Cele|bitchy |
- Kate Middleton’s nine-year Waity status got the whitewash treatment
- Demi Lovato was bullied for her weight, cut herself at age 11
- Lady Gaga on complaints that she’s copying Madonna: “That’s retarded”
- Olivia Munn vs. Selita Ebanks: Battle Hymn of the Red Dresses
- The Osbournes on Billy Ray Cyrus’ remarks on Miley: ‘really inappropriate’
- Jennifer Lopez’s stomach-baring ensemble: Fly Girl Forever or just fug?
- Tyler Perry lashes out Spike Lee’s racially-charged criticism: “He can go to hell”
- Jill Zarin of RHONY cops to ‘liquid facelift’ after she’s rendered unrecognizable
- Catherine Zeta-Jones talks about her bipolar disorder to People Mag
- Halle Berry on her custody battle ’sometimes you reach an impasse’
Kate Middleton’s nine-year Waity status got the whitewash treatment Posted: 20 Apr 2011 09:10 AM PDT So much news about Prince William and Kate Middleton! Unfortunately, the news is not all that exciting, so I'm just going to recap some stories going around, and then I'll get to the good stuff (my rant about Lifetime's Will & Kate movie, which was dreadful). Here are some highlights: *Kate Middleton's family has now given themselves a family crest. I find the idea of a family like the Middletons - nouveau riche! - getting a family crest to be rather pushy and silly in the grand scheme of things, but they've got one, and now the Middleton crest will be joined with William's crest once they are married. CB likes the Middleton crest - she thinks it's pretty and feminine. I think the upside-down acorns are fruity. Needs more lions. *Will and Kate asked people to donate to charity in lieu of actual wedding presents, and the charities have already racked up six-figures in donations. *George Michael recorded a cover of Stevie Wonder's "You and I" for Will and Kate. Michael says: “I want Will and Kate to know that this is a genuine gift, not a promo exercise. It’s a gift that they’ll be able to turn into many, many donations.” But he's not going to the wedding: "They should [be] surrounded by people they love…not dodgy ex-con pop stars.” *As for the night before the wedding, sources are claiming that William is going to spend the evening with his father or with his brother, or perhaps both. According to the British tabloids, Will is spending the night at St. James's Palace with his dad because “Prince Charles is a loving father who’s a lot closer to his sons than people often realize. He’s made it clear his priority in the hours before the wedding is his son.” * But what about Harry? According to Us Weekly's sources, “William asked Harry to spend the night at Clarence House, the night before the wedding… It’ll be great for the two brothers to be together before the big day. I’m sure Harry can help William with any last-minute nerves.” *Kate Middleton went shopping for her "honeymoon gear". Ladies, whatever happened to the word "trousseau"? It's so much fancier. Okay now for my rant - you don't have to read this if you didn't watch Lifetime's Will & Kate. IT WAS TERRIBLE. It was so bad, it wasn't even cheesy-good. They made so many huge errors in the actual timeline, and they just wholly manufactured a great deal. Their version of Waity Katie was all plucky, moody and uppity, while the version of Will was dashing and romantic. Does anyone believe that? I hated that they got the first photographed kiss (in Switzerland) wrong. I hate that they showed the 2007 breakup, and then two minutes late he was proposing! Um, there was like three years of WAITING in there. I also hated that Waity's job at Jigsaw - which she actually did for only a handful of months in 2006 - was somehow spread out over the course of the show like Waity was just WORKING and WORKING all the time. She wasn't. She just spent NINE YEARS WAITING for her prince to call her. I hated that the "other women" were so misrepresented - William dated/slept with many women while he was with Kate, during the course of those nine years. I just felt like they got the basic personalities of Kate and William so, so wrong. Kate is docile, like a geisha. She doesn't storm out of cars in the middle of a fight. She doesn't talk smack to an upper-crust girl. She doesn't confirm or deny the state of her underwear. And William is in reality a wishy-washy bastard, like his father. They portrayed him as commanding and forward, and he just isn't. UGH. |
Demi Lovato was bullied for her weight, cut herself at age 11 Posted: 20 Apr 2011 09:02 AM PDT It’s been a rough ride for Demi Lovato, who has spent the last several months narrowly avoiding becoming a premature Disney casualty. Just a few years ago, Demi was still denying that she cut herself despite plenty of pictorial evidence to the contrary. Messy breakups with Joe Jonas and the suspicious influence of Wilmer Valderrama (not to mention his continued involvement in her life) certainly didn’t help matters either. Then, she had a physical altercation with one of her backup dancers on tour and subsequently checked herself into treatment for both emotional and physical reasons, but she did her rehab time without any additional outward fuss (and is possibly still continuing out-patient treatment for the eating disorder). Now, Demi’s coming clean to “Good Morning America” about her extended affair with both eating disorders and cutting:
[From Celebuzz] Lovato’s been talking a lot lately, which is key to making amends in recovery, although I suspect the fact that she’s been talking a lot to the press is because Disney’s forcing her to do it. Still, the fact that Demi’s owning up to the fact that teen stardom isn’t all sweetness and light (such as her recent admission of a nervous breakdown in Seventeen magazine) might actually be beneficial to her fans. Included in her fandom is my own 10-year-old daughter, with whom I have discussed Lovato’s troubles in an attempt to curb the Disney idol worship. Of course, Lovato herself will now be less of a Disney presence since she just announced that she’s quitting her show, “Sonny with a Chance” too:
[From People] Well, Disney’s not really losing anything here because they can easily spin off “So Random!,” which is the series-within-a-series featured within “Sonny” itself. It appears slightly ominous that Demi’s decision to focus on the music doesn’t mean striking out on her own and finding a new record label but, instead, just sticking with the easier option of Disney’s label. Unfortunately, she’s probably contractually bound to continue on with Disney, which is probably actually the case since they have put up the appearance of letting her “Sonny” obligations fall by the wayside. At this point, Lovato herself is merely 18-years-old, but she’s been with Disney for a few years already. I’d be interested to know whether she signed new contracts with Disney after she became an adult, or if she’s still fulfilling old agreements. It’s amazing how the law generally protects minors from entering into contracts, but the entertainment business is a whole different matter when stage parents and multimillions of dollars are involved. Photos of Lovato announcing nominations for the 2010 American Music Awards courtesy of Fame Pictures |
Lady Gaga on complaints that she’s copying Madonna: “That’s retarded” Posted: 20 Apr 2011 08:31 AM PDT Lady Gaga just pulled an Aniston! She used the word "retarded." What's worse is that I almost lost the significance of that as I was reading the transcript of her coked-out rant. The basic gist of it: Lady Gaga was doing an interview with NME, and she was asked about her blatant hijacking of Madonna's songs, vibe and modus operandi. Gaga's reply? "That's retarded." And then she just coke-ranted:
[From Us Weekly] Should Gaga apologize? Sure. But no one will buy Gaga's apology unless it involves the words "I admit to copying Madonna" and "cocaine binge" and "Luc made me." Since I no longer want to get involved with Gaga's coke rages, I'd like to tell you another story about my mother's gay cat, Charlie. I talked about him in one of the last Gaga posts - I had to remind my mom that Charlie was "born this way." Anyway, one of my mom's other cats, Daisy, is a huge, aggressive girl cat, and she's homophobic. She beats the crap out of Charlie regularly, and he spends most of his days hiding in the closet. "Appropriate, isn't it?" my mother asked. |
Olivia Munn vs. Selita Ebanks: Battle Hymn of the Red Dresses Posted: 20 Apr 2011 08:04 AM PDT Last night, Selita Ebanks and Olivia Munn co-hosted an event at Pure in Las Vegas for Skyy Infusions Dragon Fruit. They'll throw a party for anything, won't they? Anyway, the evening unexpectedly turned into a red dress fashion-off! I don't know who designed these dresses, but I'm leaning more towards Olivia's cute, graphic cocktail dress as opposed to Selita's looser, more romantic dress. Plus, Selita's hair is mess (cough cough*BANGSTRAUMA*cough). There is a problem with Olivia, though, and I think it's her hair too. She chopped off her long hair a few months ago, and she basically has no idea what to do with her (grown-out) bob. I think the bob is cute, but I'm tired of seeing her styled the same way on every red carpet - and the girl loves her red carpets, so she's been everywhere. But, if you're going to style Olivia, you should definitely keep her in these kinds of simply-cut dresses, rather than big, fluffy evening gowns. By the way, you know how Olivia is out of a job because NBC cancelled Perfect Couples? And do you remember that Tina Fey likes her and recommends her to directors? Ugh. Well, Tina is promoting and defending Olivia once again, this time in Punchline Magazine:
[From Punchline Magazine] Here's the thing - if Olivia Munn was as funny as Tina Fey, and Olivia was posing in her underwear THEN we would be like "I love her, sexy and funny." But because Olivia is not funny, not talented, and is in reality just a hustling famewhore who leaks stories about herself and who she hooks up with, AND all she really does is pose for photos in her underwear and pose on red carpets looking budget… all of that is the reason why I don't care for her. Plus, she has just ruined The Daily Show. Seriously. |
The Osbournes on Billy Ray Cyrus’ remarks on Miley: ‘really inappropriate’ Posted: 20 Apr 2011 07:35 AM PDT
[From Transcripts.CNN.com] I don’t disagree with them. Last night I saw that HLN Showbiz Tonight show on in the background when I was eating out. There was no sound and I just saw the headline “Osbournes trash Billy Ray Cyrus” or something and figured they were talking smack as they always do. In reality they kind of said what a lot of people did about this controversy when it first came out. Billy Ray has since made up for this, but I don’t expect Kelly and Sharon to follow gossip as slavishly as we do and know every detail about it. Piers Morgan is stirring the pot, and you would think that he would be up on the news that Billy Ray has since backtracked from these comments. In other Billy Ray Cyrus news, the mullet is still trying to make up for that same “Hannah Montana destroyed my family” GQ interview. He gave an interview to Parade and said that he just hopes Miley is happy. He’s no longer saying she should give up on fame. “As long as she’s happy and loving making music — and I know she loves acting — that’s all that matters.” That’s much different from saying that the show destroyed his family, that he was underpaid and that he would “erase it all [the fame] in a second if I could.” He later explained that he was a “mess” when he did that GQ interview and compared talking to the press at that time to going grocery shopping when you’re hungry. I had a lot of respect for the guy after that and felt like he was just saying his piece and trying to do the best he could. He was hurt by the breakup of his marriage, he’s since gotten back together with his wife Tish and called off the divorce, and he’s trying to make nice now. It may have been “inappropriate” to say all that at first, but Piers didn’t do his homework by bringing up that controversy from February without mentioning that Billy Ray apologized nearly a month ago. Piers also never asked Kelly and Sharon about their separate issues with paying taxes and owing money to the government. Now that’s what I want to know about. I don’t care what they think about the royal wedding. (More on that here.) Here’s Kelly talking about her drug problem and how she turned her life around. She has Bride of Frankenstein hair and major bulimia face! It’s like she’s piling the hair up on her head to distract from her cheeks. You don’t get those chipmunk cheeks from normal weight gain, but I guess she’s looked like that for a while. Sharon’s face looks like a mask. How long until Kelly starts messing with hers too? These photos are from 2/12/11. Credit: WENN.com |
Jennifer Lopez’s stomach-baring ensemble: Fly Girl Forever or just fug? Posted: 20 Apr 2011 07:28 AM PDT These are photos of Jennifer Lopez at an album signing/launch. I don't even know what to call it. She just showed up in this outfit (ugh) and signed stuff for fans. First: her face looks strange. Botoxy strange. Second: Why is she obsessed with showing us her stomach? We get it, J.Lo. You had babies and your stomach bounced back. Now put on a shirt. I know this is mean to say and some of you will yell at me, but Jennifer is too old to be dressing like this. She basically put on a bra and an '80s jacket and called it a day. She's such a Fly Girl. Next: her album is called LOVE? Seriously, there's a question mark. And after she released her first single "On the Floor" to mixed reactions, Jennifer has now released the second single, "Papi". Ugh. Here it is: I find it sad. But Jennifer thinks she's the second coming of Rihanna/Beyonce/Gaga. Read this delusion:
[From Music Rooms] Oh, Jennifer. Ugh. I mean, I get it. She's transitioning, and she doesn't realize that she's still not relevant, really. Sure, she was once the biggest thing - ten years ago. And while she made a good move by going to American Idol, let's not pretend she's on her way to becoming J.Lo circa 2000. That ship has sailed. |
Tyler Perry lashes out Spike Lee’s racially-charged criticism: “He can go to hell” Posted: 20 Apr 2011 06:52 AM PDT My opinion on Tyler Perry has changed for the better over time. I used to think his films were exploitative and dumb… and then I watched a couple. While his films will never be confused with high art or even traditional "good" films, they do have their merits - they are popular, sometimes funny, they make money, and they employ many, many black actors and actresses in lead roles, as well as majority-black casts and presumably crews too. It helps to think of Tyler Perry's films as Southern-style, African-American soap operas - lots of melodrama, lots of over-acting, lots of manufactured drama and low-brow comedy. All in all, I find them at worst harmless, and at best, an African-American writer/director/producer/entrepreneur giving a certain demographic of the population the kind of fun, easy, popcorn films that they enjoy. Spike Lee does not agree. Spike has been one of Tyler's biggest critics for a long time, and when Spike attacks, he goes for the jugular. Spike basically thinks that Tyler's films are just new-age minstrel shows. And when someone brought up Spike's constant criticism to Tyler at a press conference a few days ago, Tyler finally let loose:
[From Huffington Post] I think there's a valid debate to be had regarding the racial aspects of both Spike and Tyler's arguments, I just don't think I'm the one to start that debate. I see both sides of it, but I end up coming down more pro-Tyler, for several reasons. First and foremost, I think the whole "Spike vs. Tyler" thing isn't solely about race, it's also about North vs. South, as well as about education. Spike Lee is a New Yorker, and he came from an educated, affluent family. His brother went to Yale with Jodie Foster, for goodness sake. He's followed a more "traditional" route to become a director - a BA, and then film school (Tisch) where he got a MFA. Tyler grew up poor, in the South, didn't even graduate high school, is a self-taught writer, director and actor. Both men are influenced by their backgrounds, but I can see Tyler's Southern influences in his films, and he is right - while some of his characters seem like caricatures, those people totally exist here. And not just in the Southern African-American communities. So yeah… maybe Spike should go to hell. And while he's on his way, he could try making a movie that will get a wide release. (Although I really did love Inside Job! MORE CLIVE, PLS.) |
Jill Zarin of RHONY cops to ‘liquid facelift’ after she’s rendered unrecognizable Posted: 20 Apr 2011 06:47 AM PDT
Zarin said around that time that she hadn’t had any work done, and that “If I did, I would be the first to admit it.” Only she wasn’t the first to admit it and it took a ton of people and media outlets calling her on her BS for her to own up to anything. She’s not copping to a nose job, and is claiming that her reshaped nose is the result of some contouring makeup. She also says she had a “liquid facelift,” meaning enough chemicals injected into her face to mold her into a plastic version of someone else. On the Wendy Williams show (video below) Zarin said her dermatologist “injects Restalyne on the side [of the face] so it gives you a pull. You don’t fill in the smile lines, because that’s too inaccurate… People used to use silicone, don’t use that stuff. Then she does Botox down here [gestures to neck]… tightens the neck. It’s all about pulling and tightening. Here I’ve been doing [between the eyebrows] for 10 years. My forehead and here. But this is really the difference… since I’m 5 years old I’ve always had bangs.” Look at this lady talk. Only her jaw moves. She claims to always tell the truth, but why didn’t she admit to this “liquid facelift” before, when it was so painfully obvious? It isn’t her hair that makes all the difference, her face looks like wax and it’s freakish. At least she didn’t mess with her lips yet. Wendy Williams is such a kiss ass telling her that she doesn’t look any different. [via ONTD] |
Catherine Zeta-Jones talks about her bipolar disorder to People Mag Posted: 20 Apr 2011 06:17 AM PDT Catherine Zeta-Jones and her bipolar disorder have taken the cover of this week's People Magazine. I would imagine that this will likely be one of People's best-selling issues, not just because big stars “in crisis” always sell, but because Catherine seems to be giving her story exclusively to People, and this cover story includes Catherine's first interview since the announcement about her disorder. Here's an excerpt:
[From People] I agree with everything being said here - there are millions of people with bipolar disorders, it's nothing to be ashamed of, and people should actively seek treatment. What does interest me, on a celebrity-gossip level, is the how, why and "why now?" of this. Catherine checked herself into a mental health facility a few weeks ago and stayed for less than a week, I believe. I also believe that Catherine wouldn't have come out and aired her (admittedly private) business if it not for an exclusive scoop that the National Enquirer got last week - only the Enquirer's story was about Catherine's problems with drugs and alcohol, which admittedly could have been bipolar-related. While I do think that whatever she's going through is private, and that she's taking steps to handle it and be a responsible adult about the situation, I also think that there's more to the story than what Catherine is handing to People Magazine. Covers courtesy of CoverAwards, People. Additional pics by WENN. |
Halle Berry on her custody battle ’sometimes you reach an impasse’ Posted: 20 Apr 2011 05:52 AM PDT
|
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment