Cele|bitchy |
- Leo DiCaprio & Blake Lively made a sexy, late-night trip to Disneyland
- Naomie Harris is reportedly James Bond’s latest Bond Girl of color
- The Duggars promote their second book, would love more children
- Chloe Sevigny in her own leather & frilly design: hilarious or just tragic?
- Did Kristen Stewart fly into a lip-biting rage at Robert Pattinson?
- Matt Damon got the hotness back and then some
- Sarah Ferguson is a pathological liar, blames her crazy on her parents
- Hide yo’ wigs! Angelina Jolie will be coming back for ‘Salt 2′
- Jennifer Aniston’s new boyfriend has a girlfriend, does anyone care?
- Kirsten Dunst, drunk-faced in a Patrik Ervell tux: cute or fug?
Leo DiCaprio & Blake Lively made a sexy, late-night trip to Disneyland Posted: 07 Jun 2011 08:42 AM PDT Here's how everything went down last week: first, the initial batch of nude photos of "Blake Lively" came out. Blake's rep denied that Blake was in the photos. Then the second batch of photos came out, and her rep still stuck to the same denial, only this time the denial barely got any coverage because people have eyes. Then, Blake is pap'd on a boat with Leonardo DiCaprio in Venice. She looks worried and pensive… yet breezy. You can see the photos here. That was Blake's real response to the photo scandal - "Yeah, you've seen my boobs, but I still landed Mr. Hollywood. JELLUS?" Next up: Blake makes an appearance at the MTV Movie Awards. She didn't back out, which I give her credit for, and she stood tall even though she became the butt of some jokes and some bitchiness from Reese Witherspoon. Personally (and I know many of you don't agree with me), I though Reese looked like a bitchy, hypocritical prude while Blake earned some sympathy from me. But that's just me - I admire her hustle, and I think Blake's nude photos will end up helping her career.
[From Us Weekly] Here's my question: why is Blake so different from the other girls Leo has dated in the past? I seriously don't remember Leo EVER being down with having this kind of relationship, out in public with sometimes daily updates. My best guess is that Blake is simply incredibly good in bed. Like… maybe she does stuff the other girls won’t do? That's what I always think about pretty girls with hustle who manage to land guys out of their league. Is that a gross, misogynistic thought? Or was everyone else thinking it too? |
Naomie Harris is reportedly James Bond’s latest Bond Girl of color Posted: 07 Jun 2011 08:38 AM PDT Whenever the latest round of rumours for Bond 23 start up again, it’s sure to be a wild ride into the depths of casting and storyline speculation. Still, shooting is scheduled to start this fall, so MGM is bound to narrow down their choices in the near future. Naturally, Daniel Craig will return as 007, but the identity of the Bond Girl is still technically up for grabs. An offer for that very role has reportedly gone out to none other than exotic beauty Naomie Harris, who is known for her captivating performances in movies like 28 Days Later (in which she kicked some zombie a**), two of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies (in which she charmed the audience as well as her fellow cast members, including Orlando Bloom), and Street Kings (in which she had only a minor role but held her own against the boys). Now, will Naomie accept a role alongside James Bond? One can only hope:
[From Screenrant] Quite simply put, Naomie is a devastatingly gorgeous woman with a great deal of onscreen charisma, and she’d be an asset to Bond either as an actual Bond Girl or as a villain. Either way, Kaiser is hoping that Naomie ends up in bed with Daniel Craig. Can you imagine the two of them rolling around in tangled bedsheets? Or maybe Javier Bardem’s rumored involvement will come to fruition, and she can wrestle both of them (even at the same time). Whew. Photos courtesy of Fame Pictures and WENN |
The Duggars promote their second book, would love more children Posted: 07 Jun 2011 08:37 AM PDT
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy The prolific Duggar family and 18 of their 19 kids were on The Today Show this morning to promote their latest book, A Love That Multiplies. I just caught their interview with Kathy Lee and Hoda when I switched on the TV. NBC didn’t put that one online yet, but they do have another interview that the family did earlier with Matt and Meredith. (that video is above.) Some of the other times we’ve seen the Duggars on The Today Show they’ve been announcing one of mom Michelle’s many pregnancies. She’s made it clear that she will keep trying as long as she can, and repeated that this morning. To Kathie Lee and Hoda, Michelle said “We would love more, they’re precious gifts,” and added that this was the longest time she’s gone between pregnancies. Michelle, 44, had her 19th baby prematurely in December, 2009. Little Josie was just 22 ounces at birth and had to be cared for in the neonatal unit of the hospital for four months until she was released. She’s thriving now and the Duggars are ready for another one. It might not happen for Michelle, but she’s about to welcome another Duggar baby soon anyway. Her daughter-in-law is due to have her second child in just two weeks. The Duggar kids told Matt and Meredith that they wanted to have large families when they get older. One of the older daughters said it’s nice to have your best friend be your sibling, and when Matt asked if any of them wanted to have smaller families no one raised their hand. Dad Jim-Bob explained that the book is about “why we do what we do” and “what makes us tick” along with the “Bible principles behind” their life philosophy. He explained that they make ends meet by staying out of debt, renting out properties and “buying used and saving the difference.” You can read an excerpt from the Duggar’s book on The Today Show website. It’s the part leading up to Michelle’s premature labor with Josie. She had pre-eclampsia and almost died, but thankfully both Michelle and the baby recovered and are fine now. On a purely superficial note, why has Michelle reverted back to her permed hair with the round 80s bangs? Her hair was looking slightly improved lately, and she was brushing her bangs to the side like her lookalike daughters, but this is disappointing. I honestly don’t know how I feel about the Duggars. Michelle kind of creeps me out with that baby voice and the kind of delusional way she seems to operate in the world, but she’s happy, she seems to adore her husband and her kids seem happy and well behaved. I’ve tried to watch their show but frankly it’s just too boring. |
Chloe Sevigny in her own leather & frilly design: hilarious or just tragic? Posted: 07 Jun 2011 08:11 AM PDT Okay, I think these are probably the last of the CFDA photos (although I might talk about my Gerard Butler a little later). Here is our beloved whack-job Chloe Sevigny, wearing some kind of frilly-leather combo ensemble, possibly by Opening Ceremony, which is by Chloe's own line. If this is what she comes up with as a fashion designer… dear God. I love Chloe just because she's funny, but this combination just looks… cheap. Next up: Miranda Kerry in this black cutout dress by Michael Kors. I would like to see the dress without the gold belt/embellishment at the waist. And beyond that, I really dislike cutouts. But Miranda doesn't look bad here. What's good about Liv Tyler's dress - I love the colors. What's bad about her dress: it looks like wallpaper from the 1970s. It's by Proenza Schouler, a label I'm starting to think is severely overrated. And finally, Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen. Ashley is in blue, I guess. They're both wearing their label, The Row, but MK's gold jacket is Chanel. I kind of like the blue, just because it's not incredibly over-sized and frumpy. She should be applauded for not looking like a little old lady for once. |
Did Kristen Stewart fly into a lip-biting rage at Robert Pattinson? Posted: 07 Jun 2011 07:46 AM PDT Here are some newish photos of Kristen Stewart arriving in London yesterday. She and Robert Pattinson spent the weekend together in LA, and I'm not really sure why she's in London now. Sparkles flew back to Toronto, where he's filming. Perhaps K-Stew is taking another English lover? According to the British rag, The Mirror, K-Stew was seriously pissed off at Sparkles for "snubbing" her during their "Best Kiss" win at the MTV Movie Awards. You might remember that Sparkles ran off into the audience to makeout with Taylor Lautner… apparently, K-Stew let her lip-biting bitch rage:
[From The Daily Mirror] Yeah… do you believe this? Historically, Kristen Stewart HATES showing any kind of affection in public. She hates the very idea of presenting herself publicly as anything other than a surly, angst-ridden, lip-biting, slouchy troll. She would never be mad at Sparkles for NOT kissing her in public. The last time he tried, she rolled her eyes and moved away. Besides, all of the behind-the-scenes stories from the after-parties had Kristen and Sparkles all loved up:
[From E! News] I simply don't get it. I really don't. I really thought that Sparkles would be done with Kristen by now, but it really does look like Sparkles is "the one who loves too much". Eventually, Kristen will break his heart. And at some point, he'll realize that there are less surly fish in the sea. But for now, they're good. |
Matt Damon got the hotness back and then some Posted: 07 Jun 2011 07:37 AM PDT
Damon made an appearance at an event honoring him last night. He was one of the people celebrated at the “Made in New York” awards for his “‘significant contributions’ to the city's entertainment and new media industries.” Damon lives in New York now with his family so that he can spend time with them while he’s filming. He told the audince that he used to come to New York with Ben Affleck to audition and that “our dream was…to actually some day get a movie… that [is] shot in New York.” Damon has fulfilled that dream several times over. You can see that he’s taken some weight off, which he probably gained as sympathy pounds during his wife’s last pregnancy. He’s also cut his hair short. He looks like Jason Bourne again and like he’s erased ten years. I’ll take Damon any old way, but this look is the one that won me over 13 years ago in Good Will Hunting, and this is the one I prefer. Is it blasphemous to say that he should maybe consider dyeing his hair, like his good buddy Ben Affleck? |
Sarah Ferguson is a pathological liar, blames her crazy on her parents Posted: 07 Jun 2011 07:10 AM PDT Sarah Ferguson is crazy. I think we've established that by now. Not only is she just flat-out crazy, Fergie actually offends me and others with her insanity by claiming that she's this wonderful mother (she's not, she's a narcissistic drama queen) or that she "loves" the idea that both she and Princess Diana weren't at the royal wedding. For real. Anyway, Fergie is still in the midst of a publicity tour to promote her show on OWN (Oprah's network). This morning, she gave an interview to Today, and it's a lot of the same crap that we heard in Fergie's Harper's Bazaar interview. Pity poor Fergie, she's a victim of her own generosity! The media is so mean! She's so wonderful and selfless and no one ever gives her credit for being so awesome!
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy Ah. Her story about selling influence to the royal family is now a "tabloid setup" - her story has changed yet again. She also changed her story about watching the royal wedding! Jesus, she just lies all of the time. She told Oprah that she did in fact watch the wedding in Thailand. Now she claims she didn't. WTF? Also, some excerpts from Fergie's show have begun to come out, and it's just… ugh. I mean, I imagine it will be good television just to see how delusional she is and what a pathological liar she is, but I wish some of Oprah's sycophants would call Fergie out on her BS:
[From The Telegraph] Do I believe that Fergie had a difficult childhood? Sure. Do I believe that she probably suffered emotional abuse from her crazy parents? Sure. But I also believe that at some point in one's life, you really have to take responsibility for your own actions. I believe that about Linnocent's "I'm just a crackheaded child" act, and I believe that about Fergie's "I'm a victim!" tour. Her mother didn't make her peddle influence to the highest bidder. Her mother didn't make her lie about everything and anything to this day. She's 51 years old - it's beyond time to take responsibility for your own crap. |
Hide yo’ wigs! Angelina Jolie will be coming back for ‘Salt 2′ Posted: 07 Jun 2011 06:34 AM PDT Hide yo' wigs! Angelina Jolie is officially doing a sequel to her hit film Salt. Jolie starred as (SPOILER) a covert Russian spy living in America who ends up helping and defending her adopted country. Did I ever talk about my feelings on Salt? I didn't like it very much. I thought the whole storyline and general feel of the film was extremely dated, like the film was a half-decent Cold War film circa 1984. If the film had actually been set in 1984, I think I would have enjoyed it better. Considering it was supposed to be a modern spy story… it didn't make much sense. I did like Angelina's wigs, though. And yeah, I get a kick out of her giving everyone beatdowns. But the plot was nonsensical from a purely "one person can completely take out all White House security - FOR REAL?!?" standpoint. So… there's going to be another one:
[From Deadline] More spoilers: The reason a sequel to Wanted never got off the ground was because Jolie's character friggin' dies at the end. It was complete idiocy to try to work Jolie's character into a sequel. As for this Salt sequel… well… ugh. I hope they make it feel more modern. I hope there's actual SPY stuff, rather than Angelina/Evelyn just running around, taking down armies of men single-handedly, because apparently all spies do is run around doing hand-to-hand combat all day (??). |
Jennifer Aniston’s new boyfriend has a girlfriend, does anyone care? Posted: 07 Jun 2011 06:29 AM PDT We haven’t really been keeping up with Jennifer Aniston’s lovelife, because the collective response to our last story on it was a big shrug. She’s been rolling out this relationship with actor Justin Theroux though, alternately having her publicist confirm it to People and then deny it to US Weekly for maximum coverage purposes. The latest story on these two has them making out at an after party for the MTV Movie Awards on Sunday. (This link has photos of them together.) Good for Aniston I guess, but could she possibly date someone without having her people leak stories about it to various outlets? In the tabloids this last week was a potentially more juicy story about Aniston’s latest conquest. Apparently Theroux had a longterm girlfriend right up until he hooked up with Aniston. That means that he was cheating with Aniston. It’s possible Aniston had no idea about this, or that he fed her a bunch of stories about how they were split up already. This was news to the girlfriend, who is said to be heartbroken by all this. We sort-of heard this story already, when Theroux’s girlfriend’s mother told Radar that it’s not true that Theroux was hooking up with Aniston, and that he was at a dinner party with her and a bunch of other people. I guess we know why Aniston’s rep denied this story to US Weekly after leaking it to People - either it’s a fauxmance to promote Aniston’s latest movie, or her boyfriend is cheating on his girlfriend. The tabloids are claiming that Aniston knew about this, but I think they’re just saying must have known, which probably isn’t accurate. The guy was possibly very sneaky about all of it. In this story they mention a website that posted personal vacation photos and quotes from Justin’s girlfriend Heidi about a trip they took to Hawaii over the winter. You can see those photos here, and they were posted on May 16, 2011.
[From Star Magazine, print edition, June 13, 2011] In The Enquirer they have the detail that Justin and Heidi have been together “for years,” but I can’t find any information on whether they live together or not. Either way, I don’t think it’s Aniston’s fault that her new man had a girlfriend. He may have kept her in the dark about it. Although he did step out with his girlfriend to a play in January, and there are pictures. In related news about Jen, her BFF Courteney Cox has denied that they’re fighting at all. Cox told Life & Style “I’m so sure I’m not in a fight with Jen.” Justin and Heidi are shown in the header in January, 2011. They’re shown below in August, 2008. Credit: WENN.com |
Kirsten Dunst, drunk-faced in a Patrik Ervell tux: cute or fug? Posted: 07 Jun 2011 06:10 AM PDT Historically, I've never been the biggest Kirsten Dunst fan. I've always found her rather annoying, honestly. But over the past year or so, I've noted time and time again that Kiki seems to be trying to get her act together. She's made the effort to not look or be so wasted in public, she's shown up to many events looking sober and pulled-together, and at times flat-out beautiful. Reportedly, she's even been acting more professionally behind the scenes too. All of which I respect. That being said, the girl still has some misses, and last night was one of them. Kiki wore this Patrik Ervell tux and shirt… and I really, really dislike it, in total. I dislike everything put together - the slim-cut pants, the poorly-cut jacket, the old-fashion tuxedo dress shirt, and the turquoise lapel detail. It looks like Kiki is trying too hard to look impossibly chic, like she's wearing vintage YSL instead of this budget crap. And that too-high hair bun isn't helping either. Oh, and she's back to looking drunk/high too. Just to show you that I'm not a complete hater of the tuxedo look for ladies, here's Leelee Sobieski, wearing a fresh white suit/tuxedo designed by her husband Adam Kimmel (the shoes are Givenchy). THIS is a beautiful look on a woman. Not so much with Kiki's tux. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Cele|bitchy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment