Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy


Katie Holmes, pre-divorce with C mag, doesn’t mention Tom’s name even once

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 09:06 AM PDT

Katie Holmes

Katie Holmes covers the September issue of C Magazine, and the interview took place on June 27, which is one day before she filed for divorce from tiny tyrant Tom Cruise. She looks gorgeous on the cover, right? I’m sure the shoot took place either at the same time or in close proximity to the interview, so I’m assuming that bit of a glint in Katie’s eye is rather telling. Also quite telling is the interview itself. As Kaiser noted in regard to Katie’s recent Elle feature, there’s quite a bit of telegraphing to be had from what is revealed by what Katie says (or in this case, what she doesn’t say). She’s definitely evasive here, but I have to wonder why she’s suddenly appearing on various magazine covers with very little to promote other than her suddenly single status. Perhaps that’s the answer, or maybe Katie talks about her Holmes & Yang line here and that’s just been left out of the excerpts revealed thus far:

Katie Holmes

“Going back over the tapes, there were signs: Holmes was certainly very aware of herself, laying a couple cards on the table but never showing her whole hand,” senior editor Kelsey McKinnon, who interviewed Holmes, tells WWD. “Most noticeably, the one name decisively absent from her lexicon: Tom Cruise. She never actually refers to him by name over pages and pages of transcription.”

When McKinnon asked Holmes if having Suri, 6, brought her and Cruise, 50, closer together, the Ohio native became flustered. “I don’t know. I mean. . . I don’t know,” Holmes responded. “People have been having babies a long time.”

Regarding her future, Holmes told the magazine that she is “ready to take on some more challenging roles.”

“I feel like I worked so much at such a young age that I really wanted to have life experiences. I feel more balanced and like I have more to bring to the table,” she explained. “I always felt like I wanted to catch up [in my personal life] to what I was doing [in my career].”

[From Us Magazine]

At this point, Katie was already free from Tom, and we just didn’t know it, and I love how she took such pains to avoid ever mentioning his name in the interview (and in fact, clearly didn’t want to talk about him when the journalist brought Tom up). It’s such a sharp contrast to her robotic, “He’s my man! W Mag interview from early in their relationship.

Now about this photoshoot, which is quite lovely for the most part. I’m not sure what to think about that hat though.

Katie Holmes

Photos courtesy of C Mag

katie1 katie2 katie3

Princess Charlene & Albert’s CBS interview: hilarious, sad and cringe-worthy?

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 08:37 AM PDT

Poor, pitiful Princess Charlene. You guys always yell at me when I talk about how rough Charlene's life is, and how I don't envy it, but for real. I would not want to switch places with her. Charlene and her husband have a new interview with CBS, and it's… amazing. I have a different interpretation than Lainey, who thinks it was so awful, the interview shouldn't have even taken place. I mean, obviously, Charlene and Albert seem to kind of hate each other (hilarious) and they are not any kind of "fairy tale" or aspirational royal marriage or anything. But I laughed several times during the video, so it totally works if that was their goal. Wait, that wasn't their goal? LOL. Watch the interview and then we'll discuss it:

My first thoughts were "OMG, what is Charlene doing to her face?" Many of you have claimed that Charlene has gotten a boatload of plastic surgery over the years, and while we can dispute "boatload," she's definitely getting something done. Her lips look so weird, especially when she's speaking. The whole thing reminds me of Nicole Kidman trying to speak normally through HER lip augmentation.

After I got past Charlene's funky lips and actually began listening to what she's saying and her body language throughout the interview… she just seems over it. Maybe she was never really into it in the first place. But it feels like she's not even putting in any effort to convince us that she's in a good marriage. But then – OMG!!!!! – Charlene gets "stumped" by the question, "What's it like to be a princess?" and Albert SHUTS DOWN the interview? For real, y'all? And then when Albert and Charlene get the question about his mother (Grace Kelly), Charlene looks like she's going to projectile vom. Classic!!

Around the 5-minute mark, Albert and Charlene start responding to questions about whether Charlene tried to pull a runner before the wedding and whether Albert's goons took away her passport and stuff. Charlene offers a meek denial, then Albert begins his denial, and Charlene just looks like she's going to throw up again, and I swear, she actually rolled her eyes at him. Amazing!

Oh, and it looks like Albert is still trying to get the Ol' Baster in her. Poor Charlene. He just sees her as a broodmare, and he really doesn't seem to give a crap about her beyond that.

Some photos of Charlene and Albert in London today:

Photos courtesy of WENN.
wenn3987735 wenn4003703 wenn4003700

Lea Michele in pink, prom-queen Pucci at the Fox party: busted & awful?

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 07:59 AM PDT

These are some photos from last night's "Fox All-Star Party" at the Soho House in West Hollywood. Lea Michele was arguably the biggest "star" there, so that tells you a great deal about the event. As for Lea's outfit… UGH. I just want to style her, head to toe, because whoever is styling her now must hate her. Either that, or Lea just has no idea what her strengths are, and she puts up a fight over everything. Lea's dress is Pucci – and it's completely wrong for a short, petite girl for a summer event. It looks like a dowdy, ill-fitting prom dress. The hair is a wreck too – Lea tried to copy Blake Lively's braid, but she failed miserably – and it's mostly because A) BANGS TRAUMA and B) the braid is just too messy and poorly executed. As for Lea's boobs – I don't even know. I thought they might be bolt-ons, but I think she might have just gained some weight back in her bust. PS… Is it just me, or does anyone else get "30 years old and masquerading as a 22-year-old" vibes from Lea?

Dear Martha Plimpton: I love you. I love your humor and your talent and I love that your face still moves. But girl, you need to find a different style.

Dear Tamara Taylor: Can we just agree that the haircut was unfortunate and move on from there? You need to stop trying to make this hair "happen". It looks like a really awful wig.

Dear Zooey Dechanel: Are you Botoxing? Because it looks like you're 'Toxing or filler-ing. And that's very disappointing.

Dear Hannah Simone: You are so pretty. Ditch the bangs and your current stylist.

Dear Mindy Kaling: I LOVE YOU SO MUCH and I will totally watch your show about gyno issues but I really need you to stop wearing such unflattering dresses. Please.

Photos courtesy of WENN.
wenn4004073 wenn4004013 wenn4004987 fox_party_067_wenn4005046 wenn4003982 wenn4004083 wenn4004002 wenn4004140 wenn4005029

Dina Lohan “dined and dashed” on a $2500 bill in the Hamptons, of course

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 07:14 AM PDT

I was about to start this post with "This is why Lindsay Lohan is the way she is" but I kind of think that's a cop-out at this point. Obviously, Lindsay, Ali and the other Lohan children would have been better off being raised by wolves, but that only excuses so much. So, Page Six decided to check in with Dina Lohan. What's Mother Crackhead up to these days? Dining and dashing. What is she, 15 years old?

Dina Lohan and her brother Paul Anthony Sullivan left organizers of a Hamptons charity event fuming after they allegedly skipped out of the bash without paying the bill. We're told Lindsay Lohan's party-cougar mom and her brother were offered four complimentary tickets to new East Hampton restaurant hot spot Andrra on Saturday night to watch the Great Bonac Fireworks Show to aid the nonprofit Clamshell Foundation, which supports local health, cultural and education projects.

But Dina and Paul arrived for the seated dinner with eight others. A source told us, "They dined and dashed on a $2,500 check and didn't leave a dime for the waiters. The understanding was they would get four free tickets. Anthony stormed up at the end and said, 'What is this check for?' Organizers offered a reduced bill for around $1,100, but then they just upped and left without leaving a tip. When organizers later phoned him to demand payment, Sullivan said, 'My celebrity clients were not happy.' "

Andrra owner Rich Silver confirmed that Sullivan and his party left with an unpaid bill but declined to comment further.

Sullivan, who in 2008 was sentenced to a year in jail for fraud and now runs a promotions company, said, "This is a total lie. My written and verbal agreement with Rich Silver was to comp dinner for 8 to 10 guests, six people ate. There was not to be any bill. Then you get a bill for $2,500?"

He added, "Dina was strictly invited as a guest and had nothing to do with paying anything. This is totally false. There is no bill to pay. I paid $500 for drinks, and I will wire a tip tomorrow."

Sullivan's attorney, Phil Solages, said, "My client . . . had an arrangement to assist . . . with the promotion of an event. The establishment informed him that his entire party, including himself would be comped for the evening, then he was presented with a bill in contradiction to the agreement. Upon mutual agreement the bill was greatly reduced. He is in possession of a receipt [presumably for drinks]."

Lohan didn't respond to an e-mail for comment last night.

[From Page Six]

THIS is where Lindsay Lohan gets her sense of entitlement, her sense of "everyone has to give me everything I want. FOR FREE." It's the age of entitlement, the age of I'm-a-celebrity-so-I-don't-have-to-pay. And what's worse is that society – for the most part – agrees with Lindsay and Dina. Lindsay doesn't have to pay for her crimes. Dina still gets invited to and COMPED at fancy restaurants. And when someone hands a Lohan a bill, what happens? Nothing. Literally. They don't pay, they don't leave a tip, and when someone complains, they just throw a cracked-out hissy fit.

Also: is anyone else disturbed by the fact that Dina looks younger than Lindsay at this point?

Photos courtesy of WENN.
wenn5843398 wenn5843405 FFN_Lohan_Dina_AFP_051612_9089479

Jennifer Aniston has bangs, highlights in her new movie: cute or busted?

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 05:54 AM PDT

These are new photos of Jennifer Aniston (and Jason Sudeikis and Emma Roberts) on the Wilmington, North Carolina set of their new film, We're the Millers. I guess we now know why Justin Theroux was wandering around New York City over the weekend – his love is in North Carolina, working. And she doesn't want him around. Maybe he'll visit?

I actually discussed Aniston's casting a few months ago, shortly after Wanderlust ate it at the box office – apparently, the script has been making the rounds since 2002, and it's had various re-writes and various stars "attached" to the project at various times. I believe that the current script involved Sudeikis playing a drug dealer/drug trafficker who is trying to move a marijuana shipment across the border, and he "hired" Jennifer Aniston's character, a hooker, to play his loving wife. Then they hire some kids, all to pretend that they're a family above suspicion, so they can get the drugs across the border. So Jennifer will be playing a hooker pretending to be an all-American "wife". Which is… kind of interesting. I might have to give her some credit for moving outside of her normal, cutesy wheelhouse. Of course, I expect that Sudeikis and Aniston's characters will end up together in the end.

Anyway, these photos show…? I guess Aniston and Sudeikis's characters are on the move. Aniston's character has bangs in this movie. Can you tell if those bangs are a new haircut for Jennifer, or are they those clip-on bangs? Is it a wig in total? I really can't tell anymore. As for her costume… it's not flattering. Which makes me like Aniston more – she's playing a character without a cute wardrobe. Of course, she’s still showing off her toned arms.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
FFN_Aniston_Jennifer_FF2_072312_50840573 FFN_Aniston_Jennifer_FF2_072312_50840605 FFN_Aniston_Jennifer_FF2_072312_50840602 FFN_Aniston_Jennifer_FF2_072312_50840585 FFN_Aniston_Jennifer_FF2_072312_50840604 FFN_Aniston_Jennifer_FF2_072312_50840575

Tom Cruise is going to be a New Yorker now too, he’s shopping for NYC real estate

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 04:55 AM PDT

These are some blurry new photos of Tom Cruise in London yesterday. He was "taking meetings" about a new film project called All You Need is Kill. This is the "new" Tom Cruise that he wants us to see – the doting and loving father who books back-to-back movies, the powerhouse producer who doesn't let Xenu interfere with his business, the consummate professional who will move heaven and earth to see his youngest child. Are you buying that image of Cruise? Eh. In an interesting coincidence-or-conspiracy moment, upon Tom's arrival in London, Radar claims that The Church of Scientology will be distributing L. Ron Hubbard's 1980 book, The Way To Happiness, to Olympic fans. Radar says that the CoS sent out a fundraising letter to help pay for 2 million copies of the book to be distributed for free. Apparently, CoS passed out the book during the World Cup and they claim that as a direct result, it was the "least violent" World Cup ever. So, is that what Tom's really doing in London?

But on to this interesting little story about Tom in New York City… over the weekend, Page Six reported that Tom has begun looking for a new apartment in Manhattan, and sources claim he definitely wants to spend more time there.

Tom Cruise may have been absent when Katie Holmes first dropped her divorce bombshell, as he was filming in Iceland — but now sources say the "Mission: Impossible" star intends to be spending a lot more time in New York to be near daughter Suri, and he's shopping for a bachelor pad for himself.

"Tom's looking for a new home here," says a source. "He wants a fresh start. He doesn't want to go back to the East Village apartment where he was living with Katie."

But while Holmes has settled into a new pad in Chelsea, Cruise is eyeing houses outside the city, as well as high-end residences in town.

"He's looking for something that's very private," a source told us. "Where he won't have to deal with going through a lobby, and people outside all the time.

"He also wants to have a nice amount of space for Suri, with outdoor space. That could mean high-end luxury apartments, but he's also looking at houses outside of the city or in gated communities."

Area brokers are buzzing with word that Cruise could be looking for a new mega-home. Holmes reportedly has primary custody of Suri, but the terms of the settlement are confidential.

Meanwhile, Cruise, who also has a sprawling Beverly Hills estate, is wary of going back to the space he and Holmes shared at the American Felt Building on East 13th Street.

A source pointed out that Cruise chose to stay in a hotel this week on his latest New York trip to see Suri. "Tom wasn't staying in their old apartment, because that would have been strange," says the source.

The source adds that Cruise wants to "be an active parent," adding, "So, New York, get ready for a lot more of Tom."

Besides enrolling Suri in school here, Holmes is becoming a further Big Apple fixture after her split from Cruise, signing on to star in the upcoming Broadway show "Dead Accounts" and showing in New York Fashion Week for the first time in September with the Holmes & Yang line.

Reps for Cruise declined to comment.

[From Page Six]

Tom has never really been a New York guy – whenever he's not working on a film set, you mostly hear about him in LA, or you don't hear about him at all, because when Tom flies under the radar, no one has any idea where he is. I always think of it as Tom's "boy time" – and I would love to know if David Miscavige also "went missing" during those times too. Anyway, as for Tom's new New York lifestyle – this too is part of The New Tom. It wouldn't surprise me at all if we learned that Tom had quietly hired some crisis-management firm or a war-time consigliere/publicist to advise him and help him with his post-divorce counter-attack and media blitz, the effects of which we're seeing now. This is Tom's "It's All About Suri And What She Needs" counter-attack. It's one of his most effective counter-attacks, so let's see how it plays out.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
FFN_FLYNETUK_CruiseTom_Headshot_072312_50840435 FFN_FLYNETUK_CruiseTom_702312_50840380 FFN_FLYNETUK_CruiseTom_702312_50840377 FFN_FLYNETUK_CruiseTom_702312_50840375

Natalie Portman: “In Hollywood, they consider me a smart woman”

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 04:35 AM PDT

Natalie Portman

Natalie Portman covers the July issue of Madame Figaro, and the cover shot is absolutely robotic looking, isn’t it? She looks like a (really tired) porcelain Natalie doll, which probably just means she’s highly photoshopped, but it also seems like the woman is in dire need of a lengthy nap. Perhaps baby Aleph is still a wee bit fussy and keeping Natalie up at night. Anyway, I’ve been trying to figure out what Natalie is promoting with this magazine cover because she doesn’t have any movies scheduled for release although her IMDb page reveals that she’s got three projects currently filming (including the Thor sequel and an untitled Terrence Malick projct). So I suppose Natalie is just reminding us that she’s still around and hasn’t retired from acting just because she had a baby. That makes sense, I guess. Here are some interview excerpts:

Natalie Portman

On appreciating her success: “I have always considered myself extremely lucky. I know very well that there are very few elected officials in this business and that many of us, despite their talent and hard work, will not come out of the lot. These are the laws of chance.”

On her youthful appearance: “It’s very strange because my physical traits sometimes make it difficult for others to consider me a woman and at the same time I have been in the business for so long that many think I have already passed the 40 year mark.”

On being an object of beauty: “I obviously do not see myself that way. I prefer ‘about beauty’ or ‘subject of desire.’ One can say that about all women, whatever their life and career.”

On her reputation for being an intellectual: “It is a matter of context. In Hollywood, they consider me a smart woman, but in other circles, I’m probably seen as a silly actress (laughs). In America, they see me as European. In Europe, some see me as maybe a stupid American.”

[From Madame Figaro]

I’ve always figured that Natalie struggles with having her comments misinterpreted and has attempted to guard against that dreaded evil with such guarded statements. She barely seems candid at all in her responses, but it’s hard to deny that she really is an intelligent person (and Ivy League scholar, blah blah) and perhaps doesn’t always sense her own vague air of pretention. Obviously though, she’s no Goop because, you know, Natalie actually graduated from college. Zing.

As far as this photoshoot goes, the interior shots are much better (and more relaxed looking) than the cover.

Natalie Portman

Natalie Portman

Photos courtesy of Madame Figaro

natalie1 natalie2 natalie3 natalie4

Katherine Jackson is in Arizona, hasn’t spoken to grandchildren in 8 days

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 04:34 AM PDT

We haven’t covered this story yet as it’s complicated, there are a lot of different versions floating around, and I was hoping it would be resolved without incident. Not so much. As you may have heard over the weekend, Michael Jackson’s mom Katherine, 82, went “missing” for over a week. Katherine is the primary caregiver for Michael’s three children: Prince, 15, Paris, 14, and Blanket, 10. A missing person’s report was filed on Katherine, an investigation ensued and has since been closed. Jermaine issued a statement that Katherine was resting in Arizona with her daughter, Rebbie, “following doctor's orders to rest-up and de-stress, away from phones and computers.” Paris tweeted late Monday that she hadn’t spoken to her grandmother in 8 days and that “something is really off , this isn't like her at all.

Radar claims that the idea to whisk Katherine off for a week at “a spa” was Janet’s idea, who felt that the situation at home was too stressful for Katherine. TMZ confirms that the “chaos” at the house led to Katherine’s removal, but more than that Michael’s siblings want to challenge his will, which leaves 20% to Katherine and virtually nothing to them. E! has an article outlining all that’s at stake in this, and what would happen if Katherine was removed as the children’s guardian.

Meanwhile Michael’s children have a security team and are being cared for by a nanny. On Monday Jermaine, Randy and Janet went to Katherine’s Calabasas home in an attempt to remove the children, but security guards blocked them, Prince refused to go and the cops were called. The kids still haven’t spoken to their grandmother, according to Paris’ most recent tweets. However, paparazzi agency X17 claims that the children knew Katherine was leaving. They also have a photo of her playing Uno with family. Here’s more on the latest, thanks to Radar:

Jermaine, Randy and Janet Jackson have been barred from their mother Katherine’s Calabasas home after attempting to remove their brother Michael’s three children from the house on Monday, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.

The situation adds to the ongoing drama with the Jackson family, as Katherine has been in Arizona for more than a week and hasn’t spoken to her grandchildren, of whom she is the legal guardian. “It was just total chaos when Jermaine, Randy and Janet descended on the house.

“Randy was telling Prince Michael he had to leave with them and that he had a private jet chartered to take them all to Arizona to see Katherine. Prince firmly held his ground and told Randy he wasn’t going anywhere with them. The security detail prevented the three of them from taking the kids out of state. The cops had to be called and Janet kept saying they had a legal right to be at the house when in fact they don’t. The rental house is in the name of Michael Jackson’s estate, so they were told to leave immediately. For the time being, they won’t be allowed to come back to the rental house and guards at the security gate have been told under no circumstances are they to allow them in. Paris was absolutely hysterical and kept telling her uncles to just bring her grandmother home,” a source close to the situation tells RadarOnline.com.

“The plan to take the kids out of the house was going to be a publicity stunt. The kids were going to be paraded into the house in Arizona where Katherine is staying and those photos would be published on a website favored by Randy Jackson.”

As previously reported Janet was behind Katherine’s removal from her home to Arizona, after becoming adamant that her mom needed bed rest and to be checked out by an independent doctor. And a source has revealed that Katherine is doing just fine.

“Katherine is very well," a family member told RadarOnline.com. "Janet was behind the whole thing – she felt that Katherine needed medical help and was desperate for her to get some bed rest.”

“Michael’s children are being cared for by their nanny and legal options are being explored about ensuring their safety. The children are very, very smart and they are surrounded by excellent bodyguards that won’t allow anything unsavory to happen to them. The kids just want their grandmother back, and want the family drama to end. Now that Paris and Prince are old enough, they understand why Michael didn’t have much of a relationship with anyone in the family except for Katherine,” the source says.

[From Radar Online]

What a mess this is, and how unfair it is to the kids. They lost their dad, and now their aunts and uncles are trying to take their grandmother from them in order to get their mitts on their late dad’s money. They’ve been placed in a very tough spot, and good for them for standing their ground. From the interviews I’ve seen with Paris, she comes across as very mature and even humble. I hope those kids stick together and refuse to be manipulated. They should inherit their dad’s money as he intended, but obviously their relatives want it for themselves.

As for Katherine’s health, she was at “a spa” not a hospital. Paris tweeted some insight about her grandmother’s condition. “the same doctor that testified on behalf of dr murray saying my father was a drug addict (a lie) is caring for my grandmother… just saying.” What kind of doctor cuts their patient off from a phone or Internet for over a week? Who prevents their own mother from contacting the kids she’s supposed to be caring for? Maybe I’m wrong, maybe there’s more going on behind the scenes than we know, but it looks like a money grab from here.

These photos are from 1-26-12. Credit: WENN.com and FameFlynet

Bristol Palin’s son Tripp, 3, uses homophobic slur on TV, Bristol laughs

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 04:29 AM PDT


Trip uses the word at about 1:00 in. If this video is not viewable in your country, you can watch it here.

The last we heard about Bristol Palin, her reality show was being moved to a later time slot on Lifetime after dismal ratings and even worse reviews. Bristol’s show, “Life’s a Tripp,” was faring so poorly that it was replaced by re-runs of “Dance Moms.” We didn’t cover that story, because it seemed inevitable to me and I was relieved not to have to think about Bristol and her “career.”

Well “Life’s a Trip” is still airing and Bristol is still making headlines. In the latest episode, her son Tripp, 3, called his aunt Willow a “f*ggot” when she tried to discipline him. We know Willow has also used that anti-gay slur, as she wrote it on Facebook in an argument against a guy who was mocking her family, calling him “so gay” and “such a f*ggot.” Here’s more:

The Palins have never been known for being particularly gay-friendly — and unfortunately, it seems as if the youngest member of the family is following in the footsteps of his elders.

A newly-released clip from the Lifetime reality series “Bristol Palin: Life’s a Tripp” shows Tripp Palin uttering a homophobic slur when mom Bristol and aunt Willow won’t let him visit the swimming pool.

The Palin sisters gasp, and then giggle, when three-year-old Tripp’s temper tantrum culminates in the tot calling his aunt a “faggot.”

Though Bristol does confess that she’s “doing a terrible job disciplining Tripp…I know he’s going to continue to push the boundaries,” her son’s behavior doesn’t seem too out of step, given his family’s history of anti-gay activity. In 2010, Willow sparked controversy when she fired off at a classmate on Facebook, referring to him “so gay” and “such a faggot.”

Perhaps Sarah Palin’s grandson would be better served by taking notes from dad Levi Johnston, who in 2009 embraced his gay icon status on “The Joy Behar Show” following his steamy spread in Playgirl magazine.

[From The Huffington Post]

Kids repeat what they hear at home. I’ll admit that my son has used the other F word, the more common one, with consequences, but if he’s ever heard this one he knows not to say it. I once explained to him that it was wrong for his friends to call something “gay” in a derogatory way after he asked about it. It’s doubtful Bristol has had that conversation with her son. We know her position on same sex marriage rights. This isn’t the most open-minded family.

This makes me wonder why producers decided to leave that segment in the show. It’s for ratings obviously, but if Bristol wanted it cut she could have made a case for it. (Note that they did not cut out a part of Bristol’s argument with a heckler in which she asked him if he didn’t like her mom because he was “a homosexual.” This was reported incorrectly by some outlets.) In Bristol’s mind, Tripp saying that word is probably about the same as a kid using a mild swear word. She wasn’t horrified, she was laughing.

After I wrote this story I found a blog Bristol wrote in which she claimed that Tripp used the other F word. Of course she blamed the media for claiming he said it, writing “I guess the temptation to label my three year old son is just too great for the lefty papers to resist.” It’s about her parenting, it’s not about her little kid, but I wouldn’t expect her to grasp that. Watch her kid say the word again and tell me he said “f#$@,” not “f*ggot.” It sounded like it ended with a “t,” not an “er,” but whatever. The Palins are always victimized by the media.

Lindsay Lohan is like Rita Hayworth, says cracked-out ‘Canyons’ director

Posted: 24 Jul 2012 04:27 AM PDT

When I was a recreational drug user (years and years ago), I used to buy from a dealer who lived in a really sketchy part of my college town. Not only was it the sketchy part of town, but the dealer's apartment was basically the stereotype of a "drug den". My friends and I used to refer to it as "The Shady Place". I was just struck by that memory when I was looking through these photos of Lindsay Lohan leaving Mr. Chow's last night in LA. Lindsay is a walking Shady Place. Everywhere she goes, she turns the place into a den of crack, drama and sketchiness. My guess is that she got high before she went to Mr. Chow's, then she did some lines in the bathroom, so she's riding high in these photos.

You know the Cracken is working again, right? She just finished her first week of The Canyons, that micro-budget film in which LL plays a washed up hooker (typecasting!) who pretty much has sex in every other scene, I think. Well, the film has a Facebook page and director Paul Schrader decided to blow some crack smoke up Lindsay's ass (she charges extra for that):

LINDSAY. Seven days in, first full week completed. Lindsay Lohan is a huge fan of Hollywood glamour and performances from the Golden Era. Working with her every day on varied scenes I’ve been making a mental checklist of classic movie performances she’s touched upon. There’s has been a lot of Ann Margaret, some Gena Rowlands and Faye Dunaway and of course some bits of Liz Taylor and Monroe as well as a little Rita Hayworth and even Gene Tierney (although the last may be more my creation than hers). Oh yeah, and Angie Dickinson. And Lee Remick. And Shelley Winters… . Paul S.

[Via The Canyons Facebook page]

Ann Margaret? Gena Rowlands? Faye Dunaway? RITA HAYWORTH? Jesus take the wheel. Does anyone else get the feeling that The Canyons is less a "film" and more like a bunch of shady people getting high together and saying, "Dude, you are SO like Steven Spielberg." And, "I know, girl. You're like Rita Hayworth. How much for a beej?" Because honestly, I don't see how someone sober can look at this crack-face and say, "OMG, Rita Hayworth."

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.
FFN_Lohan_Lindsay_PER_072312_50840966 FFN_Lohan_Lindsay_PER_072312_50840967 wenn4003884 FFN_Lohan_Lindsay_PER_072312_50840961 FFN_Lohan_Lindsay_PER_072312_50840960 FFN_Lohan_Lindsay_PER_072312_50840969

No comments:

Post a Comment