Cele|bitchy |
- Us Weekly: Jennifer Aniston “doesn’t have problems with Angelina anymore”
- Gerard Butler goes shirtless in ‘Playing for Keeps’ trailer: too cutesy or not bad?
- Will Kristen Stewart be able to lip-bite her way back into Rob’s sparkle-heart?
- Rihanna axed by Nivea because her trashy image negates their ‘core values’
- Jennifer Garner admits husband Ben wants another baby, but she’s reluctant
- LeAnn Rimes relieves her dental drama by tweeting bikini photos: crazy?
- Liberty Ross resurfaces without wedding ring, was spotted with Rupert
- Kris Jenner brokered Kim Kardashian’s sex tape sale “every step of the way”
- Pres. Obama thinks Anne Hathaway’s Catwoman was “the best thing” in TDKR
- Us Weekly: Kourtney Kardashian reveals 1-month old baby Penelope Scotland
| Us Weekly: Jennifer Aniston “doesn’t have problems with Angelina anymore” Posted: 08 Aug 2012 08:46 AM PDT
These are some new photos of Jennifer Aniston on the North Carolina set of We're The Millers, that movie where she plays a hooker hired by Jason Sudeikis to play a wife and mother so that they can all move a huge shipment of weed from Mexico to the US. I'm sorry we didn't have those photos of Jennifer's nips – those were floating around last week. I think these photos are all about her butt, honestly. Jennifer has a great ass, even when she's wearing unfortunate pants (like she is in these pics). Some of you might have already seen the Us Weekly cover, which is mostly about Kourtney Kardashian and her baby, but there's also a cover inset that reads, "Jen's Private Angelina Joke". I thought the story would be about Jennifer making dumb jokes about Angelina's Maleficent horns, but no. HL's excerpts say that Jennifer wants to create a photo-op with Angelina and that's the "joke":
Yeah. Why would Jennifer want to create a photo op? Why would Angelina agree to it? It's not going to happen. If it was ever going to happen, it would have gone down at the 2009 Academy Awards, when they were both in attendance (Angelina as a nominee, Jennifer as a presenter… with date John Mayer). I tend to think these two go out of their way to avoid each other. Oh, and the UK tabloids are now claiming that there are "rumors" that Justin Theroux and Jennifer are over. Justin was in NY and LA for the past few weeks while Jennifer worked in NC. But I don't know where he is now. He could totally be in NC. Or maybe he's staying in New York and they really are having some issues. Hm.
Photos courtesy of WENN. |
| Gerard Butler goes shirtless in ‘Playing for Keeps’ trailer: too cutesy or not bad? Posted: 08 Aug 2012 08:08 AM PDT
Last year, Justin Timberlake broke up with Jessica Biel just before she began work on a film called Playing For Keeps in Louisiana. There were claims that Biel was distraught, but she and her (ig)noble publicist decided to fight the good fight and put Jessica "out there" as a fun, happy free spirit who could attract the attention of her costar Gerard Butler. There were numerous reports in People Mag and Us Weekly, all about how Gerard was all over Jessica and he wanted it so bad and she was playing hard to get. Considering Gerard goes the lowest of the low-hanging fruit (Real Housewives, random chicks in Porta-Potties), some of us had a hard time believing that any woman could make Gerard beg for it. Still, Gerard did end up giving Jessica "a ride" so maybe Biel did get a good Butler-ing. Long story short, if they did have a thing, it was brief, because all of her hustling paid off and Justin took her back. Why did I go into such a convoluted history? Because the first trailer for Playing for Keeps is out, and Jessica and Gerard are playing exes and they just seem… unsuited for each other: First thing: Gerard looks really good here. I know he's sleazy and gross and whatever, but I'm just saying… he looks GOOD here. Good hair, great body, and they let him use his real accent, which is great because Gerard really can't do any other kind of accent. Do I believe that Gerard and Jessica are convincing "exes" with a small, cutesy child together? No. And that's on Jessica, really. You can put her in "mom clothes" but she just doesn't pull it off. I have to admit… even though this film looks like it has every cliché in the book (cutesy children, a wedding, obvious love triangle, etc), Gerard seems okay in it. I wish he would stop making such awful movies, but I could actually see this one becoming a modest hit. Am I back in love with The Butler? No. I'm really over him at this point. But I do wish him well – maybe this film will help him get back on track.
Photos courtesy of WENN. |
| Will Kristen Stewart be able to lip-bite her way back into Rob’s sparkle-heart? Posted: 08 Aug 2012 07:29 AM PDT
Another Wednesday, another butt-load of tabloid reports about The Great Twihard Meltdown of 2012. First, some good news: in addition to giving his "first" interview to Good Morning America on August 15 (next Wednesday), Robert Pattinson has agreed to do an interview with Jon Stewart at The Daily Show… on MONDAY. Which means that Jon Stewart will probably get the "exclusive" first interview, not GMA. There's a chance TDS interview could be a pre-taped deal to air later in the week, but why in the world would The Daily Show NOT want to air the exclusive on Monday night? You know it will be good television too – Jon Stewart is surprisingly effective interviewer, but he won't go for the "Barbara Walters cry-athon" moment. Jon will probably give Sparkles a drink and show him photos of boobs. Here are some more stories circulating through this week's tabloids:
So… basically, things are in a holding pattern, but more sources are saying that Rob will end up sticking with Kristen. For a little bit, at least. Maybe until December, because Summit will have their heads if they don't make it through November.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet, Vanity Fair, EW. |
| Rihanna axed by Nivea because her trashy image negates their ‘core values’ Posted: 08 Aug 2012 07:10 AM PDT
Last year, Rihanna signed on as the face of Nivea, which also sponsored a good chunk of her latest world tour. This always seemed like an odd move on the part of the skin care product brand, which generally projects a very wholesome vibe throughout their advertising campaigns. In sharp contrast, Rihanna has become increasingly well known for posing for obnoxiously trashy vacation photos, in which she often is spotted drinking and doing drugs, and then she usually posts those photos herself all over her social media profiles with her everpresent #thuglife tag. Never mind that the paps have caught her swanning about in see-thru tops and that she’s taken to boozing so hard that she ends up hospitalized. Well, Nivea has apparently woken up from their deluded slumber, and their new advertising priorities have been reenforced by Stefan Heidenreich, the new head of Nivea’s parent company. According to Heidenreich, Rihanna’s a terrible fit for the brand and is far “too sexy” to represent the brand in the future. No kidding, right?
[From Daily Mail] The original German article goes even further, and for some reason, both the Mail and Digital Spy have left out the best language, which is as follows: “Heidenreich’s judgement: ‘Rihanna was a No-Go.’ What does the US star, who has been linked to drugs and party excesses, have ‘to do with the core values of Nivea’?, he asked.” Indeed, it’s hard to believe that Nivea ever decided that employing Rihanna as a spokesperson was a good idea for their company, but it’s also odd that they’re just now figuring this out. Sure, Rihanna’s behavior has accelerated quite a bit lately, but it’s not like she was some virginal ingenue who has only just started boozing and acting trashy in public. Here’s the advert spot mentioned by the Mail, which shows babies and pregnant bellies receiving the benefits of the skin cream: In sharp contrast, here’s the self-projected image of Rihanna. We all know she’s trashy, and she knows it too. In fact, she embraces it, and more power to her if that’s how she wants to live. But I guess she needs to find some sponsors who want to project that image as well.
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet, Nivea, Facebook, and Pacific Coast News      |
| Jennifer Garner admits husband Ben wants another baby, but she’s reluctant Posted: 08 Aug 2012 07:00 AM PDT
I still remember what Garner told Letterman about having two children vs. one. (I mean I had to look it up but I remember it in general.) She said, in 2009 when Seraphina was three months old, that “It’s crazy. It’s like having ten kids. You think you have one and you have it under control, and then you have the other one and it just goes to hell and a handbasket.” She also talked about how tired she was at the time, and said that night to her wasn’t when she slept, it was when she put on sweatpants and had a couple of naps. Well now she’s got three kids and Ben wants four? That’s crazy! Garner also talked in that interview about what a supportive and helpful dad Ben is. They have help too, we’ve seen photos of their nanny, but I don’t doubt that they’re hands-on parents. I’m happy to hear that they’re doing well, even if they’re not exactly on the same page when it comes to how many kids they have.
These are photos of the Garner-Afflecks on Fourth of July. Garner is also shown out with Seraphina yesterday, and her dad, William Garner, is shown holding little Samuel. So cute! Credit: Fame Flynet
       |
| LeAnn Rimes relieves her dental drama by tweeting bikini photos: crazy? Posted: 08 Aug 2012 05:46 AM PDT
LeAnn Rimes has been going through some dental drama. It feels like this drama has been going on forever – hasn't she been canceling "concerts" all over the place because of her teeth issues? But last week the dental drama took on a new sense of urgency as LeAnn basically live-tweeted her procedures and her recoveries. You can read about last week's drama here. Apparently, LeAnn is still in the midst of even more dental drama this week too. But that didn't stop her from putting on a bikini and tweeting the header photo from the beach with the note, "Nothing like the beach! It cleanses the soul. Sun and sand heals all". This is in between tweets about how much pain she's in and how she's on the beach playing volleyball. Because why not? Some selected tweets:
You know what strikes me most about her bolt-on & bikini photo? Her mouth looks the same. No puffiness, no bruising, nothing to indicate this major oral surgery that has been going down. I do like that her mustache is glistening in the beachy sunlight, though. I always love that. Oh, and LeAnn has changed her avatar since the last time I looked at her Twitter feed. This is her new photo:
I know it's for the "NO H8" campaign and everything, but LeAnn makes everything about LEANN, right? She's so shallow and narcissistic, she honestly believes that she is the ultimate victim in every situation, so I'm assuming that "NO H8" is basically about "Don't bully LeAnn by pointing out how delusional and crazy she is." Also – I'm sorry, but NO ONE should push out their bolt-ons and angle their ribcage like that for a promotional photo for a bullying campaign. It seems less like "stop bullying" and more like "We turned this photo shoot into some kinky sex game involving duct tape and bolt-on cleavage."
Photos courtesy of LeAnn's Twitter. |
| Liberty Ross resurfaces without wedding ring, was spotted with Rupert Posted: 08 Aug 2012 05:40 AM PDT
In all of the back-and-forth over the past two weeks, there has been a lot of contradictory information about all of the participants in the Twihard/SWATH-gate/affair drama. A UK tabloid claimed they had an exclusive interview with Liberty Ross's brother – and that the brother basically said that Liberty thinks her husband Rupert Sanders and Kristen Stewart were having an affair for months. Someone (an unnamed source) then denied that interview to People Mag, claiming that it was just some tabloid BS. I still think there's a possibility there was some truth to it, though – at least as far as what "Team Liberty" is thinking and doing and strategizing. I tend to think that Liberty is using her husband's affair to begin to plan a new life for herself. She said in an interview (a few months ago) that she was finding life in LA very difficult, and I kind of thought she would use this as an excuse to move back to England, her home. But Liberty has been sticking around LA – she's been photographed twice in the past few days, and both times she was without her wedding ring. You can see the photos here. All of the sites merely say that Liberty entered an "office building" too – does anyone think she might have been meeting with a divorce attorney? I hope she was. And I hope she takes Rupert to the cleaners. There was also significant gossip about Liberty basically giving Rupert Sanders the silent treatment – maybe she hasn't even spoken to him since the scandal broke. That theory came apart yesterday, as another photo agency got exclusive pics of Rupert and Liberty in Beverly Hills. According to TMZ, "Cameras snapped away after Liberty Ross and Rupert outside Judi’s Deli. We’re told the two met at an office building in the vicinity." Divorce laywers? Why else would you go into an office building with your philandering husband? Meanwhile, Hollywood Life has an exclusive report in which a source claims that Liberty believes Rupert is "in love" with Kristen.
Is it weird that I kind of believe that this is what happened? Rupert might have initially copped to the affair, using words like "momentary indiscretion" (cough), making it sound like it was just a temporary lapse in judgment. But Liberty found out some additional information, or she just realized Rupert and Kristen were full of it, and she decided to unleash hell. Bless her.
Photos courtesy of WENN. |
| Kris Jenner brokered Kim Kardashian’s sex tape sale “every step of the way” Posted: 08 Aug 2012 05:28 AM PDT
Back in June, we heard second hand news that Kim’s ex Kris Humphries had claimed that Kris Jenner directed her daughter Kim’s sex tape and even had her re-shoot it “because Kris J didn’t think the first one was pretty enough.” That story about what Kris H allegedly claimed came from a woman named Myla Sinajaj, who dated Kris Humphries. She also lied to TMZ about being pregnant with his baby, so her word is not worth much at all. Now Star is claiming that Kris worked as a “middleman” to make sure her daughter earned top dollar from that video. There’s no word that Kris Jenner directed the blue movie or anything like that – Star claims “the video already existed.” I don’t doubt this version of events:
This definitely sounds true to me. Last year The Hollywood Reporter did an extensive profile on The Kardashians and their whole empire. They way they told the story, Kim’s sex tape surfaced around the time Kris was shopping their reality show. Kris described her reaction to the news as making “lemonade out of lemons” and doing what she had to do. Here’s that story:
[From Hollywood Reporter via Celebitchy] Here’s the thing – did Kim’s sex tape just “happen” to surface at the same time as their mom was shopping a reality show? It sounds like a helluva coincidence, right? There are some potential different ways that this whole thing may have come about, and different levels of involvement on Kris’ part. Here are some possible theories: A. Kris told Kim to make the sex tape so it would propel their family to fame. I wouldn’t say she was there and directed it or watched it and had Kim re-shoot it, that’s way too creepy for me to consider. But it’s possible she told her to make it and made sure that it came out at just the right time. B. Kris learned of Kim’s sex tape while she was shopping the reality show, and decided to take advantage of the opportunity, as she half-claimed in that Hollywood Reporter interview. In that case Star’s new article would be dead-on in that Kris brokered the deal, as she’s done with all the deals for her family. C. Kim’s sex tape came out and Kris let Kim handle the negotiations. Remember, no sex tape like this featuring a celebrity can come out without that celebrity signing off on it. There are exceptions, and adult film distributors do get sued, but not when it comes to a big name distributor like Vivid. Let’s be realistic – Kris is involved in every aspect of her family’s business. It sounds so likely that she made sure Kim got top dollar and recognition for that sex tape. The jury is still out on whether she told Kim to make it or not.
These photos are from February, March, June and July. Credit: FameFlynet and WENN.com |
| Pres. Obama thinks Anne Hathaway’s Catwoman was “the best thing” in TDKR Posted: 08 Aug 2012 04:33 AM PDT
"Catwoman? 'Sup, girl. Meet me at Burger King." So many of y'all were prepared to unleash hate on Anne Hathaway as Catwoman in The Dark Knight Rises. I remember the comments. I remember the preemptive hair-pulling and complaining. And I stayed true to Anne: I believed that she would do a good job, and lo and behold, not only did Annie do a great job, but she was arguably one of the best parts in a good (and somewhat uneven) movie. Now that you've seen her in action, can we at least agree on one thing: she didn't embarrass herself? Can you give me that? That she held her own with those actors, that she worked the hell out of the material she was given, and that you might have actually missed her when she wasn't on-screen? Well, you don't have to give me that. Barack Obama has given me that. During a fundraiser in Connecticut (in which Anne was co-host along with Harvey Weinstein), Pres. Obama took a moment to praise Catwoman:
Obama then continued, "Just my opinion: Bane was a mess! He couldn't make up his mind about his motivations. He really didn’t adhere to a coherent socioeconomic or political philosophy I guess that's why he was based on Mr. Bain Capital Mitt Romney, right? That's the conspiracy, right? Whatever, y'all, I need a cig." Obviously, that's a joke for our earnest commenters. As for the whole "Does POTUS really have the time to sit through such a long-ass movie?" – my guess is he watched on Air Force One, in between campaign and fundraising stops. I don't mind the president taking some time out to watch a movie, but I'm sure this will bring another round of controversy. Bring it on.
Photos courtesy of WENN. |
| Us Weekly: Kourtney Kardashian reveals 1-month old baby Penelope Scotland Posted: 08 Aug 2012 04:26 AM PDT
Kourtney Kardashian gave away (sold?) the first baby photos of her daughter Penelope to Us Weekly. It's a step up from Life & Style, who got the first photos of Mason (Dixon) Disick two years ago. I bet Kourtney got a nice check from Us Weekly, but it was probably in the low six-figures, don't you think? Kourtney gave birth to Penelope Scotland Disick on July 8 – which makes this baby one month old. Granted, I know nothing about babies, but is it just me or is this a big one-month-old? Maybe it looks that way because Kourtney is so petite. Also: it's interesting that Scott didn't make the cover, right?
I can't wait to find out about Kourtney's push present. What do you think Scott gave her? A gift certificate for ten bikini waxes? No, I jest. I keep hearing that Scott really has "changed" and he's a better man these days. And I can't reiterate enough how happy I am that Kourtney and Scott have ended the cycle of "K" names, and that they didn't start their own trend of "M" names either. Here are some photos of Scott and Mason in Miami over the weekend. Mason is so friggin' cute. I like that he's all "I'm going to walk everywhere by myself."
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
No comments:
Post a Comment