Cele|bitchy |
- Megan Fox gave up veganism, gained weight: doesn’t she look better?
- Amy Winehouse wasn’t on drugs at the time of her death, but she was drinking
- Alex Skarsgard plays hide and seek, looks adorable and sexy
- ITW: Jada Pinkett & Will Smith have separated after 13 years of marriage?
- Jennifer Garner is officially pregnant with her third child
- Kelly Osbourne in printed Manish Arora: terrible, unflattering or meh?
- Celebrity Big Brother contestant shows outrageous implanted fake washboard abs
- January Jones’s on-screen son says Jones is “not approachable”
- Helen Mirren in red Michael Kors at a screening: stunning, fabulous or meh?
- Sean Penn disrespects ‘Tree of Life’ & Terrence Malick: is it just sour grapes?
Megan Fox gave up veganism, gained weight: doesn’t she look better? Posted: 23 Aug 2011 08:56 AM PDT Yesterday, we previewed Megan Fox's appearance on the September cover of Amica Magazine, an Italian publication. In that post, I noted that in recent photos of Megan, she looks like she's put on some weight. Nothing drastic or anything, she just doesn't look so slim and bony, like she did before. If anything, I think Megan looks wonderful with an extra ten to fifteen pounds - it fills out her face a bit, and makes the tweaking look softer. These are new photos of Megan from the set of This Is Forty yesterday - you can see her weight gain even more in these pics, I think. Previously, Megan's trainer has claimed that Megan has never had an eating disorder, and that she just has crazy metabolism and she struggles to put on weight. Of course, Megan has a history of saying quite the opposite - in past interviews, she's claimed that when she needs to put on weight, she just binges on sweets, and when asked if she had an eating disorder, she gave a non-committal non-confirmation. Of course, in the Amica interview, Megan once again claimed something different - she said, "For a year and a half, until about four months ago, I followed a strict vegan diet based on raw fruits and vegetables, no bread, sugar and coffee. But I had lost too much weight. So now I eat a bit of everything. I train three times a week doing circuit training with my trainer Harvey Pasternak." She also disrespects Marilyn Monroe and says that MM was bipolar and a "negative energy" that Megan didn't want in her life, and that's why Megan was getting rid of that gaudy MM tattoo. Anyway, I still say the extra weight looks good on Megan. Her body reminds me of Kristen Stewart's - you can tell that both of them are going to have weight struggles in their 30s, when their "skinny" metabolism goes to hell. |
Amy Winehouse wasn’t on drugs at the time of her death, but she was drinking Posted: 23 Aug 2011 08:19 AM PDT Just hours after Amy Winehouse's death was made public, the British tabloids managed to get their hands on various crack dealers in and around Winehouse's neighborhood, some of whom had sold Amy drugs in the past. They were looking to see when Amy had last bought, and they found one dealer who claimed that Amy had bought crack and heroin on her last night on earth. Most of us were like, "Yeah, that makes sense." Amy's family claimed that she wasn't on drugs anymore, that her only problem was alcohol. Well, it's looking like Amy's family was right - the toxicology report has come out, and Amy didn't have any drugs in her system when she died.
[From The Mail] I don't know - I'm sure this will be fodder for some conspiracy theories, but I don't have a problem with believing that Amy was only consuming alcohol on the night of her death. I tend to think her body simply gave up after years and years of alcohol and drug abuse, and Amy's on-again/off-again teetotaling probably didn't help either. Poor Amy. |
Alex Skarsgard plays hide and seek, looks adorable and sexy Posted: 23 Aug 2011 07:50 AM PDT
Spoilers for past True Bloods In terms of Alex’s other projects, that dumb-looking movie he did with his gratefully now ex-girlfriend, Kate Bosworth, Straw Dogs, is coming out on September 16th. Everyone will be watching to see how Kate and Alex handle the press circuit and red carpet. There’s some controversy over the fact that Alex’s character is being billed as sexy in the promotion for the film. Here’s a link to a story that explains why. photo credit: Girlie/Fame Pictures |
ITW: Jada Pinkett & Will Smith have separated after 13 years of marriage? Posted: 23 Aug 2011 07:46 AM PDT Jesus! Just the other day, I was thinking about how slow it was going to be this week, and how we wouldn't have much gossip until September, when the film festivals and Oscar campaigns begin in earnest. I actually thought to myself, "I wish some big couple would break up. Someone exciting." Well… something might have happened. MIGHT. In Touch Weekly (via The Mail) is reporting that Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith have separated.
[From The Mail] When TMZ contacted Jada's rep, Karynne Tencer, she said, "What? In Touch said that? I know nothing about this … Lord. I’m going back to bed.” So obviously, this is still in the "In Touch Weekly is reporting it, for what it's worth" stage of gossip developments. Nothing has been confirmed, and if ITW's story is untrue, I tend to think Will and Jada could possibly sue. If it is true, then what a coup for ITW, and I expect Will and Jada will release a statement to People Magazine or Us Weekly shortly. |
Jennifer Garner is officially pregnant with her third child Posted: 23 Aug 2011 07:31 AM PDT
[From People] Well congratulations to them. I guess now that we know Garner was pregnant when she said “there’s no deeper want for a woman” than to be a mother it’s not as outrageous of a statement. It’s still a little out there, but taken in context it makes sense. We’ve heard plenty of rumors and blind items that there were problems in their marriage, and that Garner is all about family while Affleck is ready to bolt. It would make sense given what they’ve both said to the press and given Affleck’s past. This is not a guy who gushes about his wife like his best friend, Matt Damon. He probably dotes on his kids though. White blouse photos are from 8/19/11. Family outing photos are from 7/17/11. Credit: Fame and WENN.com |
Kelly Osbourne in printed Manish Arora: terrible, unflattering or meh? Posted: 23 Aug 2011 07:26 AM PDT Here are some new photos of Kelly and Sharon Osbourne at last night's Hollywood screening of God Bless Ozzy Osbourne. I wasn't even going to start with this junk, because of most of the time I end up feeling sorry for Kelly Osbourne. She's so proud of her weight loss and she's got a job now - on E!'s Fashion Police - and she's clean and I should applaud her for that. But considering that Kelly is now billed as some kind of Fashion Girl, should we really expect more from her? Look at this dress! It's hideous. It's an edited and updated version of a Manish Arora gown (go here to see the runway look, which was hideous too). This is beyond an issue with shoulder pads - there's padding throughout the top half of the dress! And the print is just awful. And the sleeves! For the love of God, WHY would even want to wear this? It's not cute. It's not "young". It's not flattering. It's terrible. Should we even talk about Sharon? She looks like she's melting. Ladies, THIS is too much. Sharon doesn't even look jacked or tweaked - she just looks sick. As for the documentary, it was produced by Jack Osbourne, and it's supposed to be pretty decent. It includes behind-the-scenes stuff about Ozzy's rise and what he's like on tour, and lots of Ozzy's friends and celebrity fans are interviews, like Paul McCartney and Tommy Lee. Go here for more about the documentary. One last thing - I did like Kelly's shoes. And her hair color. |
Celebrity Big Brother contestant shows outrageous implanted fake washboard abs Posted: 23 Aug 2011 06:57 AM PDT
[From The Daily Mail] The Mail has more on the procedure, which involves liposuction to the stomach along with those implants. The Sun quotes a cosmetic surgeon who estimates that it cost around £6,000 or around $9,900 USD. Overall the effect is totally ridiculous, but it probably fits this guy’s personality well. He says he loves it, after all. |
January Jones’s on-screen son says Jones is “not approachable” Posted: 23 Aug 2011 06:53 AM PDT One of the little quirks of Mad Men is that it seems like producers have replaced the child actor playing Bobby Draper (the son of Betty and Don Draper) several times. Allegedly, Bobby has only gotten replaced once, but I really feel like there was at least one other child actor in the mix, making THREE Bobby Drapers. Anyway, the latest and last Bobby Draper, a kid named Jared Gilmore, is out of production now. He left Mad Men for a role on Once Upon a Time, which… good for him? Sure. It's not like Bobby Draper is given that much to do - when we see Betty and Don as parents, it's mostly through their interaction with Sally (Kiernan Shipka). Anyway, as Jared Gilmore was leaving, he gave a little exit interview to TV Guide, and he ended up calling out January Jones:
[From TV Guide] Ha! January is such an idiot, and now we know that she's mean to kids too. If you listen to January talk about her Betty character, it's clear that January is too stupid to really understand the nuances of what and who Betty really is - January just wants to stand around, looking pretty (which is kind of what Betty wants to do). Incidentally, Kiernan Shipka (Sally Draper) has spoken about her relationships with various cast members, and she never sounds like January's biggest fan either. Kiernan seems closest to Jon Hamm and Elisabeth Moss, both of whom seem to adore her. Here are some recent photos of January and her bump. She's still pregnant, for the love of God. And she's still getting pap'd all of the time. She won't be getting as much attention now that Jennifer Garner is knocked up, though. Dimple Parade photos sell better than Mystery Paternity Bump photos. |
Helen Mirren in red Michael Kors at a screening: stunning, fabulous or meh? Posted: 23 Aug 2011 06:24 AM PDT OMG, have you see the trailer for The Debt? I'm SO seeing this movie. But I love stories about Mossad and the Cold War - Spielberg's Munich is one of the best movies ever! Anyway, The Debt. It's a film told in two storylines - these three Mossad agents are hunting a Nazi war criminal in the USSR in the years after WWII, and then the three agents as senior spies, reflecting on their mission and how the mission was screwed up. Helen Mirren is one of the spies! And Jessica Chastain plays the young Mirren character. The film also stars Sam Worthington, Marton Csokas, Tom Wilkinson, and Ciarán Hinds (*squeal*). Here's the trailer. It looks so good. Anyway, Mirren and Chastain were the stars of a screening last night. Or should I say, Helen Mirren was the star, because the bitch looks AMAZING. Helen's red dress is Michael Kors. I even love her blowout! I guess I should mention that Dame Helen is wearing fug ankle shoes/booties, though. She has great legs, but you can't tell because of her shoe choice. Jessica Chastain (who is in everything these days) wore an edited Christian Dior from 2008. It's pretty, although it's hit-or-miss wearing such a pale color when you're a pale redhead. Jessica makes it work, though, and she's got a killer figure. The makeup is overdone - raccoon eyes! I blame Duchess Kate. And Alan Cumming, for no reason other than he's fabulous and he needs to STOP. I do not need to see Cumming's cleavage. |
Sean Penn disrespects ‘Tree of Life’ & Terrence Malick: is it just sour grapes? Posted: 23 Aug 2011 05:50 AM PDT Before Terrence Malick's Tree of Life premiered at the Cannes Film Festival this year, there were many, many Hollywood people who were already claiming that it was a shoo-in for all of the big award nominations, just for the sheer fact that it was Malick film, starring Brad Pitt and Sean Penn. What could go wrong? Well, some critics hated the film (even booing it at Cannes), and some people held on to their "Masterpiece!" claims once they had seen the film. I still haven't seen it, by the way. And I probably won't for a while, just because it sounds like Malick was very self-indulgent and precious as a director, and I have issues with that kind of masturbatory "genius". Anyway, Sean Penn has a new interview where he too criticized the film, but Hollywood insiders say it's just sour grapes because Malick edited Sean's part so much:
[From Page Six] I don't know if I can take anybody's side in this case. Should I really slam Sean for offering a mild criticism (for HIM) when it's obvious to many people that the film does have some issues, and that it's not for everyone? The worst I can say about Sean is that he should stand up for his own work and not sh-t on a director he chose to work with AGAIN, knowing how it could turn out. Also, I suppose it is petty when Sean is probably peeved that his part was cut and no one is mentioning his name for awards anymore, while Brad's part wasn't cut that much, and Brad is still being discussed for awards. Still, I think Malick probably deserves more criticism than he's gotten - people are walking on eggshells around Malick because everyone thinks he's a "genius". |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment