Cele|bitchy |
- Maxim 2011 Hot 100 list includes Paz de la Huerta, Taylor Swift
- Kirsten Dunst in sequin Chanel at the Met Gala: what the hell?
- Naomi Campbell in Alexander McQueen at the Met Gala: hilarious or…?
- Kate Hudson in Stella McCartney at the Met Gala: radiant or fashion fail?
- Sarah Jessica Parker in McQueen at the Met Gala: Streisand-esque?
- Gisele Bundchen in red McQueen at the Met Gala: gorgeous or bland?
- Rihanna in see through Stella McCartney at the Met Gala: just fug
- Taylor Swift in pastel J. Mendel at the Met Gala: too sweet or not bad?
- Madonna in Stella McCartney at the Met Gala: surprisingly pretty or fug matron?
- Jessica Alba in Ralph Lauren at the Met Gala: sweet or messy?
| Maxim 2011 Hot 100 list includes Paz de la Huerta, Taylor Swift Posted: 03 May 2011 08:49 AM PDT
It’s the time of year that all young starlets prize over all others; that is, the moment when the Maxim 2011 Hot 100 List reveals itself to the world. As is customary, the annual list contains many of the same swimsuit and lingerie models that I’m not terribly familiar with, but a few names seemed rather surprising. Paz de la Huerta, drunken, violent mess, came screaming in at #84 with a smear of dark lipstick, and Taylor Swift took #20, which is strange because Swifty is certainly pretty but not, you know, hot. Jake Gyllenhaal will be thrilled, I’m sure. Other highlights include the following ladies: #69: Emma Watson (which shall provide another convenient taking a break from college excuse); #64: Miley Cyrus (if only because she’s barely legal); #61: Eva Amurri (Susan Sarandon’s daughter); #58: Christina Aguilera (naturally, Maxim used a very old photo); #56: Christina Hendricks (who should’ve at least made the 20s); #54: Vanessa Hudgens (validation, finally!); #42: Emma Stone; #38: Lindsay Lohan (no comment); #36: Brooklyn Decker (her likely response? “Duh.”); #35: Kim Kardashian; #31: Evan Rachel Wood; #30: Sofia Vergara; #28: Lea Michelle (not if her stylists have anything to do with it); #26: Kate Middleton; #25: Britney Spears (minus a few hot dergs); #22: Rihanna; #21: Jessica Alba (yawn); #17: Megan Fox (she was #2 in 2009 and #4 in 2010); #15: Olivia Wilde; #14: Scarlett Johansson (who wastes it by dating crusty old Sean Penn); #12: January Jones; #10: Jennifer Lawrence; #8: Natalie Portman (bitchface extraordinaire); #7: Anne Hathaway; #6: Bar Refaeli; #5: Mila Kunis; #4: Cameron Diaz; #3: Katy Perry; #2: Olivia Munn; and finally, #1: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley (a.k.a. “Megan Fox 2.0). Conspicuously missing from the list? Miranda Kerr (truly a surprise considering her Victoria’s Secret popularity), Gwyneth Paltrow (the curse of the Goop finally kicks in) and Taylor Momsen (probably because she’s still underage). Yes, Maxim is merely a lad mag, but this list of ladies is rather underwhelming, isn’t it? Several of them have seen much better days, several of them are alcoholic messes, and a good number of them merely feel like obligatory token additions. You can read the full list at Maxim.
Photos courtesy of Juan Rico/Fame Pictures          |
| Kirsten Dunst in sequin Chanel at the Met Gala: what the hell? Posted: 03 May 2011 08:44 AM PDT
Kirsten knows she looks like all sorts of hell too, and her expression is like “yeah, what am I going to do about it at this point?” She has on pink lipstick, blue eyeshadow, and took a wave iron to her hair to complete the look.
|
| Naomi Campbell in Alexander McQueen at the Met Gala: hilarious or…? Posted: 03 May 2011 08:28 AM PDT
These photos of Naomi Campbell are maybe THE BEST THINGS EVER. Yes, she's wearing Alexander McQueen, which is cool, and yes, she chose one of McQueen's more uncongenial dresses, which is nice to see because McQueen's odder designs deserve to be recognized as well. BUT HER FACE. Look at her face! Is that the face of someone is happy and content? Is that the face of a supermodel who is twerking it? Nope. That is the face of "I'm going to give you this one, people, because I know you love to laugh." Actually, she'd probably shove a bedazzled cell phone up your biscuits if you laughed at her face, to her face. Don't try it!
As for the dress… I mean, yeah, it's not really great, in my opinion. But I like that McQueen's girls wore his stuff to his tribute. And the detailing on the gown really is lovely. Sure, it's bridal, and that makes Naomi's married Russian fiancé kind of nervous. But at least it's not as epically hideous-bridal as Fergie. Or Serena Williams:
The dress is Oscar de la Renta (is it a wedding dress?). Oh, and it's a total and epic disaster. FEATHERS. FASCINATOR. FUG.
Photos courtesy of WENN & Fame. |
| Kate Hudson in Stella McCartney at the Met Gala: radiant or fashion fail? Posted: 03 May 2011 08:13 AM PDT
Photo credit: WENN and Fame |
| Sarah Jessica Parker in McQueen at the Met Gala: Streisand-esque? Posted: 03 May 2011 08:03 AM PDT
Like Gisele, Sarah Jessica Parker also decided to posthumously honor Alexander McQueen by wearing one of his more conservative dresses. Now… I don't hate the dress in it's entirety. I actually think SJP looks very put-together with the dress, the great makeup (I love her eye makeup in particular), the high fashion hair, and the blue shoes which "pop". But there's something "off" about the look too. I think maybe it's the high collar on the dress…? The high collar makes it seem like SJP is wearing an old-school, Hollywood costume rather than a near-vintage McQueen ensemble. But perhaps that is the fault of McQueen, and not SJP, who just wanted to wear something special from her friend Lee. So, in the end, I can't hate on this ensemble. She looks put-together, age-appropriate and rather lovely, although a bit conservative and dated. Also… is anyone else seeing Barbra Streisand? It's the hair and the nose, right? I've never really seen SJP look so strongly like Streisand. And yes, Bravo's Andy Cohen was her date. Matthew Broderick had better things to do, I guess.
Photos courtesy of WENN. |
| Gisele Bundchen in red McQueen at the Met Gala: gorgeous or bland? Posted: 03 May 2011 07:46 AM PDT
I have a question: how whipped is Tom Brady? He always attends these big fashion events with his wife, she gets the final say in his hair, and you know she dresses him too. While I don't hate on men being whipped as a general rule, I will hate on Tom Brady for a moment - he needs to grow a set and stand up to his wife, at least about the hair. The hair is ridiculous. He's a big boy, he should get a haircut.
As for Gisele… meh. She's one of the few girls wearing McQueen, but I'm not sure if this gown is the best representation of McQueen's style in total, you know? Because I thought it was Oscar de la Renta. It looks like something Jennifer Garner would wear for the Oscars - not bad, per se, but not for Gisele, and not for this event. I also find Gisele's styling to be blah - she doesn't look "made up" at all. She looks like she just came from the beach, which doesn't "go" with the dress. I guess I should say something about those now-defunct pregnancy rumors too - I don't see much of a belly on Gisele in these photos, so she was probably just bloated that day that I claimed she looked pregnant.
Photos courtesy of Fame & WENN. |
| Rihanna in see through Stella McCartney at the Met Gala: just fug Posted: 03 May 2011 07:43 AM PDT
Photo credit: WENN and Fame |
| Taylor Swift in pastel J. Mendel at the Met Gala: too sweet or not bad? Posted: 03 May 2011 07:27 AM PDT
UGH, Taylor Swift. God, this chick. I know some of you like her and some of you want me to stop giving her a hard time, and Imma let you finish, but THIS CHICK BUGS. Of course she chose a pastel J. Mendel gown for the Met Gala. OF COURSE. Of course her gown looked like a fancy prom gown. Of course. Although I will give Swifty some credit… the dress is slightly interesting. The skirt has layers that look unfinished, like parts of the train were hacked off in the limo. So… everything is not super-perfect and sparkle-pony middle school. I guess I can also applaud her for not doing her hair in her standard "big soft country waves" and actually attempting to work a strong red lip. But the pastels must stop. They're not even flattering on Swifty with her pale coloring! I would have loved to see this dress in a stronger color - a vivid blue or lavender would have been nice. But then where would Swifty be without her too-sweet ice cream colors?
Photos courtesy of WENN. |
| Madonna in Stella McCartney at the Met Gala: surprisingly pretty or fug matron? Posted: 03 May 2011 07:01 AM PDT
OH SNAP. You know how Madonna and Gwyneth Paltrow are no longer BFFS, after an alleged falling-out over… God knows. Something to do with fraud trainer Tracy Anderson, and maybe Kabbalah. Maybe Goop, maybe it's just that too snotty bitch divas can't get along forever. Anyway, THE SCANDAL: Madonna wore Stella McCartney, JUST LIKE GWYNETH. And guess what? I think Madonna got the prettier Stella dress. Right?
So… yeah, I think Madonna looks kind of great here. Her face work (twerk) is under control and she doesn't look like someone just jammed a pair of two-big chicken cutlets into her cheeks. The hair is decent. And the dress is rather beautiful and (GASP) age-appropriate. Madge never wears anything age-appropriate, so seeing her all covered up and feminine, with her gristle and her thighs of doom under wraps is all rather… lovely. I LOVE THE TRAIN. So pretty. I love the glittery stars. I love that Madonna surprised me by looking put together and pretty. Oh, Madge's date was her manager - Guy Oseary. He's cute. I think he's dating Bridget Moynahan.
So… do you think Gwyneth was pissed that Madge showed up in Stella too? And that Madge got the prettier dress while Gwyneth was stuck with some circa 1999 Michael Kors reject? I wonder if they even spoke to each other at the event.
Photos courtesy of WENN & Fame. |
| Jessica Alba in Ralph Lauren at the Met Gala: sweet or messy? Posted: 03 May 2011 06:53 AM PDT
photo credit: WENN and Fame |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
No comments:
Post a Comment