Cele|bitchy

Miley Cyrus’s “private” naked photos leak (SFW)
Jessica Simpson is spending her engagement at the bottom of a bottle
Nicole Kidman is no longer a sample size, and that’s okay
Christina Aguilera on new bf: ‘a really strong friendship’ when she was married
Alicia Keys new fauxhawk: totally hardcore or copying Willow Smith?
Johnny Depp wanted to wear footie pajamas & bunny ears for ‘The Tourist’
Michelle Williams is sticking with white-blonde hair: tragic or lovely?
Eva Longoria and Tony Parker have lunch, invite paparazzi and tell the press all about it
Ryan Gosling talks about guzzling melted Haagen Dazs, being “fat & unemployed”
Reese Witherspoon gets a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, brings her kids

Miley Cyrus’s “private” naked photos leak (SFW)

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 08:43 AM PST

Allegedly, Miley Cyrus's purse was stolen last weekend, and someone got a hold of her cellphone, which had some sketchy and naked photos on it. Those photos have now leaked. I just spent the last five minutes looking at what I'm pretty sure are Miley's little barely legal tittays. Would you like the NSFW photo? Here you go. She's wearing a flannel, y'all. And miracle of miracles, it's not a cooter shot. I'm pretty sure the boobie photo is Miley, just because I'm convinced those are her legs. She does have great legs.

As for the wisdom of an 18 year old girl (she was probably 17 when she took the photos) having naked photos of herself in general, much less on an easily accessible cell phone that someone could leave/forget/drunkenly drop at a club - well, this is Miley. What did you expect? This girl is going to make Britney's breakdown look quaint, I think. And in the coming months and years, just prepare yourself - Miley Boobs and Miley Cooter are going to be all over the place.

SFW photos courtesy of ONTD.

Jessica Simpson is spending her engagement at the bottom of a bottle

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 08:22 AM PST

Either Jessica Simpson isn't pregnant, or she isn't at all concerned about Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Honestly, I wouldn't put it past Jessica to not know what FAS was, so I'm still somewhat unconvinced that she is not with child. According to Page Six, Jessica and her fiancé Eric boozed it up two nights ago after the Rockefeller Center tree lighting. You know what doesn't get enough coverage? The idea that Jessica is a total boozehound. Don't get me wrong, I like nothing more than pouring myself a stiff cocktail to watch NCIS (for real), but it seems like a lot of stories about Jessica revolve around her drinking. Todd at IDLITW often refers to Jessica as a barely functioning alcoholic - although he could just be writing that for comic effect (?).

Jessica Simpson put pregnancy rumors to bed once and for all by downing margaritas and tequila shots with new fiancé Eric Johnson at Stanton Social after performing at the Rockefeller Center tree lighting on Tuesday. The singer took a table of 20 which included father Joe Simpson, her assistant and security guards.

A spy told us, “They were very well-mannered and drank basil lime gimlets, pineapple 75’s, Maker’s on the rocks, margaritas and wine. They ordered a lot of food. Jessica let her guard down enough to steal a few kisses from her fiancé in front of papa Joe. Jessica, Eric and the crew settled on shots of Don Julio to finish out the evening.”

[From Page Six]

That sounds like an enormous amount of liquor, right? If I had a night like that at my age (I'm close to Jessica's age), I wouldn't be able to function for days, probably. We're not in college anymore, you know?

Here are some photos of Jessica and Eric. She looks great for someone who just climbed out of a bottle. Eric looks pretty rough though. Like a man who just realized what he'd gotten himself into.

Photos courtesy of Fame.

Nicole Kidman is no longer a sample size, and that’s okay

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 07:51 AM PST

These are new photos of Nicole Kidman in NYC this morning, entering the Good Morning America set (the video of the interview is below). I am seriously not trying to be mean, but Nicole is no longer a sample size, and she should stop trying to harness herself into those size zero or size two clothes. I'm not saying she looks bad - at all. Nicole looks great when she's got a little meat on her bones, and who doesn't gain a little weight in their stomach, right? I'm just saying, this dress is wrong, and she should have either gone one or two sizes up, or just gone for a different look.

Anyway, Nic was on GMA to promote her leading role in Rabbit Hole, the film that is getting some critical buzz. Notably, EW's critic said that it was one of Nicole's finer performances of the past few years, mainly because her face is now capable of some movement. To me, the film looks like the kind of weepy grief porn that is made just to be some kind of Oscar-bait, but whatever. I'm happy for Nicole, and I'm happy that she's returning as a somewhat interesting actress. I winced several times during the interview though - even though we're hearing about "The Return of Nicole Kidman's Face", she is still tweaking that sh-t. And as Lainey says, the third lip is still there. Plus: she looks strangely overly-rouged.

Christina Aguilera on new bf: ‘a really strong friendship’ when she was married

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 07:37 AM PST

People Magazine has a new interview with Christina Aguilera. She talks about her boyfriend, a Burlesque set assistant named Matt Rutler who she seems to have taken up with in a hot minute following her divorce (and amid those rumors that she was hooking up with Lindsay’s ex, Sam Ronson). When asked if she’s in love, Christina gives more than a non-committal answer, and makes it sound like things are moving quickly. She said “There’s a love there, yes” but then added “I’m having fun, I’m dating and it’s something I haven’t had in a really long time.” So it’s not like she said “Yes I love him so much,” but she did make it sound serious. So my question is - is this guy the reason why Aguilera broke up with her husband or was she cheating with women as we heard eariler? She was married when she was filming Burlesque, and that’s where she met this guy. Here’s what she told People [via Radar]

It’s been just six weeks since Christina Aguilera announced her divorce, but the singer is wasting no time being single, already announcing she’s in love.

In a candid interview with People magazine, Aguilera has opened up about her split from husband Jordan Bratman and surprisingly revealed she’s fallen for another man.

The blonde star is talking about Matthew Rutler, a set assistant on her new movie, Burlesque, who she has been photographed with numerous times since her break up.

When asked if she is in love, Aguilera said: “There’s a love there, yes. I’m having fun, I’m dating and it’s something I haven’t had in a really long time.”

Rutler’s mother, Kathleen, spoke exclusively to RadarOnline.com and denied they were anything but friends.

But Aguilera has now revealed they began dating right after she filed for divorce.

“Matthew is a special person. We had a really strong friendship on the movie,” she said. “He’s the kind of person you could spend hours on the phone talking to and all of a sudden it’s daylight.

“Once I filed for divorce, we started dating. I’m not trying to jump into anything. I just left a five-year marriage. I’m taking it slow and trying to be happy.”

And she isn’t ruling out tying the knot again.

“Wholeheartedly. I know one day I’ll be able to feel that again for someone. That idea will never die.”

It sounds like she admitted she had a least an emotional affair, doesn’t it? She said “We had a really strong friendship on the movie.” We’ve heard that before.

Christina spent Thanksgiving with Rutler’s family and without her son, Max, 2, who was with his dad and Christina’s estranged husband, Jordan Bratman. US Weekly reports in the print edition that she was seen in West Hollywood on November 24 making out with Rutler at club The Abbey, after which she headed to New York to have Thanksgiving with Rutler’s family. On Sunday, Christina was spotted at a gig for Rutler’s band. These two have been dating way more than just the six weeks since Aguilera filed for divorce.

Alicia Keys new fauxhawk: totally hardcore or copying Willow Smith?

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 07:19 AM PST

Do you know it's only been six weeks since Alicia Keys gave birth to her little baby boy 'Gypt? It feels like forever ago. Anyway, Alicia walked the red carpet last night for the film Biutiful (the Javier Bardem film). Alicia decided to forgo her previous incarnation as Cleopatra Keys, and this time aim for the stars with a very high fauxhawk. I kind of like it… well, I prefer it to the Cleopatra look she was doing while pregnant, what with the excessive, cheap-looking face jewelry and headpieces.

You know who Alicia reminds me of in these photos, with this hair? Willow Smith. For real. This fauxhawk style was little Willow's a few months ago, before Willow dropped it for something trendier. Haha, Alicia is copying style techniques from a kid.

Johnny Depp wanted to wear footie pajamas & bunny ears for ‘The Tourist’

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 07:04 AM PST

Much like the barrage of Angelina Jolie interviews, there are lots of new Johnny Depp interviews, all for The Tourist. Unfortunately, there aren't really any new photos of him floating around, so we have to make due with some older pics, and some stills from The Tourist. Once again, Pop Sugar has some of the most extensive interview slices, and Johnny is cracking me up with some of his answers. He talks about how he can't grow a full beard, so basically he had to wear a stunt beard glued to his face. But the funniest part is when he's talking about the pajamas:

In terms of where you are at in your career as a global movie star, what makes you choose a project?
Johnny Depp: I never think of myself on those terms as a “huge global movie star,” so I can’t help but smile because it just doesn’t register as me. It still feels like I’m doing the same bits, just trying something different each time, exploring something new. It’s important to keep challenging myself and try to come up with some new face every now and again. Many years ago Marlon Brando asked me, “How many films do you do per year, kid?” I said, “I dunno, maybe three.” He said, “Too much. We only have so many faces in our pockets.” And I went, you know, that’s really true, but I feel like I still got a few faces left.

Many of your most famous characters have tons of elaborate costumes and makeup. What did you bring to your character Frank?
JD: The story, the script, and the character dictate where you’re going to go. I imagine someone I may have known in the past that reminds me of a character. [The Tourist's] Frank has this heavily groomed beard, which I by the way can’t grow so was all glued on. It’s a perfectly landscaped beard, which came from a guy I knew years ago and I was always fascinated with, because it looked like something in a jar. I couldn’t believe someone could actually treat [a beard] so pristinely.

In The Tourist there’s a scene where you’re in pajamas; how did that come to be?
JD: I wanted footie pajamas with little bunny ears, but [the director] wouldn’t go for it. Initially he was supposed to be either in a towel or his underpants, but there was something about a grown man in pajamas that you’d pull out of Leave It to Beaver’s dad’s drawer. The imagery, juxtaposed with the background of Venice, I just thought there was something really funny about it.

The canal scenes are intense. Did you go in the dirty water or was that left to the stunt men?
JD: All that stuff — doing the stunts, being yanked down a Venice canal in a boat, being handcuffed to the railing — was way secondary to the immense fear that I had of going into “the drink.” The stunt guys who did have to go into [the canal] were on serious antibiotics like weeks beforehand. I remember being cuffed to that railing and getting ready to take off and saying to myself, you’re going in . . . you’re going into this water. Luckily, I didn’t, but it was pretty close a couple of times.

Did you have any actual tourist experiences while shooting in Venice?
JD: My tourist times were between the hours of 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. That was the only time that I could really wander and have a look around, because there’s virtually no one on the streets at that point. Everywhere you look is kind of a visual poem; I was amazed — these wonderful facades, clotheslines with people’s laundry, and little signs on churches “bread for the poor.” It’s a beautiful, magical place. That’s the Venice I like to see as opposed to going into the gondola and putting a flower in my teeth. I like the nighttime Venice, the quiet Venice, when it feels like the ghosts are around.

What sort of artistic freedom do you look for in roles? Was it always that way?
JD: Is there something in there outside the author’s intent that I can add that is maybe a little bit different, that is coming from the outside and is not done to death. Is there something I can add to make it interesting? I’ve always had that, it’s probably a bad habit. I remember doing Platoon back in ‘86 with Oliver Stone. I was rewriting my dialogue, which is probably why he mostly cut me out of the film. I suppose Cry Baby was the first character I felt good about. With Edward Scissorhands, nobody really knew what I was going to do; even Tim [Burton], bless him, was a little nervous initially with my take on it, but it all worked out. I guess it probably comes from being locked into television for years and the parameters were so rigid there was no room for movement. There was no room to grow so I swore to myself after that I wouldn’t do that again. If I had to go back to construction, that’s OK, I was pretty good at that. Pumping gas, I can do that too.

Paris is home to you now. What makes you love the city so much?
JD: Everything. The literary history in Paris has been and always will be a fascination for me. The books that were written here, art history, paintings, painters who wandered these streets, great poets — it’s just always been magical for me and I’ve always oddly felt more at home here than anywhere else in the world. I suppose just to be surrounded by all this art, and all this incredible work that people have done over the years. You can feel. It’s still there, you still feel all those real writers. It’s very inspiring.

Your character in this movie is not Johnny Depp cool; how did you figure out what you wanted to do with this character?
JD: The idea was to make him really the everyman of the movie, the math teacher who doesn’t have particular highs or particular lows in his life and has a slight amount of OCD in his weird routines. [I wanted to] take this normal guy and put him in these high-stakes situations that were less than normal. The electronic cigarette was the device that would ring the alarm that he’s in panic mode.

The director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck said you added the humor to the film; what is the story behind that?
JD: I thought, if you took this guy and put him in these situations, especially if he’s going to stick around, he has to recognize the level of absurdity in what he’s going through. Also, if I see a gag coming around the corner, I snatch it up. I can’t help myself. You spend 90 percent of the time when you’re working trying to make your costar laugh, and I guess some of it’s in the film.

What was it like meeting and working with Angelina?
She’s a real treat to get into the ring with. She’s a lot of fun and funny! She’s deeply committed to the work, has a great approach and is very smart. She also has a very very absurd and perverse sense of humor. We met, oddly, right before we did this, which was just weird because we have a lot of mutual friends, acquaintances, and people we’ve worked with. When we sat down together, it was kind of instant. We got each other. Within minutes we were yakking about our kids, the perils of parenthood and all that fun stuff.

Do you hope to have the chance to work with her again?
Boy, I certainly would like to think so. I hope so. If she’ll have me again, I’d be more than happy. She’s a good girl. I have a lot of respect for her. In the face of all that she, Brad, and the kids have to deal with, being globally under the microscope every second of the day, she’s grounded. She’s as cool, normal and low key [a woman] as you’d want to meet. She doesn’t take it all that seriously. She is a wonderful mommy, a great mommy, which you’ve gotta take your hat off to as well. And she’s out there trying to do things in the world, to help. She’s impressive. She’s a force.

[From Pop Sugar (two stories)]

Depp also talked more about Angelina when he was interviewed for Entertainment Tonight (the video is here). Depp describes Jolie as "a very normal girl” and that "Angelina’s life with Brad and the kids has been kind of overly shockingly documented and what I was pleasantly surprised by is she’s not really fazed by it. She’s a very normal girl and she’s very, very smart and very thoughtful, very kind. The two main things: This woman who has become this wonderful mother — she’s a fantastic mother — and very funny as well; good sense of humor.” He also talks a little about how he and Angelina brought their kids together, and how Jack Depp played videogames with Pax.

Photos courtesy of Fame & WENN.

Michelle Williams is sticking with white-blonde hair: tragic or lovely?

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 06:34 AM PST

Michelle Williams has progressively been going for a lighter and lighter blonde for months now - and it has reached the point where her hair now just looks white. At first I thought it was merely a styling choice, in an effort perhaps to look more like cream of wheat. And then I wondered if it was just about the roots, because she was playing Marilyn Monroe - maybe there was some tricky wig-or-extensions drama. But that film is done, and Michelle didn't get rid of the white blonde. If anything, it's just even more white.

Here are more shots - these photos are from a London screening of Blue Valentine, which Kate Winslet attended. Apparently, she's a huge fan of Michelle. Nice.

Eva Longoria and Tony Parker have lunch, invite paparazzi and tell the press all about it

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 06:31 AM PST

So Eva Longoria and Tony Parker had lunch yesterday and US Weekly has the details of how they’re peacefully trying to hammer out the terms of their divorce and are allegedly keeping it amicable. TMZ of course has the photos. I think this is meant to counter the rumors that these two are at each other’s throats following all the stories we’ve heard about what a conniving serial cheater Tony really is. Plus they filed for divorce in separate states, suggesting that they’re ready to battle it out. This photo op is clearly Eva’s doing, just like she was the one to go telling US Weekly about all the text messages she found as evidence of Tony’s cheating. I do agree that she was the wronged party and that it’s well within her rights to let her side of the story be known. At some point she should give it a rest, though, and realize that it’s best if she let her divorce unfold behind closed doors as much as possible. There’s nothing to be gained by letting it all hang out there, and if she wants people to feel badly for her like Sandra Bullock she needs to get away for a while and lay low. Here’s US Weekly’s take on Tony and Eva’s lunch:

Are Eva Longoria and Tony Parker hoping for a do-over?

Though the exes shared a meal at an L.A.-area hotel on Wednesday, a source close to the couple tells UsMagazine.com that “they are not reconciling.”

“It was just a friendly lunch to work out the details of the divorce,” the insider claims.

On November 17, the Desperate Housewives actress, 35, filed for divorce just one day after Us Weekly broke the news that Parker, 28, sent hundreds of racy texts to mutual pal Erin Barry. Despite Longoria’s heartbreak, a source tells Us the couple remains committed to ending their marriage with dignity.

“It’s been very amicable,” the source insists. “They still get along.”

[From US Weekly]

US Weekly is the outlet that ran the whole divorce story from Eva in the first place, and they had another obviously pro-Eva story in their print edition this week. She got a side blurb on her “Tony-Free Holiday” that included the details that she “celebrated Thanksgiving with pals in L.A.” and “made a full [Thanksgiving] dinner, down to the cinnamon sticks.” You make cinnamon sticks? Their sources tell them that Eva and Tony “are speaking, but she’s still heartbroken.” As for what’s next for Eva, she’s “focused on her work” and is “not even thinking about dating.” She’s certainly thinking about how to spin the press coverage so that it’s in her favor. No one deserves to be cheated on and that can devastating. I get the urge to make the details known to the press. Eva could have waited a little while before she leaked this whole story and tried to make sure she was portrayed positively every step of the way. This lunch date complete with photos is too much.

Ryan Gosling talks about guzzling melted Haagen Dazs, being “fat & unemployed”

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 06:21 AM PST

Maybe this is why Ryan Gosling didn't show up for the All Good Things premiere? Eh. Gosling took part in a round-table discussion of potential Oscar nominees, sponsored by The Hollywood Reporter and Entertainment Tonight. ET excerpted the part of the discussion where Gosling talked in great detail about his firing/withdrawal from The Lovely Bones, an incident which happened a few years ago. Gosling was one of the first ones cast for the project - he was supposed to play the father of the murdered girl, in the film adaptation directed by Peter Jackson. Gosling describes how he was just flat out wrong about the character, thinking that the father should be much, much heavier:

Ryan Gosling said he was “fat and unemployed” after showing up on set of ‘The Lovely Bones’ 60 pounds bigger.

During a round table conversation put on by The Hollywood Reporter that included a number of other Oscar Award hopefuls, Ryan said he and ‘The Lovely Bones’ director Peter Jackson had “wildly different” ideas as to what the character of Jack Salmon (that was eventually played by Mark Wahlberg) was to look and act like. “I was 150 pounds when he hired me, and I showed up on set 210 pounds,” he disclosed.

“I really believed [the character] should be 210 pounds. I was melting Haagen Dazs and drinking it when I was thirsty,” he admitted. “I really believed in it. I was excited about it.”

Ryan said when he got on set, he was asked to hit the treadmill. “I just showed up on set and I’d gotten it wrong. … It didn’t ever become about the weight because the weight was just indicative of a deeper misunderstanding about the character.”

The actor seems to have bounced back from the “misunderstanding” as his role in ‘Blue Valentine’ is getting a bit of Oscar buzz.

[From Entertainment Tonight]

Melting Haagen Dazs? Sweet Jesus. Why does that sound so good to me right now? Oh, right, I'm sick. I want to take baths in ice cream and egg drop soup (in no particular order). CB also showed me this - Jared Leto did the same drinking-ice-cream thing when he was trying to gain weight.

You know what's weird? I read the book, and in no way is the father supposed to be a heavy man. He's also not supposed to be blonde - he's black Irish, if I remember correctly, and he's supposed to be a good-looking man. Maybe Mark Wahlberg was the right choice. Here's the video from the round-table discussion:

Additional photos courtesy of WENN.

Reese Witherspoon gets a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, brings her kids

Posted: 02 Dec 2010 05:58 AM PST

Reese Witherspoon was honored with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame yesterday. Reese brought along her boyfriend, agent Jim Toth, (not show) and her two children from her marriage to Ryan Phillippe, Ava, 11, and Deacon, 7. She also posed with the chihuahua who starred with her in the Legally Blonde movies! (Allegedly, it’s not like we would know the difference.) The 34 year-old Oscar winning actress was lovely in a cap sleeve black dress with red polka dots and patent red peep toe heels. In her acceptance speech, Reese made some nice comments about her fellow actors and being part of the acting community:

Reese Witherspoon received the 2,425th star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame today in honor of her Oscar-winning movie career, which started in 1990 with an open casting call for the tear-jerker coming-of-age drama Man in the Moon.

“What I understand now, after 20 years of making movies, is that the achievement is being part of a community of people—often who have done this for generations—who are the best at what they do,” the 34-year-old actress and Glamour cover girl said.

With Reese were her kids, Ava and Deacon, and filmmaker James L. Brooks, who just directed her in How Do You Know—out Dec. 17, natch.

Also sniffing around the ceremony was the chihuahua who played Bruiser, Reese’s closest companion in Legally Blonde.

[From E! Online]

That’s cute that the Legally Blonde chihuahua was there! I also love that she brought her kids with her. She does try to shield that from the paparazzi, but it’s so nice that they were able to share in this with their mom. They’re such good looking kids.

Kaiser and I were just talking about Reese earlier this week, and we agreed that we both like her and somewhat identify with her personality. Kaiser wrote me that Reese “seems very professional, very organized, very judgy,” and “like she has a low tolerance for fools and a–holes.” You can also tell that she’s a hard worker who puts her best foot forward and trudges through difficult situations. Now that she’s in a good place in her personal life and has a new boyfriend, Reese has definitely softened somewhat. Straight-laced Reese even spoke in a recent Glamour interview about feeling sexy.

Credit: WENN.com

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy

No comments:

Post a Comment