immediately his personality changed drastically. He began touching me and repeatedly said he wanted to f#@$ the sh*t out of me. At that time I asked him to put on a condom for protection, but he insisted that he did not want to. In his own words, he said that because it was his first time he wanted to feel everything.”

Justin then “quickly took off my clothes,” she said - and the pair had sex. “He was on top of me with my legs around him,” Mariah wrote in the court declaration. “At the time I was on top of some type of shelf. The sexual intercourse itself was brief, lasting only approximately 30 seconds…

“He was clearly embarrassed about how the sex did not last very long. He immediately put on his clothes and blew me off when I asked about seeing him again. I asked him for his private phone number, but he insisted on taking my phone number. We had no paper or anything to write it down on, and Justin Bieber was clearly not interested in getting his cell phone or any paper. He said he would just remember the number, which I told him.”

“When I later realized I was pregnant with Justin Bieber’s baby, I tried to contact him through his representatives but no one ever called me back. On July 6, 2011, I gave birth to a baby boy. That was exactly 36 weeks and two days after the sexual encounter with Justin Bieber. Based on the timing as well as the fact there were no other possible men that I had sex with that could be the father of this baby, I believe that Justin Bieber is in fact the father of my baby.”

[From Star Magazine, print edition, November 14, 2011]

If that’s true it’s so cold. The least he could have done would be to take down her phone number!

Yeater’s lawyers are calling for a paternity test, and they’re also calling out Bieber for not personally denying this very high profile story:

“She is not seeking exorbitant compensation,” Rogers and Pare told Star exclusively. “She merely requests that Justin Bieber provide a DNA sample to verify that he is the father of Mariah Yeater's baby, and if so, to help provide child support as required by California law.”

In the wake of Star's exclusive report detailing the paternity suit, Bieber's camp told ABC News, "It's sad that someone would fabricate, malicious, defamatory and demonstrably false claims" and that they would "vigorously pursue all available legal remedies to defend and protect Justin against these allegations."

While the Baby singer himself been out plenty since Star broke the exclusive news — appearing on Dancing with the Stars, On Air with Ryan Seacrest and tweeting he was going to “ignore the rumors" — he has not yet publicly delved into the details of the allegations, something Yeater’s attorneys addressed in their exclusive statement to Star.

“It is noteworthy that Justin Bieber himself has not denied the fundamental fact that he had unprotected sex with Mariah Yeater following a concert in Los Angeles.

“If Justin Bieber is willing to voluntarily undergo a paternity test Ms. Yeater welcomes such cooperation and will be happy to resolve this issue in a less public manner. We call upon Justin Bieber and his attorneys to reach out to resolve this issue in a reasonable manner.”

[From Radar Online]

Go ahead and yell at me and tell me he’s just a kid. He is, and he’s also a superstar and a multi-millionaire. This might all be fabricated by a woman out for publicity, but if so she’s going to great lengths to make her case and it sounds like a solid one to me. Whether or not she’s making this up, that could really be her being obnoxious on Twitter. I think we should reserve judgment until the paternity tests come out, whether after the December 15th hearing or sooner. This is really ringing true to me, and I wonder if Bieber’s lawyers are going to try and block that DNA test.

Kaiser just told me that Bieber is going on the Today Show today to address this story. We’ll cover that as soon as the video is out.

Update: Bieber was just on The Today Show, where he was interviewed outside by Ann, Al and Matt. He was outside with a bunch of screaming fans around a pen, basically. He said “I’d just like to say that none of those allegations are true. I know that I’m going to be a target, but I’m never going to be a victim. It’s crazy, because every night after the show I’m gone right from the stage right to my car. It’s crazy that people want to make up such false allegations, but to set the record straight none of it is true.”

Matt then asked Justin if he knew the woman and he said “Never met the woman.” He was pretty well spoken about it and he looked amused while he said it.

Other than that, they just talked about his Christmas album and the fact that he’s donating the proceeds to charity.

Update 2: Yeater’s lawyers did an interview on HLN’s Dr. Drew show, thankfully not with Dr. Drew. They looked very young but made their point in a well spoken and convincing way. They said “we have every reason to believe in this story. We filed it in good faith, we stand by her.” They also claimed to have additional “credible evidence” that has not been released by the media that “Justin Bieber is the father of this baby.” I kind of hope she pulled a Monica and didn’t do her laundry, you know?

Here’s a photo of baby Justin Bieber vs. baby Trystan Yeater.

These photos are from Mariah Yeater’s MySpace via The Superficial. Thanks to Stacie for the Star scan.

Hilary Swank makes her first post-Chechnya appearance as her PR firm fires her

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 08:03 AM PDT

Last night was the premiere of J. Edgar at the AFI Film Fest. All of the stars came out for the film except for Dame Judi Dench, who was in London doing press for the new James Bond film. Several of Clint Eastwood's former stars and friends came out to celebrate his new film too - including Hilary Swank. This is Hilary's first public outing since she got publicly slammed for attending the birthday party of a Chechen dictator, and accepting $1.5 million for the pleasure. Days after the scandal went international, Hilary canceled a charity appearance, claiming she was sick, but I guess she feels well enough to hang out with Clint Eastwood, right? Also, Bedhead reported earlier this week that Hilary fired her manager over the Chechnya incident, and now Entertainment Weekly reports that Hilary's PR firm fired HER.

Hilary Swank's bad month just got even worse. In the wake of the storm of bad press surrounding her paid appearance at a birthday event for Chechen president, and alleged human rights violator, Ramzan Kadyrov, the two-time Oscar winner has been dumped by her PR team at 42West, a source familiar with the situation confirms exclusively to EW.

The publicity firm parted ways with Swank over a disagreement on how best to deal with the fallout from the Oct. 5 event, which was also attended by Jean-Claude Van Damme, Seal, and English violinist Vanessa-Mae.

Earlier this week, it was widely reported that Swank fired her manager of eight years, Jason Weinberg, and two of his associates at CAA, though not her lawyer, Jeff Bernstein, who reportedly played a significant role in the Chechnya visit. Three weeks ago, Swank apologized for attending and promised to donate her fee to charity, but appeared to stop short of taking personal responsibility. "If I had a full understanding of what this event was apparently intended to be," she said, "I would never have gone."

Calls to 42West have not been returned, and Swank's lawyer has not responded to a request for comment.

[From Entertainment Weekly]

Sucks for Hilary. I guess she's doing her own PR now, thus this red carpet appearance for Clint Eastwood. She's probably hoping that Clint will act as a human shield to protect her from the fallout. I can't believe she's using an old dude like that.

I'm including some more photos from the AFI premiere. Leo looks great, IMO. Clint looks old as dirt. Naomi Watts looks nice, but Liev looks rough. And Armie Hammer is so cartoon-handsome, it's creepy. Oh, and my lover Ed Westwick was there! He's in the movie too. He's so smarmy and gorge.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Brett Ratner on Olivia Munn: “I banged her a few times… she’s bitter”

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 07:21 AM PDT

I have Kanye West's "Runway" stuck in my head right now, and it's like the line "Let's have a toast to the douchebags" is skipping and repeating over and over. So, let's have a toast to the douchebags, Olivia Munn and Brett Ratner, because I really can't tell which one is the "victim" here. Neither, really. They both pretty much suck. The basic story is that in Olivia Munn's memoir, Suck It, Wonder Woman!: The Misadventures of a Hollywood Geek (horrible title), Munn described an sexual encounter she had with an unnamed Hollywood director. Brett Ratner, director of Tower Heist (and the Rush Hour movies, amongst others) was asked about it, and he identified himself as "the director" - but he went on to clarify the salient details. It's all pretty gross.

Brett Ratner appeared on G4′s Attack of the Show for just a little over six minutes, but that was plenty of time to cover a wide range of topics. The director took the time to delve into his new film, Tower Heist, the upcoming Oscars (which Ratner is producing), Occupy Wall Street (a "viral marketing" campaign for Tower Heist, according to Show co-host Kevin Pereira), and sex with Olivia Munn. Wait, what?

For those unaware of the gossip, Munn wrote in her memoir, Suck It, Wonder Woman!: The Misadventures of a Hollywood Geek, that she once saw a Hollywood director she had dated holding his "undersized manhood" while eating shrimp. It's long been rumored that she was referring to Rush Hour director Ratner, and while he did admit on Show Thursday that he was the subject of the passage, he's claiming that none of it's true. And making sure to heighten the drama while he's at it. "I used to date Olivia Munn … when she was Lisa," said Ratner of Munn, née Lisa Munn. "That was the problem. She wasn't Asian back then."

But Ratner didn't stop there: "She was hanging out on my set of After the Sunset, I banged her a few times … but I forgot her," he said. "Because she changed her name … I didn't know it was the same person. So when she came and auditioned for me for a TV show, I forgot her, she got pissed off and she made up all these stories about me eating shrimp and masturbating in my trailer. And my shortcomings. She talked about my shortcomings. I get it. She's bitter."

(Munn's rep has yet to respond to EW's request for comment regarding Ratner's words.)

Serious props to Pereira, who changed the mood of the gossip-y conversation by responding, "To be fair, you did ask for a shrimp cocktail in the green room today." Ratner did, however, have one nice thing to say about Munn… sort of. "I think she's a lovely nice girl. It's not the same girl that I met, actually. Olivia and Lisa are two completely different girls."

[From Entertainment Weekly]

I don't understand the whole "She wasn’t Asian back then" thing. Meaning that Olivia put herself out there as half-Chinese just to…? What? Have a "thing" for people to talk about? Yeah, Brett sounds like King of Douches here, but that doesn't really make me Team Olivia. She's the one who slept with Brett Ratner, likely to jumpstart her career. And she totally seems like the kind of person who would retaliate against an ex (who she only slept with to further her career) by making up a rumor about shrimp grease. Yuck. I dislike both of them so much. I can't believe Tina Fey is trying to make Olivia Munn happen. I'm so disappointed in the world right now.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Amber Heard versus Eva Green: who’s the bigger bombshell?

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 06:51 AM PDT

The more I see Amber Heard, the more impressed I am with her style skills. Either this girl has a righteous stylist, or Amber just has an other-worldly sense of what works on her body. I'm not saying that Amber is super-fashion forward, or that I want what she's wearing. I'm saying that I wish I looked like her so I could dress like her. Her body is AMAZING. And the clothes she wears only accentuate and emphasize how crazy that body is. The face is… well, she's giving me ScarJo vibes lately. Remember when Scarlett went too blonde for a while? Amber is doing that.

Anyway, these are photos of The Rum Diary UK premiere in London last night. Amber wore this shiny Alessandra Rich that could have easily looked cheap, but it's tailored perfectly and her insane body makes the dress really, really work. She's so sexy. I don't know how popular this movie is going to be, but I hope Amber's career is all uphill from here. I don't even know if she can act. I just want her to go far so she'll keep getting invited to red carpets.

I'm also including photos of Eva Green, who was at the premiere because…? I don't know, maybe she's friends with Johnny Depp. I haven't written about Eva since that post about how I prefer to write about Eva so much more than the Kardashians. It's still true, but all of you Kardash-haters out there just have to realize that this week was an anomaly for the excessive Kardashian coverage, because of Kim's divorce. And no one is forcing you to read and comment on the Kardashian posts anyway! If you feel that strongly about it, take the effort to read and comment about other people, and soon the Kardashians will be phased out, you know? Here's hoping. As for Eva, I love her beautiful face, and she's got a killer body too. I'm not in love with the dress, though. I hate when skirts have those dual slits in front - it's totally car wash to me. I like Eva's leopard-print shoes, though.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Kris Jenner snipes “I hate an Indian giver,” Native American groups call her out

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 05:50 AM PDT

I used to think the term “Indian giver” referred to how the US Government made a lot of promises to the Native Americans and then reneged basically every time. In my mind the early Americans were the “Indian givers” because they gave to the indigenous people and then took back land and screwed them over at every turn. As I learned a while ago, the phrase actually refers to American Indians as supposedly taking back gifts, and is considered derogatory.

So Kris Jenner used the term “Indian giver” when referring to the fact that her daughter Kim Kardashian wasn’t intending to give back her $2 million engagement ring to Kris Humphries after their 72 day marriage. On Good Morning America yesterday, Kris J. sniped “I hate an Indian giver. It's a gift - you keep a gift.” It was a stupid and entitled thing to say, but like a lot of things this woman says it was also a half truth. That $2 million dollar engagement ring that Kim claims Kris H. bought her was recycled from 2009, when Kim bought it for herself to try and get Reggie Bush to propose.

Kris is now under fire from Native American rights groups for using that phrase. I love how these Kardashian idiots are getting fallout at every turn:

The backlash against Kris Jenner is exploding over her use of the phrase "Indian giver," and the largest American Indian and Alaska Native organization in the country has told RadarOnline.com exclusively that her comment "wrong and hurtful…”

Pata was referring to Jenner's use of the phrase "Indian giver" on Good Morning America after saying that she hoped her son-in-law Kris Humphries didn't want the engagement ring he gave her daughter Kim Kardahsian back.

"The phrase "Indian giving" is wrong and hurtful," she added. "The cultural values of Native Americans are based on giving unconditionally and empowering those around them. Instead this cultural value is forgotten when negative stereotyping of Native people occurs.

"November is Native American Heritage Month and this moment calls for a reflection on the contributions of America's first peoples to this great country. There are over 5 million US citizens identified as American Indians or Alaska Natives and 565 federally recognized tribal nations. This November we're focused on celebrating 1.7 million Native youth under the age of 18 that face many challenges. There are many hopeful solutions and we invite the Jenner and Kardashian family to join with the country in learning more during Native American Heritage Month."

As RadarOnline.com previously reported, an organization that serves the Native American community called Kris's comment "false and hurtful," as well.

[From Radar Online]

I know this is a throwaway phrase that used to be in wide use that Kris probably has no clue about. The Native American rights groups are using this as a teaching moment to try and get people to stop using it. This just goes to show how out of touch the Kardashians are, and of course how money-grubbing they are. Kris J. was talking about a $2 million dollar ring that Humphries supposedly bought for her daughter. Humphries is a multi-millionaire in his own right, but he’s also an athlete with a limited shelf life. Of course Kim isn’t going to return the engagement ring, though, since she bought it for herself fair and square. It was as much of a “gift” as the “loss” she took on her wedding. Bitch can’t recycle it again later, either, unless she gets the diamond reset or cut so it looks significantly different.

Kris talks about the ring at 3:00 in. As they say on The Soup, I watch this for you. (And it can be a sacrifice.)

Here’s Kris signing copies of her book at a Barnes and Noble in New York

LeAnn Rimes threw a total hissy fit when Brandi publicly called her “overbearing”

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 05:06 AM PDT

Did I miss this story? Did CB already cover this? I don't think we did. Last week, Brandi Glanville appeared on The Wendy Williams Show. Wendy asked Brandi what LeAnn Rimes is like as a stepmother to Brandi and Eddie Cibrian's two sons, and Brandi hedged and then replied, "Overbearing." LeAnn had a Twitter hissy fit, of course, and tweeted: "I am his WIFE & their 'bonus mom' and it’s out of line after 3 years to continually discuss. Negativity does not help kids. Go promote your show if that’s what you’re really there to do." And then LeAnn followed up with, "I however will not be lied about. Obviously we are not in a good place like has been claimed and it's not good for the kids. I'd like to see some resolve, but that doesn't look like its happening anytime soon. #hopeforthebest."

Brandi then tweeted back (because this is high school, apparently): "Let’s b clear just as u get asked about me, I get asked about u. It is my story & life also. I will answer honestly, don’t b a hater." So, that was what happened in public, on their respective social media. Now what happened behind the scenes? In Touch Weekly has the story:

LeAnn Rimes was already livid that her husband Eddie Cibrian's ex-wife, Brandi Glanville, called her an "overbearing" step-mother on The Wendy Williams Show. But then LeAnn directed her anger at Eddie.

While on the phone with him in NYC on October 24, LeAnn flew into a terrifying rage after a misguided Eddie - trying to play peacemaker - suggested that she call Brandi.

Although LeAnn's rep denies the story, the insider says LeAnn cursed at Eddie for proposing she talk to "that whore Brandi" on the phone.

"She was screaming and crying," an insider tells In Touch. "She just flipped out."

[From In Touch Weekly, print edition]

"That whore Brandi" - whatcha talkin' 'bout, homewrecker? Seriously, though, I believe this. If anything, I think In Touch Weekly is probably underselling what really went down. I see LeAnn in complete hysterics, collapsing under the weight of her own "overbearing" martyrdom, screaming "BONUS MOM!!! SCREEEEEEEE!!!!"

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Kristen Stewart in Marios Schwab: very cute or too short for squatting?

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 04:35 AM PDT

Yesterday, Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson and Taylor Lautner were all on hand at Grauman's Chinese Theatre to immortalize their hand and foot prints, in honor of Twilight. Kristen's dress is Marios Schwab - why do girls wear super-short dresses when they know they're going to be photographed squatting or bending over? I don't get it. Anywa, I tried to find and crop some photos of Sparkles and Kristen looking at each other lovingly, but those were kind of hard to find. I suppose in addition to Kristen's multitude of personality quirks and physical twitches, you're also going to tell me that she OF COURSE has some kind of extreme light sensitivity, because in nearly all of the photos, she's shielding her eyes from the sun, squinting unattractively or just closing her eyes. I would think that the sun was just really, really bright, but both Taylor and Sparkles managed to get through the ceremony without ruining every photo with their "light sensitivity".

But! There are still enough photos of Sparkles gazing lovingly as his beloved for me to think that they're still together. I don't think they'll stand the test of time or even last much longer than a year more, but for now, they're still together. I had been wondering about their couple status because Sparkles had been doing Breaking Dawn promotion with Ashley Greene, and that girl looked like she was ready to jump on some sparkle-dong. That's what Star Mag's story says this week - that Ashley is trying to get with Sparkles, and Kristen "ordered" Sparkles to avoid Ashley like the whore plague.

While Kristen Stewart has been busy filming Snow White and the Huntsman in Wales, her Twilight costar has been getting close to her longtime love, Robert Pattinson.

"Now that Kristen's gone, Ashley Greene is making moves on Rob," an insider tells Star. The pair have been getting cozy while promoting Breaking Dawn: Part 1 abroad. And Rob isn't exactly pushing Ashley away.

"His ego is getting stroked big time by Ashley - and he loves it!" says the insider, revealing that the on-screen brother and sister shared several intimate evenings together. "They have been on romantic dates, just the two of them. Ashley is forward - she made it known that she wants something more than a friendship."

But Kristen isn't turning a blind eye to Ashley's advances.

"Kristen has warned Rob to keep his distance from Ashley and she's furious with him for not obeying," says the source. "Rob swears there is nothing going on, but Kristen is so upset that she's saying she may dump him for good."

[From Star Magazine, print edition]

I doubt Ashley is Sparkles type - yes, if we judge his taste in ladies from Kristen, we know he likes brunette bitches, which Ashley definitely fits. But we can also tell that he likes girls with some twitches, with some insecurities, which Ashley doesn't have. Ashley is the closest thing to raw ambition out there. She doesn't have time to twitch.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Madonna’s friends dumped her when she tried to move in on Chris Martin

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 04:27 AM PDT

I've long been chronicling and wondering about the "falling out" of Madonna and Gwyneth Paltrow. They used to be super-tight, they used to work out together, they used to party together and use their fake British accents together and everything was super-duper and fancy. Then, about two years ago, it seemed like Goop and Madge began pulling away from each other. Many thought that the dust up was likely about money - notably, about Goop going into business with Tracy Anderson, the fraudulent trainer who had likely bilked Madge out of some investment money too. Goop and Anderson are still in business together, though, and Madge and Goop are still on the outs.

Then, earlier this year, something else weird happened - all of the "cool girls" began mean-girling Madge. It became evident at this year's Met Gala, where Stella McCartney dressed both Gwyneth and Madge, but all of the cool girls wanted to hang out with Goop and everybody ignored Madge. Madge retaliated by telling reporters that she "felt fat" in her Stella dress, and BAM, Madge is no longer wearing Stella McCartney, nor is she friendly with any of the McCartneys any longer.

Now Star Magazine has an interesting take on what was really behind the Mean Girl War - it over boys, not money.

Madonna is singing the blues these days - because her A-list pals have turned their backs on her!

"Madonna doesn't really have friends anymore," a source tells Star. "She used to have a huge group who adored her. But now Gwyneth Paltrow, Stella McCartney, Beyonce, Jay-Z, Kate Hudson, Fergie and everyone else have dumped her."

And now it seems like all of Tinseltown is shunning the 53-year-old. Madonna was banned from Stella's 40th birthday party and dad Paul's wedding. And her outcast status was again obvious when none of her former friends turned out for the Oct. 23 London premiere of her film W.E.

According to the source, the cold shoulder began when Madonna clashed with BFF Gwyneth over her relationship with the actress's husband, Coldplay front man Chris Martin.

"Madonna got a little too flirty with Chris, and the tnesion spilled over to her relationship with Gwyneth… when Gwyneth's relationship with Madonna soured, so did everyone else's. She got her friends in their circle to dump her too. And now Madonna's really lonely because of it."

[From Star Magazine, print edition]

Er… Madge flirted with Chris Martin? And Goop got mad? Now, I don't have any problems believing that Madonna is the kind of woman who will blatantly and directly flirt with your husband in front of you. I don't have a problem believing that Goop systematically shuts out and mean-girls any woman who pays too much attention to Chris (hello, Kate Bosworth). My problem is putting those things together - Madge flirting with Chris and Goop getting mad about THAT? Yeah, I just don't see it. Maybe I don't want to see it, though. Gristle on goober. Rough.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Friday, November 4, 2011

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy

No comments:

Post a Comment