Thursday, August 16, 2012

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy


Doutzen Kroes shows off her crazy bikini body in Miami: gorgeous & sexy?

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 08:29 AM PDT

Oooooooooh. New photos of Doutzen Kroes!! She's in Miami with her husband Sunnery James – again. I'm not even sure Doutzen and Sunnery's vacation ever ended. It seems like they've been there for months. And before everyone starts screaming "WHO?" (a great way to get your comments deleted, btw), Doutzen is a big-time model. Most people know her from her Victoria's Secret work (catalog, commercials and runway), but she's also one of the top girls in the industry overall. And I love her. I think she's got such a beautiful face, and her body is to die for… slender AND strong, muscular and athletic but still feminine and lithe. She's got such a great, athletic figure that Victoria's Secret feels the need to airbrush-out her stomach muscles.

So… I'm really just covering these new photos of Doutzen in a bikini because… well, we should do that more often. All of the sites operated by boys get to run endless amounts of celebrity bikini photos. Why can't we do that too? Feminism! Or something. All I know is that when I saw Doutzen's toned, lovely butt, I was filled with a weird combination of jealousy and lust.

A few months ago, Doutzen was talking about food, eating and whether she can partake in any of that because she's a model. Doutzen admitted that she has a real problem with French fries (me too! We're the same): “French fries. I really like the ones at Shake Shack. That’s the thing with french fries, and potato chips too. You have one, and you can’t stop. But I always try not to eat the whole bucket that they give you, because I think that’s the trick. Everything in moderation; you can’t force yourself to eat none of the good stuff. I wouldn’t be a happy person if I only ate salads. I love salads — but salads with fries.” But Doutzen also spoke realistically about keeping in shape: "I box, I jump rope, and I do lots of leg work, you know, to keep the butt up. So, it’s lots of things. I have an amazing trainer and I’m really fortunate to have that, you know? But it’s also my job. You can’t compare my life to somebody who goes to work everyday; I have to look this way.” Oh, Doutzen. You are one of my favorite girl-crushes.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
FFN_KroesDoutzen_Beach_BRJ_081512_50859216 FFN_KroesDoutzen_Beach_BRJ_081512_50859223 FFN_KroesDoutzen_Beach_BRJ_081512_50859247 FFN_KroesDoutzen_Beach_BRJ_081512_50859220 FFN_KroesDoutzen_Beach_BRJ_081512_50859218 FFN_KroesDoutzen_Beach_BRJ_081512_50859259

Lady Gaga will wear fur if she considers it a “museum pièce de résistance”

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 07:53 AM PDT

Lady Gaga wears fur now. Sort of. Maybe. I'm still not sure, actually. As I covered earlier this week, Gaga stepped out in two different furry looks over the past week. One of the jackets (the pink one) is Armani, and the white-and-grey one is Hermes. There was debate that both jackets were fake, and Gaga refused to detail exactly what was going on. PETA got involved, and asked for Gaga to clarify her stance on wearing fur, considering she used to be vocally opposed to it. Well, Gaga has finally responded. And I'm still not sure WTF she's talking about.

To the fans. i want you to know that I care deeply about your feelings and views, and I will always support your philosophies about life. We've been having over-arching conversations about society, equality, and politics for the past five years, and we should continue.

I do not however support violent, abusive, and childish campaigns for ANY CAUSE. Particularly one that I respect. "Animal Rights." I am choosing not to comment on whether or not the furs I purchase are faux fur-pile or real because I would think it hypercritical not to acknowledge the python, ostrich, cow hide, leather, lamb, alligator, "kermit" and not to mention meat, that I have already worn.

This should already put me in a category as one who appreciates and adores the beauty of animals in fashion, but am not a strict vegan. I have truly always stayed away from skinned fur, especially i have never been able to afford a nice one, but this does not mean my morals are rigid and that I won't bend at the sight of an absolute art piece of a coat. I have no chains about this.

You see a carcass, I see a museum pièce de résistance. But I am truly sorry to fans who are upset by this, its a fair and applaudable feeling about the health and safety of animals. I respect your views, please respect mine. And to campaigners, Save your flour to make bread for the children who are hungry. And Kim Kardashian is fabulous.

[Via Little Monsters]

If I'm reading this correctly (and really, who knows?), I think Gaga is basically saying that she's always worn animal skins, just not fur, but that she always left the possibility open to wearing fur if she found a piece that she considered "beautiful" or "art". Which has happened, apparently. So, she's wearing fur because she considers it a piece of art, and she isn't worried about being flour-bombed by PETA either, thus "Save your flour to make bread for the children who are hungry. And Kim Kardashian is fabulous." All in all… I can't really hate on Gaga for this. Right?

Photos courtesy of WENN, Little Monsters.
gaga1 gaga2 wenn5892809

Chris Brown feels “horrible” about Rihanna’s Oprah interview, doesn’t get it

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 07:44 AM PDT

Chris Brown

These are some photos of Chris Brown performing in Cannes on 7/25 in a very packed club atmosphere; so it seems that Team Breezy is still enjoying a very successful career in spite of the fact that he feels like the whole world piled on him when he just happened to beat the crap out of Rihanna three years ago. Might I add that Chris is still a violent a-hole who continues to spread his mayhem. Most recently, he nearly started a fight at a club the night before the Billboard Music Awards, and then in June, he and Drake got into a huge fistfight at the Greenhouse club in NYC.

In an interesting development, both Chris and Drake have been sued for $16 million by the company that owns the club trademark for “glass-flinging, broken-bottle-swinging free-for-all in a crowded club,” which make sense since publicity from the fight resulted in the loss of a licensing deal, the temporary shuttering of the club, and the ongoing threat of a lost liquor license. NBA star Tony Parker, who was injured in the fight, has sued the club for $20 million dollars as well. Meanwhile, Chris continues his tour of terror unabated. Maybe it’s a bit unfair for me to speak of him with those words, but it’s clear that he hasn’t learned his lesson, and it’s only a matter of time before his violent ways erupt again (and again).

At the moment, however, Chris is still upset that he’s still known as the guy who beat up Rihanna. He’s reportedly aghast at the fact that Rihanna has spoken to Oprah about it during the interview that will air August 19, and he just doesn’t understand why things are being rehashed three years after the fact:

Rihanna Oprah

Chris Brown has seen the preview video of Rihanna’s upcoming interview with Oprah, Aug. 19, and he “feels horrible” because he and Rihanna are currently “more cool than anyone will know,” but he’s discouraged by his past mistake being rehashed over and over again, a source tells HollywoodLife.com exclusively!

Chris Brown’s assault on Rihanna back in 2009 will once again be front and center in the media when Rihanna's interview on Oprah's Next Chapter airs this Sunday August 19.

During the interview, Rihanna confesses and cries to Oprah: “I lost my best friend. Everything I knew switched, switched in a night. And I couldn’t control that. It’s not easy to interpret on camera, not with the world watching.”

A source close to Chris tells HollywoodLife.com exclusively, “Chris saw the video clip. Of course he saw it, how do you think he feels? He feels horrible he did that.”

The source continues, “Watching [Rihanna's interview with Oprah] made him realize he made a big mistake and he's been paying for it ever since. He’s working hard, in the studio, dancing, doing everything he can to rebuild his name and career and I think he been successful in doing all that. Y’all should be talking about his road to recovery and how he’s been a man and made s-t right. He and Ri are cool, more cool than anyone will know. She forgave the [boy] the minute that s-t went down, so what that say about their relationship?”

[From Hollywood Life]

Yeah, Rihanna probably did forgive Chris for what he did, but she’s obviously very conflicted about what happened and could use some really good, extensive therapy. As for Chris, I don’t buy for a second that his reaction to the interview clip was to feel “horrible” about what he did. Rather, his reaction was probably to feel glass-smashingly angry about the fact that she would dare to talk about it in a public venue. As for the fact that we should respect his alleged “road to recovery” and how he’s “been a man” about it all? Bitch, please.

Chris Brown

Chris Brown

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and OWN

FFN_CHP_Brown_Chris_072512_50842975 riri2 FFN_CHP_Brown_Chris_072512_50843000 FFN_CHP_Brown_Chris_072512_50842976

Samantha Brick got death threats for being so beautiful: “I felt violated”

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 07:24 AM PDT

A quick question for our UK readers: is Samantha "There are downsides to being this pretty" Brick now a legit celebrity over there? I'm asking because I found a ton of new photos of Brick, and it seems like she's still getting a lot of attention – like, she's something of a "reality star" in the UK now, only she doesn't have a reality show, she just lives in a delusional world of her making and she occasionally writes about it.

In case you've already forgotten Brick, she's the woman who created an international firestorm when she wrote an essay for The Daily Mail called "There are downsides to being this pretty" complete with photos of Brick looking like this, in which she claimed that men always hit on her and called her gorgeous and women were always, always JELLY of her. She followed up that essay with another one in which she compared herself to Angelina Jolie, and then there was another piece a few months ago in which she claimed her marriage was the best thing ever because she's submissive to an emotionally stunted husband who weighs her every morning, and who would dump her if she gained more than a few pounds. So… let's check in with Samantha Brick, shall we?

When Samantha Brick wrote an essay titled, "There are downsides to looking this pretty: Why women hate me for being beautiful," she thought she was sending an important message to ladies around the world.

Instead, she was flooded with a barrage of Internet bashing and hate mail. Now, Samantha tells In Touch some went so far as to trash her — and even threaten her life.

"They said, 'You should die. You should be bricked to death,' playing on my last name," the 41-year-old Birmingham, England, native tells In Touch, four months after her April 2 article ran in the U.K. Daily Mail. "They attacked the way I look — my teeth, my breasts, everything."

Samantha says a friend even got a call from a stranger claiming to be holding Samantha hostage. "It was surreal," she says. "I felt violated."

Although Samantha admits the attacks forced her to question, for the first time, just how pretty she really is, and even made her contemplate getting plastic surgery, she now has her self-confidence back — and has no regrets. "I still get e-mails from models, housewives and ordinary women," she tells In Touch, "thanking me for telling their story."

[From In Touch Weekly]

Obviously, death threats are always horrible and no one should condone them. I don't really understand how someone could have read any of Brick's essays and come away with "She should die." Brick is just some crazy lady, spouting off her delusions into the world. What Glenn Beck is to politics, Samantha Brick is to feminism. Nonsensical, harmless, crazy.

Oh, and I found an answer to my own question – Samantha IS a celebrity now. She just joined the cast of the new season of the UK's Celebrity Big Brother. That should be a treat for the UK. But how will Samantha's French husband deal with her absence?

Photos courtesy of WENN.
wenn3826802 wenn3973141 wenn4033425 wenn5824648 wenn4033427

Halle Berry is going to court today in her bid to move Nahla to France

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 06:25 AM PDT


The inevitable end game in Halle Berry’s custody battle with her ex Gabriel Aubry is finally playing out. We’ve seen Halle Berry go off screaming at the paparazzi outside her daughter’s school, and we’ve seen her playing happy family on the beach with her new fiance, and smiling at the paparazzi when it suits her. It’s all part of her plan to make a case that the paparazzi in America are so dangerous that she should be granted permission by the court to move with her daughter to France. Nevermind that a two or three hour move outside of LA would accomplish the same thing. I’m hoping the judge feels the same way, but we’ll see.

TMZ reports that Halle has subpeoned a paparazzo to testify in her custody case, and that she plans on using video to prove how dangerous a situation it can be for Nahla.

Halle Berry is going to court today to convince a judge to let her move to Paris with 4-year-old Nahla — over the vigorous objections of baby daddy Gabriel Aubry — and Halle’s secret weapon is the paparazzi.

Halle will try to prove it’s unsafe for her to continue living in the U.S. because the paparazzi have created extreme danger for her and Nahla. We’ve been in touch with various paparazzi agencies and know Halle’s lawyer, Stephen Kolodny, has been on the hunt for video he can show the judge … hoping to show Halle and Nahla being “terrorized” by aggressive photogs. The trial will become a video presentation, which will include a crazy scene where Halle had to call the Beverly Hills Police so she and Nahla could make an escape from a restaurant.

Ironically, Halle has subpoenaed her arch-enemy, paparazzo Andrew Deetz. You’ll recall, Halle went nuclear on the guy (see video) after he dogged Nahla at her school. Sources connected with Deetz tell TMZ … Deetz has not only been subpoenaed, he will gladly testify it’s his job to be uber-aggressive.

And we’ve spoken with sources connected with expert witnesses who will testify Halle and Nahla will get safe haven in France, where it’s a crime to harass celebrities in public.

[From TMZ]

I believe that Halle really does hate the paparazzi. She had a guy spy on at home in 2008 and I remember Halle telling Tyra Banks in 2009 that she found it “horrifying” when a lady recognized Nahla on her own when she wasn’t with her. But if that’s the case, she can rectify the situation by getting better security, moving to a more secluded area as I mentioned or just taking more precautionary measures to avoid the paparazzi. She’s had years to do this, and now her only solution is to hightail it off to France. That incident in which she screamed at a photographer is looking mighty convenient now. This is about limiting Gabriel’s access to their daughter, and using the paparazzi as an excuse. Honestly I’m surprised she’s still even with Olivier Martinez. I expected them to break up by now.

If Halle is successful in her bid to move to France, at least she’ll have to foot the bill for Gabriel to visit his daughter. I hope she gets shot down in court, but we’ll see.

Here’s Halle’s new man, Oliver Martinez, out with Nahla on 8-12-12. Gabriel Aubry is shown with Nahla on 4-24-12. Halle, Oliver and Nahla are shown together on 8-11-12. Credit: Pacific Coast News, WENN and Fame.

Gabriel Aubry happily picks up little Nahla from school in Los Angeles FFN_MartinezOlivier_Nahle_EXCL_VM_081212_50856401 wenn5892479 wenn5892481 77514PCN_Halle09-682x1024 77514PCN_Halle02-682x1024

Kristen Stewart doesn’t understand why she’s getting the brunt of the criticism

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 05:53 AM PDT

TMZ has a story up which is making me feel kind of… ugh. Throughout the Kristen Stewart-Rupert Sanders cheating scandal, there has been a constant debate/conversation about feminism, misogyny, "homewrecking" and the role of the media as some kind of morality police. While I definitely think Kristen Stewart has received the brunt of the criticism – unfairly – I do understand WHY that happened, and I always thought it had less to do with misogyny and more to do with fame. Rupert Sanders hasn't taken as big of a public hit because he simply did not have a public profile before the scandal. Whereas Kristen was and is arguably one of the most famous women in the world. Most people think Rupert is a POS, of course, but Kristen is the one who riles up emotions and she's the "newsworthy" one. Anyway, TMZ has a story in which sources close to Kristen claim she's "furious" that she's "taking all the heat" from the affair:

Kristen Stewart has publicly shown remorse over her affair with her “Snow White and the Huntsman” director, but privately she is FURIOUS she’s taking all the heat … sources directly connected with Kristen tell TMZ.

Our sources tell us … Kristen can’t believe the public isn’t painting Rupert Sanders as the bad guy. She’s grousing that he’s 19 years her senior and was “in a position of power over her” … being a director of a movie she had just shot and presumably someone she was going to work with again.

Kristen is also incensed that she’s being called the big cheater. Although she knows she shouldn’t have done it because she was in a committed relationship with Robert Pattinson, she feels Rupert is in a totally different and far more culpable situation, being married with 2 kids.

We’re told Kristen fears her career may be irreparably damaged — something she believes she doesn’t deserve as a 22-year-old single woman who made a stupid mistake.

[From TMZ]

Yeah. She's partly right – Rupert is equally culpable in the affair, and he deserves more criticism, more of a career hit, more of public outcry. But this whole argument of "Rupert was in a position of power over her" – really? It reminds me of the People Mag story two weeks ago in which "sources close to Kristen" claimed that "Rupert had been infatuated with [Kristen] since the production [of SWATH], but she always kept it professional because she loved [Robert Pattinson]. She still does. It only became a flirtation recently, and she was lured into a brief situation that she never wanted." I simply don't buy Kristen as a victim, preyed upon by an older man who had a position of power over her. SWATH was Rupert Sanders' first film as a director, and he pretty much only got the make the film because Kristen and Charlize signed on. I think Kristen's playing the victim in the hopes of garnering some sympathy, and that pisses me off. Was Kristen young and dumb, and did she make a horrible mistake? Yes. Should she have to “pay” for that mistake by eating sh-t for a while? Yep. Will playing the “pity poor me” card too soon end up causing a backlash? Probably. Will she be fine a year from now? Yep.

Photos courtesy of WENN.
wenn4011928 wenn3902824 wenn3899762

Miley Cyrus’ pixie cut compared to Britney’s shaved head breakdown: fair or not?

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 05:40 AM PDT

r
Miley Cyrus has been tweeting photos of her new platinum asymmetric pixie cut since she got it just four days ago. To me she comes across like a normal 19 year-old experimenting with her look and sharing it online, only some people are concerned about her. Radar has quotes from a random psychologist who claims that Miley’s behavior is reminiscent of what Britney went through when she shaved her head in 2007. They’re both former child star singers who cut off their hair, but I don’t see it beyond that. Here’s more:

“Miley Cyrus seems stuck in a set of compulsive behaviors that cry out for attention,” Los Angeles-based psychologist Dr. Seth Meyers, who has not treated the Hannah Montana star, told RadarOnline.com in an exclusive interview.

“Miley Cyrus’ parade of unusual and provocative behavior recently reminds me of Britney Spears’ downward spiral in the past,” explained Meyers, referring to The X Factor judge’s meltdown in 2007 when she suddenly shaved all her hair off.

“The apparent recent marks on her wrist, the drastic haircut, and an undeniably fledgling career suggest to me that Miley is overwhelmed with anxiety, feeling lost and uncertain about her future. Her loved ones should keep a close eye on her in case her impulsive behavior continues and gets worse, potentially putting her at risk of self-harm,” he warned.

Wild child Miley got her headline-making haircut from Beverly Hills stylist Chris McMillan, who created Jennifer Aniston’s iconic ‘Rachel’ cut in the 90s.

[From Radar Online]

The only evidence Radar offers as evidence that Miley is cutting herself are photos of light scratches on her wrist. As commenters on Radar point out Miley has a new puppy. She has several dogs and it’s more likely that one of her dogs scratched her.

Miley is 19 years old. When I was 19 I pierced my nose, wore combat boots, and got tattoos that I thankfully had the foresight to put in places that clothing covers. We didn’t have The Internet or cell phones and our cameras weren’t digital so we didn’t take as many pictures, which is sad really. I wish I had more photos from college. What I’m saying is that if I were famous with a worldwide platform people would probably say I was crazy at 19 too, and look I turned out fine and now spend my days gossiping. Maybe I’m not the best example, but I don’t see the big deal about Miley’s cute new hair. She didn’t freak out and shave it in front of the paparazzi like Britney, she hired a celebrity hairdresser to give her an avant-garde new cut. She should let up on the tweeting, though, she gave it up once in the past and she should realize that she needs to step away for a while. It does look like she’s going through something, but it seems more like normal insecurity and affirmation-seeking than a breakdown.

Jennifer Lawrence would never cheat on her boyfriend, unlike a certain trampire

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 05:21 AM PDT

The header photo is a new pic of Jennifer Lawrence in the September issue of Vogue – Vogue profiled some of the coolest, most fashionable people under the age of 45, and J-Law made the list. And this photo is really… something. I love her body. I love that she looks strong. I'm including some photos at the end of the post of Jennifer coming from the gym too – crazy body.

Over the past year or so, there were lots of rumors about a potential "rivalry" between Jennifer Lawrence and Kristen Stewart, arguably two of the most well-known young actresses in Hollywood right now. Kristen spent the last four years as the romantic lead in one of the most successful franchises of all time – and Jennifer Lawrence just began another franchise which will make as much money, if not more. Jennifer also auditioned for the "Bella Swan" role, if I remember correctly, and it's believed that Jennifer and Kristen are often up for the same roles, and that will probably continue for years to come. Kristen allegedly scored the lead role in William Styron's Lie Down in Darkness, which Jennifer was very vocal about wanting too. But it will interesting to see how their personal lives diverge – Kristen's personal life is a mess right now (do I really need to recap that?), while Jennifer is happily dating Nicholas Hoult, and they seem very stable and happy. Well, according to Radar, that's by design. Sources say J-Law would never screw around on HER boyfriend:

There's no love lost between Jennifer Lawrence and Kristen Stewart, as the Hunger Games actress aims a dig at her troubled rival, telling pals she would never cheat with a married man, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.

The 22-year-old Oscar nominated starlet, who is soon to reprise her role as the fearless Katniss Everdeen in the smash hit sci-fi film, is often hit on by older, married movie directors. However, unlike some, she claims that she definitely won't ever be tempted to stray from her British actor boyfriend Nicholas Hoult.

"Jennifer has a healthy rivalry with Kristen, but she thinks that the cheating scandal she got caught up in could have been avoided," a source close to Lawrence revealed. "Recently, although she didn't say Kristen's name directly, she couldn't resist having a subtle dig at her rival. She told a group of friends that she would never two-time Nicholas. Jennifer then went on to say that she has received attention from many older men, especially powerful movie directors in the past, and would never want to jeopardize her career by getting involved with a married man. She was clearly referring to Kristen's liaison with Rupert," the source said.

As RadarOnline.com previously reported, the bitter rivals were recently embroiled in a battle for the lead role in the big screen adaptation of William Styron's novel, Lie Down in Darkness.

This time, it was Kristen that was rubbing her hands with glee as she beat her nemesis to the part. It was much needed relief for the 22-year-old actress after suffering the fallout for her affair with married Snow White and the Huntsman director Rupert Sanders.

"Kristen is obviously down about what happened with her and Robert Pattinson, but she was thrilled when she found out she beat Jennifer Lawrence to a movie role," a source told RadarOnline.com

"She is insanely jealous of Jennifer, not just because she feels The Hunger Games has stolen some of Twilight's thunder, but because everyone was talking about her as such a beautiful actress. Kristen has never been comfortable in her own skin and feels threatened by Jennifer's good looks. And the thing with Jennifer is, she isn't just attractive, she's a talented actor.

"Jennifer's a threat to Kristen, she's only a year younger, so chances are they will continue to battle it out for the same movie roles. The pair of them are very competitive too; they won't give up any future roles without a fight," the source said.

[From Radar]

Of course, the majority of this crap is just the media/gossip/tabloid world pitting two young women against each other, hoping for the next "great rivalry" like Aniston versus Jolie or something like that. But… I do think that Kristen and Jennifer do keep an eye on what the other one is doing, you know? There is a healthy sense of competition, and I don't see how that's anything to be ashamed of. Women shouldn't be afraid to openly compete with each other in the professional world, but when it devolves into "She's a trampire!" and "She's fat!" arguments, it really doesn't serve the greater good.

Photos courtesy of Vogue, WENN.
vogue1 wenn5893362 wenn5893381 wenn5893400

Us Weekly: Jennifer Aniston “is SO not trying to keep up with Brad anymore”

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 04:31 AM PDT

As I said yesterday, it's all elopements and babies and beach weddings for Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux for the next month. That's all we'll be hearing about. Unless The Leg captures her prey, in which case JustJen shall be pushed aside! But for now, we're all focusing on "the proposal" and of course, BABIES! Both People Magazine and Us Weekly have folded the "baby stuff" within their respective proposal cover stories, which is interesting, I guess. I covered People's cover story yesterday, but I was waiting to read the full Us Weekly story before I wrote about it. I'm glad I waited, because Us Weekly's story was chock full of scandalous goodies. Things I learned from Us Weekly's story:

*Justin was "nervous" before he proposed, and "He even swore to a friend she'd say no!"

*We can now refer to JustJen as "the free-spirited couple".

*Jennifer "cried" when Justin presented her with the ring. Justin "kept the proposal simple… he was surprised she said yes, but he is so happy."

*JustJen went to Blue Hill in the Village AFTER the proposal (Justin did not propose AT the restaurant), and Jennifer "was celebrating her engagement. It's one of their favorite restaurants and they have had dates there before."

*Quote from Jennifer's pal: "Jen's had a really hard time with love. She hasn't always given herself the respect she deserves. It's wonderful she's doing that now with Justin."

*Jennifer is already working on wedding plans: "Destination Wedding!"

*She kind of wants to elope, and just invite a few friends – "There will be the feeling of a vacation, since that's their favorite thing to do."

*DANGER: "Justin wants a New York City winter wedding." OH NOES.

*Jennifer wants high-style for her wedding too. "She'll celebrate in high style. Justin isn't as flashy as the men she's been with in the past, so it won't go too over-the-top."

*Jennifer doesn't want bridesmaids. Because all of her friends are whores. Just kidding!

*Justin refused an opportunity to screentest for the pilot of Friends!!! He later said, "Who wouldn't want to be a bazillionaire? But I don't really regret it."

*PITY PARTY ALERT: A friend says, "Jennifer was broken after Brad cheated on her, and Justin has promised to be there for her always."

*Justin proposed to Jennifer several weeks ago, but "she wasn't ready… He was let down, but he persevered. They had been going back and forth, but finally she said yes."

*Justin belongs to a motorcycle club called Die Fast. He also graduated from Bennington.

*Us Weekly's timeline of Justin and Heidi Bivens' relationship is a lot different than Heidi's version. According to Us Weekly (they actually printed this): "A Theroux insider says [Jennifer and Justin] couldn't resist the attraction and began hooking up after Wanderlust began in September 2010. By the following March, says the insider, 'Justin completely broke up with Heidi.' That gave Aniston the all-clear to go public, showing off matching rings and adopting his hipster uniform." For the record, most media outlets claim Jennifer and Justin have been together for "two years" which means they began their relationship when he was with Heidi, in September 2010. Also, Heidi has made it clear that she didn't consider the relationship over until May 2011. Just FYI.

*BABIES! Us Weekly's sources say that "they want children" and they've already been trying and "there's a real likelihood they'll adopt."

*And what of the suspicious timing and The Leg? "Jen is SO not trying to keep up with Brad anymore. Years ago, that was true. She was heartbroken for a long time and it went down in such an ugly way – but she couldn't care less now."

[From Us Weekly, print and online editions]

I told you it was a good one! I love that Us Weekly didn't shy away from their original reporting last year about Justin and Jennifer's alleged on-set affair in 2010, and I love that a "source" finally admits the Jennifer WAS competing with Brad and Angelina at one point. But she's not anymore, of course. Because all of this is simply about beach weddings and babies. Of course!!

Photos courtesy of Terry Richardson/Terry's Diary.
aniston justjen1 justjen2

LeAnn Rimes feeds the Twitter trolls, sounds just as crazy as them

Posted: 16 Aug 2012 04:30 AM PDT

I do have moments where I feel some sympathy towards LeAnn Rimes. I know, I know, go ahead and yell at me. I think LeAnn is willfully delusional and crazy as all get out, but she has to deal with both fans and "enemies" who can battle her crazy-for-crazy. A great example? LeAnn puts her insanity out into the world via her Twitter feed every single day. LeAnn is ALWAYS on Twitter. It's pretty much her life. The problem is that when someone puts so much of herself into Twitter, when someone trolls that person, it's really difficult for someone like LeAnn to simply ignore it. Yes, someone trolled LeAnn and she fed into it. And it was… just a mess, from start to finish:

LeAnn Rimes is on the defense! The social media savvy singer got engulfed in a nasty Twitter battle with a follower on Wednesday, after they slammed her for her homewrecking ways – and RadarOnline.com has the details.

After Laura James mentioned Rimes in a Tweet, noting that she "cheated with Ed & broke up her marriage and his," the country star immediately rushed to defend herself and her marriage to Eddie Cibrian.

"correction…we broke up our own marriages," she responded, also stating that "people have nothing better to do than judge something they know nothing about."

"Well, then u better prove to others what u did was right by staying together so u can get ur fan base back. Otherwise the breakups & your marriage were all for nothing," James spat back at LeAnn. "And u might not want to believe this but ur fans hate u & ur career is in the shi**er. while Ed smells like a rose through all of this! Hope ya have a prenup bc that is all he wanted is ur money. Good luck to you."

"excuse me? I have nothing to ‘prove’ we are happy and my fans are wonderful and no one is perfect. All I need to speak to about me and my sins is the good lord," responded LeAnn. "Remember you can’t break what’s already broken. I’m not anything like what you read about. It’s all lies and anything you’ve read about no matter who or where it comes from….well, let’s just say its a game for so many to hurt others. Time to move on, everyone else has."

[From Radar]

Now, I went through LeAnn's Twitter feed for like a full five minutes (five whackadoodle minutes that I will never get back), and I couldn't find any of these tweets. Somehow, The Mail managed to get screencaps of them, which you can see here. Even without the screencaps, I already believed the story though. Because A) LeAnn is dumb enough to feed the trolls and B) All of this sounds like Classic LeAnn. She even included some of her mantras: "No one is perfect" and "You can't break what's already broken" and "it's all lies". My favorite is "All I need to speak to about me and my sins is the good lord." That's right, y'all. Only the good lord can judge LeAnn because it's all lies except for the true stuff but that only happened because no one is perfect and because both marriages were already broken!! Y'ALL!!! Anyway, please, stop trolling LeAnn. In the end, you're just feeding her persecution complex. And when LeAnn feels persecuted, she just maniacally tweets random crap about bullying, interspersed with bikini photos. And no one needs that.

Photos courtesy of LeAnn's Twitter.
leann5 eddie1 leann4 leann3 leann2 leann1

No comments:

Post a Comment