Cele|bitchy

Duchess Kate wears teal Jenny Packham, actually pulls back her hair: amazing?
“Jessica Simpson reportedly sold her baby pics to People Mag for $800K” links
John Travolta’s first accuser changes story while a third man comes forward

Duchess Kate wears teal Jenny Packham, actually pulls back her hair: amazing?

Posted: 11 May 2012 01:53 PM PDT

These are new photos of Duchess Kate and Prince William today (tonight) in London for the British Olympic Association Concert. Kate is wearing this Jenny Packham number which… hm… I don’t really dislike. I can’t say I’m in love with it, but I do think it’s mostly good. Great color, love the pleated skirt, love the fit. I feel like Kate didn’t want to show too much skin, and seeing as how Kate LOVES LACE (along with buttons), she asked Packham to cover the back in both lace and buttons. I wish we had access to photos of the back, but we don’t – go here to see it from behind. There are literally two dozen buttons on Kate’s back. Girl, sit down. This is a button intervention. UPDATE: BAM!! Buttons.

What else? The shoes are Jimmy Choo – I think they’re the same ones from earlier this week, when Kate wore the white Roland Mouret. Once again, the Duchess is without pantyhose!! OMG.

But really, we just need to talk about her hair. Can you even believe your eyes? Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, in an evening gown with a completely appropriate and elegant chignon?!?!?!? WHO ARE YOU AND WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH THE REAL WAITY?!?!!? As I’ve said before, THIS is what she should be doing more of. Look at how beautiful she looks! I feel like we’re seeing her for the first time, this tall, elegant, regal duchess. And you know we have to praise her whenever she does something right – good job, girl. Keep it up. Literally! Keep your hair up and out of your face. You’re 30 years old, you don’t need a hairy security blanket.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

“Jessica Simpson reportedly sold her baby pics to People Mag for $800K” links

Posted: 11 May 2012 10:29 AM PDT

Jessica Simpson's baby photos probably sold for $800,000 to People Mag. [Celebuzz]
Gwyneth Paltrow is the new face of Hugo Boss Nuit Por Femme. Why is Gwyneth acting so poor lately? She's doing ads for everything. [LaineyGossip]
Shauna Sand continues to the classiest bitch ever. [Dlisted]
Charlize Theron & K-Stew on a French talk show. [Pop Sugar]
Cough. Michael Fassbender. Cough. [Pajiba]
You can hear Chris Brown's awful song here. [Yeeeah]
Ryan Gosling is gansta, yo. [The Blemish]
Sofia Vergara without makeup! [Evil Beet]
Flynn Kerr-Bloom is such a BIG baby. [A Socialite Life]
Kate Upton in a not-great dress. [IDLITW]
This is the story that CB & I don't want to cover. [Gawker]
We need to have a conversation about Melania Trump's face. [Go Fug Yourself]
3-year-old dances to Gotye, is adorable. [OMG Blog]
Kim Kardashian has a sweet ride. [Moe Jackson]
The "Don't Show Your Chocha" movement is gaining ground to the "More Long Sleeves" movement. [The Frisky]
Miley Cyrus's eye makeup is freaking me out. [ICYDK]
Zooey Deschanel to play Loretta Lynn? I don't hate that idea. [CDAN]

John Travolta’s first accuser changes story while a third man comes forward

Posted: 11 May 2012 04:24 AM PDT

Another day, another John Travolta story. If you'd like to review where we were in this ongoing, seemingly never-ending "John Travolta loves to grope masseurs" scandal, go back and re-read yesterday's post. Unfortunately for all of us who were laughing at Travolta's lawyer's "evidence" that JT wasn't even in LA on the date of the first masseur's assault, it now looks like JT can prove that he wasn't actually in LA on that date. And the proof goes beyond that horribly Photoshopped image. So, of course, the first masseur is changing his story – only to say that he got the date wrong.

The Plantiff who filed a bombshell lawsuit against mega-star John Travolta still maintains the Grease star made unwanted sexual advances towards him, but now says he got the date of the incident wrong, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting. Travolta's lawyer has insisted from the beginning that it was impossible for the actor to have committed the alleged assault on that date because he was in New York City and called the claims "fiction."

According to sources close to the case, John Doe #1's account of the incident remain the same, but the date on which he said the alleged assault took place was not January 16, 2012, but actually on an earlier date.

"It was a miscalculation," one source said about the wrong date being claimed in the lawsuit. A second source said that the date change will not drastically affect the lawsuit filed against the star. “The lawsuit will likely be amended, but this doesn’t change the facts of the lawsuit," a source connected to the case told RadarOnline.com exclusively.

"John Doe #1 gave very specific information, and staff from the Beverly Hills Hotel will absolutely be included as witnesses in the case. The source pointed out that Travolta's lawyer Marty Singer has been a pit bull against the claims, with Singer telling RadarOnline.com that they had flight and hotel details that would prove that Travolta was not in Los Angeles on January 16, 2012. Let’s not forget John Doe accuser #2. It’s very interesting that Travolta’s team hasn’t gone after him," the source pointed out.

With two lawsuits now filed against Travolta, the source said that even though the original date was wrong, they aren't going to withdraw the suit, which accuses the actor of assault, sexual battery, and sexual harassment.

"This case will absolutely proceed through depositions and to a trial. The lawsuit can’t and won’t be thrown out because the date was wrong by the first John Doe, which will ultimately be up to a jury to decide. Both accusers are ready to go public, and aren’t afraid of John Travolta, and they will see this through to the end,” the source said.

Both John Doe #1 and #2 are repped by Los Angeles attorney Okorie Okorocha.

[From Radar]

Look, don't even pretend that this doesn't make you wonder if the first masseur has some serious credibility issues. If I was going after Travolta – for any reason – I would make sure that I had all my ducks in a row, every detail nailed down. So… the first masseur might have issues, but the "source" is totally right about the second masseur – I do think it's very interesting that Travolta's people haven't gone after his story yet.

Still, though – it's getting worse to be John Travolta. A third man has now come forward to claim that JT "accosted" him in 2009 – on a cruise ship! You can see a photo of the third accuser here at The Mail (he has no issues with being publicly identified). The highlights of his story:

John Travolta has been hit by fresh sexual harassment claims today after a third man came forward. Fabian Zanzi has accused Travolta of accosting him back in 2009 while he was working on the Royal Caribbean cruise ship. Chilean-born Zanzi was an employee on the liner at the time and was in charge of VIP guests.

Zanzi – the first of the three victims to be publicly named – told South American news website ABC.es that Travolta approached him and offered him $12,000 to have sex with him. He told the website he refused the Pulp Fiction actor’s advances.

Zanzi recalled: ‘He had something on his neck. I thought it was a fuzz. As I approached, he took off his white coat and was naked. He hugged me and asked me to do a massage.’

Reports suggest Zanzi has filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Travolta – although this has yet to be verified.

[From The Mail]

Chilean? Oh, yes. This happened. He's lithe and dark and young, just Travolta's type. And of course, John requested a massage. OF COURSE. That is what gets him off. So sketchy.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy

No comments:

Post a Comment