Cele|bitchy

Duchess Kate & Prince William embrace each other in public: shocking?!
Katie Holmes gets revenge on Tom by looking good, enrolls Suri in new school
Did Kristen Stewart just score a coveted dramatic role that she desperately wanted?
Princess Eugenie & Beatrice are trying to mean-girl Duchess Kate
Justin Bieber doesn’t get why Prince William doesn’t just use Propecia
George Clooney shocked to discover Stacy Keibler is not a “natural beauty”?
Eva Mendes walks Ryan Gosling’s dog, and is she hiding a small baby bump?
Katy Perry & John Mayer are dating publicly now: gross or perfect couple?
Jon Gosselin cries poor, Kate sneers that she dropped child support requirements in April
Jessica Biel in white lace Elie Saab in NYC: David’s Bridal doily fug?

Duchess Kate & Prince William embrace each other in public: shocking?!

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 07:48 AM PDT

Everybody wants to talk about these photos! So here you go – Prince William, Prince Harry and Duchess Kate were all in attendance at yesterday's Team Pursuit Track Cycling Olympic event, where they watched Team GB take the gold and set a new world record. William and Kate were so pleased, they actually forgot they were out in public and William (prepare to gasp and clutch your pearls) EMBRACED his wife in an enthusiastic manner. Kate, unsure of exactly what was happening and unfamiliar with such a public gesture, gently embraced her husband back, throwing one arm around his neck and placing her other hand on his arm. THIS IS THE BIGGEST SCANDAL EVER.

Of course I'm being facetious, so don't yell at me. I do believe William was caught up in the emotion and excitement, and he just grabbed onto Kate. I like how Kate still had her body turned towards the action, though. And she still looked like, "I need to make sure the photographers get a good shot!" No, I jest. Or am I?

Coincidence or conspiracy: William publicly embraced his wife when she had her hair pulled back in a ponytail! Perhaps he's tired of her sausage-curl security blanket? Doesn't Kate look adorable with a ponytail? Don't they both look like… kids? Not kids, but they look like they're in 20s again, carefree and happy. Bedhead said that she thinks Kate and Will definitely went home and had sex after this. Maybe the Olympics will finally be the magic that makes a baby! Nine months from now, I'm calling it – nine months from now, there will be a royal baby.

You know one of my favorite parts about Will, Kate and Harry at the Olympics? Even though I know they have handlers and security people around them, I like that there aren't "royal boxes" for most of these events, and that the young royals are mixing it up in whatever seats they get.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Katie Holmes gets revenge on Tom by looking good, enrolls Suri in new school

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 07:10 AM PDT

Now we continue the tale of Tom Cruise spoiling daughter Suri to death by taking her to Disney World instead of those boring old museums that Katie Holmes has been frequenting. The tale has grown into a much darker one than Tom merely strolling through the Magical Kingdom wearing his lifts, and if you so dare, you can see photos of a shirtless Tom (happy trail and all) high-fiving fellow swimmers while frolicking with Suri at the Blizzard Beach water park. So transparent, that Tom.

Meanwhile, it looks like Katie is ready to get down to business since Suri will be beginning the school year in just a few weeks. While it was reported that Katie had enrolled Suri in a very prestigious Catholic school in NYC, that’s apparently not the case. Instead, Suri will attend “The World School,” which boasts worldwide campuses and allows its students to continue their studies around the globe:

Katie Holmes has enrolled her daughter Suri at an exclusive “world” school with campuses dotted around the globe. The brand new $40,000 a year Avenues is to open 20 campuses on five continents, enabling students to switch between schools without disrupting their education.

Aimed at the children of the jetsetting elite “The World School” enables pupils to follow their parents around the globe without being tied to school vacation schedules. The six-year-old will be based at the school’s flagship New York campus, just a few blocks from the luxury apartment she shares with Katie.

A source told Life & Style magazine: “Katie has eagerly been telling Suri all about the lunchrooms, basketball courts and different activities Avenues offers. Suri’s really excited about it.” The imposing school building will have a rooftop playground, along with a main gym that includes full-size basketball and volleyball courts.

Suri had been expected to attend an exclusive Catholic school but her mother’s choice has certain advantages. The website boasts that it is a step better than “national” schools such as Britain’s Eton. With campuses planned for China, India, Africa, Europe, the Americas and Australia Suri will certainly be able to study around the globe.

Along with high academic standards the school claims it will also teach pupils life skills, an advantage to children as sheltered as Suri. “Avenues will embrace practical matters so often ignored by academic institutions,” it says. “Students will become comfortable with a variety of life skills, including practical matters such as time management and technological competency.”

[From Daily Mail

This seems like an odd choice for Katie since she's seemingly intent on providing Suri with a Catholic upbringing. Perhaps Katie thinks that the next Holmes & Yang line will really take off, and she'll have a big reason to travel. Who knows.

Meanwhile, the tabloids have cooled their heels on the TomKat divorce this week with the lone holdout being Star, which talks about how Katie is looking oh-so-sexy lately as revenge against Tom's controlling ways. Yes, I can imagine how losing the midget would perk one up on all sorts of levels, and now that she's enjoying her newfound freedom, Katie's even been wearing leather pants, which lends credence to the March report that she was looking frumpy on purpose to spite Tom, or maybe she was just so depressed that she couldn't muster up the strength to care about her appearance during her last months of marriage.

Strolling through Midtown Manhattan on a recent Saturday afternoon, Katie Holmes turned heads for all the right reasons. Clad in a short, formfitting dress and flirty flats, the smiling, newly confident star was a far cry from the sad, mousy-looking creature she became during her marriage to Tom Cruise, 50. "She definitely looks different -- and better," an eyewitness says of 33-year-old Katie. "She seems more alive and vibrant, and healthier."

Though Katie lost a significant amount of weight from stress in the days surrounding her June 29 divorce filing, she treated herself to a full makeover after the July 9 settlement -- and celebrated her freedom by reclaiming her sexy, single style. And for katie, getting her true self back is the sweetest form of revenge. "Tom always insisted she dress and appear demure and not play up her sexuality too much," explains a friend. "Now, she's ready to break free and show the world what she's all about."

"She's going to do whateer it takes to look her best," the friend says of the actress, who went from hot girl next door to carefully done-up trophy wife to neglected, dowdy mom during five years of marriage. "This makeover was just the start."

And already, it's done wonders for her mood. "Katie's so much happier now," a pal adds. "Every day, she's getting more and more of her old self back."

[From In Touch, print edition, August 13, 2012]

The tabloid also theorizes that Tom has been strategically appearing more rumpled and ragged than usual (instead of his normal “clean-shaven and impeccably dressed” self) in “a calculated attempt to reform his robotic image — and let the world know he’s human.” Good luck with that, Tom. I wouldn’t doubt that Tom’s “people” (i.e., the CO$) would want Tom to project the image of a sympathetic, downtrodden single father (with some newly hatched grey stubble) who wants nothing more than to be with his daughter during expensive, highly-publicized vacations, but the best thing that Tom could do is keep his head down at this point. But of course, he won’t do that.

As for Katie, I’m not convinced that her fashion sense has truly improved since leaving Tom. However, she’s often wearing the best accessory of all these days: A smile.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and Pacific Coast News

Did Kristen Stewart just score a coveted dramatic role that she desperately wanted?

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 05:36 AM PDT

Months ago, Jennifer Lawrence mentioned in an interview that she was obsessed with William Styron's Lie Down in Darkness, and that if a film adaptation of the book was ever made, Jennifer wanted to play Peyton. Then Kristen Stewart name-dropped the same book in her Elle Mag interview (when she was supporting Snow White). Kristen told Elle, "Have you ever read Lie Down in Darkness? I want to play Peyton more than anything I can possibly taste or touch in my life. I want to play her so bad. Oh, dude, she f–kin' loves it! She's in love with [her father]. I mean, I think she's in love with him. It's not his fault. They're the most f–ked-up family!" I haven't read the book, so I can't speak to who would be better in the role, but I will say that I simply LIKE Jennifer Lawrence more, and I think she's a better actress. I tend to think Lawrence has more friends in Hollywood too, more people rooting for her to succeed – but that becomes a Catch-22, because Jennifer Lawrence is booked solid for the next year on future projects, and when producers went looking to cast Peyton, they ended up with Kristen…?

Kristen Stewart may have become tabloid fodder in recent days, but the 22-year-old seems decidedly committed to being taken seriously as an actress: Vulture hears exclusively that Stewart has landed the lead role in an indie adaptation of William Styron's 1951 novel, Lie Down In Darkness. Directed by Crazy Heart helmer Scott Cooper and set in genteel fifties Virginia, Lie Down will have Stewart play Peyton Loftis. As part of a dysfunctional and disintegrating family, Peyton is constantly compared to her crippled sister, Maudie, and her intense physical beauty makes her the object of her frigid mother's jealous hatred and the target of her father's incestuous, alcoholic lust. (Stewart will also appear in another fifties-era film, Walter Salles’s On the Road, when it’s released in the U.S. sometime this fall/winter.)

The part of Peyton had been coveted by Jennifer Lawrence, but Lawrence will spend the better part of the next year shooting sequels. (Catching Fire ignites this fall, while a new X-Men film at Fox commences shooting in January.) Set up at Open Road Films, Darkness has been in development for years by producer Jeff Sharp (You Can Count on Me, Proof) and while it's unclear how soon it might start production, this is a major casting hurdle cleared.

Meanwhile, less clear is what will become of Universal Pictures' planned sequel to Stewart's Snow White and the Huntsman. In April, before the film's June release, Deadline reported that David Koepp, Hollywood's go-to screenwriter for blockbusters like Jurassic Park, Mission: Impossible, and Spider-Man, had been retained to write a script for a Huntsman sequel. "The word is the studio hopes to fast track the project so that Huntsman helmer Rupert Sanders can make it the next project he directs," wrote Deadline.

But the sequel's future has naturally been complicated by Stewart's admission of an affair (of some sort) with the married Sanders, her director on the film. Could (or would) the two ever reteam? A Universal source insists that "nothing has changed and we are still looking at sequel options that would include Rupert directing."

Calls to David Koepp were not returned, but as one agency insider noted, it would be highly irregular for a screenwriter of Koepp's renown to continue work on a project that didn't have a director attached to oversee its progress to the screen, lending credence to the idea that Sanders remains the intended director. Agency sources say that Universal hasn't yet sought any other candidates to replace Sanders.

Calls to Snow White and the Huntsman producers Joe Roth and Palak Patel as well as to Sander's agents also went unreturned; Stewart's agency declined to comment on her future film plans.

[From Vulture]

Vulture isn't some tabloid – I believe this. I believe that Kristen is the leading contender for the role. But Gossip Cop has a "production source" who claims "While it's exciting to see all the interest the project is generating, the film is still in the pre-production process, and no offers to cast have been made as of yet." You know how I read this? Vulture's story was also from the same "production source" who used it as the proverbial canary in the coal mine – producers are trying to see if Kristen will still have a career in six months. They want to see the public reaction to news that she scored a coveted role. And the reaction is…?

Kristen does have another film in preproduction, though – she's going to be working with director Nick Cassavetes on the film Cali. There were reports last week that Alex Pettyfer would play her boyfriend. Which… would be interesting from a gossip standpoint, because Alex is supposed to be one of the biggest douches of the Hot, Young Hollywood set. Alex and Kristen could easily have a grumpy-off.

Meanwhile, Radar reports that Kristen has been "banished" from attending Robert Pattinson's NYC Cosmopolis premiere on August 13. Obviously. I mean, isn't that one a no-brainer? A source tells Radar, "Despite the fact Robert and Kristen have been communicating by cell phone, she will not be at the Cosmopolis New York premiere. Security was briefed and they were told that Kristen is not allowed anywhere near the red carpet or the after party. The decision was made because Robert just doesn't want to see her. There were fears that she could use it as a chance to talk to him in person and that sort of drama is not wanted at the premiere. There's also the fact that if she did attend, it would distract from the film premiere itself and the movie bosses are not interested in that sort of publicity. It's going to be Robert's first public appearance since the scandal broke – and they really want to make it less of a media circus than it already will be." Oh, for the love of God. Kristen is not going to try to hijack the premiere. And I would put money on producers secretly wishing she WOULD show up and create a lot of drama.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Princess Eugenie & Beatrice are trying to mean-girl Duchess Kate

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 04:36 AM PDT

This story is slightly complicated, so let me get through some background before we begin. Allegedly, Prince Harry and William are pretty close to their younger cousins, Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice. Harry is said to be especially fond of them, and Harry (who is closer in age) seems to travel in many of the same aristocratic and moneyed circles as his cousins. When Harry found himself single recently, Eugenie set him up with a friend – a beautiful, blonde model friend named Cressida Bonas. Harry and Cressida hit it off, and they might still be seeing each other. Here's where it gets more complicated.

Because it seems like Duchess Kate doesn't get along so well with her cousins-in-law. Kate, Eugenie and Beatrice are not outwardly bitchy to each other, but there are some tensions and some hard feelings over old grudges. It doesn't help matters that the Queen recently re-emphasized the royal hierarchy so that princesses who "marry into the family" have to curtsey to "blood princesses" – making Kate lower in status than Beatrice and Eugenie. So, why is this Cressida Bonas thing raising Kate's hackles? Because Cressida's sister Isabella is the one person that made Kate incredibly jealous – because William was totally in love with Isabella. So…

Prince Harry and a beautiful blonde? It seemed like just another date in the life of the eligible young royal. But when the blonde is Cressida Bonas – half-sister of the woman Prince William once wanted to marry – and the matchmaker is royal cousin Princess Eugenie, palace insiders see Harry's rendezvous as the most recent volley in the way between the Yorks (Eugenie, 22, and Beatrice, 24) and the Middletons.

"No woman makes Kate as insecure as Isabella Anstruther-Gough-Calthorpe," a palace insider tells In Touch of Cressida's half-sister – for whom William left Kate for five years ago.

"Eugenie knew it would get under Kate's skin," adds the source, explaining that were things to get serious between Harry and Cressida, family gatherings would become excruciating for the duchess.

Why would Eugenie put Kate in such an uncomfortable position? The source says there's been a royal battle brewing for quite some time: "There is no love lost between the sisters. They have nothing in common, unless you count Kate now being a member of the royal family."

The source says it's not entirely one-sided. "Prior to the royal wedding, Kate invited Beatrice to a party, but forgot to mention it was costume," says the source. "Poor Beatrice was so embarrassed, she ended up in tears in the bathroom."

Now that she's part of the royal family – and a future queen – Kate knows such oversights are beneath her. But it won't be easy to forgive and forget.

"Although Kate will have to socialize with the Yorks at royal events, they'll never be good friends," the source says.

[From In Touch Weekly, print edition]

I mean, in some sense In Touch is just reorganizing some facts and gossip to pit the princesses against the duchess. But… there might be something there. I'll admit, I don't pay much attention to Eugenie and Beatrice, but I remember hearing stuff about the York girls not getting along with the Middleton girls – and this was years before Kate married William. So, maybe Eugenie decided to get back at Kate using a weird method. I don't know.

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Justin Bieber doesn’t get why Prince William doesn’t just use Propecia

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 04:31 AM PDT

It's no secret that Prince William is balding. He's been losing his hair since his early 20s. Maybe it's genetic, maybe it's stress, maybe it's all of the fruity hats the royal family has to wear. Whatever happened, it happened fast and William went from "Wow, he's a good-looking whippersnapper" to "Wow, he has his father's hairline." For the record, I don't think there's anything wrong with a bald or a balding man. It's what they do with it and how they own it. I get the feeling that William doesn't really own it, but maybe I'm wrong. Maybe he's fine with the way he looks. Hopefully.

Anyway, Justin Bieber was doing an interview with something called "Rollercoaster Magazine" and the conversation came to William and his bald spot. Bieber, as you can imagine, spoke like an 18-year-old with a full head of hair:

Justin Bieber got himself into a hairy mess when he took a cheap shot at Britain's Prince William.

In an interview with Rollercoaster magazine, Bieber said: "I mean, there are things to prevent that nowadays, like Propecia. I don't know why he doesn't just get those things, those products. You just take Propecia and your hair grows back. Have you not got it over here?"

The British press is up in arms over boorish Bieber's slap at their beloved royal's shriking mane.

"While he's brushing his golden locks, Bieber also needs to brush up on his manners," sniffed one royal watcher. "He should remember that he's just a rock star. One day, William will be king – thinning hair and all!"

[From The Enquirer, print edition]

First of all, it's kind of funny that Bieber just pulled the word "Propecia" out of the air. It feels like he or someone in his family has looked into it. Second of all, it's adorable that Bieber thinks that it's so easy – "Like, just take a pill or something. You'll have hair, I promise." Ask John Travolta if it's that easy. Third thing: Hahahahaha. It's just funny! Justin Bieber to Prince William: "I don't get it. Why can't you just, like, grow hair?" If only, Bieber.

Photos courtesy of WENN.\

George Clooney shocked to discover Stacy Keibler is not a “natural beauty”?

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 04:29 AM PDT

Does anyone else think George Clooney is going to look leathery as he ages? Like, the second coming of George Hamilton. George has never been a pale guy – he's always had a lovely olive skin tone, what I like to think of as "Mediterranean" if that's not too much of a stereotype. But it seems like George has never liked SPF, and he likes the sun. So, Stacy Keibler is trying to keep up her color too. She wants to be nice and tan as well. Unfortunately, Stacy might be going about it the wrong way. Star Mag claims that Stacy has bought a tanning bed, and now George is thinking about dumping her because of it. COLD.

George Clooney is seriously turned off be a new piece of "furniture" that his girlfriend, Stacy Keibler, bought for her LA home.

According to a source, Stacy upset George by blowing tens of thousands of dollars on a high-tech tanning bed.

"He was attracted to her initially because she seemed like a natural beauty who didn't obsess about her looks," the friend says. "But that's not really true, and it's beginning to bother him."

George, who works hard to cultivate an intelligent image, genuinely worries that Stacy's tanorexia will reflect badly on him, says the insider. Ironically, Stacy thinks purchasing the bed was responsible – because now she won't be driving back and forth to the salon twice a week.

The insider adds, "She is not taking his disapproval seriously, but George has dumped girls for smaller offenses."

[From Star Magazine, print edition]

Let's be real – "He was attracted to her initially because she seemed like a natural beauty who didn't obsess about her looks"?? I remember what Stacy used to look like, before Clooney – a busted cocktail waitress. He hired a team of people to give her a makeover, and the result was Stacy looking like a slightly less-busted cocktail waitress. He could go anywhere for "natural". He wants someone who won't embarrass him on a red carpet, and Stacy is TRYING. So, I'd say Clooney is fine with Stacy being somewhat high-maintenance as far as grooming and such goes. That's how he made her, you know?

Besides all of that – does Stacy even have her own place in LA anymore? I think she moved into George's house. She refers to his home as "ours". Which could be one of those "dump-able offenses." In any case, Gossip Cop spoke to a "source close to Keibler" and they said the story is false. Battle of the unnamed sources! Who do you believe?

Some photos of George on a commercial shoot in Italy earlier this week:

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and WENN.

Eva Mendes walks Ryan Gosling’s dog, and is she hiding a small baby bump?

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 04:28 AM PDT

This is the second day in a row that we have new Eva Mendes photos! This, after a Eva Mendes drought for more than a month. Aren't we lucky? These are photos of Eva "running errands" with a cute companion. Do you recognize her buddy? That's George, Ryan Gosling's Mohawked dog. So… you let your lady spend the day with your dog. What does that mean? That means Ryan Gosling and Eva Mendes are still very much together. It also means that George got to spend the day with his mom (step-mom?) as she got her hair done and picked up some food. My puppy is fine with a quick food pickup, but he would definitely NOT behave if I took him to a hair salon. My dog would be Chaos Incarnate. So maybe George is really well-behaved? Maybe he just tolerates Eva. Or maybe she gives him bacon, which is the surest way to any dog's heart.

Anyway… we discussed some other photos of Eva yesterday in which Eva seemed to be shielding her torso from paparazzi inspection. And now in these photos, Eva is wearing a very loose dress. Is she trying to tell us something? Something of the baby bump variety? Eh. I thought for a moment that she looked kind of pregnant from behind yesterday (go here to see those photos), but I really can't tell in these pics. Pregnancy might explain why she and Ryan dropped off the radar for a little bit. And I could totally see an "unplanned" pregnancy for Ryan and Eva, quite honestly. All I'm saying is that these photos aren't definitive proof.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

Katy Perry & John Mayer are dating publicly now: gross or perfect couple?

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 04:23 AM PDT

These photos are over a day old by now, but I just had to comment on Katy Perry and John Mayer’s first paparazzi-documented appearance together, which leads to the conclusion that Us Weekly was correct last week when they reported that the circle of douche was now complete. That is, Katy and John were seen out looking very “affectionate, holding hands and cuddling!” at a West Hollywood bar, and then they also supposedly had pizza together on the following evening. Do you think John’s David Duke c*ck has officially gotten lucky yet? Because he loves those damaged, on-the-rebound sort of girls, and Katy fits that profile pretty perfectly.

Also, Katy and John are both famewhores, so this prospective relationship works on that level as well. Naturally, they were photographed outside the Chateau Marmont because that’s the place to be seen when one really wants to be seen:

He’s dated stars including Jennifer Aniston, Taylor Swift and Jessica Simpson.

And now it seems that rumours John Mayer has found himself a new celebrity girlfriend in Katy Perry are true.

The pair were pictured enjoying a date night together at Pace restaurant in Los Angeles before moving on to the Chateau Marmont Hotel to continue their evening.

[From Daily Mail]

So is it just me, or is John a complete fool to hook up with yet another pop singer who has a habit of taking out her relationship angst through passive-aggressive lyrics? You’d think he’d have learned his lesson after whining about how Taylor Swift totally humiliated him with her “Dear John” song. As for Katy? I’m not sure why she thinks that John will treat her well after he’s done a number on so many other women, but these two deserve each other. They really do. I hope they get married and (don’t) have babies.

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and Pacific Coast News

Jon Gosselin cries poor, Kate sneers that she dropped child support requirements in April

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 04:21 AM PDT

This week’s Star Magazine had some quotes from Jon Gosselin bitching about his financial situation due to his hefty child support payments, which were $22,000 a month the last I heard. Jon had a job working construction last year, but I doubt he’s worked steadily and he’s obviously hurting. He told Star that he was afraid he might get sent to jail for failing to pay child support:

“I can’t afford to pay my rent, and the domestic-relations staff tell me they will put me in jail unless I pay child support. I am a single father who’s trying to make ends meet during a recession. What do I do – pay child support or rent? I need to support my kids, but I could lose my house, and I need my home to continue to have custody.

“I’m doing the best I can. But life is so expensive with eight kids!”

[From Star Magazine, print edition, August 13, 2012]

Jon also had a few choice words about Kate’s ambitions to star in a reality dating show. “I think this is completely ridiculous! We have eight children, and they need us. She is putting reality TV and dating in front of the kids. I know I have a lot to be thankful for, but Kate’s need to be famous is not one of them.”

Poor Jon, he’s just such a victim. Meanwhile Kate is making it clear that Jon doesn’t even have to pay child support any longer. Her lawyer issued a statement that Kate dropped the requirements for support in April:

"I read Jon's statement on RadarOnline.com and was quite surprised to read that he claims to be struggling to keep his child support payments current. As of April 27, 2012, Kate voluntarily relieved Jon of all current and future child support obligations for their eight children," she said.

"Kate and Jon talked and worked through all of these issues and she withdrew the child support.

"Currently, he is only paying a small amount on arrears for support that was not paid prior to the April date when she dropped support. Those payments will soon end meaning that Kate is the sole supporter of the parties' children.

"The last thing Kate ever wanted was for the children to see their father in dire financial straits.”

[From Showbizspy]

So Jon is broke from paying past child support, and even after Kate had it waived he went crying to Star about it. I’m not on Kate’s side at all, I just think it’s about time both of them realized that they’re no longer famous, and they’re no longer pulling in the big bucks. It’s time to downsize instead of trying to squeeze another fifteen minutes out of the fame that’s long since passed.

Jon is shown on 4-5-12. Kate is shown on 1-19-12. Credit: FameFlynet

Jessica Biel in white lace Elie Saab in NYC: David’s Bridal doily fug?

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 04:20 AM PDT

I just felt an unfamiliar pang of pity for Jessica Biel as I was going through these photos. Jessica is in New York now, promoting Total Recall… all by herself. Last night was the NYC premiere, and Jessica was the only headlining star to show up. No Colin Farrell, no Kate Beckinsale, not even John Cho. Just poor Jessica in her sad white, lace dress. She looks like Miss Havisham. This Elie Saab just screams "bridal!" to me… and it's a sad look. Check out the original runway look with sleeves – wouldn't that have looked much better on Jessica? It still would have been bridal, but at least it would have looked designer bridal and not David's Bridal. That doily wrap isn't helping either. She was aiming for "breezy, summery" and she ended up looking like she was the jilted, forgotten bride at a budget beach wedding.

Jessica is still sticking with her story that she and Justin haven't even set a date for their wedding, by the way. There were lots of rumors that it would be this summer, very soon, like mid to late August. And the tabloids are keeping the hope alive that it will happen soon, because if not, they might run out of these "Sad Jessica Biel" stories:

Before Jessica Biel becomes Mrs. Justin Timberlake, she's hitting some snags in planning her bachelorette party. Namely, that she doesn't have anyone to invite.

"Jessica doesn't have a lot of girlfriends," says an insider. "Her plan right now is to fly to Colorado and meet up with a group of her hometown friends."

Meanwhile, her hubby-to-be is planning a bachelor party that a source reveals is "going to make The Hangover look like Driving Miss Daisy."

[From Star Magazine, print edition]

Jessica doesn't have a lot of girlfriends? On one side, I think that claim is BS – she's friends with Jennifer Garner, and Jessica does charity work with a lot of women from Revlon, plus some other charitable organizations she's involved with. On the other side… I could totally see how Jessica would end up alienating long-term girlfriends because A) Justin tried to sleep with them, B) Justin actually slept with them, C) Jessica thinks that Justin might sleep with them or D) Jessica talks about Justin too much and her girlfriends are tired of the same neverending conversation.

I'm also including a photo of Jessica in brown and black Giambattista Valli outside The Daily Show yesterday. I'm not a huge fan, but I like it better than the Elie Saab doily.

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

Friday, August 3, 2012

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy

No comments:

Post a Comment