Cele|bitchy |
- Angelina Jolie reacts to her Globe nom: “This can’t be, I never expected this”
- Would Leonardo DiCaprio take Blake Lively back, if she came begging?
- Jennifer Aniston: “People think that I do a lot of injections, but I don’t”
- Beyonce & Jay-Z have gone “partially vegan” for her pillowy pregnancy
- Kim Kardashian thinks her “talent” is “making people fall in love with her”
- Johnny Depp is having a “mini midlife crisis” and Vanessa Paradis is tired of it
- Lindsay Lohan’s latest “modeling job” for Jag Jeans: busted, trashy & crackie?
- Charlize Theron in Stella McCartney in LA: lovely and less puffy?
- Is Fergie pregnant with Josh Duhamel’s baby, or has she gained a little weight?
- Is Prince William “secretly” in love with his sister-in-law, Pippa Middleton?
Angelina Jolie reacts to her Globe nom: “This can’t be, I never expected this” Posted: 16 Dec 2011 08:47 AM PST Have you missed Angelina Jolie Week? I have. We've still had Angelina stories to talk about, of course, but I miss the constant barrage of all-things-Angelina that was last week. Of course, several of the bigger awards shows announced their nominations this week, and Angelina surprisingly got some of those noms. I really am shocked – I didn't expect In the Land of Blood and Honey to be a hit film (Angelina didn't expect either, that's not why she made it), so my only expectation was that the film would be discussed in the scope of war films and humanitarian aid, etc. I didn't think that it would actually be an awards contender anywhere, really. But it is. Increasingly so! Remember, Angelina is all over this film – she wrote the script, she directed it, she financed it (for the most part) and she produced it. That means that if the film as a whole gets an award, they're pretty much handing it over to Angelina herself. Several days ago, the Producers Guild of America announced that they were giving ITLODAH – Angelina herself – the Stanley Kramer Award. The Stanley Kramer Award is given to people and productions "whose achievement or contribution illuminates provocative social issues in an accessible and elevating fashion.” Previous winners have included Hotel Rwanda (I love that movie), In America (I love that movie) and Sean Penn (meh). PGA presidents Hawk Koch and Mark Gordon stated their reasoning: "In the Land of Blood and is an extraordinary film that portrays a complex love story set against the terrors of the Bosnian War, especially towards women. This film truly embraces the legacy of Stanley Kramer." Jolie will be on hand on January 21 to accept the award with her fellow producers. So, in addition to that, Jolie just picked up another Golden Globe nomination for Best Foreign Film yesterday. You know what I wonder? I wonder if the criteria for "Best Foreign Film" is the same at the Globes as it is at the Academy Awards. Like, I don't think Angelina has a chance in hell for getting nominated in the directing or writing categories at the Oscars, but would the Academy nominate the film in Best Foreign? It's certainly an interesting idea, isn't it? And that way, both Brad Pitt AND Angelina would be nominated, just like they were in 2009. Meanwhile, Angelina released a statement when she heard about her Globe nomination (what is this, like, her seventh or eighth Globe nomination?):
[From The Hollywood Reporter] Jolie released a second statement to Us Weekly: "I am grateful that the Hollywood Foreign Press Association is honoring our film. This was a true collaboration, and I am forever indebted to our cast and crew, who experienced their own personal tragedies in the Bosnian War and gave me an authentic perspective into the conflict. This nomination is a tribute to the collective talent and passion of this extraordinary cast.” Damn, she really wants this! Now I kind of want ITLOBAH to be nominated for an Oscar. |
Would Leonardo DiCaprio take Blake Lively back, if she came begging? Posted: 16 Dec 2011 07:59 AM PST A few days ago, Leonardo DiCaprio was photographed with yet another "mystery blonde" – you can see the photo here, at TMZ. Leo is still in Sydney, Australia, filming The Great Gatsby, and I suspect this "mystery blonde" is one in a long line of blondes whose names are all a mystery to Leonardo, considering they only get a few hours of his time each night. That's just a guess – but Leo doesn't seem like the kind of guy who mopes around after a breakup, chilling on the couch, eating ice cream. Leo likes to go to clubs and check the scene for fresh blondes. And I'm assuming he's had a steady supply since Blake left him (and probably before she left him too). Still, at the end of the day, I still find the pairing of Leonardo and Blake much more interesting and compelling than Blake and Ryan Reynolds. My love affair with Bleo is unending, and maybe it's the hopeless romantic in me (hint: I'm not a hopeless romantic), but I don't believe we've seen the end of Bleo. I will cling to anything that gives me Bleo Hope. Including this In Touch Weekly story:
[From In Touch Weekly, print edition] *BLEO SQUEAL* Fingers crossed that some part of this is true. That Blake keeps tabs on Leo, that Leo might feel like there's unfinished business with one of the rare girlfriends who walked out on him (or at least made it seem like that publicly). Of course Leo would take her back. If she begged! Would Blake beg? I think she might – but only if she got really dicked over by Ryan, which isn't as impossible as some of you like to think. I don't think Ryan is an incredibly nice, open and giving man. But maybe he's changing for Blake. Because she's that powerful! PS… Will Blake do the awards show circuit? You know she'll be invited to present at some of the shows – probably Critics Choice, maybe the Globes. Will she and Leo be at the same awards show? I'm not even going to ask if she and Ryan will walk the red carpet together – they won't. But I could see Blake going as a free agent, a smiley, happy fashion girl who doesn't have a care in the — "OH HI LEO!" |
Jennifer Aniston: “People think that I do a lot of injections, but I don’t” Posted: 16 Dec 2011 07:58 AM PST Over the Thanksgiving holiday, DirectTV gave me some free movie channels, and at one point in my orgy of turkey, ham and wine, I caught twenty minutes of Just Go With It. It was terrible – much worse than even I was expecting. It's like everybody in that film just agreed to go to Hawaii and get paid and they didn't even bother with a proper script or anything. Anyway, I watched a scene with Nicole Kidman and Jennifer Aniston, and it shocked me. Nicole's face was frozen and jacked, obviously, but she was trying to make some facial expressions, and it worked sometimes. The shocking part? Parts of Jennifer Aniston's face looked more frozen than Nicole's. During that film, Aniston had something weird going on with her mouth/cheeks/lower face. Like, Aniston could move her eyebrows but she was talking oddly, like she couldn't feel her upper lip or something. So – do you really think Aniston gets injectables? I've figured her for a Restylane girl for several years now – they make a face look "fuller" and younger, and I always think Aniston has gotten some fresh injections when she looks particularly apple-cheeked. In the new issue of InStyle, Aniston comes close to admitting it:
[From People] Tinted eyelashes? I've never done that. Is it a quick process? Why does it have to be done every three weeks? So many questions. As for her skin care – well, yes, of course. She's been an unapologetic sunbather for years and years. She loves to roast herself under the hot Mexican sun. Of course there's going to be long-term skin damage, and fake-baking isn't really going to help, either. That will just turn the skin damage a nice shade of orange! But let's talk about: "I'm not saying that I haven't tried it … but I see how it's a slippery slope." Meaning what? That she has tried it and she found the maintenance of monthly injections exhausting? Oh, and I also think she's been fooling around with collagen lip injections too – at least she was when she was promoting Horrible Bosses. PS… Do you think Aniston (and Theroux) will make it to the Golden Globes now that Brad and Angelina have gotten their nominations? I say… no. I think she'll make it to the Oscars, though. Maybe she and Theroux will present together (ha). If she managed to get John Mayer into a tux for Oscar night, OF COURSE she'll show up to the Kodak with Theroux. |
Beyonce & Jay-Z have gone “partially vegan” for her pillowy pregnancy Posted: 16 Dec 2011 07:56 AM PST Have you seen some of the latest blind items having to do with Beyonce and her Deflating Bump of Conspiracies? Go here to Dlisted to read some of them – I mean, they are "allegedly" about Beyonce, but… they certainly fit, right? Still, Beyonce is on track to give birth… soon. Like, within the next month, apparently, considering she claims she was six months pregnant on September 23rd. Meaning she's past the eight-month mark right now. Which means that surrogate is probably ready to bust. One of the blind items claims that Beyonce is making all kinds of deals behind the scenes to profit from her pillowy pregnancy, including a Jessica Simpson-style "How I Lost the Baby Weight" magazine spread shortly after "giving birth". Allegedly, Bey is still going to be selling this pillow until we're all sick of it. So… here's a preview. Us Weekly has a story about how Bey has gone on a "partially vegan" diet (???) and Jay-Z has joined her in pillow solidarity or something.
[From Us Weekly] WTF is a "partially vegan" diet? Is that "eating your vegetables as part of a balanced diet that includes ham and chicken and steak"? So we're not just supposed to buy the pillowy pregnancy, we're also supposed to buy that Bey is maintaining a partially vegan diet, and that Jay-Z is dieting with her? Here's an honest to God question: Is Beyonce just making this up as she goes along? Did she have an actual plan to fool people, and is this the plan? Because if this is the plan, Bey can afford to be getting much better advice. |
Kim Kardashian thinks her “talent” is “making people fall in love with her” Posted: 16 Dec 2011 07:43 AM PST This is kind of old/boring news, but the Kardashians made Barbara Walters' "Most Fascinating People of 2011" list. Unfortunately for Barbara, she already knew she was going to include them back in September, and that's when she did the interview – before Kim filed for divorce, before Kourtney announced her pregnancy, etc. Barbara explained to David Letterman earlier this week, "They were the first ones we interviewed and we did them in September. We said, anything going to happen? ‘No no no, you can do it now because nothing’s going to happen.’ Then Kim gets married. Then Kourtney gets pregnant. Then Khloe’s moving to Dallas. You cannot trust the Kardashians.” No, you can't trust them. You can't even trust them not to dick over media outlets that are supporting them. Anyway, people are discussing the interview Walters did because she did "call out" the Kardash Klan. Except not really.
[From Radar] You can tell that Kim was actually kind of pissed off to be talking about the Ray-J pr0n again. Like, she's the Rooney Mara of famewhore dumbass reality stars. She's too good to talk about the "start of her career." As for the "no talent" versus the "challenge" of “getting people to fall in love with you for being you"… that's not really a talent OR a challenge, really. I mean, if you're comparing being a really talented singer to being a "watchable" reality star…? That's still not "talent." That's being a good hooker/hustler. Oh, and Kris's favorite daughter is Kim? Yeah, probably. |
Johnny Depp is having a “mini midlife crisis” and Vanessa Paradis is tired of it Posted: 16 Dec 2011 06:51 AM PST When Johnny Depp appeared on Vanity Fair a few months ago, his unfortunate "rape" comments made all of the headlines – he compared photo shoots to "being raped somehow," and that issue eclipsed the other parts of the interview. Once I got the chance to read the whole thing, it struck me that Depp isn't the mysterious poet/beatnik that he once was (or that we thought he once was). Nowadays, he's usually wasted. Nowadays, he's kind of full of himself. Nowadays, he doesn't seem to be so obsessed with his girlfriend of 13 years, Vanessa Paradis. Star Magazine has an oddly on-target story about the "rough patch" that Johnny's been in for a while, and how friends are referring to it as his "mini midlife crisis." In turn, sources claim that Vanessa was having none of it, and she told Johnny to only come home after he sorted himself out.
[From Star Magazine, print edition] That's what I always hear about Johnny and Vanessa – that they're very passionate and volatile, that they're two eccentric personalities, and that they spend a lot of time apart. If you go back and read Johnny's past VF interviews, you start to get an idea of just how much time they spend apart – weeks, even months at a time, and in Vanessa's absence, Johnny seems to spend his free time partying and drinking (and working, sure). So is there trouble in Paradis-paradise? Maybe. Or maybe they just have an unconventional relationship that works for them? |
Lindsay Lohan’s latest “modeling job” for Jag Jeans: busted, trashy & crackie? Posted: 16 Dec 2011 06:03 AM PST I don't know how recent this is, but I think it's a new story. Lindsay Lohan, crackie extraordinaire, has landed yet another "modeling" gig, this time with a brand called "Jag Jeans." Yes, LL is a Jag… girl. The promotional copy reads like the drunken ramblings of Mother Crackhead: "As Jag Jeans' newest endorser, Lindsay embodies the strength and fearlessness of the woman of today. She is unafraid to be who she is. She is fierce yet exudes feminine grace." She is crackie yet exudes vodka fumes. She is unafraid to be a raging, delusional monster. She embodies crack drama and narcissism. Here's more:
The Jag people also not that LL wore her own diamond Cartier bracelets in one shot, and she apparently claimed they were "a special gift." Which is her way of saying that she crack-heisted them, correct? As for the quality of the jeans, the quality of the ad campaign and the quality of LL as a model… well, she shilling denim booty shorts, and they shot it at a Beverly Hills hotel because LL can't leave the state without completing her community service. It's never going to be high-class, you know? |
Charlize Theron in Stella McCartney in LA: lovely and less puffy? Posted: 16 Dec 2011 04:02 AM PST Here are some new photos of Charlize Theron at the LA premiere of Young Adult last night. Her dress is Stella McCartney, and while I don't really care for it, I think this red carpet appearance is way better than the NY premiere. At the end of the day, I really disliked the choice of an orange, leather sheath for a winter premiere in NYC. But this little Stella cocktail dress is kind of cute, and Charlize's face has improved too. I mentioned the other day that Charlize's lower face was looking kind of strange to me, especially around her mouth. Whatever was happening, it looks better in these photos. Less puffy. Charlize was recently discussing how weird it is for adult women to be into Hello Kitty. Ruh roh. Mariah Carey is going to throw down.
[From Us Weekly] LMAO at "I see so many women in their 30s walking around in Hello Kitty sh-t and nobody is concerned for them." I love Charlize's casual bitchiness. If she continued with, "…So I just go around, smacking the s–t out of every bitch in a Hello Kitty shirt," I wouldn't be surprised at all. |
Is Fergie pregnant with Josh Duhamel’s baby, or has she gained a little weight? Posted: 16 Dec 2011 04:02 AM PST For whatever reason, the tabloids are warring over the state of Fergie and Josh Duhamel’s marriage this week. The first story concerns the Fergian womb, which has been the subject of speculation as recently as August when its owner mysteriously glowed while going on hiatus for her band, The Black Eyed Peas. Now, the rumors are back courtesy of Fergie herself striking some suspicious poses on the red carpet of the New Year’s Eve premiere. Further, an In Touch insider who claims that Josh is “dying to be a dad.” Hence this story:
[From In Touch, print edition, December 26, 2011] Basically, anytime a female celebrity places a hand upon her stomach, this automatically means that she’s with child, right? So that particular posture could mean nothing. As for her over-the-shoulder poses, I’m just going to assume that Fergie likes showing off her booty: Meanwhile, Star puts in its two cents with a different story about how Fergie is partying her ass off, and Josh is really pissed off about it:
[From Star, print edition, December 26, 2011] So which story, if either, is true? Each of them negates the other, so it’s a tough call. Josh doesn’t seem like the type to freak out over his lady knocking back a few drinks, assuming that she’s not pregnant. If anything, you’d think he’d freak out over the fact that his wife’s face is continually morphing. That has to be strange to deal with, right? Who knows though — Fergie could very well be pregnant. After all, Josh does seem rather, uh, enthused about her midsection in this photo: Then again, when her stomach is in plain view, she doesn’t really look pregnant at all. Maybe it’s just a case of a little weight gain (although she looks great) and awkward posing on the New Year’s Eve red carpet. Photos courtesy of Fame and WENN |
Is Prince William “secretly” in love with his sister-in-law, Pippa Middleton? Posted: 16 Dec 2011 04:01 AM PST This National Enquirer story is maybe one of my favorite stories of the year. I'm not saying it's the truthiest or the most believable, because it's totally not. It's just an enjoyable piece of pure fiction that I absolutely loved. According to the Enquirer's sources, Prince William is secretly in love with his wife's sister, Pippa Middleton. William and Pippa. OMG.
[From The Enquirer, print edition] Yes, this entire article was full of euphemisms for "Prince William jerks off to photos of his sister-in-law." Excuse me, his "beautiful" (??) sister-in-law. I mean… on one side, poor Kate. She's the pretty sister! Pippa is the ambitious sister, and Kate is the pretty one, the one with the motherlode of patience and a frightening lack of ambition. That being said, I could see why a dude – any dude, really – might prefer Pippa's company over Kate's. Pippa is Forever Uptradey, true, but she seems bright, opinionated, and loads more interesting than Kate. Pippa starts a conversation and dominates it, while Kate just asks, "What would you like to talk about?" and starts blinking furiously. But seriously, none of this story is true. William wanted a geisha, someone who would know her "place," someone who would never challenge him, and that's what he got. I'm sure he's very happy with his choice, and if he isn't, he'll just screw around and Kate will look the other way, just like she did when they were dating. There will be no talk of "divorce." There will only be "Well, this is what you waited nine years for. Suck it up." |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment