Cele|bitchy |
- Chelsea Handler attacks Angelina, talks up Aniston in a new interview
- Beyonce allegedly gave Jay-Z the most expensive car in the entire world
- Gwyneth Paltrow “played a role” in Gaylord Jwifty’s relationship
- Colin Farrell in an ascot: dashingly sexy or much too fancy?
- Amy Adams on her baby: ‘I want her to feel her identity isn’t caught up in what I do’
- Angelina Jolie talks babies and paparazzi on Larry King
- Mark Zuckerberg pledges most of his $6.9 billion fortune to charity
- Nicole Richie and Joel Madden might be getting married this weekend
- Christina Aguilera blames sexy nude ‘leaked’ photos on ‘hacker’
- Laura Dern & Ben Harper are attempting to reconcile
Chelsea Handler attacks Angelina, talks up Aniston in a new interview Posted: 09 Dec 2010 08:29 AM PST We've actually had requests for yet another story of Chelsea Handler being a drunken mess, yet again. Do you know how happy I would be to ignore the whole sordid mess? Yes, it's funny to watch the Brangeloonies and the Jen Hens battle it out in The Great and Unending Uncool War, but there's just so much nastiness all around, it's kind of giving me an ulcer. But you asked for it. Okay, to recap: over the weekend, Chelsea Handler did a stand-up act, and she ended up shouting down a heckler by going off on an obscene tangent about how Angelina Jolie is C-U-Next-Tuesday, amongst other things. On her Monday show, Chelsea defended herself by saying that she's always made fun of Angelina, but she didn't say anything about Jennifer Aniston and their trip to Cabo and whether Aniston had anything to say about the tirade. Then, yesterday, Star Magazine released their cover - a story any of could have written in our sleep. According to Star, Jennifer Aniston "broke down" and confessed to Chelsea that she "can't stop loving Brad." It was low-hanging fruit for the tabloids - Aniston and Handler were just together in Cabo two weeks ago, and Aniston has never protested Chelsea's nasty attacks on Jolie, ever. Then, just hours after Star released their cover, PopEater ran sympathetic Aniston pity party story about how angry Aniston is over Chelsea's tirade:
[From PopEater] "Jen has gone out of her way to keep her private feelings about that woman who stole her husband private and has always asked her friends to do the same." - except for all of those times she didn't. Except for getting her friends to bash Angelina and Brad in Vanity Fair. Except for going off on Angelina in 2008 in Vogue, and even bringing up the Jolie-Pitt kids in GQ in the same year. Except for all of these "leaks" from well-placed "sources" who also let us know exactly what she's thinking about "that woman who stole her husband." Also: the fact that the "source" is still using language like "that woman who stole her husband" makes me think that Aniston is sitting at home alone in a caftan, rocking and stroking her hair in between sticking pins in her Jolie Voodoo doll. Also - just out today, Chelsea has a new interview in Glamour Magazine where she's talking about the triangle bullsh-t even more. Hint: Aniston emails her "funny" jokes, probably about how Angelina is a C-U-Next-Tuesday.
[From Glamour] So despite Camp Aniston's attempt to distance themselves via PopEater, Chelsea is still talking up her friendship with Aniston. There are only two versions of this story: either Aniston is completely fine with Chelsea being her nasty, coked-out attack dog and she completely cosigns everything Chelsea says and does OR Aniston does not agree, but those feelings aren't strong enough to keep her away from being friends with Chelsea, which speaks volumes as to the kind of people she surrounds herself with. Also, I'd just like to note something else - this Glamour interview is relatively tame as far as Chelsea talking up her Team Aniston status. You want psychotic, you should go back and re-read what she said in Rolling Stone. |
Beyonce allegedly gave Jay-Z the most expensive car in the entire world Posted: 09 Dec 2010 07:50 AM PST Beyonce, supposedly still 29, has allegedly given her husband Jay-Z the most expensive car in the entire world for his 41st birthday last Saturday. The Bugati Veyron Grand Sport costs $2 million dollars and it can’t even go under water, double as a boat, or fly (photos at the end of the post). In fact there’s a car that goes under water that isn’t offered yet, but will probably be cheaper than this. The good news is that this story originated in The Sun, and could be completely made up. It’s hard to fathom anyone dropping two million dollars on a freaking car no matter how rich and flashy they are.
[From Popeater] Let’s hope this story is fake, but if it’s not it definitely stands in contrast to the recent news that Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg is going to give away most of his $6.9 billion fortune to charity. And the dude drives a Honda Fit. Now that impresses me way more than a $2 million dollar car. |
Gwyneth Paltrow “played a role” in Gaylord Jwifty’s relationship Posted: 09 Dec 2010 07:36 AM PST Us Weekly's print edition has another minor story on Jaylor/Gaylord Jwifty - the Jake Gyllenhaal and Taylor Swift romance. Last week, Us Weekly had the super-posed photos of Swifty and Jake wandering around arm-in-arm around New York, along with an absolutely hysterical article chock-full of quotes from Camp Swifty about Jake being the coffee-swirling love of her life. There was also a minor story about Jake and Swifty's visit to the Gaylord hotel in Nashville, thus summarizing, however inappropriately and immaturely, my take on their relationship. Anyway, this week's Us Weekly story is, as I said, minor, but that's only because Gwyneth Paltrow is such a minor demon these days. According to their sources, Goopy played a part in getting Gaylord Jwifty together:
[From Us Weekly, print edition] Gwyneth is at the bottom of it! It's all part of her dastardly plan. Global domination, one beard at a time. But of course Gwyneth is friends with both Jake and Taylor. OF COURSE. She's friends with everybody. Everybody WORTH being friends with. And of course she threw them a little "party" too. I bet she even cooked! And decorated! And then washed the dishes with her perfect vagina. By the way, Goopy's new Goop newsletter is all about how she's "freezing her ass off" - and she recommends some cold-weather items for us. $1000 for Burberry boots? Of course! Oh, and Goopy has items in dollars and British pounds, of course. I'm surprised she didn't throw a few items in dinar-only, just to be smug. |
Colin Farrell in an ascot: dashingly sexy or much too fancy? Posted: 09 Dec 2010 07:09 AM PST We saw the photo call for The Way Back yesterday - the set of photos were amazing, just for Colin Farrell's sheer hotness, little Saoirse's stunning beauty, and Jim Sturgess's incessant pillow-weeping. Last night was the London premiere for the film - and Colin showed up in what I can only identify as an "ascot". Is that right? At first I thought it was a clown tie that Colin was wearing for fun, but Colin is really trying to bring the "Brad Pitt in Tom Ford" ascot vibe, isn't he? Thoughts? Can Colin pull this off? He's always been an eccentric dresser, almost a mini-Johnny Depp. When someone like Pitt wears an ascot, it seems like an aspect of his dandiness, his fussy dressing. On Colin it seems like a way to pick up women, right? Like, "Baby, do you like my ascot? It's the perfect length to tie your wrists together while I'm boning you like there's no tomorrow, love." Verdict: Colin can pull off the ascot. And I would pull it off… with my teeth. The rest of them… here's Jim Sturgess. I actually felt kind of bad yesterday when I claimed that Sturgess looked like the kind of guy who would pump for a minute and then burst into tears. So I looked up some videos of him singing. Um… okay, he was totally the kind of guy I would have been in love with when I was 18 years old. He's also a pillow-weeper, for the love of GOD. There's a reason you fall for guys like that when you're 18 years old - you don't know any better. You think when a guy pumps for a minute and bursts into tears, it's because of his sensitive soul. It's not. It's because he sucks. Also: the boy has bangs trauma. Like, Peggy Olsen-in-Mad-Men level of bangs trauma. Saoirse! She's so pretty. I really, really hope that Colin isn’t tying her up with his ascot. |
Amy Adams on her baby: ‘I want her to feel her identity isn’t caught up in what I do’ Posted: 09 Dec 2010 06:44 AM PST
Here are more photos and Amy’s interview. Doesn’t she look so much like Mariah Carey in that one photo below? I think it’s her hair and sunglasses, plus she’s making an expression like Mariah always does. Photo credit: Fame Pictures |
Angelina Jolie talks babies and paparazzi on Larry King Posted: 09 Dec 2010 06:34 AM PST Sometimes it amuses me that some of the over 30-crowd of celebrities is still so old-fashioned when it comes to media. What other explanation is there for people like Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt consistently giving interviews to crusty old fart Larry King? This man was a boring old gnome back in the 1980s - and now he's just ridiculous. And yet, some of the "older" celebrities are still stuck in the old-media dynamic, and they still go on Larry King Live. Anyway, Jolie is going to be on tonight - it should be good. And by "good" I mean "you'll want to shoot Larry in the face after five minutes." So it seems Jolie and Larry have already pretaped the interview - that means no calling in to yell at her, Chelsea Handler! And some of the interview excerpts have already begun leaking out - like this one, from Us Weekly. Jolie tells Larry that she and Brad are open to having more kids:
[From Us Weekly] She's been using that "we're open to it" line for a couple of years now. I like it - I imagine her real thoughts are something like "six kids and no sleep makes Angelina want to stab Larry in the face, thank you." My theory: they'll probably adopt one more kid, a few years from now, maybe. Once the twins have grown up a little more, then Angelina will get all broody. Just my theory. UPDATE: Oh, this happened last night? MY BAD. CNN really needs to update their site, for real. Honest mistake (because I never watch LKL). Here's the only video clip I could find from the interview: |
Mark Zuckerberg pledges most of his $6.9 billion fortune to charity Posted: 09 Dec 2010 06:06 AM PST Back in the early 2000s, Bill Gates decided that if he was going to do some charity work and give away some of his money, he was going to go balls-out with it. He pledged the bulk of his wealth to the charity that he and his wife had founded, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and steadily throughout the years, their foundation became the gold-standard. The bulk of the foundation's work is in developing countries in Africa and Asia, and they prioritize communicable, curable diseases, as well as quality of life issues, in addition to bringing technology, jobs and finance to the developing world. The foundation has a largesse of some-odd $20-30 billion from Bill and Melinda (from the last numbers I saw). Then, several years ago, Bill Gates' friend, mentor and surrogate father Warren Buffett pledged the bulk of his fortune to the Gates Foundation as well - adding another couple dozen billion dollars to the pile. With Buffett's signal to rich people everywhere - that you can't take it with you and you might as well give it someone who really needs it - more billionaires quickly signed on and made enormous pledges, not just to the Gate Foundation, but to other foundations and charities. And now America's youngest self-made billionaire Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, has made a similar pledge. Zuckerberg is worth $6.9 billion, by this year's estimates. And he just pledged the bulk of his fortune, taking the cue from Buffet and Gates.
[From CNN] It's kind of amazing, right? Zuckerberg is 26 YEARS OLD. He still has decades to enjoy his billions, you know? There are yachts that could have been bought, expensive champagne that could have been poured on expensive hookers' boobs, mansions and helipads that could have been maintained. Instead, this 26 year old kid decides to pledge the bulk of fortune to charity? I also think that Zuckerberg is kind of enjoying the attention he's gotten from The Social Network, and I think that with his higher profile, he felt the pull to do something big, and not in some "how do I get rid of this dead hooker's body?" kind of way. I know it's dumb to bring this all back to a movie, but I can't help but think that the movie is part of it, part of Zuckerberg's new-found celebrity. I applaud him for doing something righteous with his celebrity, and with his wealth. By the way, Zuckerberg was on 60 Minutes this past weekend. Here's the video - he's actually pretty funny! |
Nicole Richie and Joel Madden might be getting married this weekend Posted: 09 Dec 2010 05:55 AM PST
[From Hollywood Life] If this is really happening, congratulations to these two. I thought they would remain happily unmarried as long as possible. Even though they’re getting married at the end of the year, they’ll get the tax advantages of married status for all of 2010. It sounds unromantic, but it’s practical. I love that Nicole snubbed some people too! Event photos are from March, 2010. Credit: WENN.com |
Christina Aguilera blames sexy nude ‘leaked’ photos on ‘hacker’ Posted: 09 Dec 2010 05:45 AM PST
It all looked like typical “sexy” photos that a starlet would release to drum up interest, and given what we’ve seen of Aguilera it wasn’t particularly scandalous. Only now her people are insisting the photos were “hacked” from her “stylist’s” computer. Give me a break.
[From Just Jared] If a “hacker” did this, why didn’t they send takedown notices to the blogs? Egotastic and The Superficial still have all these photos up. That’s right, because XTina loves the publicity and she loves to show off. She should have just left these photos out there instead of concocting up a ridiculous cover story. There may be something else Christina wants us to notice in these photos. It really looks like she has a large bruise on her cheek and around her eye (photo NSFW) in at least one of the pictures. She also has a large bruise on her knee (linked photo NSFW) and a cut on her leg although that could be a dancing injury. There were rumors of domestic abuse in Christina’s marriage around the time she announced her separation. These photos aren’t going to do much to quash the pregnancy speculation either. What do I have to achieve in life to get a closet like that? I’ve seen shoe stores with less options. |
Laura Dern & Ben Harper are attempting to reconcile Posted: 09 Dec 2010 05:40 AM PST Back in October, Ben Harper very publicly dumped Laura Dern - he filed for divorce, claiming that they had been separated for months (when they had just recently been on vacation). Team Dern fought back, claiming that they weren't separated, and that the filing had left Dern "stunned". Now, barely two months later, it looks like Ben and Laura are attempting to bury the hatchet. Radar reports that they've been spending time together, and that Ben has even invited Laura to come with him to Paris:
[From Radar] Maybe I'm an old softie (I'm not really), but I do think it's nice when a couple with children gives it another go. However, I'm still completely bewildered as to how Ben could have so publicly tried to dump Laura, making it look like he was the injured party and that she had done something wrong. And then he takes her back…? I would love to know that backstory, I really would. If anyone has any good theory/gossip, please let me know. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment