Crushable |
- Camp Week: Crushable’s ‘So You’re Going Camping’ Survival Kit
- Gallery: Celebs vs. the Paparazzi
- Sunday Cute: Grizzly Bear Eats R2-D2
- Creepy Things That Seem Real But Aren’t: Camp Week Edition
- A Comprehensive Guide to Making Award-Winning Action Movies
- William and Kate Royal Wedding Dolls Are Terrifying
Camp Week: Crushable’s ‘So You’re Going Camping’ Survival Kit Posted: 28 Aug 2011 10:15 AM PDT So you’re going camping, eh? What an excellent idea! Not sure what to bring with you? Well, we can help you out with that. Though be warned: When we say “camping,” we don’t mean camping of the pitch-a-tent-in-the-woods variety. We mean a very special kind of camping. We mean the sort that involves tacky decorations and drag queens. So what are you going to need to survive this camping trip of ours? Read on to find out! 1) Lawn Flamingos 2) How to Survive a Garden Gnome Attack 3) John Waters DVDs 4) The Batmobile Related posts: Post from: Crushable |
Gallery: Celebs vs. the Paparazzi Posted: 28 Aug 2011 08:50 AM PDT Not being famous, perhaps I wouldn’t know this, but to my way of thinking, the absolute worst thing about being famous has got to be dealing with the paparazzi. Sure, when you live a public life, photographers are always going to be an issue, but I still feel bad for actors, musicians, artists, etc. who get hounded all the time for no other reason than that they happen to make a living in the entertainment industry. But celebs aren’t always victims; occasionally, they fight back! Sometimes the attacks more warranted than others, but either way, they make for interesting tabloid fodder. Actually, here’s a question for you: If a celeb is busy attacking a photographer snapping pictures of the celebrity’s everyday life, what does that make the photographer who’s snapping pictures of the incident? Food for thought… Related posts: Post from: Crushable |
Sunday Cute: Grizzly Bear Eats R2-D2 Posted: 28 Aug 2011 07:15 AM PDT I’m not really sure how that poor little droid ended up there in the first place, but gee, that grizzly sure does seem to like him. Though it probably would have made the whole Star Wars trilogy go a lot faster if the grizzly ate Vader instead. Or better yet, George Lucas. That’d probably fix things. Happy Sunday! [Via The Mary Sue] Related posts: Post from: Crushable |
Creepy Things That Seem Real But Aren’t: Camp Week Edition Posted: 27 Aug 2011 04:47 PM PDT Creepy Things That Seem Real But Aren't is a series that explores modern urban legends, bringing you a new tale each week. On the first day of April in 2010, redditor ducttape36 put up a post entitled, "I'm Going Camping This Week in VT… Creepy Details Inside." Now, who could resist a title like that? The previous summer, one of ducttape's friends bought a house in the backwoods of Vermont. And when I say backwoods, I do mean backwoods—it was miles away from anything remotely resembling a town. It wasn't unusual for the friend to find various forms of wildlife in his yard—deer, moose, coyotes, and so on—and he and his wife would often hear the animals' cries and howls. Occasionally, though, the noises would sound… kind of odd. But ducttape brushed his friend's claims off as just typical woods sounds—until he heard them for himself. One night during a buddy movie night, what ducttape described as "blood-curdling inhuman screams" began emanating from the woods. The next day, the friend called up ducttape and said that there were tracks in his yard. Snow had been kicked up, as if there had been a fight, and a path lead out into the woods behind the house. The friend had strapped his snow shoes on and headed into the woods to investigate—and found blood everywhere. A little further on, he saw a dead deer in the snow. The deer hadn't been eaten; rather, it had been torn apart. But that wasn't all ducttape's friend found: Behind the deer's ravaged corpse, broken pine branches had been stuck in the snow. There was no way they had simply fallen there; they were sticking straight up, having been driven into the snow, and they looked "almost like a shrine or a tombstone made of branches." Ducttape's buddy wisely got the hell out of there. The noises didn't stop, though, so once spring came round, ducttape decided to help his friend investigate. In his post, ducttape told the reddit community that he, his friend, and a couple of their other buddies were going to hike the woods behind the house and camp out. Naturally, they would be bringing a camera with them. He asked the other redditors if they had any advice for him. "Have you ever heard of anything like this happening? Is there some crazy backwoods cult or folklore that I haven't heard about?" he asked. No one really did, though, and off he went. Two days later, he posted report of their trip. The hike was tough; they went through the woods, up the mountains, and off the path, eventually setting up camp by an old campfire pit. Though ducttape says they (happily) never felt like they were in danger, the did find a number of odd things:
Related posts: Post from: Crushable |
A Comprehensive Guide to Making Award-Winning Action Movies Posted: 27 Aug 2011 01:20 PM PDT While we’re on the subject of how to do things in movies, why don’t we take a moment to learn exactly how one makes an action movie? If you’ve ever dreamed of being Michael Bay– or maybe just dreamed of kicking him in the shins– now’s your chance. Let this chart teach you everything you need to know, then get out there and make some movie magic. You tiger. [Via] Related posts: Post from: Crushable |
William and Kate Royal Wedding Dolls Are Terrifying Posted: 27 Aug 2011 11:45 AM PDT Okay, so we all remember when the Franklin Mint put out the Kate Middleton Royal Engagement Doll. It’s pretty, if not entirely necessary, and for the low, low price of $195, you can have your very own vinyl Kate, dressed elegantly in that blue dress we’ve all come to know and love. But then a different company– Arklu Ltd.– came out with ANOTHER Kate Middleton engagement doll, and this one is… not so pretty. Granted, it’s only £34.95 (roughly $57), so perhaps it’s understandable that it would look a little cheaper than the Franklin Mint’s doll; but really? $57 for this? That, ladies and gentlemen, is a $57 Barbie. But I guess they must be doing okay in terms of sales, because not only are they offering that monstrosity, they’ve actually struck again: They’ve just released William and Kate Royal Wedding Dolls. And they are TERRIFYING. See for yourselves. OH MY GOD THEY ARE GOING TO EAT YOU. RUN. RUN FOR YOUR LIVES! Seriously, they’re scary, right? The clothes look a little better on these ones than they did on Arklu’s Kate engagement doll, but I think it’s something about their faces that does it. Wills looks a bit rat-like, and Kate has the wide-eyed look of panicked hysteria. Not how I’d want to be remembered, but whatever. Anyway, you yourself can have this terrifying twosome for your very own, if you’re willing to shell out £99.95 ($165). You can also get Kate– sorry, Princess Catherine– on her own for £49.95 ($82), though apparently, if you want Wills, you’ve got to get both of them. Is this a statement about how William can’t exist without Kate? Maaaaaaybe; but probably not. You can get the full rundown on Kate’s accessories and whatnot at Arklu’s website, but I’d like to take a moment to draw attention to the following detail, which, for reasons that will become apparent, isn’t visible in the picture:
That’s right. The Kate doll is wearing blue underwear. I can’t even. According to USA Today, Arklu got confirmation from Clarence House that the royal family “would not wish to object to the production of a doll,” which I guess means they approve of it. But I’m still not sure that these dolls are something that really needed to be made. Maybe that’s just me, though. What do you guys think? Related posts: Post from: Crushable |
You are subscribed to email updates from Crushable To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment