| Taylor Swift is too “classy” to allow her backup dancers to drink Posted: 14 Apr 2011 09:00 AM PDT 
Just thinking about Taylor Swifty's incessant cuddlefesting and ponies and sparkles and 12-year-old drama is enough to make me reach for a bottle of liquor. Can you imagine what it would be like to be around her 24-7? I would need a crack pipe, some blow and a baker's dozen bottles of cheap vodka. Well, the people who are actually around Swifty 24-7 are a lot stronger than me. According to Life & Style's Scene Queens, Swifty demands that all of her backup dancers on tour not only be drug-free, but alcohol-free too. Honestly, I don't mind the idea of drug testing, but NO DRINKING?!? WTF? Taylor Swift's squeaky-clean image is not an act. How do we know? Because she's even insistent that her backup dancers behave as well as she does! At an audition for dancers in LA on March 30, Life & Style's Scene Queens heard that hopefuls were told that Taylor's Speak Now tour will be strictly sober and that everyone will have to submit to random drug-and-alcohol testing while on the tour. "All the dancers auditioning looked clean-cut and girlie," a spy tells the Scene Queens. "Everyone wanted to fit the role of Taylor's good-girl image perfectly to get the job." Unlike some of her pop star peers, Taylor's very careful to project the epitome of class. "The second you put out a song and somebody likes it, you become a role model," she's said. "That's just how it happens, so I've always been really mindful of that." We won't be holding our breath for Taylor to trash hotel suites any time soon.
[From Life & Style] Now imagine Miss Goody Two-Shoes being pissed on by John Mayer. Look, if her deal was really and truly all ponies and sparkles and cuddlefests, all the time, across all walks of life, maybe I would see the point of all this. But Swifty just wants things to "look" classy, not actually BE classy. She's fine with sneaking off and getting laid, douche-style, by John Mayer, but she's not okay with her backup dancers going out and having a drink after the show? Not everybody is as obsessed with coffee as you, Swifty! Sidenote: I've been doing really well with not drinking lately, but I'm totally going to have a glass of wine tonight while watching Bones - I'm already looking forward to it! The past few months, I've been trying to get healthier because I was tired of my flab and I was tired of walking up hungover and wretched. And I have been feeling a lot better lately! I also switched from vodka cocktails to wine when I do drink. My point? It's MY choice, SWIFTY. And I don't think having a glass of wine a couple of times a week makes me any less "classy" than Taylor “The Mayer Douche Nailed Me And Dumped Me And I Wrote A Song About It” Swift. 
Photos courtesy of Fame & WENN.
    |
| Demi Lovato on why she went to rehab: “I had a nervous breakdown” Posted: 14 Apr 2011 08:37 AM PDT 
Disney star Demi Lovato, 18, got out of three months of rehab in early February, having been sent there by her people after she punched a backup dancer in the face while on tour with the Jonas Brothers. Demi was definitely out of control when she got sent for treatment, she was physically abusive and was said to be doing drugs, but her people spun it like she was getting treatment for emotional issues that came to a head with that one incident. Other stories came out about her struggles with bulimia and with cutting, and now Demi is ready to talk about what she went through. She has an upcoming interview with Robin Roberts, her first since rehab, to air on 20/20 Friday and she also has another interview with Seventeen. She’s been appointed as the spokesperson for Seventeen’s “Pressure to Be Perfect” campaign, and will give advice to teens in a twice monthly column on their website.
In Seventeen, Demi describes what happened to her as a “nervous breakdown” and tells them that she’s still struggling with bulimia: On her nervous breakout
"I basically had a nervous breakdown. I was really bad off. My parents and my manager pulled me aside and said, 'You need to get some help.' It was an intervention. I wanted freedom from the inner demons. I wanted to start my life over." SL: Have there been times recently when you feel like it could be so tempting to go back to your old dangerous habits, like eating disorders?
DL: Yes, there have been times when I definitely have been tempted to get rid of my dinner. But I will deal with it for the rest of my life because it’s a life-long disease. I don’t think there’s going to be a day when I don’t think about food or my body, but I’m living with it, and I wish I could tell young girls to find their safe place and stay with it. 17: How do you keep yourself in a safe place?
DL: I don’t let anyone’s insecurities, emotions, or opinions bother me. I know that if I am happy, that’s all that matters to me. And it’s okay to be selfish like that sometimes, when it comes to your well-being. Do what makes you happy, and don’t care what others think. 17: How do you define your personality now that you’re out of treatment?
DL: I don’t really define it by anything. I live my life every day, and if I feel like wearing combat boots one day and shoes the next, I will. I allow myself a lot of freedom and I’m very peaceful now. I have come to realize that just making yourself happy is most important. Never be ashamed of what you feel. You have the right to feel any emotion that you want, and to do what makes you happy. That’s my life motto.
[From Seventeen Magazine, with more in the May issue] She’s been working for Disney since she was 15 and was acting at the age of 7. That’s a huge amount of pressure and can’t be easy to cope with. I give this girl a lot of credit for taking her rehab seriously and for coming out the other side of it. She also didn’t talk to the press right away and waited until she had a couple of months to adjust to life before doing interviews. (She did do a
video thanking her fans last month.) However we last heard that she was dating Wilmer Valderrama and that doesn’t bode well for her sobriety or her self esteem. You have to have a pretty low opinion of yourself to get with that guy. Photo below is from 8/18/10. Credit: Fame. Header photo credit: Seventeen 
 |
| Drew Barrymore goes dramatically red: better or worse? Posted: 14 Apr 2011 08:14 AM PDT 
These are some new photos of Drew Barrymore debuting her new hair color last night at a book launch for Kimberly Snyder's The Beauty Detox Solution. Drew has been "rocking" a half-and-half look for the better part of year, I suspect to grow out some over-processed blonde color. Whatever her reason, the old style (below) did not look great: 
But now Drew is a redhead! A bottle ginger. I think it looks good on her, and Drew's coloring can definitely handle red hair. My only complaint is that it looks like a rather cheap dye job - and it also looks like she's a budget Florence Welch. But whatever… it's still better than the old half-and-half. 
Fergie was also at the book launch, and it seems like she was trying to cover up her alleged recent eye work with some overzealous cat-eyes. In the end, it was too much makeup and her face still looks super-jacked. So much so that I was considering doing a post called "Fergie versus Courteney Cox: Which jacked face is worse?" 
Photos courtesy of WENN.
      |
| Jennifer Lawrence gets tarted up for GQ: pretty & pink or scorched & tacky? Posted: 14 Apr 2011 07:50 AM PDT 
You guys seemed to enjoy my Jennifer Lawrence post the other day, so here's another one! On Monday, we saw Jennifer's super-sweet Teen Vogue pictorial, which involved lots of cutesy styling and a hawk/falcon (I can't tell them apart, I apologize). I complained about the "lack of focus" in the photo shoot, but at least I have to give Teen Vogue some retrospective credit for not tarting up such a young woman (she's 20). GQ's pictorial (here at GQ, but these are two photos from the shoot) has focus: sun-burned, soft-core porno. You're better than this, Jennifer! But still, I appreciate that she's got some movies to promote, and God bless it. At least she's not underage. And she's in that Mel Gibson movie, The Beaver. It's like "Maybe my tittays will make you forget The Crazy… you are being hypnotized… you will see The Beaver…" Unless you were among the tens of hundreds of people who saw Winter’s Bone, last year’s acclaimed indie thriller about the Ozark meth trade, or the tens of tens of people who saw an episode of The Bill Engvall Show, the unacclaimed TBS sitcom that was canceled in 2009, your grand introduction to Jennifer Lawrence was probably Oscar night back in February. If the name doesn’t ring any bells, you’ll remember the dress: arrest-me red. Four-alarm-fire red. I’m-20-I’m-hot-and-I’m-already-nominated-for-a-goddamn-Oscar red. Lawrence didn’t win that night, but let’s just say we couldn’t tell you what Natalie Portman wore. In June’s X-Men: First Class, the franchise reboot-slash-origin story set in the 1960s, Lawrence’s color palette shifts to electric blue. She plays the budding mutant Mystique, a fleshy role that was first inhabited on-screen by Rebecca Romijn—which means the series is graduating from an actress with a body for the part to one who can actually play it. Englishman Matthew Vaughn directs, and he didn’t need to see Winter’s Bone for proof that Lawrence was right for the role. (He still hasn’t seen it.) For Vaughn, she was just a no-name girl from Kentucky who popped on her X-Men audition tape. “There are a lot of young American actors right now who haven’t got any technique,” says Vaughn. “And to be blunt, a lot of these kids assume that just by having a good set of teeth and tits, smiling for the camera’s gonna be enough. I needed someone who could act.” Whatever he saw, it’s contagious. Jodie Foster cast Lawrence in this month’s dark comedy The Beaver, now better known as the movie Mel Gibson finished just before he Mel Gibson’d again. And Lawrence just locked up the most coveted young-actress role in Hollywood: the lead in The Hunger Games, based on the dystopic best seller about a teen huntress forced to compete in an annual contest where kids battle to the death. Lawrence is quickly cornering the market on steely chicks with molten cores, and Vaughn says it’s because “she’s got a set of balls on her.” Teeth, tits, technique—and testicles, too? Let’s get back to that dress.
[From GQ] Wow, that's interesting that Matthew Vaughn hired her without seeing Winter's Bone. I figured that when you land a part like that in Hollywood, it becomes your calling card that gets more work. Of course, he probably really hired Jennifer because she looks like a young Rebecca Romijn. Last thing: WHY WHY WHY is no one telling any good Michael Fassbender stories from the set of X-Men: First Class?!? I need a dose of Fassbender, for the love of God. 
Photos courtesy of GQ.
   |
| Hugh Grant bugged a paparazzo talking about how NOTW bugged celebrities Posted: 14 Apr 2011 07:45 AM PDT 
It’s safe to say that Hugh Grant has some issues with the paparazzi. In just the past few years, he’s hauled off and thumped one over the head with a tub of baked beans as well as kicking a photog in the crotch seemingly just for giggles. To be utterly fair, Grant’s got a pretty understandable reason to dislike the tabloids and their paps, for he was one of the thousands of public figures targeted within the huge wiretapping scandal involving the Rupert Murdoch-owned News of the World and The Sun. That particular scandal went down a couple of years ago, and it’s such a huge mess that we’ll probably not see the end of it for quite some time.
Hugh’s story picks up a few months ago when he was merrily driving along in his Ferrari (he calls it “my midlife crisis car”) and broke down on the side of the road. Shortly thereafter, a bloke stopped to help him but then pulled out a long-lens camera and commenced snapping away. At some point, Hugh realizes that this guy is Paul McMullan, a former News of the World pap and one of the key whistleblowers in the aforementioned wiretapping scandal. McMullan now bides his time running a pub, but that certainly didn’t stop him from selling the photos and story about finding a broken-down Hugh to the Daily Mail. Hugh then later contacted McMullan and, unbeknownst to the former pap, recorded their conversation, which is now published in New Statesmen for all to see. Amongst many other revelations recorded by Hugh, McMullan actually thanks Hugh for breaking down on the side of the road and helping him make £3000 for the story, and also for being “a very good earner” for him in the past. McMullan goes on to claim that, in the past, Daily Mail was also just as bad about tapping cell phones as the two tabloids that got popped in the wiretapping scandal. He also bemoans the fact that the days of analogue mobiles have since passed, for that was a time when it was incredibly easy to use a cheap scanner and record the full phone conversations of Princess Di, Prince Charles, and the like. The entire article details a rather riveting discussion, which is well worth reading in full, but here are some relevant excerpts pertaining to McMullan’s former employ under NOTW: Grant: Murdoch, yes . . .
McMullan: So I was sent to do a feature on Moulin Rouge! at Cannes, which was a great send anyway. Basically my brief was to see who Nicole Kidman was shagging - what she was doing, poking through her bins and get some stuff on her. So Murdoch’s paying her five million quid to big up the French and at the same time paying me £5.50 to f*ck her up . . . So all hail the master. We’re just pawns in his game. How perverse is that? Grant: I suppose the fact that they’re dragging their feet while investigating a mass of phone-hacking - which is a crime - some people would think is a bit depressing about the police.
McMullan: But then - should it be a crime? I mean, scanning never used to be a crime. Why should it be? You’re transmitting your thoughts and your voice over the airwaves. How can you not expect someone to just stick up an aerial and listen in?
Grant: I’d rather no one listened in, to be honest. And I might not be alone there. You probably wouldn’t want people listening to your conversations.
McMullan: I’m not interesting enough for anyone to want to listen in.
Grant: But celebrities you would justify because they’re rich?
McMullan: Yeah. I mean, if you don’t like it, you’ve just got to get off the stage. It’ll do wonders.
Grant: So I should have given up acting?
McMullan: If you live off your image, you can’t really complain about someone . . .
Grant: I live off my acting. Which is different to living off your image.
Him Yeah, but you’re still presenting yourself to the public. And if the public didn’t know you . . .
Grant: They don’t give a sh*t. I got arrested with a hooker and they still came to my films. They don’t give a f*ck about your public image. They just care about whether you’re in an entertaining film or not.
McMullan: That’s true . . . I have terrible difficulty with him [points to pap shot of Johnny Depp]. He’s really difficult. You know, I was in Venice and he was a nightmare to do because he walks around looking like Michael Jackson. And the punchline was . . . after leading everyone a merry dance the film was shot on an open balcony - I mean, it was like - he was standing there in public.
Grant: And you don’t see the difference between the two situations?
McMullan: You can’t hide all the time.
Grant: So you’re saying, if you’re Johnny Depp or me, you don’t deserve to have a private life?
McMullan: You make so much more money. You know, most people in Dover take home about £200 and struggle.
[From New Statesman] All of these admissions essentially speak for themselves, and the paparazzo comes off looking like a huge douche. Of course celebrities (especially those like Johnny Depp, who would never sell wedding photos to a tabloid) don’t deserve to have their private conversations targeted by hackers. The argument always exists whether people who purposely seek out fame even deserve privacy, and to a degree, they necessarily give some of it up by not being able to walk down a street without having their photograph taken. And of course, they shouldn’t be stupid enough in this day and age to put nude photos on their cell phones, but they don’t deserve to be hacked. Photos are from September and December, 2010 and March, 2011. Credit: WENN.com 
 |
| OK! Mag: Robert Pattinson bought Kristen Stewart a $17k diamond ‘promise ring’ Posted: 14 Apr 2011 07:23 AM PDT 
This story is in OK! Magazine, which regularly runs fan fiction stories on Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart. At least they’re not putting them on their cover anymore now that they seem to have struck a deal with the Teen Mom people. Their latest probably BS story involves Rob buying Kristen a $17,000 diamond “promise ring” that they claim doesn’t look like an engagement ring, but it sure does in the example picture I’ve seen. OK! really misses the boat on Kristen’s birthday celebration too. They have some blurry faraway photos of the bar where they partied and show a blurry picture of them talking with the claim that they “shared a brief kiss.” There’s no mention of the dirt biking or the actual non-romantic gift that Sparkles gave lip-biter.
Talk about surprises! Rob Pattinson has picked out the perfect gift for his love, Kristen Stewart. According to a Twilight insider, Rob, 24, has bought a diamond “promise ring” for his 21-year-old co-star girlfriend, and he’s just waiting for the right moment to give it to her. The friend of the couple reveals that Rob has been showing off the vintage ring, which was made in the 1800s. “The ring is rose-cut diamonds set in rose gold,” the friend says. “It’s a very feminine piece of jewelry and very old.” “The diamonds aren’t huge, and it doesn’t look like an engagement ring,” the insider continues, adding that Rob, who spent about $17,000 on the ring, “found it through a dealer who specializes in estate jewelry, and he knew it was just perfect for Kristen.” The rock is coming without a proposal - but not because Rob wants it to. “Rob is more mature than Kristen, and he’s ready to settle down,” the insider says. But the actor realizes that though Kristen… loves him deeply, she’s not prepared to be Mrs. P. just yet. “Rob would marry Kristen, but he knows she’s not ready, so he’s taking baby steps,” the friend adds. “That’s why he bought the promise ring.”
[From OK! Magazine, print edition, April 25, 2011] This never happened. Rob knows Kristen’s style and it’s dirt bikes, cigarettes and dive bars, not antique diamond rings. That’s what the Twihards want, so OK! is giving it to them as they’ve done for the past two years. Still, isn’t this the picture you get of these two as a couple? Rob secretly buys expensive jewelry and holds on to it, knowing the Kristen won’t care a whit about it and will probably find it creepy. So he buys her a dirt bike for her birthday instead, nervously fingering a velvet jewelry box in his pants pocket as he stares longingly at her, knowing he’ll never get the nerve to give it to her. 
Photo below via Hollywood Life. Ring photo from OK! Other photos from the set of Breaking Dawn and are from 11/7/10. Credit: WENN.com 
 |
| Catherine Zeta-Jones’ bipolar disorder treatment is related to Gerard Butler Posted: 14 Apr 2011 07:19 AM PDT 
Yesterday, many of us were stunned at the news that Catherine Zeta Jones is bipolar, and that she was being treated for the disorder at a mental health clinic. I said yesterday that I hadn't heard a whiff of anything regarding Zeta, but some of you reminded me that I had, in fact, heard a few stories. Nothing too bad, and nothing that I didn't explain away at the time as simple "Oh, she's on vacation" or "She must be tired." But yes, over the past year, we've had lots of photos of Catherine chain-smoking and looking pretty drunk and out-of-it, and yes, looking back on some of the stories of her being "tired" and "out of it" were probably bipolar-related. Anyway, People Magazine - who broke the story - has another article up about Zeta and Michael: Walking the red carpet at New York City’s Museum of Modern Art this week, Michael Douglas was feeling grateful for all the well wishes he’d received from friends and fans as he battled cancer. “I feel great!” the actor, 66, told PEOPLE at Tuesday night’s event to celebrate Carnegie Hall's 120th anniversary. “I feel a tremendous amount of support from so many people.” Absent from the event was his biggest supporter: wife Catherine Zeta-Jones. Hours later, it was revealed that she has quietly sought healing of her own. Her rep says the actress recently checked into a facility for a few days to treat her bipolar II disorder. The revelation was surprising to many, not least because the Oscar-winning actress and mom-of-two stayed steadfastly positive in public while sticking by Douglas’s side through a grueling six-month battle with cancer. But behind the scenes, those close to the actress say she felt the strain. Her rep acknowledged the timing of Zeta-Jones, 41, seeking treatment was in part connected to “the stress of the past year.” Adds a friend, “Catherine has had to deal with Michael’s illness, and that’s been hard.” A Famous Example In sharing her experience, the actress put a very public face on a mental illness experienced by millions. The key indicator of bipolar II, experts say, is a cycle of high and low moods, often with episodes of depression. Zeta-Jones herself has described her bouts with melancholy, telling The Sunday Times in the U.K. that “I’m lucky. … But that’s not to say I don’t get down on myself. I try and stay positive, being negative isn’t good for my personality. I don’t just bring myself down, I bring everyone around me down. It’s like a dark cloud, ‘Uh oh, here we go’, and I have to snap out of it.” Dr. David Miklowitz, professor of psychiatry at UCLA School of Medicine, says stress “definitely can play a role” in triggering depression or what doctors call hypomania, short periods of mild manias. "Certain life events, changes, particularly those that affect the sleep cycle, can trigger symptoms,” says Miklowitz. “An event like a loss experience or family conflict can be a cause or a trigger of bipolar episodes.” Carrie Fisher Another celebrity knows the feeling. Carrie Fisher, who has laid bare own battles with weight, drugs and alcohol, and also revealed that several years ago she was diagnosed with bipolar II, has described the challenges of the mood swings that come with it. “A manic phase is not predictable,” Fisher has said, according to USA Today. “The last time, I hacked off my hair, got a tattoo, and wanted to convert to Judaism.” Perhaps most important, though, is that sufferers can – and many do – manage the disorder effectively, many times with various medications. Now that she’s checked out of treatment, Zeta-Jones can get back to her everyday life – being an actress. She has two new movies coming up, including Playing the Field, currently in production in Louisiana with Gerard Butler and Jessica Biel, and Lay the Favorite. Adds the friend, Zeta-Jones’s decision to seek treatment was a positive step that will allow her to perform at the best of her ability. “She went in for a few days because she’s about to start working, and to make sure she’s in top form,” says the friend, “which she is.”
[From People] Um… Catherine Zeta-Jones is in Playing the Field? With Gerard Butler?!? I'm calling it: Gerard Butler instigated this current breakdown, probably after he and Zeta had some kind of torrid one night stand. My theory is solid. (Except I don’t think they’ve worked together yet, but nevermind!) A note about the photos on this post and yesterday's: I swear to God, I'm not trying to be mean, I'm just using some of the most recent photos we have of Catherine. Her eyes take on a different meaning in retrospect. 
Photos courtesy of WENN.
    |
| Is Kate Bosworth showing off her bones and her sunburn? Posted: 14 Apr 2011 06:48 AM PDT 
First things first: how friggin' often does Kate Bosworth go to the salon? Every photo op of The Bos lately is of her entering or exiting a beauty salon, sometimes with a fancy book to let us know that SHE READS. Anyway, even though The Bos is so immensely private and important and in demand that she would never, ever need to famewhore herself, she somehow got pap'd yesterday going into and coming out of a salon yesterday. These are the photos - she looks like a carrot. Like, I would think she was overdoing the fake-bake if I didn't know better. But I do know better - she's not fake-tanning, at least not right now. That is just how she looks when she's tan/sunburned. The Bos was recently vacationing (without Alexander Skarsgard) in Mexico, and she made sure the paparazzi got photos of her swimming and sunbathing topless - see the photos here. The photos are so posed I'm surprised The Bos didn't bust something. OOooh… I have a new theory, now that I’ve studied the photos. The photos without the sunglasses are of The Bos entering the salon, and she looks like she’s a normal color. Then, in the sunglasses photos, she looks orange. It’s before-and-after the fake-bake. She wants to keep her vacation “tan” - too bad she looks orange. Anyway… it's interesting that she had a little paparazzi-friendly getaway without Alex, right? Maybe there really is trouble in bony famewhore paradise. 
Photos courtesy of Fame and WENN.
       |
| Is Waity Katie already knocked up? Shotgun royal wedding! Posted: 14 Apr 2011 06:15 AM PDT 
Do you really think Waity Katie is going to get knocked up before the wedding? FOR REAL? I mean, I get it. We all want to cover royal wedding stuff, but Star Magazine should have just played it safe and ran with my story about how Kate Middleton might be wearing her hair for the wedding. This is actually the second time Star Magazine has run a big "WAITY IS PREGGO!" cover story - the first time was last June, when Waity was truly Waity, and when it looked like she might have to pull ye olde "I'm pregnant, now you have to marry me" strategy. But given that she's got the ring, and her face is on all of the commemorative junk, I think Kate knows she's got this one in the bag, and she can get pregnant at her leisure once everything is official. Still, it makes for a decent story (via Jezebel), especially considering that everybody is talking about how she's not a virgin (pregnant hussy!!!): Star - Kate Middleton is “bursting with the secret knowledge that she could soon be a mom.” See, she might already be pregnant! Maybe! Perhaps! Royal insider Christopher Wilson reveals: “She and Prince William aren’t waiting until after the wedding. There’s huge pressure on them to produce an heir to the throne. And they’ve taken so long to get started. Around the palace, people are saying she could already be pregnant.” Adds another source: “Finally, it’s baby time!” Yet another source claims: “They don’t want to be old parents.” Plus: “Kate had originally been nervous about having morning sickness on the wedding day, but in the end, she decided not to put it off, to just leave it up to fate.” In other words: THEY ARE HAVING UNPROTECTED SEX. Wills and Kate would love to have a girl and are even talking about naming her after Diana. And! The mag also printed this sentence: “The queen is willing to turn a blind eye to a wedding-day baby bump, since she can’t wait to be a great grandmother.” The “royal wedding scandal” page has details about Prince William’s bachelor party, aka “stag do” — the setting was a former monastery by the sea, there was surfing, “several bottles of expensive port” and drinking games. The boys forced William to wear a toupee and chest wig, and then brought out a bunch of blow-up dolls. Port? Wigs? Scandalous indeed! As for Kate’s “hen party,” there was champagne and “a lot of girl gossiping,” as well as charades. “Kate loves just talking with her friends about her daily lives,” says a source. Kate’s sister Pippa was seen having a fitting at Alice Temperley, so some speculate that Kate’s dress might be Temperley. Also, There’s a $40 million prenup that Kate has signed, and Harry and Chelsy have made a “secret pact” that they will get married in two years.
[From Star Magazine via Jezebel] In Touch Weekly (via Jezebel) also has a Middleton-womb story, only theirs is just about how Kate wants to get pregnant right after the wedding because Kate has her head in the game and she knows that “At the end of the day, the most important thing for the future queen of England to do, is to produce a royal heir to the throne.” They also claim to have the inside track on baby names: for a boy, Edward, Andrew or Phillip, and if it’s a girl, Alice or Rose. 
Photos courtesy of WENN.
     |
| Heidi Klum’s tan belted loose jumpsuit: cute or fug? Posted: 14 Apr 2011 05:54 AM PDT 
I love Heidi Klum, and I love seeing her all over the place. Her fashion sense is whack though and she often fails miserably when it comes to dressing for events, especially awards shows. So her latest outfit, a loose tan backless jumpsuit almost cut to her navel, isn’t so much a fashion fail in my opinion as a curious choice. With Heidi, everything is relative. Plus, even considering the weird fringed scarf thing at the back, this is not the worst onesie that Heidi has worn by a longshot. It shows off her hot body without looking try hard. I also love her hair now, which she’s either grown out from that awful mom style or is using tasteful extensions with. She’s a gorgeous woman.
Heidi wore this getup to the 16th annual Los Angeles antiques show and I can image that plenty of people were dropping their bidding cards trying to get a glimpse of her cleavage. A tasteful suit would have been more appropriate, but Heidi usually gets a pass for bringing the sexy in a weird package. Plus, look what Lisa Kudrow and Kathy Hilton wore.
Also in attendance were Billy Corgan in an Elmer Fudd hat with the Veronicas, Grey’s Justin Chambers with his wife (I was thinking there was a scandal with him, but it was only a sleep disorder), and Lionel Richie. That dude is 61 years old! Does he ever age? He probably wears those glasses to hide all the work he’s had done. 
 |
No comments:
Post a Comment