Thursday, February 24, 2011

Cele|bitchy

Cele|bitchy


Khloe Kardashian on trying to get pregnant: “if it happens, it happens”

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 09:30 AM PST

wenn2955743
US Weekly has an inset story on the cover this week with the title “Khloe Kardashian: Our Baby Struggle.” US does have a few quotes from Khloe inside, but she doesn’t exactly open up to them about it and is kind of dismissive about it. I think her struggle to get pregnant has been a lot of frustration and pain for her and Lamar, but it’s not like Khloe went on about it or admitted that it gets to her. All she said to US was “If it happens, it happens. It takes time, I guess, I don’t know.”

Hollybaby is saying that Khloe should get to a fertility specialist stat, but maybe she has already and just isn’t ready to talk about it. (Until a tabloid outlet ponies up the cash for a cover story exclusive.) We know Khloe and Lamar have been trying to get pregnant for well over a year, and it was in August that Khloe said just about the same thing she told US - she’s leaving it up to the powers that be whether she gets pregnant. Back then she saidIt's in God's hands, and let it happen when it happens. I'm 26. It should happen naturally. I don't want to force it. I would love to have a baby, and if I get pregnant, I get pregnant. I don't think, like … my biological clock is ticking!

Fertility doctors recommend that if you’re under 35 and have been trying to get pregnant for a year or more you should seek help. Khloe doesn’t seem as concerned about it as the press is though. She put it out there that she wants a baby and they’re going to ask her about it until it happens for her.

Meanwhile Kim says she’s in no hurry to get pregnant. Kim’s shelf life is limited and a baby would only slow her down.

Khloe and Lamar are shown at the Teen Choice Awards on 8/8/10 and shopping at Louis Vuitton on 1/26/11. Credit: WENN.com and Fame

fp_6631298_kardashian_odom_

fp_6631288_kardashian_odom_

wenn2955721

fp_6631294_kardashian_odom_

Penelope Cruz steps out one month after giving birth, looks great

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 08:54 AM PST

fp_6837829_cruz_penelope_fpinf_33_35

These are the first photos of Penelope Cruz since she gave birth nearly one month ago exactly. By the way, we still don't really know the name of Penelope and Javier Bardem's son, although one of Javier's relatives claims that the boy is named Leo. Sweet. Anyway, doesn't Penelope look great? She looks… healthy. Life she recently gave birth and she's still got some baby weight but it's all good. Those genes… I'm so glad they reproduced.

Ay caramba! Just a month after giving birth to a baby boy, new mom Penelope Cruz stepped out in Santa Monica on Wednesday — and showed off a truly enviable post-baby figure.

Visiting the offices of Hollywood producer Jerry Bruckheimer (the man behind Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides, in which Cruz stars), the stunning Oscar winner, 36, looked every bit the international movie star in shades, clingy striped top and tight blue jeans.

(The slim star also flashed her huge engagement ring from husband Javier Bardem, a 3-carat sapphire ring worth a reported $30,000, according to sources.)

After an ultra-private wedding last year, Cruz and Bardem, 41, welcomed their first child in L.A., reportedly named Leo Encinas.

Although the Spanish superstar couple have remained fairly mum about their new family, Bardem couldn’t help but gush while accepting a Goya Award in his native Spain Feb. 13.

“I dedicate [this award] to my wife and son for awakening my heart and smile every day,” the Biutiful actor (who’s also up for an Oscar this Sunday) said.

[From Us Weekly]

Good for them. I know some people claim that Penelope and Javier are both major douches, but I prefer to think of them as just rather press-reticent. Hopefully. In any case, I'm happy for them.

fp_6837824_cruz_penelope_fpinf_28_35

fp_6837539_cruz_penelope_fpinf_24_35

fp_6838216_cruz_penelope_fpinf_02_35

Photos courtesy of Fame.

Us Weekly: Billy Ray Cyrus is jealous of all of the attention Miley gets

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 08:30 AM PST

usweekly2

Miley Cyrus's drama with her father takes the covers of both Us Weekly and Star Magazine this week. We get an e-copy of Us Weekly as soon as it comes out, and last night I flipping through it when I stopped on the above layout. I mean… I love Us Weekly, and I think they've got good people working for them, but who gave the go ahead for this epic side-by-side? This is maybe the most inappropriate photo spread of Miley and Billy Ray, and that's really saying something.

Anyway, the article is mostly a recap of previous Rogue Mullet stories that we've already covered - go here for his GQ article, and here for some of the fallout and breakdown. There are a couple of good quotes from insiders though:

A Disney source tells Us Weekly" "He totally pushed Miley into being a star!"

Another insider says Billy Ray is simply jealous of his daughter: "He was always upset he didn't get as much attention as Miley. This is his way of stealing the spotlight."

And yet other insiders claim that Billy Ray is just lashing out because he and Miley were already on the outs. "Billy Ray already had a huge fight with Miley over her behavior. She won't talk to him anymore, so he sees no problem voicing his opinion to whomever will listen."

Before Miley turned 18, Billy did little to rein in Miley, and according to one source, he even used to tip off the paparazzi about Miley's whereabouts to ensure she'd get photographed.

[From Us Weekly, print edition]

Some more little pieces of information - Team Mullet says Tish lets Miley do whatever she wants too, while Team Miley says that Tish is the disciplinarian. Whatever. Even though I think this family is a train wreck, I also tend to want to give Miley a break. Yeah, her image is way too sexed up and provocative and she shouldn't be drinking or drugging… but Jesus, what were you doing when you were 18?

usweekly1

Cover and screencap of the Us Weekly's layout, courtesy of Us Weekly.

Kate Middleton wears beige & feathers for her first royal outing: cute or fug?

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 08:04 AM PST

kate_william_1_wenn3223959

I really am excited. Kate Middleton has started working! Huzzah! Today in Wales, Kate Middleton and Prince William stepped out for their first official royal appearance before the public. It was a ceremony for the naming of a lifeboat. For real. They hold ceremonies for that junk! The lifeboat was christened "Hereford Endeavour" with is so, so fancy. I wouldn't be surprised if Hereford Endeavor joins a fleet of lifeboats with names like Higgenbottom Fancypants and Rumpcrumpet Biscuitshire. Anyhoodle, I guess when you're christening a smaller vessel, you don't slam a champagne bottle against the fiberglass hull, you just pour champagne on the hull. Sure.

Prince William and his fiancee Kate Middleton are making their first public appearance together in Wales at a lifeboat ceremony.

The visit has been highly anticipated because the couple have kept such a low profile since announcing their engagement last November, making only one other prior appearance at a charity event.

They plan to marry April 29 at Westminster Abbey.

William is to name the Trearddur Bay Lifeboat Station’s new lifeboat the “Hereford Endeavour” at Thursday’s ceremony. He is an active search-and-rescue helicopter pilot with the Royal Air Force at the Anglesey base in Wales.

The couple will visit their alma mater, the University of St. Andrews in Scotland, on Friday.

[From The Canadian Press]

So… how did Kate do for her first public outing as a soon-to-be-royal? Lady Biscuits (Kate) did well, I think. She smiled a lot and seemed to be pleased to be there. The Welsh probably already adore her. My only criticism is that she chose this plain beige suit and a funky feather hat. Hatlet. Headpiece. Whatever. Oh, and she looks super-skinny too. She's losing a lot of weight for her wedding day.

kate_middleton_1_wenn3223967

kate_middleton_2_wenn3223964

kate_middleton_3_wenn3223965

william_kate_3_wenn3223961

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Did Sofia Vergara & Katherine Heigl get into a bitch-fight?

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 07:37 AM PST

fp_6687654_heiglvergara_newset_scp_18_26

These are photos from earlier this month, on the New York set of New Year's Eve, the follow-up to Valentine's Day. It's an ensemble romantic comedy, and Sofia Vergara and Katherine Heigl both have parts in it (Heigl got the part meant for Halle Berry). Sofia and Katherine were put together as friends or coworkers within the film, and I believe they've already shot most of their scenes. Which brings me to one of the funnier tabloid stories this week - according to Star Magazine's insider, "Katherine’s always complaining about having to stand outside in the cold for long periods of time, and Sofia can’t stand her whining. Finally, Sofia told her to be grateful that she has the role in the first place.” Ha! After Sofia told Dame Heigl to STFU, the insider claims that Dame Heigl and Sofia just started ignoring each other. Now, it just feels like this is true, right? It reinforces what we know of the two women - Sofia is easy-going and happy to have found a niche in Hollywood, and Dame Heigl is an ungrateful snot who bitches and moans about every little thing. Unfortunately, Gossip Cop is raining on my bitch-fight parade:

"The New York set of New Year's Eve is getting icy – and not because of the frigid winter temperatures," begins a piece in Star magazine.

The tab claims co-stars Sofia Vergara and Katherine Heigl are "ignoring each other on set."

The reason?

A Star "insider" says, "Katherine's always complaining about having to stand outside in the cold for long periods of time, and Sofia can't stand her whining… Finally, Sofia told her to be grateful that she has the role in the first place. That clearly didn't go over well."
Unfortunately, Star's dish is even colder than the temperature on the film's New York set.

A source close to Vergara assures Gossip Cop the feud is "not true." And a production source notes Vergara and Heigl worked together only ONE day – and that was two weeks ago.

We're also told the two women got along great.

[From Gossip Cop]

So, who to believe? Star Magazine's insider with his delicious story of Dame Heigl living up to her a–hole hype, or Gossip Cop's source who claims that the whole thing is false? I tend to believe that Sofia and Dame Heigl probably didn't get along all that well, but that both of them managed to be professional throughout their one day of filming.

fp_6687040_heiglvergara_newset_scp_00_26

fp_6687054_heiglvergara_newset_scp_14_26

fp_6687048_heiglvergara_newset_scp_08_26

Photos courtesy of Fame.

Charlie Sheen, his new gf, a porn star and his ex wife go on vacation together

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 07:25 AM PST

wenn2049469
Here’s a link to a photo of Charlie and his three live-in loves

The headline sounds like a joke, only the reality conjures up nasty visions of coke fueled orgies with Charlie’s vacant crazy eyes and gold-filled mouth hanging open. I doubt the guy would be able to spend two days just relaxing at home and watching porn without smoking crack and inviting porn stars over. He needs to be surrounded by women who cater to him, and he needs constant entertainment.

Yesterday we heard that Charlie’s most recent ex wife, Brooke Mueller, has moved in with him, along with their twin boys and a nanny to watch the kids while Brooke gets high with Charlie. Brooke reportedly took Charlie up on his offer to buy her a house in the neighborhood, and is just shacking up with him temporarily while he finalizes the purchase of the home. We haven’t heard whether Denise Richards accepted Charlie’s offer of a house, and she seems too stable and levelheaded to take it seriously. Brooke joins Charlie and two other women, a model and a porn star, in living with him. ET Online has a photo of all of them posing together and both Charlie and Brooke looked cracked out of their skulls.

Charlie, Brooke, the porn star and the model are now all on vacation together in The Bahamas. Charlie reportedly flew them all out there on his private jet a couple of days ago.

I’m a little confused by both Radar and TMZ’s claim that the porn star, Bree Olsen, is Charlie’s girlfriend. I thought the new chick, Bong model Natalie Kenly, was the girlfriend. Since they’re all living and vacationing with Charlie I guess we can assume they’re all girlfriends.

Radar has a new interview with a woman Charlie paid to live with him last year. A very young-looking porn star tells their interviewer that she was with Charlie for four months and that he gave her something like $50 to $75 thousand dollars over that time. He would pay her $3 to $5 k in cash every time they met. It’s pretty dumb to tell that to the press. That money was tax free up until this point. I wonder if Charlie writes it off as an entertainment expense.

Also, Charlie Sheen’s dad Martin Sheen recently compared Charlie’s addition to cancer. He said “the disease of addiction is a form of cancer.” I get the disease model of addiction, I really do, but comparing it to cancer makes light of real diseases. Charlie is not a victim.

wenn1896514

Lindsay Lohan’s crack lies fall apart after viewing surveillance tape

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 07:05 AM PST

wenn56054322

I'm about to write something absolutely shocking: Lindsay Lohan is a crackhead liar made of crack lies. I know! I'm clutching my pearls as we speak. So, remember how Lindsay Lohan stole that necklace and then sauntered around Venice Beach, cracked out of her skull, wearing the stolen necklace? And then the cops got a search warrant, and somebody at the police station tipped her off, and Lindsay didn't want the cops to raid her place and find all of her hoarded drugs so she arranged for a friend to "drop off" the stolen necklace at the police station. Then, when the charges came down, Lindsay's team of cracked-out enablers went into overdrive offering possible explanations for the crack thievery. They said Lindsay "borrowed" the necklace. They said the video surveillance would show that Lindsay just "accidentally" took the necklace, because her crack mind is weak and forgetful. They said Lindsay would be found innocent! Lindsay said that she was not raised to lie, cheat or steal. Well, guess what?

A male shopping with Lindsay Lohan at the beachside jewelry store in Venice, California, distracted an employee as the Mean Girls star stole a gold designer necklace — this according to a law enforcement source who has intimate knowledge of the surveillance video.

“Lindsay had removed a necklace of hers that she was wearing when she tried on the necklace in question,” the source close to the case told RadarOnline.com, exclusively.

“As Lindsay was putting her necklace back on, it’s apparent the store clerk was distracted by the male companion that was with Lindsay.”

The sales associate provided a statement to investigators claiming she didn’t realize that Lohan hadn’t taken the necklace off, RadarOnline.com has learned.

“The video then shows Lindsay and her male friend walking out of the store, all while Lindsay was wearing the necklace,” said the source. “It’s all clearly visible on the video.”

Lohan, 24, pleaded not guilty on February 8 to a single count of felony grand theft; if convicted, she could be sent to prison for up to three years. Worryingly for the starlet, prosecutors believe the store surveillance video is strong evidence against her and one source even described it as a “smoking gun”.

“The District Attorney believes that Lindsay’s friend distracted the clerk on purpose and that could bolster the case if it goes to trial against Lindsay,” said the source. “This simply wasn’t a case of miscommunication of a necklace being loaned and not returned, as Lindsay has claimed.”

“Distraction theft” — as it is known in some legal quarters — if proved, can help establish a criminal’s intent. Lohan’s high-powered lawyer Shawn Holley didn’t receive the video until Wednesday at L.A.’s Airport Courthouse, where the actress appeared before Superior Court Judge Keith Schwartz for a routine hearing.

“This case does involve jail time — period,” Schwartz told Lohan, warning actress that he would send her to jail if she accepted a plea deal offered by prosecutors. “If you plead in front of me — if this case resolves in front of me — you are going to jail. Period. It may be an issue as to amount of time.”

Schwartz said that if Lohan rejects the offer the case will be set for a preliminary hearing in front of another judge; she must decide by her next court date on Thursday, March 10.

[From Radar]

So the surveillance tape that Team Crack claimed would VINDICATE Lindsay is somehow the most important evidence against her. Time for a plea, crackhead. And maybe the prosecution should talk to this dude who did the distractin’. I doubt he wants to hitch his wagon to Team Crack.

wenn5600252

wenn56054384

wenn5613470

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Alyssa Milano shows off her baby bump at the ‘Hall Pass’ premiere

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 06:27 AM PST

hall_pass_premiere_06_wenn3223036

Alyssa Milano announced her pregnancy earlier this week. CB and I had an extended conversation about it, oddly enough. We debated whether or not people cared - it's not like people wish Alyssa harm or anything, but we also wondered if she still really had anything by way of a fan base. Anyway, we ended up not writing about it until now. Alyssa showed off her bump last night at the premiere of Hall Pass, that stupid-and-offensive-looking movie starring Owen Wilson and Jason Sudeikis, amongst others. I think Alyssa is in it too. In any case, Alyssa wore this jacked up grey skirt that might have been cute if wasn't fitted to go right under her boobs. It's just… unflattering. I know maternity styles are different, but Alyssa seems like she's into her second trimester by now, and there's no reason to look like she just got an oversized skirt from Target and hiked that junk up. That being said, her hair and makeup look good. She's a very pretty woman.

hall_pass_premiere_19_wenn3223049

The award for most unattractive outfit goes to Christina Applegate. Once again, I know that her style choices are limited, considering she just had a baby. But could she have found a more flattering muumuu?

hall_pass_premiere_14_wenn3223044

Here's Jason Sudeikis, trying to be the cool guy.

hall_pass_premiere_13_wenn3223043

Owen Wilson, who is actually The Cool Guy.

hall_pass_premiere_20_wenn3223050

And lastly, Jenna Fisher. Sigh… Jenna. Girl. Hire somebody to dress you. This is one of the most flattering things I've ever seen her in, but the bar has been set really, really low. It looks like she's dressed up to go to a high school dance. Some women just do that clothes - this dress could be a solid look on another woman, but on Jenna, it just looks so dated and cheap.

hall_pass_premiere_24_wenn3223054

Photos courtesy of WENN.

Susan Sarandon wears a gold bracelet crafted from her children’s teeth

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 06:08 AM PST

sag arrivals 13 310111
Susan Sarandon with son Jack Robbins at the SAG Awards. Credit: WENN.com. Inset via Hollybaby. She didn’t wear that bracelet to the SAGs, though.

This is a bizarre story that I just couldn’t resist covering. The lovely Susan Sarandon, 64, had an elegant bracelet custom made for her - out of her children’s baby teeth. She told Popeater that the bracelet was made from her three children’s teeth: Eva Amurri, 25, Jack, 21, and Miles, 18.

Apparently, the tooth fairy doesn’t visit Susan Sarandon’s house. ‘The Lovely Bones’ actress has been stepping out at events wearing a rather unusual bracelet crafted from opals, rubies, gold and — her children’s teeth! Yes, you read that right.

She crafted the personalized bracelet from the pearly whites of daughter Eva Amurri and sons Jack Robbins and Miles Robbins. “A friend of mine designed it,” she told PopEater as she twirled the bracelet around her wrist.

[From Popeater]

Hollybaby reported on this same bracelet last month and claimed that it was made with Eva’s wisdom teeth, but either way teeth are involved and they’re her childrens.

My son recently lost his first two baby teeth, which he was adorably proud of. It was a big moment in our house and he made us promise that the tooth fairy wouldn’t take his teeth. We said we’d work something out with her so he would still get paid but could keep his teeth. I have no idea what I’ll do with those teeth, but we’re keeping them for now. Around that time I was kind of skeeved out to learn that my mother-in-law had saved every one of my husband’s baby teeth. She had a little sack filled with them and it wasn’t pleasant to see them all laid out on the table.

Sarandon’s bracelet is so pretty and you can’t even see that there are teeth in it. Us moms can be a little weird about saving things from our children, and I guess teeth are relatively harmless when compared to the other things kids shed that we could possibly save. I’m thinking fingernails, placenta, boy parts that are sometimes removed at birth. Umbilical cords make sense to me, although I have no idea where my kid’s is. Teeth are just little bones and kids shed them like so many other things from childhood. We just want to hold on to that time somehow, even as our kids give us new things to be so proud and thankful for every day.

Susan and Eva Amurri are shown below on 8/29/10. She’s shown with Miles Robbins below on 5/3/08. Credit: WENN.com

wenn2979743

wenn5130500

Is Brad Pitt moving his family to Manhattan?

Posted: 24 Feb 2011 06:02 AM PST

fp_6839074_pittbrad_lax_rev_05_08

These are new photos of Brad Pitt at LAX yesterday. Still wearing a hat, which seems to be hiding his longer hair. Is Brad growing his hair out? Unknown. Anyway, Fame Pictures is trying to make a big thing about how Brad is probably flying to France to oversee even more renovations to the chateau. I don't know if that's really where he's headed, though.

Meanwhile, OK! Magazine claims that Brad and Angelina are planning a move to New York, just in time for Jennifer Aniston's move to New York. OK! is creating controversy because they think Brangelina will move uptown, while Aniston will move downtown, and "the city isn't big enough for all of them." It's not all Bermuda Triangle stuff though - apparently, Brad and Angelina have finally decided to get married. Yeah, yawn:

It looks like Brad Pitt and Angelina may finally have wedding bells ringing in the near future - along with a new house in Manhattan to call their own!

A friend of the couple tells OK!: "Angelina has always love city living, and Brad wants to make her happy. So they looking to purchase a townhouse instead of an apartment. Right now, they want something with about 10 bedrooms. That's two extra bedrooms compared to their last NYC apartment. They're trying to find something that can accommodate everyone and toying with the idea of buying two townhouses and turning them into one big house - that way, they have more than enough room to extend their family." Which, according to sources, is something they will do when they finally get married.

The friend also says: "New York is filled with good memories for them, really romantic ones. They loved their times at the Waldorf, and Angelina loves the antique shops and bookstores. They also love taking the kids to museums and Central Park."

[From OK! Magazine, print edition]

Yeah, it's crap. But if it's true, then good for them, I guess. Good luck trying to wrangle six kids in the city.

One last thing - OK! Magazine has a side story that I find much more interesting. It's all about how Brad is getting back into shape after developing something of a gut last year. According to sources, while Angelina was directing in Budapest, Brad was working out like crazy at a private gym. Lots of running and weight machines, etc. He has been looking thinner lately.

fp_6839075_pittbrad_lax_rev_06_08

fp_6839072_pittbrad_lax_rev_03_08

Photos courtesy of Fame.

No comments:

Post a Comment