Cele|bitchy |
- Radar: Cameron Diaz’s “joker face” is the result of Botox & chemical peels
- Gabriel Aubry: The nanny tripped, I didn’t push her
- Joan Rivers: “Chelsea Handler made it on her back f–king the president [of E!]“
- Demi Moore was rushed to the hospital for “substance abuse” issues
- Life & Style: Brad Pitt is concerned Shiloh will be bullied for her short haircut
- Blake Lively’s questionable casting in Soderbergh’s new film causes studio to back out
- LeAnn Rimes is still trying to make her failing music career happen
- Cynthia Nixon: “Everybody likes to dump on the bisexuals”
- Sam Taylor-Wood, 44, and Aaron Johnson, 21, welcome 2nd daughter, Romy Hero
- Oscar-winning director Tom Hooper just dumped his pregnant girlfriend
Radar: Cameron Diaz’s “joker face” is the result of Botox & chemical peels Posted: 25 Jan 2012 08:40 AM PST Cameron Diaz has been in Paris all week – go here and here to review our coverage of Camy's various costume changes. She's been all over the place during Paris Fashion Week, to the point where her appearances seem… I don't know… odd. Like, yesterday, she went to the Armani show, the Givenchy show, and the Chanel show. Before that, it was Dior and Versace, and some other ones thrown in. Look, Camy loves fashion, and God knows, it's probably a lot of fun to get free clothes and show up at runway shows. But I've got to wonder – doesn't Cameron have better things to do with her time? Anyway, as we keep discussing, Cameron's face is looking different. CB thinks she definitely looks tweaked, and while I agree, I don't think Camy looks as horrible as she did when she was with Alex Rodriguez. That man did serious damage to Camy's girl-next-door, California-Girl beauty. Six months ago, Camy's face looked bloated, waxy and rough – but in the photos from Paris, I think she looks better. Now Radar is getting into the mix with what's going on with Cameron's face:
[From Radar] That's the plastic surgeon's big, scandalous reveal? Camy had Botox and she's too shiny? Whatever. I guess I agree about the immovable forehead, and I doubt she had a facelift or an eye job. I think she was messing around with fillers last year with horrible results, and most of her "new look" is the result of "deflating" after the fillers. |
Gabriel Aubry: The nanny tripped, I didn’t push her Posted: 25 Jan 2012 08:05 AM PST
Opinions on this story were very polarized. Some people thought the nanny was on team Halle and was trying to malign Gabriel, which is supported by the nanny’s claims that Gabriel often called her a “spy” when she was at his house. Maybe she does have allegiances to Halle, but even if that’s the case it doesn’t rule out Aubry being abusive. Also, the nanny told the police the minor and unnecessary detail that Nahla had a rash that Gabriel refused to treat. Why would she tell them that unless she was throwing accusations out there trying to see what would stick? Plus, the nanny lost a restraining order bid she had against Gabriel. In the restraining order, she admits opening his apartment door with a key she had on January 18 just prior to the altercation and she makes no mention of knocking. On the other hand, we’ve heard for some time that Aubry has an explosive temper, and why would the nanny bother to take out a restraining order unless she was afraid of him? It’s not too farfetched to imagine him going off on an employee who overstepped her bounds and then pushing her out the door. Well a new article in Radar has a “source” close to Gabriel who claims that he didn’t push the nanny and that she “tripped.”
[From Radar] When someone issues a denial that starts with a question, it’s suspect to me. “Why would I do that?” is not the same as categorically saying “I didn’t do that,” although the source later claims that the nanny “tripped.” Yesterday there was a court hearing in which Halle asked for an emergency “no contact” order for Gabriel and their daughter until the investigation into this incident was completed. TMZ reports that the judge left the custody arrangement “as is” and put off a ruling until the judge who has been handling this case returns from vacation. Radar has more information that “The Los Angeles Department of Children & Family Services is expected to interview Berry, Aubry, and the nanny in the next several days.” Let’s pretend that none of these people are famous and that we only know their situation and nothing else about them. You have a couple who went through an acrimonious divorce and who both love their daughter. The mother doesn’t want the father to have contact with his daughter at all and has actively worked to limit their contact. A nanny who works for the mother claims that the father yells a lot, is verbally abusive towards her and pushed her twice out the door, once with his daughter in her hands. Barring our feelings on whether the guy is abusive, and whether this is emotionally damaging to his child, is it enough to deny him all contact with his daughter? It’s a hard accusation to prove, so probably not. I could see supervised visitation continuing indefinitely, though. Gabriel and Nahla are shown on 1-13, 1-9, 1-6 and 12-28. Credit: WENN.com |
Joan Rivers: “Chelsea Handler made it on her back f–king the president [of E!]“ Posted: 25 Jan 2012 08:04 AM PST For a while now, I've felt like Joan Rivers is past her prime, and I think she's using cruelty and shtick in the place of relevancy and genuine comedy. But I recently watched her 2010 documentary Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work, and I came away from that documentary with a new respect for her. She doesn't really make me laugh, but I admire her longevity and her will to succeed and thrive. I might have to rethink some of the harsher things I've said and thought about Joanie, though. Because she's taking Chelsea Handler to task and I'm ready to cosign Joan one thousand percent.
[From Radar] Team Joan. Joan is the truth-teller in this situation. Plus, I think Chelsea took Joan's "I don’t even have a dressing room" comment personally, when Joan likely meant it as a cut on E!, right? Whatever. Most female comedians pay homage to Joan for her decades of glass-ceiling-breaking, and it says something about Chelsea that she can't even feign respect. |
Demi Moore was rushed to the hospital for “substance abuse” issues Posted: 25 Jan 2012 08:03 AM PST I’d like to express some surprise at this story, but that would be a disingenuous tactic even though I, like many of you along with Kaiser and CB as well, would love to see Demi rise from the ashes of her divorce like a gloriously unaffected phoenix. However and instead of taking Kaiser’s suggestion to fire her publicist and position herself differently after shedding the douche that is her ex-husband Ashton Kutcher, Demi has eagerly taken up a “party girl” reputation. She’s been boning random young singer and model types. She’s gone in for some post-split tweaking. And she’s rambled on about how she believes that she’s not worthy of being loved. Then, there’s the somewhat sympathetic portrait of Demi as a woman who is drowning her sorrows in alcohol. Last October, In Touch printed a story that Demi has a drinking problem and is a complete mess. Then in December, Demi’s alleged AA sponsor passed away, and her friends reportedly worried that she’d start boozing again. Well, those worries are apparently not unfounded, for TMZ is now reporting that Demi was taken to hospital late Monday evening for “substance abuse” issues:
[From TMZ] So if Demi has now been placed in a facility, does that mean she’s in rehab, or is her rep truly going to go with the “exhaustion” excuse? They really should ban that word in publicist circles because no one ever buys it. As for Demi, I hope she gets it together soon not only for her sake but for her daughters as well. She’s not the first woman to go through a terrible split with a cheating douchebag, and she won’t be the last. Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN |
Life & Style: Brad Pitt is concerned Shiloh will be bullied for her short haircut Posted: 25 Jan 2012 08:01 AM PST I don't even know. Life & Style has a sketchy history with their cover stories about Angelina Jolie and Shiloh. It began in 2010, when Shiloh got her little bob haircut and everyone freaked out because bob haircuts = lesbianism, obviously. And God knows, little girls should ONLY have long hair. There was significant backlash against Life & Style for basically declaring that Shiloh was a lesbian (because of her hair), but that didn't stop the tabloid from running several more covers in the same vein, meaning that Shiloh has been "manipulated" into her tomboy lifestyle by her EVIL, horrible mother, Angelina. And now this – photos came out a few days ago of Angelina and the kids at the Farmer's Market – see them here. Shiloh was working a new, shorter haircut. Which, obviously, is the direct result of Angelina's awful parenting, which has obviously caused Shiloh's lesbianism. Of course.
[From Hollywood Life] Yes, Brad is so concerned! He's the good parent, you see. And when he finally leaves Angelina, he'll bring Shiloh to Jennifer Aniston, and Aniston will magically convince Shiloh to wear her hair longer, and instantly, Shiloh will no longer be a lesbian! HUZZAH. Seriously, though – LEAVE SHAX ALONE. She's doing her own thing, Montenegro Style. The kid has an excess of personality, which speaks to her parents creating an environment in which their kids' individuality can flourish. |
Blake Lively’s questionable casting in Soderbergh’s new film causes studio to back out Posted: 25 Jan 2012 07:28 AM PST OH NOES. The girl with the golden PR moves has fumbled! Several weeks ago, the casting rumor mill went into overdrive and there were major claims that Blake Lively had scored a lead role in Steven Soderbergh's latest film, The Side Effects. Blake was alleged cast as a woman struggling with addiction, torn between her veteran husband (Channing Tatum) and her shrink (Jude Law). It was a juicy, meaty role, and Blake would have been required to do some heavy lifting, acting-wise. The speculation about the casting caused consternation – why Blake? Why Steven Soderbergh? WHY? Well, things just got more complicated. As it turns out, the film studio producing The Side Effects, Annapurna, has just dropped out, and rumor has it they dropped out because of Blake's alleged casting. What makes it even worse is that now it seems like Blake's casting is back to just being a "rumor" not a fact.
[From HuffPo] That's pretty rough for Blake – she can't headline a film without it causing major financial difficulties and controversies. Does this mean the film will be recast in total? Does it mean that only the lead role will be recast? Does it mean that although Blake's PR game is spectacular, she still can't headline a film in the eyes of Hollywood producers and studios? Considering I – and nearly everyone else – balked at the idea of Blake headlining a Steven Soderbergh film, I'd say it's just that people don't buy her as a lead actress in films yet. They're content to let her play "the girl" in big-budget films, but she doesn't get to headline yet. |
LeAnn Rimes is still trying to make her failing music career happen Posted: 25 Jan 2012 07:00 AM PST Here are some photos of everybody's favorite Falcor, LeAnn Rimes, at LAX yesterday. Is this the way you dress for a flight? Thigh-high stockings and a miniskirt? Apparently, LeAnn was flying to Nashville – this is according to her Twitter account, where she tweeted, "I could not have made a better record at this time in my life. It's like making a film. I'm proud…SO, headed off to Nashville to a HUGE meeting with my label to play them the whole new record LIVE. SUPER excited cause it ROCKS. #proud". So, she's recorded ANOTHER album? Didn't her last album just come out a few months ago? Didn't it bomb? Wasn't there a rumor that her label was probably going to drop her? Why is LeAnn still trying to make her music career happen? So many questions. Meanwhile, a prediction by AstroChicks, an online astrology site, is making a surprising amount of headlines. Their psychic claims that 2012 is the year that LeAnn will get pregnant, perhaps to keep Gemini Eddie Cibrian interested and engaged – you can read the full prediction here. You know what I hate? I hate that LeAnn and I share a sign – we're both Virgos. LeAnn gives Virgos a bad name. Yes, we're OCD and kind of crazy and anal retentive, but we're not ALL batsh-t insane. In any case, I kind of hope that LeAnn does get pregnant this year. It would give her something else to obsess over. |
Cynthia Nixon: “Everybody likes to dump on the bisexuals” Posted: 25 Jan 2012 06:10 AM PST
[From The Daily Beast] I like that she’s asserting that she can call herself gay if she wants, and that no one else can tell her who she is. I also get how this can really piss off gay people, because it can be a hard fight for some people to be accepted for how they know they were born. It seems sad that being bisexual is still a dirty word today, especially for men. I wish there was greater acceptance that our sexuality is on a continuum and that there are people in the middle. It was refreshing when Anna Paquin came out as bisexual, because it was just so rare to hear. Cynthia is also bald as a badger (I’ve never heard that phrase before, but google suggested it and I thought it was cute.) She’s starring as a cancer victim in the play Wit. Instead of just wearing a skull cap, Cynthia really did shave off all her hair. She told The Daily Beast that she doesn’t like her new look. “I think I look like Ralph Fiennes as Lord Voldemort. Or maybe Nosferatu.” Cynthia is a breast cancer survivor after being diagnosed with early stage cancer almost five years ago. She seems to have beaten it with a lumpectomy and she still takes Tamoxifen. Photo from ABC via OMG!. She is shown with hair on 12-13-11 credit: WENN.com |
Sam Taylor-Wood, 44, and Aaron Johnson, 21, welcome 2nd daughter, Romy Hero Posted: 25 Jan 2012 06:09 AM PST British photographer and director Sam Taylor-Wood fell in love when she was 43 years old. Heartwarming – except that she fell in love with an 18-year-old kid. The kid in question is Aaron Johnson, and they are still together, three years later. Shortly after they met and worked together, Sam got knocked up, and she and Aaron got engaged – they still haven't gotten married, but in 2010, they welcomed a baby girl named Wylda Rae to their family. It's a family which includes a teenage daughter and a 5-year-old daughter from Sam's previous relationship. Anyway, last May, Sam announced that she and Aaron were expecting their second child together – and she's apparently just given birth. It's another girl!
[From The Mail] Well… congratulations. I'm glad that Sam's pregnancy was happy and healthy, and that their second baby was born without complications. I'm also happy to see that Aaron is sticking with Sam for going on 3 years now. Go ahead and call me sexist, but I still wonder if this is going to last in the long run. I mean – he's only 21! And he's now a father of two girls, and stepfather of two girls. AND HE'S ONLY 21. And his fiancée is 44. I still think that if the genders were reversed, people would still have huge problems with this – it's specific to a 40-something person attaching themselves to a teenager. It's like Courtney Stodden and her father/husband. It's creepy. UPDATE: And we have a name! Aaron and Sam named their daughter Romy Hero. I don’t get it. |
Oscar-winning director Tom Hooper just dumped his pregnant girlfriend Posted: 25 Jan 2012 05:41 AM PST I vaguely know who Tara Subkoff is. She was one of the founding designers with Imitation of Christ, she's BFFs with Chloe Sevigny, and she used to date Jimmy Fallon back in the day. I had no idea that Tara had been dating Tom Hooper, the British director who won the Oscar for The King's Speech last year, for more than a year. But they were together. And now it's over. And it's a MESS. Tara is pregnant, you see. And her version of events has Tom Hooper dumping her literally MINUTES after she told him she was pregnant. His version is different, but it's still pretty rough:
[From Page Six] If this story was about two B-list (or even C-list) actors, it would be getting major play. But I guess people don't care about British directors and their pregnant fashion designer girlfriends? Prove them wrong! Care about this, because it's a really scandalous gossip story. Do you believe Tom's side of things, that he dumped her without knowing about her pregnancy? Or was Tara trying to "trap" him into a commitment by getting knocked up? I think the crux of the scandal is in the timing – she finds out she's pregnant and he dumps her, all within a 24-hour-period. Sketchy! |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment