Cele|bitchy |
- Did K-Stew & Sparkles do honeymoon reshoots because of eye-rolling?
- Howard Stern thought Katie Holmes was “in a trance,” Tom might do a ‘Glee’ cameo
- Julie Bowen: ‘You have to drink’ to get beautiful like Jennifer Aniston
- Chloe Sevigny in doily couture: greasy, hideous mess, or not that bad?
- Kelly Osbourne on weight gain reports: “I’m not - I’m the same size!”
- Christina Aguilera explains SuperBowl flub: ‘I took in the moment a little too much’
- It’s as if someone is trying to make Lea Michele look like hell, right?
- Britney Spears’ tour bans drugs, alcohol, cookie dough & hot dogs
- Karl Lagerfeld’s new additions to his List of Hate: thongs, happiness & sugar
- Ryan Phillippe’s rep does damage control: he’s not quitting acting
Did K-Stew & Sparkles do honeymoon reshoots because of eye-rolling? Posted: 26 Apr 2011 08:02 AM PDT Life & Style just sent us these blurry, wonderful photos of Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson filming in the Virgin Islands. Doesn't it look like they're wrapped in taffeta? LMAO! According to L&S's sources, they were doing reshoots on the "romantic honeymoon scenes"… which I thought were already shot in South America? Sounds like some producer is worried about the lack of chemistry, perhaps? Why all the reshoots, I wonder? Anyway, this report is just about how happy and sparkly they both were during the filming:
[From Life & Style] Hm… "Kristen even showed her affectionate side by putting her arm around Rob while they were chatting with another woman." Sounds more like she was marking her sparkly territory, although I'm sure Sparkles ate it up. I imagine the reshoots were grueling, though. In my mind, the director has to continuously remind K-Stew, "Can we have one take where you don't roll your eyes as he tries to kiss you?" |
Howard Stern thought Katie Holmes was “in a trance,” Tom might do a ‘Glee’ cameo Posted: 26 Apr 2011 07:54 AM PDT On Monday’s episode of “The Howard Stern Show,” the shock jock talked at length about various celebrity run-ins that he experienced at the weekend nuptuals of big-shot Hollywood producer Brad Grey. Naturally, Tom Cruise was at the wedding with wifebot Katie Holmes in tow, and while Stern was on the dance floor with his wife, Beth Ostrosky, the two couples crossed paths. Stern perceived that Tom was his usual “friendly” self as always around industry types; as for Katie, she was reportedly “in a trance.” Indeed, that’s the perfect way to describe Holmes ever since Scientology got their claws into her, thanks to the Unhinged, Lift-Wearing Midget himself. And why wouldn’t she be positively catatonic? Beyond the few token film roles within which she’s supposedly immersed herself over the past several years, all that Katie has to do with her time is get audited and go shopping. Then, she goes shopping some more. That last part sounds completely doable at first to us civilians, but I imagine that it gets rather old and unfulfilling very short order. Speaking of the Poison Dwarf, his career (such as it is) has recently experienced a very dubious uprising. Not only has that Les Grossman horror-comedy come to life, but Tom’s also prepping for the onset of filming for Rock of Ages. To add further gasoline to the ritualistic L. Ron Hubbard-themed sacrifice fire at which the Cruise prays, rumors are floating around that Tom will make a Goop-styled “Glee” cameo of his own:
[From MTV} How lovely. Maybe they can eventually get Goop's character together with that of Cruise. She can do another sex-ed styled skit and dangle a bag of P-E-N-I-S gummies in front of Tom while he follows her around with puppy dog eyes. Whether or not this "Glee" thing doesn't work out, there's also Cruise's newly announced attachment to play a "politician who gets caught in an affair" within a script by Crazy, Stupid, Love screenwriter Dan Fogelman. If that's not enough to satisfy your own personal "need for speed," well, it gets even better from there, for (drum roll) AMC Theaters is bringing Top Gun back to theaters for two very special exclusive dates: April 30 and May 2 (see times and theater listings here). Supposedly, anyone who shells out for a ticket will receive "a theatre-sized commemorative poster," you know, much like the one that young Katie Holmes used to keep on the wall over her childhood bed. Yuck. Photos courtesy of Fame Pictures |
Julie Bowen: ‘You have to drink’ to get beautiful like Jennifer Aniston Posted: 26 Apr 2011 07:45 AM PDT
[From People] That opening line about Aniston is ridiculous: “People want to work with her, protect her, be her or date her.” This is another planted piece by Huvane about how great Aniston is, and I’ll be honest it sort-of works. It’s better to have someone who can string a coherent sentence together sing Aniston’s praises and make a joke about it than quote her directly or plant another story about how she’s dating an up-and-coming star who has previously denied having anything to do with her. Also, Bowen kind of looks like Aniston but not in a way that at all pales to her. She’s beautiful in her own right. Maybe she has fond memories of getting drunk with Aniston on set and/or is just hoping to get blitzed later. She’s got three boys under the age of six: Oliver, who turned five earlier this month, and twins John and Gustav, who turn two May 8. (I think she’s with Oliver and one of the twins below.) Photo credit: WENN and Fame/Juan Rico |
Chloe Sevigny in doily couture: greasy, hideous mess, or not that bad? Posted: 26 Apr 2011 07:35 AM PDT These are photos of Chloe Sevigny at last night's Chanel-sponsored Tribece Film Festival Artists Dinner. I don't think Chloe is wearing Chanel, though. At least… yeah, I'm pretty sure that's not Chanel. Chanel does have some doily couture, but it doesn't look like this for the most part. As for how Chloe looked overall… well, I know many fashion editors consider her high-fashion. I don't. I think she's almost always a hot mess. It's not even that I always hate what she's wearing… sometimes she wears interesting clothes. It's her face. It's her styling. It's that she paired what is basically a huge, ugly doily with S&M booties, greasy hair and trashy-looking orange-red lipstick (what is it with the orange-red today?). It's just a horrible look overall. By the way, as I was looking to see if Chloe has been up to anything, I saw this piece from Faded Youth. They say several interesting pieces of info. First, Zoe Kravitz was also at this dinner, but there's no mention of Zoe's alleged boyfriend Michael Fassbender. Zoe is on the Tribeca Film Festival jury, and obviously, she's flying solo to a lot of events. But it makes me wonder… are Zoe and Michael over? Discuss. In addition to that little side-step, Faded Youth (quoting a report from Star Mag) claims that Chloe has been dating (ish) a dude named Charlie Smith. I don't know who he is, but apparently he's a friend of Spencer Pratt, and he was on The Hills? Here are some gross photos of him. So, according to Faded Youth/Star, at an event a few weeks ago in California, "Chloe and Charlie arrived together, and though she was one of the event's hosts, she spent most of her time wrapped up in him. She was beaming." Whatev. One more thing - Chloe teamed up with Kiehl's for a limited edition skin thing. You can read about it here. Here's a question - if you were a skin care company, would you want Chloe anywhere near your brand? Last thing - Adrien Brody was also at the event. I actually like his beard! But he still looks like a massive douche to me. |
Kelly Osbourne on weight gain reports: “I’m not - I’m the same size!” Posted: 26 Apr 2011 06:51 AM PDT Despite my general dislike of not-so-bright girls who don't actually DO anything, I find myself liking Kelly Osbourne in a general way. I'm not saying she's one of my favorites or anything, but I've liked some of her interviews and I don't think she's as bad as some of you think. And for some reason, people like to talk about her and whatever she's wearing and how she's gone legit, career-wise, these days with a new gig modeling for Material Girl and a spot on E! Fashion Police. All of this new legitimacy came shortly after Kelly lost a great deal of weight, and I suspect the legitimacy will only last as long as Kelly keeps off the weight. So… is she gaining some weight back? Kind of. Over the past month, I've seen some photos of her and read some reports about Kelly and her (alleged) weight gain. But then as I was looking through the new photos of her yesterday, I didn't really see it, which makes me think she probably put on a few pounds and took them off very quickly. And now Kelly is denying that anything ever happened:
[From Us Weekly] It's kind of impressive that she can maintain that kind of weight by only working out a half an hour. Do you believe her? Meh. I think it's more likely that she did gain a little bit and she just took it off quickly. And I'd just like to say, for the record: It doesn't matter to me what size Kelly is. I'm happy that she lost weight and got healthy, but most women who struggle with their weight will yo-yo throughout the years, and blaring headlines about weight gains or losses are… well, they're kind of mean, I think. I embrace some chunk on the ladies. Some do not. I think Kelly looks fine/cute at this current size, and I think she would still look cute with ten or twenty extra pounds. Same with Scarlett Johansson, same with Kate Middleton, same with just about everybody. Why are we so obsessed? |
Christina Aguilera explains SuperBowl flub: ‘I took in the moment a little too much’ Posted: 26 Apr 2011 06:45 AM PDT
Anyway as part of her new gig Christina has to talk about the fact that she’s been too drunk on several occasions to remember the words to the National Anthem, to walk properly, or to remember where she lives. She’s previously called her very public issues with drunkenness “hiccups” and explained that she just went through “a really hard divorce.” In an appearance on the Ellen show today, Christina expands on that theme. She doesn’t say that there’s no excuse for forgetting the lyrics during the most important US sporting event of the year to a song that celebrates national pride, she doesn’t say she’s sorry and embarrassed, she just offers a bunch of excuses and justifications as is typical for her.
[From the Ellen Degeneres show, received via e-mail] It’s all about Christina and how she feels and how she’s been labeled and is recovering from that after screwing up. We’re all judging her (read this earlier interview, she said people were judging) for being overwhelmed with national pride (in the form of some Jack Daniels) when she was just trying to do her job that she gets paid seven figures for. Well now Christina has another job to laugh about if (when) she shows up too blitzed to do it properly. Also, would it kill her to cover up a little? She’s wearing lingerie in public again. Header photo credit: Michael Rozman/Warner Bros. Other photos are from 4/21/11 credit: WENN.com |
It’s as if someone is trying to make Lea Michele look like hell, right? Posted: 26 Apr 2011 06:19 AM PDT These are photos of some of the Glee girls (and Chris Colfer) filming in (SPOILER) New York on Monday. I see Diana Argon and Lea Michele, and I don't care about the other ones. Lea, as you may know from my informal Twitter polling, won our contest for "Who Would You Rather Smack?" question. It was between Lea and Kristen Stewart, and most of you wanted to smack Lea (I wanted to smack K-Stew). Note: I'm not advocating violence in any way, we were just having a theoretical discussion about the IDEA of which girl is more worthy of a smack, and it's not like any of us would ever do it. We just like to fantasize about it. For some of us, it's a fantasy that gets us through the day. Anyway, Lea won our little poll, and I'm guessing that these photos will add to her negative appeal. Lea is styled in what I'm guessing is an homage to Mary Tyler Moore? I have to give Lea some credit - she's able to "pull off" 1970s styles more than most actresses. Now, to negate that credit, she looks like hell. It's just a bad combination of bangs trauma and too-bright horizontal stripes and HER FACE. Which brings me to my next poll question: Do you think the crew of Glee hates Lea Michele too? The makeup people, the costume department, the producers, the camera guys, I feel like they're all conspiring to make Lea look like hell because they don't care for her either. Or because she’s actively alienated them. Do you think some people actually had to put some effort into making Lea look this bad, or do you think it just comes naturally to Lea? Discuss. Last thing: Chris Colfer. Feathers. No comment. |
Britney Spears’ tour bans drugs, alcohol, cookie dough & hot dogs Posted: 26 Apr 2011 06:17 AM PDT "Do y'all see that hot derg, or is it just me?" - Britney Spears Ever since Britney Spears' breakdown in 2007-08, whenever she tours or performs, it is widely believed that Team Britney makes all of her crew and backup dancers sign contracts that will ensure that there will be no drug or alcohol use around Britney. I was looking for the both the first reports of this and the last - apparently, it's been happening since December 2008 (according to our records) and as late as this month. Britney's dancers can't smoke crack or have a stiff drink while they're working with her. Good deal. A not so great deal? The Sun reports that Team Britney won't even allow junk food around Britney nowadays.
[From The Sun] Hahahahaha… Britney "protecting her voice." Um, chica doesn't SING in concert. From what I've heard, someone just puts on a CD and Britney just lip synchs and moves around a little bit during her concerts. That's it. As for the junk food… that's a bridge too far. True, most of the backup dancers probably eat healthy anyway, but if a dancer needs a hot dog, what is Team Britney going to do? Call the Hot Dog Police? Anyway… yes, Britney's backup dancer rules are way harsher than Taylor Swift's. Swifty also bans alcohol and drugs, and Team Swifty also does random drug and alcohol testing, and the refusal of testing will result in firing. But if you work with Swifty, at least you get hot dergs. And cuddlefests. Oh, and why didn't CHEETOS make the list of banned substances?!? |
Karl Lagerfeld’s new additions to his List of Hate: thongs, happiness & sugar Posted: 26 Apr 2011 06:17 AM PDT Today is going to be a good day. You know why? Because we have a new Karl Lagerfeld interview to read! Huzzah! The Kaiser's interviews are always priceless, full of little gems about fat, potato-chip-eating peasants and their sweatpants, and each interview brings new additions to The Kaiser's on-going List of Hate. In today's episode of "What in the world does Karl Lagerfeld hate this week?" we have: sugar, alcohol, haircuts, washing his own hair, making time for dentists, knowing too much about politicians, thongs and HAPPINESS. We actually have some things to add to The Kaiser's List of Love too: he enjoys the IDEA of milk, the smell of chocolate, the advertising world, and fax machines. I LOVE HIM.
[From W Magazine] I love him. He's wonderful. I mean, he's crazy and kind of senile (which explains Blake Lively), but he's also surprisingly funny, and I enjoyed the part where he was giving props to Tom Ford. I also love that he doesn't do his own hair. He's like a crotchety old lady. |
Ryan Phillippe’s rep does damage control: he’s not quitting acting Posted: 26 Apr 2011 06:08 AM PDT
[From Gossip Cop and Access Hollywood] So which was it, were Ryan’s comments taken out of context or did The Post make up those quotes? It’s not like they’re saying that Ryan didn’t talk to The Post. On our Ryan Phillippe story yesterday we had a lot of people defending the guy. Most of the comments came from just two people, one using multiple aliases, (which isn’t allowed, read the information in bold), and both of whom have histories of only commenting on Ryan and Reese’s stories. (You can see my comment on that story for more details.) Those same people also have made quite a few negative comments on stories about Reese. Ryan told Ellen Degeneres that his mom regularly reads the blogs and asks him why he has such a bad reputation. So I guess it’s not surprising that Ryan has some pretty staunch defenders on the blogs who are either superfans or related to him. Poor Ryan, he says and does things he regrets and then relies on other people to clarify what he really meant. He needs to give Ben Affleck a call and ask for some advice on how to make his next move. Ben’s scandal was minor too, but people really disliked the guy for a long time after the J.Lo fiasco. It took him a while to recover. Ryan is shown on 4/21/11 in NY and on 4/8/11 outside a club in London. Credit: WENN.com |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment