Cele|bitchy |
- Brooke Burke, David Charvet marry in St. Barths after 5-year engagement
- Did Jennifer Lopez & Marc Anthony split because of her ties to Scientology?
- Miley Cyrus is being mentioned for the ‘Dirty Dancing’ remake
- Halle Berry celebrates her 45th birthday on the beach, without Olivier Martinez
- Demi Lovato, Kim Kardashian in white at awards show: who looks better?
- Angelina Jolie takes the older kids out to ‘Shrek the Musical’
- Pippa Middleton’s ass is made of lies, ass experts say
- Selena Gomez delivers a creepy “cougar” love declaration to Justin Bieber
- Did Selita Ebanks call Nick Cannon poorly endowed?
- Dolly Parton: “I never really had the desire to have children”
Brooke Burke, David Charvet marry in St. Barths after 5-year engagement Posted: 15 Aug 2011 08:57 AM PDT We’ve only just discussed the day-long (not even that) engagement and marriage of Tara Reid and her Danish businessman boyfriend, and now here’s a celebrity marriage that finally happened after an extraordinarily (by some people’s standards) lengthy engagement period. After five years of being engaged (and two kids together), Brooke Burke and David Charvet have finally tied the knot. That seems like a long time, right? There are all sorts of celebrity couples who stay together without being engaged, but if you’re gonna bother to attach a prospective marital label to it, five years seems like a long time to wait. Not that I’m an expert on marriage by any stretch, of course. According to Fame Pictures, the couple got hitched in St. Barths, France on a boat in a “small spontaneous ceremony.” Even though, you know, it couldn’t have been completely unplanned since the rings were present and accounted for already. After getting married, Brooke and David embarked upon their honeymoon, which is actually the same vacation that’s already taking place with their two children, 4-year-old daughter Heaven Rain and son Shaya Braven, plus Brooke’s two daughters from a previous marriage. Sounds romantic right? Maybe not. Naturally, David and Brooke also gave exclusive news of their marriage to Life & Style as well:
[From Life & Style] And then there was the obligatory bikini photo-op: Brooke and David are such an attractive couple, yes, and their kids are adorable too. Hopefully, they’ll make time for an actual one-on-one honeymoon in the near future instead of waiting another five years for the opportunity. Photos courtesy of Fame |
Did Jennifer Lopez & Marc Anthony split because of her ties to Scientology? Posted: 15 Aug 2011 08:35 AM PDT Much like Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith, Jennifer Lopez seems to have been flirting with the Church of Scientology for years now. Back in 2007 and 2008, she was giving interviews praising Scientology and using some of the language associated with CoS ("audit" and "tin can" I guess?). Considering that Jennifer is also supposed to be heavily into Santeria, no one really thought much of it, probably because no one really wanted to imagine Jennifer covered in hen's blood, praising the almighty Xenu. However, The Mail has a source who claims that Jennifer's Scientology connections might have been one of the major factors in her split with Marc Anthony:
[From The Mail] What is Marc? Catholic? Something similar happened with Nicole Kidman, right? She was and is Catholic and some said that her family's faith is what always kept her at arm's length from CoS. Jennifer Lopez, meanwhile, seems to have only kept faith with Santeria and just added some Xenu on the side. I think Jennifer's… dad?… is a Scientologist too. That probably adds to the pressure that J.Lo feels to embrace Xenu. |
Miley Cyrus is being mentioned for the ‘Dirty Dancing’ remake Posted: 15 Aug 2011 08:08 AM PDT Yesterday, there was a "swag party" event which drew out some celebrity women. Let's just say this: the swag party got a better turnout than the Do Something Awards. That speaks volumes. Some of the celebrities who there just to take home bags of free crap included Emma Roberts, Jamie Pressly, Kristen Bell, Cher (?!?!), Hailee Steinfeld and Zoe Saldana. And of course, Miley Cyrus, who looked clean and pretty and de-bloated. She's lost some weight, right? Or she just gave up the liquor on a regular basis. Did you read Lainey's defense of Miley last week? I really enjoyed it, and I agree, although I tend to give Miley more of the benefit of the doubt than some. If you read her interviews and her Twitter feed, it's clear that while Miley isn't the most eloquent or mature young woman, she's trying. She's smarter than most of the young child stars, she's trying to take control of her own image, her own career, and move beyond the also-ran status of Disney stardom. She's keeping a lower profile for the most part this year, and she's back with Liam Hemsworth. It feels like she's making the effort to do some growing up outside of the public eye, and I do think she should be applauded for it. And quite honestly, if I'm given a choice between Miley and many of her contemporaries, like Emma Roberts, I'm going to choose Miley. She's more interesting, and she has more to say about everything. However, I do have some bad news. Miley's name is being mentioned for the remake of Dirty Dancing. Like, Miley could play Baby. To, like, Justin Timberlake's Johnny Castle. Ugh. Go here to read about some of the casting rumors. |
Halle Berry celebrates her 45th birthday on the beach, without Olivier Martinez Posted: 15 Aug 2011 07:30 AM PDT Halle Berry just celebrated her 45th birthday this weekend, and these are photos from her beach party celebration. Oddly enough, I haven't caught sight of Olivier Martinez in any of these photos of Halle's alleged "friends and family". Perhaps she didn't feel like bringing her hostage-boyfriend out to play. Or maybe he wasn't around to celebrate Halle's milestone birthday. So, I'll give Halle credit for looking amazing. I have never looked this great in a bikini at any age, and Halle gets a slow clap for taking care of herself and for looking more than a decade younger than 45, and for achieving it through (mostly) natural methods. Has Halle had some nips and tucks? I believe she had a nose job when she was much younger, but other than that, I buy that her face is Botox and filler-free, and I think her Crazy keeps her young. Most of the people at Halle's beach party seem to be women, but there are a handful of dudes there. Are they just Halle's people, like her hairstylist and stuff, or are these people whose livelihoods don't depend on Halle paying them? I don't know. Nahla is a cutie, isn't she? I like when she gets a little attitude in photos - she has a funny, lovely little face, full of personality. I hope she gets more of her personality from her dad, don't you? |
Demi Lovato, Kim Kardashian in white at awards show: who looks better? Posted: 15 Aug 2011 07:06 AM PDT Last night, the "Do Something" Awards were held in LA, and the biggest "gets" of the evening were Kim Kardashian, Demi Lovato, Jane Lynch, and Justin Bieber (The Bieb didn't even walk the carpet). So… no offense to Jane, but the event wasn't really A-list or anything. Still, we do have some interesting photos of Demi and Kim posing together on the carpet. Now, go ahead and yell at me because I've never thought Demi was a really "fresh, pretty" looking girl. But doesn't she look amazing when she stands next to Kim Kardashian? Maybe that's the new thing - "How great do you look standing next to a Kardashian?" Because Demi looks gorgeous, fresh, natural, beautiful and adorable next to Kim's kat-face. As for the actual fashion happening here… is it wrong that I like both of their dresses? Kim made a rare fashion hit with this long gown in an off-white, with a metallic belt, designer unknown. My only complaints about Kim's look are the shoulder pads (dated, unnecessary) and the fact that she's too dressy for this kind of event. As for Demi - some sites are talking about how her boobs are on display, but I think she looks really pretty and healthy. I do hope she's doing alright, because she looks great. Is it a bad sign that she's hanging with Kim Kardashian? Probably. But that's an issue for another time. PS… I included some closeups of Kim's face just to emphasize the point that her face is officially a tragedy. She's ridiculous. |
Angelina Jolie takes the older kids out to ‘Shrek the Musical’ Posted: 15 Aug 2011 05:56 AM PDT The Empress! We've had so many sightings of The Empress lately. It's a good omen - Zahara's presence in England must have calmed down the rioters. Or maybe she just really likes England, probably because she carefully studies the British monarchy to prepare for her gradual global domination. God Save the Empress. Sidenote: I love her little fist. I feel like she's photographed making a fist often enough to say that Zahara can take care of herself. She may be girly and she may allow Shiloh to carry the "tomboy" torch, but something tells me that Zahara will cut a bitch who steps out of line. Anyway, these are new photos of Angelina out with the four older kids on Sunday. She took Zahara, Shiloh, Maddox and Pax to a matinee of Shrek the Musical in London's West End. Brad's already gone, by the way, having abandoned his family once again for what's turning out to be a pretty long film shoot for World War Z. He's in Scotland now - I wonder why Angelina and the kids didn't go with him? Surely the Empress would have been the hit of Scotland. By the way, look at the photos of this unknown child below. Who is it? I have a theory. It's FAX CANNES JOLIE-PITT!! He/she has been spotted! I was just looking at photos of the kids the other day, and I thought to myself, "Damn, it's been forever since Fax has been out and about." He/she is really getting big! (Sidenote: In case you don't remember, Fax Cannes "Mystery" Jolie-Pitt was my filler name for random Jolie-Pitt babies when I couldn't identify them, and then Mystery/Fax became a whole other mythological child, The Hidden Jolie-Pitt, the one that only makes an appearance every so often.) Seriously, though, who is this kid? I guess he's a friend of Maddox and/or Pax and/or Fax. |
Pippa Middleton’s ass is made of lies, ass experts say Posted: 15 Aug 2011 05:55 AM PDT At some point, people really stopped caring about Pippa Middleton, right? Every media outlet was trying to make Pippa "happen" and then… nothing happened. Pippa continued to get pap'd everyday and women realized that she has skin damage and her style is pretty sketchy. Men woke and realized that while she has a cute little ass, it doesn't even make the top ten of most men's fantasy-ass lists. And I think everybody, men and women, realized that Pippa doesn't have her sister's reticence. Pippa wants to be famous. Pippa wants to be Uptradey. Pippa wants to get everything she can out of being associated with the royal family. And most people found that kind of gross. So these are new photos of Pippa with her on-again boyfriend Alex Loudon. I haven't heard anything about Pippa with George Percy in a while - do you think his family was like, "Seriously, you could do much better than Uptradey"? So Pippa had to go back to Alex and she had to make it look like Alex was her choice all along. Alex was playing cricket, and since I don't know anything about anything involving cricket, I'm not even going to attempt to explain what's happening in these photos. Something cricket-y. By the way, how old does Pippa look? She and Kate both look and dress like they're well into their 40s. In addition to that, there was/is a TLC special about Pippa, called "Crazy About Pippa". Perhaps the last-ditch effort to make Pippa "happen" in America, I guess. Anyway, their "experts" suggest that the early days of Pippa-mania may have begun under false pretenses. The experts think that Pippa was wearing butt-padding underneath her maid of honor gown! A random spa owner says, "I’m not convinced that it’s completely natural. Because I think, if you look at other photos of her and you see her in jeans, she’s got quite a flat bottom.” Could be. |
Selena Gomez delivers a creepy “cougar” love declaration to Justin Bieber Posted: 15 Aug 2011 05:45 AM PDT So last week, we covered the rumor about Selena Gomez possibly dumping Justin Bieber over his friendship with Chris Brown as well as the disappointing revelation that these two were in fact still together. While this does nothing to dissuade near-universal fears about a Gomez-Bieber accidental pregnancy, here’s something else that might creep you out just a bit. It seems that, even before Selena and Justin got together, she had a major crush on the little guy; last year, she even described herself as a “cougar” for lusting over his weeness:
[From Hollywood Life] So Selena described Bieber as a “kid” and now (presumably in the past few days) has confirmed that she’s still feeling the same way about him. While this could be a lot creepier — their age difference is only two years — Selena’s still romancing a 17-year-old that, on his best days, looks like a 14-year-old boy at the very most. Of course, these two are now frequently joined at the lips and, uh, probably elsewhere. Am I overreacting to find this entire thing more than slightly creepy? Photos courtesy of WENN |
Did Selita Ebanks call Nick Cannon poorly endowed? Posted: 15 Aug 2011 05:36 AM PDT
So is that rude or was she just trying to be funny? If Shuter had asked first how it was to kiss Diddy and she said “eh” like that, I think it would be fine. As it is she just wants it to be known that it wasn’t tolerable to have to kiss him for a scene. Have you ever heard an actor or actress say that? Usually they either compliment the person or say that it was awkward because of the cameras, they don’t put down their co-star. Maybe Diddy hit on her though or was a jerk to her or something. As for an ex, wouldn’t you say “no comment” or “it was nice while it lasted” or something? It just seems bitchy. It turns out that Selita sounds even worse in the extended interview. The title of this article is: “Selita Ebanks Talks Nick Cannon’s Tiny Male ‘Talent,‘” but they don’t back it up with any quotes where she says anything like that. I don’t think she actually called Nick’s member small and it seems like the title for the article is based on her saying “eh” over and over again. The rest of the stuff she’s quoted as saying sounds snotty.
[From Huffington Post] Well, I guess I know I don’t like her now. Nice that she’s so concerned about how larger women look in spandex. Selita just wants to help people, she’s not at all like those models she mentioned who snark on and attack each other. (Note: The newest photo of Selita is the one above where she went back to her dark hair color. She looks ridiculous with this two tone hair, below.) photo credit: Diane Cohen and Juan Rico/Fame Pictures |
Dolly Parton: “I never really had the desire to have children” Posted: 15 Aug 2011 05:19 AM PDT Dolly Parton, 65, has a new interview in The Mail to promote her latest album - her 41st! I love Dolly. Dolly is the exception to every rule. Dolly is grace and genius and hilarity, all with an enormous rack. I love her. Do not speak ill of Dolly. Do you know that the Dolly empire, including her song catalog and Dollywood, is worth nearly $1 billion? Did you know that people in the music industry refer to her as The Iron Butterfly? Did you know that she's awesome? The full Mail piece is here, and here are some highlights:
[From The Mail] Another one-liner from Dolly - when asked how long it takes to do her hair, she says, "How do I know? I’m never there!" Oh, and she refers to her boobs as "showdogs" which is awesome. I need to start calling my boobs "showdogs". As far as the "rumors" that Dolly has nailed various celebrity men…? I don't know. Burt Reynolds bedded lots of high-profile women back in the day, but I don't know if Dolly would have been one of them. And Stallone? Puh-lease. I really hope she didn't go near him. Not that I would begrudge her an affair - I wouldn't. I just hope that if she did fool around with someone, it was someone really hot. Like, Robert Redford or something. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment