Cele|bitchy

---

• Linnocent has a cracked-out, hyper-paranoid martyr complex
• Chelsy Davy is going to be dressed inappropriately for the wedding, of course
• Kelly Osbourne channels Helena Bonham Carter: lovely or fug?
• Jodie Foster calls lower percentage of female directors “race psychology”
• Beyonce’s Parisian fashions: cute or busted?
• Kate Middleton’s dress is done & other royal wedding updates
• Rachel Bilson and Hayden Christensen celebrate their reunion with bikini photo op
• 16 and Pregnant’s Jennifer Del Rio’s ex says she got preg just to be on the show
• Edward Reid, “The Next Susan Boyle” performs saucy nursery rhymes
• Ice T’s trashy T&A wife, Coco, got a reality show on E!

Linnocent has a cracked-out, hyper-paranoid martyr complex Posted: 25 Apr 2011 08:59 AM PDT Continuing in the ongoing theme of "Linnocent is just a poor, innocent crack baby and everybody is out to get her, for no good reason because she never does anything bad," we have some additional crack leaks from Team Linnocent. I covered some stuff earlier today - but there's even more coming out now. It's almost like… Mother Crackhead is doing lines of blow and calling up media outlets in between shots. Strange, I know. She never does that (before 3 pm)! So, in these new chapters of Blindsided By Crack: The Linnocent Story, we have Linnocent's coked-up paranoia meshing with her own over-inflated ego and her raging martyr complex. Everybody is out to get her!!! Don't they know that she's just an innocent crack baby? Lindsay Lohan believes prosecutor Danette Meyers is on a “witch hunt” against her, and is praying the Deputy D.A. makes good on what she asked the judge — drop out of the case. Sources in contact with Lindsay tell us … Lindsay believes she’s become a living, breathing press release for Meyers, who is running for L.A. County District Attorney. There are several flaws in Lindsay’s theory. First, Meyers asked Judge Stephanie Sautner Friday to remove her from the case. Since the judge knocked the felony charge down to a misdemeanor, Meyers assumed the case would be transferred to the L.A. City Attorney. But the judge noted the D.A. can still prosecute the case if it wants to … so Meyers’ request was denied. Second flaw — Meyers has prosecuted hundreds of big cases in her more than 2 decades as a prosecutor, and is extremely well-respected, so she really doesn’t need a misdemeanor theft case all that much. [From TMZ] Yes, Linnocent. A prosecutor is totally out to get you. It's her JOB to put away crackheads and sociopath hustlers. But wait, there's more! Mother Crackhead also called up PopEater to rage, rage, rage against the California court system trying to make an example out of Linnocent because she's (SOB!) a celebrity!!! After returning to Lynwood Correctional Facility on Friday for a five-hour stay before posting bail, Lindsay Lohan has now come to the conclusion that she is being punished simply because she’s a celebrity. “She is being treated differently from everyone else because she is famous,” a source close to Lindsay tells me. “We were all in shock when she was forced to return to jail just to make an example out of her. It’s not right. Especially when she is working so hard to live a healthy life.” On Friday, a judge ruled that Lindsay, who has been accused of stealing a necklace, was in violation of probation. After five hours in jail, she posted bail and will remain free pending an appeal. “She is innocent and can’t understand what is going on,” my source tells me. “She didn’t steal any necklace and will be found innocent. It’s obvious this is only happening because she is famous and anyone that thinks celebrities get away with stuff or let off will think again after seeing this.” However, Dan Abrams, ABC News legal analyst and founder of Mediaite.com, disagrees. “I know it’s hard for some to believe, but Lindsay Lohan is basically being treated the same way any DUI, probation violating, accused small-time thief would be treated by the L.A. judicial system.” [From PopEater] I would go so far as to say that throughout the past three years, Linnocent has been treated BETTER than "any DUI, probation violating, accused small-time thief would be treated" BECAUSE she's a celebrity. From where I'm sitting, the California legal system is a total joke, and if Linnocent had pulled all of these crack shenanigans in any other state, this dumb bitch would already be sitting in a jail cell. Photos courtesy of WENN.

Chelsy Davy is going to be dressed inappropriately for the wedding, of course Posted: 25 Apr 2011 08:34 AM PDT I've known for a while that Prince Harry's on-again girlfriend Michael K Chelsy Davy was going to be his date for the wedding. The British tabloids were talking about it months ago, even though Chelsy and Harry were off-again at the time of the engagement announcement. Chelsy managed to work her way back in (beej) and score an official invite. People Magazine just confirmed that not only did Chelsy get an invite to the wedding, she also gets to go to the Buckingham Palace reception, where the Queen will be! Oh, Chelsy. Girl, you have to let me in on your beej technique. It looks like Chelsy Davy is truly back with Prince Harry, and she’s been invited to his older brother Prince William’s wedding this Friday. Davy, 25, was confirmed on the guest list, revealed by palace aids this weekend, of those attending William’s marriage to Kate Middleton at Westminster Abbey. Not only will the blonde Zimbabwean be at the church service – she will surely lend her support to Harry, 26, at the private reception, where he is set to deliver his best man’s speech late in the evening. Harry and Davy, who broke up in 2009 after five years together, have been quietly seeing each other since rekindling their relationship late last year. In February, they were spotted having dinner in London. Harry recently passed the latest stage of his military training, enabling him to fly Apache attack helicopters. He is set to be based in Suffolk, about 80 miles from London, where Chelsy is set to start her law job in September. [From People] So it's all official and junk. Harry's so dumb and horny and he probably would have given her the royal gem collection if she asked for it (while naked). Here's the next question - what will Chelsy wear? You know it's going to be inappropriate. Chelsy is no Waity. Chelsy likes to wear trashy, revealing clothes, God bless her. Well, Life & Style has the scoop on that stuff: Who’s designing princess-to-be Kate Middleton’s wedding gown may still be top secret, but Life & Style can exclusively reveal that Prince Harry’s girlfriend, Chelsy Davy, will be wearing two couture Alberta Ferretti dresses at the royal wedding on April 29. “Chelsy was approached three months ago by Italian designer Alberta Ferretti’s team, who offered to dress her for free,” an insider tells Life & Style. The 25-year-old blonde trainee solicitor hadn’t even heard of Alberta Ferretti, so she asked her friends for advice, and they told her to go for it. “The design team has designed two longer gowns for Chelsy to decide on for the ceremony and a shorter dress for her to wear in the evening,” says the insider. “She’ll wear a hat or fascinator to the ceremony but hasn’t decided yet. The dresses are in bold colors.” “Alberta Ferretti is known for her sexy dresses, many of which have low, draped backs, and Chelsy has never been one to shy away from a sexy dress,” the insider adds. “Chelsy is thrilled with the stunning amazing made-to-measure designs for her. She wants to look her best, because the wedding will be her first official outing with Prince Harry since they reunited.” [From Life & Style] So, basically, Chelsy is going to wear something red and low-cut and then her boobs are going to "accidentally" spill out during Harry's toast, and then she's going to get under the table and "perform" for Harry in the middle of the reception. Take that, Waity!!! Seriously, who will be paying attention to anybody else BUT Chelsy? Photos courtesy of Fame & WENN.

Kelly Osbourne channels Helena Bonham Carter: lovely or fug? Posted: 25 Apr 2011 08:03 AM PDT These are photos of Kelly Osbourne and her family at the Tribeca Film Festival premiere of God Bless Ozzy Osbourne, a documentary about Ozzy which was produced by Jack Osbourne. What do you think of Kelly's outfit? It looks very Helena Bonham-Carter, right? I kind of like it for that reason. Lately, I've been wondering if Kelly's "Look at me, I lost so much weight and I'm now in demand and important" thing was going to come back and bite her on the ass, just because it seemed like she was gaining some weight back. One of the best ways to look thin? Pour and cinch yourself into an incredible corset-bodice-basque thing. As for the jacket… well, it's not my style, but since it's all so reminiscent of HBC, I will accept it. This is one of my favorite looks on Kelly, ever. Minus the too-bright, too-young lipstick. Guess who else was at the premiere? Our favorite hot mess, Paz de la Huerta. She was looking soberish. Photos courtesy of WENN.

Jodie Foster calls lower percentage of female directors “race psychology” Posted: 25 Apr 2011 07:30 AM PDT Just one year ago, Kathryn Bigelow won the Oscar for Best Director, an award that was voted upon by her peers, who themselves are the very force behind getting movies made in Tinseltown. Regardless, Jodie Foster is now complaining about Hollywood’s treatment of female directors, which I find rather contradictory. Jodie can speak in terms of chronic discrimination against women in the film industry, whereas she has no problem when her Hollywood friends treat women badly in a much more acute basis. For instance, she truly admires and supports Roman Polanski for being such a wonderful director and diffuses all discussions of his admitted-rapist status as “That’s not my business.” What is her business, however, is that Jodie (who, just like nearly every director out there, struggles to fund her art) feels really beaten down by the man as a female director. So naturally, she continues to support Mel Gibson, who actually beats women (such a nice symmetry there, right?) by sticking with him and proclaiming, “I will love this man for the rest of my life.” How would she feel if Mel punched a female director? That’s a question that shall remain unanswered, but Jodie’s merely sounding off on what actually affects her pocketbook. You know, other than the ill-advised decision to direct The Beaver: In an era when women account for only 7% of the directors of Hollywood movies, Jodie Foster is the rare female whom financiers will back to helm any film, never mind a marketing challenge like “The Beaver,” her upcoming $20-million tragicomedy about depression starring Mel Gibson. When asked about the industry statistics during a recent interview promoting “The Beaver,” Foster said she thought the low numbers of female directors were a result of studio executives’ fears of uncertainty. “I don't think it's a plot and these guys sat around and said let's keep these women out,” Foster said. “I think it's like race psychology. When a producer hires a director, you're hiring away your control completely. You're bringing on somebody that will change everything. When you give that amount of power up, you want them to look like you and talk like you and think like you and it's scary when they don’t, because what's gonna happen? I’m gonna hand over $60 million to somebody I don't know. I hope they look like me.” When it was mentioned that many studio executives do, in fact, look like her — a 48-year-old white female veteran of the industry, Foster nodded. “And name the lists that come out of the female studio executives: guy, guy, guy, guy,” she said. “Their job is to be as risk-averse as possible. They see female directors as a risk.” Foster got her first directing opportunity on 1991’s “Little Man Tate” from male executives at Orion Pictures. In 1989, she won the lead actress Academy Award for “The Accused.” “I was acting in ‘Little Man Tate’ for almost no money and I had just won an Oscar,” said Foster. “They were under almost no financial risk whatsoever. The real pioneers are someone that didn't have the ‘in’ that I had. I had guys who knew me. I was like their daughter.” [From LA Times] While I don’t have access to all of the male-to-female ratios of entering and graduating classes of accredited film schools, I’d be willing to wager that there isn’t some huge conspiracy at work involved at that level. The hard truth of the matter is that most film school grads, regardless of their sex, never get work as directors. Of course, a lot of directors (like Jodie) don’t go to film school at all and enter the profession after acting for a period of time before deciding, “[W]hat I really want to do is direct.” From there, it’s a matter of starting small and moving onto directing bigger films. So what I think is at work here, rather than what Foster is defensively labeling as “race psychology,” is that fewer women actually decide that they want to direct because, honestly, having a huge ego (and being stubborn enough to push past obstacles rather than whining about them) is part of the job. Even Woody Allen has a massive ego, and if Jodie truly believes that she’s the only director who’s had to start with small, low-risk pictures, well, she’s completely wrong about that. Even actors that move into directing (George Clooney, Ben Affleck, Zach Braff) have to start with little indie films, and they often appear in their own films too (something that Jodie complained about as an example of what she, as a female, had so suffer through), which in turn saves the studios money. No director starts out with blockbuster budgets; in fact, many of the large-scale directors like Michael Bay started out directing music videos. Jodie never had to do that. Honestly, if Jodie Foster wants to start pullng the “race psychology” card, she needs to do two things: (1) Get her hands on real statistics and not assume that women have it harder because of her own path; and (2) Surround herself with allies that don’t include anti-Semetic rageaholics and child rapists who believe it is okay to sodomize a women even when she says “no.” Without further ado, let’s review this trailer for The Beaver, which pretty much says it all about Jodie’s inability to see the larger picture in the capacity of director: Photos courtesy of WENN and Fame Pictures

Beyonce’s Parisian fashions: cute or busted? Posted: 25 Apr 2011 07:27 AM PDT As we saw last week, Beyonce and Jay-Z have been in Paris, for reasons unknown. I think part of their visit was so that Beyonce could be photographed for some fashion magazine, but for the most part, Bey and Jay have just been getting pap'd, happily. Considering they historically don't enjoy being pap'd - especially when they're together - I tend to think Beyonce is just gearing up to promote her album, and it helps to have some goodwill. Another theory - Beyonce and Jay are in the general area of London, because one or both of them was invited to perform in some capacity at the royal wedding. That's what some of the British tabloids are saying, although the rumor just got shut down. It wouldn't be impossible - Prince William is said to enjoy Jay, Beyonce and Kanye West. But William wouldn't book them for his wedding, would he? Anyway, these are some photos from Beyonce and Jay's Paris tour. The pics of Beyonce is the fuchsia and black number are from her magazine shoot. Everything else is just Bey's sketchy style. The polka-dotted Mad Men-inspired number is especially hideous, and whatever is happening to Bey's sideboob in the black jumpsuit is just WRONG. Photos courtesy of Fame.

Kate Middleton’s dress is done & other royal wedding updates Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:46 AM PDT This morning, I was startled to see that MSNBC had sent the two hapless cohosts of Morning Joe to London to (presumably) cover the royal wedding. It's like MSNBC wants to ensure that the English hate Americans in total. Attention, UK: Please do not judge us based on Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski. We Americans recognize that they're awful people, and we apologize for sending them in your general area. Truly, I'm sorry. So, yes, everyone flew to London over the weekend, because now so many American television personalities are now reporting from the tops of double-decker buses and in front of Buckingham Palace. It will be interesting to see if any of the network news anchors are based in London this week - I suspect that such a "soft news" story will only warrant the anchors flying in on Thursday. And while the Americans seem enchanted by British royal tchotchkes, it's being said more and more that the British aren't really that interested in the royal wedding. Considering the Americans seem really, really into it, perhaps they could push it back until later in the day, just so Americans don't have to get up at such an ungodly hour (4 am)? No, they won't do that. So here is today's royal wedding updates. According to Us Weekly, Kate Middleton's dress is done. A senior palace source says, “Kate will have no more fittings… The next time the dress goes on is Friday morning!” And we still don't know who designed the damn thing. Sophie Cranston of Libelula said she's not the designer, so people are still considering Sarah Burton for McQueen, Bruce Oldfield and Alice Temperley. Out of those three choices, I would say Oldfield is still the best bet, because his designs are so boring, but I also think Temperley might be a solid possibility. Her designs are frilly, romantic, girlish, and kind of cheap-looking, which Kate probably loves. What else - no beer is going to be served at the royal reception, but there will be wine served, so it's not like the royals are shunning alcohol. Prince Harry is going to host an early-morning breakfast the next day, which makes me pity the poor Buckingham Palace servants. And HuffPo has a detailed list of the wedding guests, including some not so great celebrity and political attendees: David Beckham, Elton John and Mr. Bean actor Rowan Atkinson will mingle with dozens of royal guests at Prince William and Kate Middleton’s wedding, according to an official guest list released Saturday that includes one uncomfortable presence – the Bahraini crown prince accused of a brutal crackdown on protesters. St. James’s Palace also released the seating plan at Westminster Abbey, which showed that relatives of William’s mother Princess Diana are sitting across the aisle from the royal family, joining the Middletons in an exception to the traditional division of a church into a bride’s side and groom’s side. There was no explanation of the seating arrangement, but the Spencers have not had a good relationship with the royal family, especially after Diana’s brother Charles Spencer attacked the royals during a speech at her 1997 funeral. More than 46 foreign royals are seated behind the British royals. They include Bahrain’s Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa, an invitation that could prove awkward in light of his government’s rough treatment of mainly Shiite pro-democracy protesters. Some human rights campaigners have started to petition Foreign Secretary William Hague to revoke the invitation, saying the prince should not be allowed to attend the occasion. At least 30 people have died in Bahrain since mid-February, including four who died while in official custody, and many well-known activists and lawyers have been imprisoned. Other foreign royals who are attending include those from Denmark, Norway, Spain, Saudi Arabia, Thailand and Morocco. Only a handful of celebrities are invited, including the Beckhams, director Guy Ritchie, soul singer Joss Stone, and Atkinson – a close friend of William’s father Prince Charles. Although about 1,900 guests have been invited to the couple’s wedding ceremony at Westminster Abbey, half of them will sit in the section of the abbey where views of the altar are restricted, and they will have to rely upon video screens to follow the service. Queen Elizabeth II and other royal family members will sit in the front row across the aisle from Middleton’s parents and brother James. They will be closest to the abbey’s sanctuary, where William and his bride will stand. Foreign dignitaries, the Middletons’ family friends, British government and defense officials, families of British soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, William’s army colleagues, and people who work for William’s charities will be seated around the abbey. Palace officials said that only crowned heads of states are traditionally invited to royal weddings, and that political leaders who are not from the 54-member Commonwealth of nations, such as President Barack Obama or French President Nicolas Sarkozy, weren’t sent invitations. About 600 of the guests will then attend a champagne and canapes reception at Buckingham Palace hosted by the queen. [From HuffPo] I also saw that neither of the past two prime ministers got invites - no Tony Blair, no Gordon Brown. I understand why Gordon didn't get invited (he's ridiculously boring), but no Tony Blair? I thought Blair was tight with the royals (according to him)? Guess not. It's also interesting that the Spencers are being kept separate - physically - from the royal family. From what I understand, neither Harry nor William has much to do with the Spencer family at this point, so it's not like the Spencers are going to really know anyone there, you know? Photos courtesy of Fame.

Rachel Bilson and Hayden Christensen celebrate their reunion with bikini photo op Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:38 AM PDT Rachel Bilson and Hayden Christensen look to be back together after their split last summer, as evident by these photos of the couple no one cares about vacationing in Barbados. Several photo agencies have these pictures, and again this is in Barbados and it’s not like any photographers are going to be following these two on vacation. Rachel wore several different bikinis for these photo ops (here she is in another bikini on DListed) to maximize her publicity options. I suppose we’ll next be hearing about how they’re re-engaged: The couple, who reportedly threw in the towel on their over three-year relationship in March, were spotted soaking up the sun during an island getaway to Barbados to celebrate Christensen’s 30th birthday. Bilson, 29, was photographed showcasing her fit physique in several tiny string bikinis while spending the day swimming in the Caribbean ocean with Christensen, whom she met on the set of “Jumper” in 2007. The low-key couple later got engaged in December of the following year. But last summer, the actress was spotted sans engagement ring as reports surfaced that she and her “Star Wars” beau were “taking a break” to reevaluate their relationship. One of the main reasons for the split was reportedly due to the distance between Bilson in Los Angeles and Christensen in Canada. Bilson’s rep confirmed in August that the couple’s engagement was off, but the two appeared to be giving their relationship another shot when they were spotted hanging out again in L.A. three months later. Despite breaking up and making up yet again, the couple may have to face another geographical obstacle if Bilson continues working on her new pilot, “Hart of Dixie,” in Wilmington, N.C. [From The NY Daily News] I’ve said that I don’t find Rachel as grating as Kaiser does, but I’m definitely seeing Kaiser and Lainey’s point that she oversells. Bilson had one movie out last year, she has one in the can for this year (with Kate Bosworth, doesn’t that seem fitting?) and now she’s staging vacation photos to announce her next project. She also has a porcelain line at Macys and hopes to go into bedding. I’m surprised she doesn’t have a perfume, clothing line or exercise tape out yet. When your main career as an actor or singer is flailing, there’s always the opportunity to try and sell your personal life and launch a side business to bring in cash. Still, Bilson is doing much better than her old O.C. costar, Mischa Barton. That’s not saying much.

16 and Pregnant’s Jennifer Del Rio’s ex says she got preg just to be on the show Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:25 AM PDT Another day, another abusive Teen Mom. First we had season one’s Amber Portwood beating up her baby’s father on television, then we had Jenelle Evans of season two in a horrific fight with another woman that was caught on tape and sold to the paparazzi agencies. Now there’s Jennifer Del Rio, a star of 16 and Pregnant’s now-airing third season (the show that roots out the best drama queens for Teen Mom), in a fight with her babies’ dad, Josh Smith. (Smith and Del Rio have tins.) Smith told cops that Del Rio punched him in the face but she claims that he punched himself in order to set her up. Advance footage from 16 and Pregnant shows Del Rio smacking Smith and telling him he’ll never see his kids again. I would suspect the abuse is mutual though, as Smith puts his hand in front of Del Rio’s face in another advance clip (below) where she breaks up with him. Del Rio’s episode airs Tuesday on MTV. In a request for a restraining order, Del Rio’s ex alleges that she got pregnant on purpose in order to get on the show and that she told him she was already pregnant in order to trick him into not using condoms during their relationship. We’ve heard that teens were getting pregnant in order to get on the show, but I didn’t really believe it. Now I do. “16 & Pregnant” star Josh Smith says his baby mama PLOTTED to get pregnant just so she could be on the MTV reality show … this according to court documents. Smith filed a request for a restraining order against Jennifer Del Rio this week — stemming from an incident in which she allegedly punched Josh in the face. In the docs, Smith claims his baby mama is a “compulsive liar” who concocted a diabolical scheme to get pregnant — allegedly telling him she was knocked up (even though she wasn’t) so he wouldn’t wear a condom. Smith explains … “She was giving me sonogram pictures … that she claimed was ‘our baby’ when in actually [sic] it was her friend’s sonogram pictures she was copying. She lied to me and my parents for 3 months saying she was pregnant. She wanted so desperately to be on ‘Sixteen and Pregnant’.” As for the restraining order, Jennifer claims she never attacked Josh … and has since filed for a restraining order against HIM … claiming Josh punched himself in the face to set her up so she would go to jail. The couple is scheduled to be back in court on May 2. [From TMZ] What’s it going to take for MTV to rethink this show? Is it going to take a shooting or a serious car accident? They regularly film kids beating on each other in front of their babies. I don’t understand how it’s legal to stand by and film instead of interfering when something like that happens. These are some seriously screwed up kids having babies and getting paid over a quarter million a year to go on television. It’s disturbing to say the least. Here’s a clip from Del Rio’s episode in which she breaks up with Josh. He drops her off at the side of the road and drives off with the twins. MTV’s 16 and Pregnant (Season 3) - MTV Shows Del Rio smacks Smith at around 1:20 into this trailer. (via Starcasm) MTV Shows

Edward Reid, “The Next Susan Boyle” performs saucy nursery rhymes Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:06 AM PDT I don't watch these signing or talent competition shows, but the next day, if the headline is fetching enough, I will watch videos of some of this stuff online. Since Susan Boyle stunned the judges and the audience of Britain's Got Talent in 2009, most reality competition shows have been trying to push viewership by promoting some competitor as "the next Susan Boyle." It's become a code for "old(er), kind of funky, but talented." Such it is with the latest "new Susan Boyle," a Scotsman named Edward Reid. He performed on Britain's Got Talent a few days ago, and now everybody is talking about his saucy performance of traditional children's nursery rhymes. Here you go: Edward Reid Sings Nursery Rhymes to Run backing… by UCANLEARNPOKERdotCOM I like when he's ba-baaing. It cracks me up. Doesn't this sort of remind you of George Michael? I imagine this is how George Michael would sing nursery rhymes. Which makes me like it more. Screencaps from the video, courtesy of ITV.

Ice T’s trashy T&A wife, Coco, got a reality show on E! Posted: 25 Apr 2011 06:05 AM PDT You may know Ice T’s girlfriend, Coco, from the many photos of her huge ass and boobs that she’s posted on Twitter. I’m not exaggerating at all, she has “titty Tuesday” and “thong Thursday” where we get to see her assets that silicone built. She admits to breast implants, but claims her butt is real. Early photos of her prove otherwise. TMZ has the news that Coco is getting a reality show, from the same network that regularly rewards D-list sex tape stars with reality shows, E! Coco has no problem revealing several intimate details (and body parts) on her Twitter feed — now TMZ has learned she’ll be doing that every week … on her new reality show. According to our sources, Coco will be starring in a new show for E! — the same network that airs “Keeping Up with the Kardashians.” Hmmm, we’re sensing a theme here … We’re told the show has begun shooting in NYC — it will focus on her crazy life and will feature her hubby, rapper/actor Ice-T. [From TMZ] Of course she did. Because all you have to do to be famous is get extreme plastic surgery, have no sense of shame, and post photos of yourself on Twitter. It doesn’t hurt that she’s married to Ice T. E! needs programming and people must be watching these shows. I sat through a whole episode of Kourtney & Kim Take New York recently. Prior to that I’d never seen an entire episode of any show involving the Kardashians. It was actually mildly interesting. Kourteney, Kim and Scott were incredibly annoying, but the show had a story arc and everything thanks to how obviously scripted it was. I blame Ryan Seacrest for foisting so many reality stars on the public using this same formula. I hope Kim Kardashian and Kendra Wilkinson realize that this is their competition - trashy plastic surgery victims who look like cartoons and are unapologetic about it, (but still lie about what they’ve had done, natch) not women who sign off on releasing their own sex tapes and then try and act like they’re mortified by them.

You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610