Cele|bitchy |
- Kim Kardashian’s Cosmo UK shoot: surprisingly pretty, or not so much?
- Ashley Judd’s memoir: repressed memories of childhood sexual abuse
- Miley Cyrus claims she was misquoted about her disrespect of YouTube stars
- Lindsay Lohan rumored for Sharon Tate role, part in the new ‘Superman’ too
- Gwyneth Paltrow is shocked to discover her peasant ancestry
- Reese Witherspoon’s wedding photos in People: tacky or romantic?
- Carrie Underwood, Brooklyn Decker & more fashion from the ACM Awards
- Hugh Hefner is marrying 24 year-old Crystal Harris without a prenup
- Nicole Kidman in python & fur L’Wren Scott: gorgeous or dominatrix lite?
- Dean McDermott’s ex wife Mary Jo Eustace publishes “Cougar” cookbook
Kim Kardashian’s Cosmo UK shoot: surprisingly pretty, or not so much? Posted: 04 Apr 2011 08:41 AM PDT Kim Kardashian is the cover girl for the May issue of Cosmo UK. Kim is a regular on the international editions of Cosmo, for whatever reason. Maybe her extraordinary Kat-Face is better appreciated internationally. These shots are courtesy of The Mail - I found a lot of photos from Kim's other appearances on other issues of Cosmo, but I think this one is a brand new photo shoot. I'm sorry if I'm wrong and this is an old one. I actually kind of like the shoot - Kim's not a very good model, and her own personal style is pretty trashy and tacky, and her Kat-face is out of control… but in this shoot, there are a few shots where she looks genuinely pretty. I'm a fan of the above photo, where she's wearing the white feathered bustier. Her face still looks jacked, but it's one of Kim's best "posed" photos. The Mail has some excerpts from Kim's interview too - she's just talking on and on and on about body image and stuff. It's kind of boring, but she talks to such excess about taking pride in her curves that I now think she's got issues with them.
[From The Daily Mail] Um, she fit into a size 4?!? No, Kim. I do not believe that. I think you're lying, and because you lie about your size, I therefore think all of your happy-talk about your curves is null and void. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure that Kim's waist is a "size 4". But there is absolutely no way that her ass or her boobs would ever fit into anything resembling a size 4. Cosmo UK photos courtesy of The Mail. |
Ashley Judd’s memoir: repressed memories of childhood sexual abuse Posted: 04 Apr 2011 08:37 AM PDT
[From The National Enquirer, print edition, April 11, 2011] That’s just awful. I’m not a firm believer in suppressed memories. From what I understand it is a real phenomenon though and there have been repressed memories that have been verified as true from details given by victims. There’s controversy over the topic due to the fact that some memory “retrieval” has been prompted or planted by therapists and has led to false accusations. Getting back to Ashley Judd, that’s really terrible all those things happened to her and maybe she hopes to help other victims. I question why she’s coming out with a memoir though. The last thing I saw her in was Tooth Fairy and that was the only movie she had out last year. Her career has pretty much stalled in the past few years, and if those diva stories are accurate we may know why. Ashley is shown on 9/20/10. Credit: WENN.com |
Miley Cyrus claims she was misquoted about her disrespect of YouTube stars Posted: 04 Apr 2011 08:16 AM PDT Last week, Miley Cyrus got on her soapbox and declared that "It should be harder to be an artist. You shouldn't just be able to put a song on YouTube and go out on tour." Miley was criticizing the Rebecca Blacks of the world, and although I kind of thought Miley had a point (it really should be harder to be an "artist"), Miley is not the right person to make that point, considering she got her start on The Mullet's coattails. If you want to read Miley's original comments, go here. I think they speak for themselves, but after Miley was criticized soundly for the interview, she quickly took it back. But it's not her fault! She was "misquoted."
[From E! News] So now we know. Miley isn't an oblivious bitch! Or she is oblivious as to how hypocritical she sounded, and she just decided to blame it on someone else. In other Miley news, there's now an unauthorized Miley sex doll with… ugh… "three achey love holes". Miley is pissed about it and she's making suing noises although the makers of the "Finally Miley" sex doll (which sold out in less than 48 hours) say that they haven't received a cease and desist letter YET. |
Lindsay Lohan rumored for Sharon Tate role, part in the new ‘Superman’ too Posted: 04 Apr 2011 07:36 AM PDT Given Lindsay Lohan's history of crack shenanigans, it seems utterly asinine that she would still be allowed to have a career. But over the past few days, it seems like there's been a spate of new rumors revolving around Linnocent auditioning for various roles. First, there was the rumor that she auditioned for the Lois Lane part in the new Superman reboot, which ended up going to Amy Adams. And now Radar is reporting that Linnocent is still up for a part in the film - perhaps as a villain? This is all according to Linnocent's crack friends, though. None of it is coming from legit studio sources, all of whom are probably horrified:
[From Radar] Yeah… she's not getting a part in Superman. I can just feel it. But I do wonder why the studio hasn't called Linnocent out on her crack lies yet - perhaps they're just waiting to see if it blows over. Or perhaps legit Hollywood is now pursuing a new strategy with Linnocent: first, let her crack hustle go on uninterrupted, getting more and more press, and then some studio spokesperson will come out and say something nasty about her, thus adding some good press to the story, because everybody hates Linnocent. Of course, there's another option too. One of Linnocent's johns is a producer on the film, and that's how she's auditioning. Ugh. There's also another casting rumor - apparently photographer Tyler Shields is going to "directing" a film about Charles Manson called Eyes of a Dreamer, and Shields wants Linnocent to play Sharon Tate, the actress who was married to Roman Polanski and murdered (while pregnant) by Manson's people. Shields and Linnocent have worked together before - he photographed her promotional images in costume as Linda Lovelace, and he also did a few other porny photo shoots with her. Like these: |
Gwyneth Paltrow is shocked to discover her peasant ancestry Posted: 04 Apr 2011 06:53 AM PDT As we talked about last Friday, Gwyneth Paltrow deigned to appear on Who Do You Think You Are?, that show about celebrities tracing their genealogy. The promos made it sound like Gwyneth's ancestors were all, obviously, better than all of our ancestors. Like, her ancestors were all Kabbalah holy men and scholars. Anyway, the full episode is online now, in case you missed it - go here to watch. Gwyneth's episode was a lot like all of the other episodes (sob!) - Gwyneth found out she had some cool ancestors, and some not-so-cool peasant ancestry. On her mother's side, she's descended from peasanty seamstresses who traveled from Barbados to America because they were being run out of town by the newly freed slaves. On her father's side, Gwyneth has some unfit mothers in the mix. What I kind of loved was that Gwyneth's styling changed with each new revelation - like, she had a costume change every few minutes, she styled her hair in all of these different ways, and the lighting on her was always beautiful. Having just recently seen the Steve Buscemi episode, I can tell you that not every celebrity gets that kind of styling and treatment. In other Goop news, her cookbook is coming out soon and there are still rumors going around that she's going to be launching some kind of Goop magazine. The latest news comes via Page Six:
[From Page Six] You know what is kind of stunning to me? That Goopy has positioned herself as a "foodie". Now everybody is saying it, and people don't even blink when she's referred to as a "foodie" in casual reporting. The bitch is always on a juice fast! And roasting a chicken does not make you a foodie! |
Reese Witherspoon’s wedding photos in People: tacky or romantic? Posted: 04 Apr 2011 06:52 AM PDT
[From People] There are more details of Reese’s semi-rustic kind of country-themed outdoor wedding in this earlier story. I’ll buy this issue tonight if I can find it in stores. I’m really looking forward to seeing Reese’s wedding photos, and I’m especially interested in the decor and feel of the reception. Still, I’m kind of shocked that she went this route. Maybe Jim convinced her to do it for her career. He does work for Creative Artists Agency after all. Reese’s dress is pretty and I love her simple hair and makeup, but why can’t we see her new husband at all? Also, why did she wear a blush gown? Is she so traditional that she feels she doesn’t deserve a white gown for her second wedding? I still really like Reese, but this People cover doesn’t seem like her to me, nor does the fact that she’s been hanging out with Chelsea Handler. Congratulations though, and she’s definitely pleasing a lot of fans. Reese is currently promoting Water For Elephants, out April 22, and this ties in nicely with that. Kaiser reminds me that Reese’s last movie bombed (remember How Do You Know? That was all she put out last year) and that could also be motivating her to go public with her wedding photos. Here’s Reese out shopping on 3/24. This was before she got married. Credit: WENN.com |
Carrie Underwood, Brooklyn Decker & more fashion from the ACM Awards Posted: 04 Apr 2011 06:22 AM PDT This is just another fashion post for the Academy of Country Music Awards - I already covered the two biggest "names" at the show, Nicole Kidman and Taylor Swift. I wasn't going to do detailed coverage on some of the "lesser" country acts, just because I'm not a country music person and I don't pay attention to it, but as I was looking through the photos, I was overcome by how badly these women dress. Maybe that's the wrong word though - I've always felt that country music fashion is way more prom-y and "Southern" obviously. Big hair is acceptable and necessary. Glittery, sequined, beaded pastels are in vogue, forever and always. So… by those standards, how did these ladies do? Above, we have Carrie Underwood in a lovely jewel-toned alice + Olivia dress. I like the color on her quite a bit, but all of the glittery stuff at the waist makes the whole thing look cheap. And I would have liked to see her do something different with her hair. Next: Julianne Hough in this orange monstrosity. I think she was trying to match it to her skin? Brooklyn Decker's boobs were there for some reason. I actually like the Victoria Beckham dress - I appreciate minimalism and a sleek sheath on a young woman. That being said, she needed to go up one size and have it tailored to her body, because this is too tight in the bust. I can make out every detail of her bust. Also: I'm disliking the haircut, but it will look cute when it grows out a little. Jennifer Nettles in this sleek black number. I'm including Jennifer because I LOVE her. I think she's adorable and so, so pretty. This is an interesting choice for her, and I like that she wore something rather sleek to a country music show. Sara Evans. She looks like she works at a fancy Ho-Jos. I like the idea of Miranda Lambert's gown much more than the execution. Her boobs look great, the hair is cute, and white is a nice color for her (although she looks very bridal). I think my problem is with the metallic waist/belt thing - it makes her look "thicker" than she really is. Martina McBride had a similar problem with her waist/belt too. I don't like this gown on her at all, though. |
Hugh Hefner is marrying 24 year-old Crystal Harris without a prenup Posted: 04 Apr 2011 05:58 AM PDT
So it looks like Hugh and Crystal are moving forward with their wedding, which is scheduled to take place on June 18 at the Playboy Mansion. The ceremony will be held in the grotto area in front of the waterfall and the reception will have a “silver and white” theme. Preparations are underway, but they don’t involve a prenup, according to TMZ. You would think that would be a given when the groom is a millionaire 60 years older than the bride.
[From TMZ] This guy has sons that are 19 and 20. They should sit their dad down and have a little talk with him about protecting his assets. At 84, Hef could conceivably live another 15 years but that’s a best case scenario. He’s about to leave the bulk of his estate to the last golddigger he hooked up with in a very long line of interchangeable surgically enhanced bottle blondes. Crystal was there at the right time and she seized her moment. She’ll win the marriage lottery soon and she knows it. Maybe she thinks she’s earning it. (I would say “on her back” but you know that’s not specifically the case here.) |
Nicole Kidman in python & fur L’Wren Scott: gorgeous or dominatrix lite? Posted: 04 Apr 2011 05:51 AM PDT Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban were also at the Academy of Country Music Awards last night, although I don't think Keith took anything home…? No, he didn't. He was up for two awards but he didn't win. Well, at least he and Nic had an excuse to be there. Nicole wore her biggest high heels (Manolo Blahnik) and this fascinating L'Wren Scott dress. I would have loved to have seen this on Taylor Swift… right? Swifty would have looked really cute in it! But on Nicole… I don't know. The combination of the "python" (I think that's real python too) and fur detailing…it reads like "dominatrix lite" to me. I will say this, however: I prefer Nicole in this kind of gear than what she wore throughout the awards season, which amounted to a series of ill-fitting, too-frilly gowns. Remember that fug Christian Dior? Yeah. This is much better. But here's a question: what's going on with the fit of L'Wren dresses these days? Penelope Cruz's L'Wren dress seemed to be oddly tailored too. Oh, and people are still talking about Nicole's frozen face. The Mail has an interesting piece (plus photos!) here. I don't know about her Botox (well, I do), but her lips are seriously out of control. This is what I could find: |
Dean McDermott’s ex wife Mary Jo Eustace publishes “Cougar” cookbook Posted: 04 Apr 2011 05:45 AM PDT
[From Fox News] Look, I get the urge to date younger guys after a divorce. More of them are single without ex wives, kids and the baggage that comes along with age. They’re probably more willing to please and less set in their ways. Good for Eustace for getting hers and moving on. For the love of God, though, why is she calling the guys she dates “cubs” and talking about introducing them to new flavors and “adult food” as if they’re toddlers? It’s creepy and it sounds like she’s talking about a son, not a boyfriend. To be fair, the book jacket says that Eustace was approached by the CougarLife ceo about cooking for her cub, so maybe she’s just on board for this idea and it wasn’t something she came up with on her own. The CougarLife lady probably has to cook for her “cubs” at home because it’s embarrassing to take them out. You have the “he looks like your son” comments, along with the sticky issue of who is going to pay for dinner when your date is scraping by and you’ve got a lucrative career. May as well make some coffee flavored lobster and have sex at your place, that way you won’t have to face the reality that your boyfriend is living with roommates in an apartment that needs fumigation. I remember the guys I dated in college and I remember scrubbing some nasty tubs before I was able to take a shower. Some of those guys were really hot, looking back, but life at that time was much less convenient on so many levels. I guess it seems inevitable that someone has put out a “Cougar” cookbook, because a lot of those young dudes can’t cook anything other than Ramen and it’s not like they can pick up the check on a night out. Ultimately it’s a marketing gimmick, just like the famous women that Eustace uses to name each recipe. *Note: dating site spammers are the scourge of bloggers. I checked and no spammers from cougarlife have bothered us or I would not have reported this. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment